Climate change in the Pacific Northwest: still happening after all these years

From the University of Pittsburgh, refreshingly, no mention of AGW in this latest paper. Why, it’s almost as if, these extreme climate shifts occurred….naturally.

6,000-year climate record suggests longer droughts, drier climate for Pacific Northwest

Pitt-led team used a sediment core from Washington state’s Castor Lake to unravel regional wet/dry cycles since 4,000 BCE and found longer, more extreme periods have occurred since 1200 AD, possibly associated with changing El Niño/La Niña patterns

Measurement of oxygen isotope ratios (red) and grayscale (black) arranged to show drought cycle duration and intensity with 20th century wet period indicated. Credit: Mark Abbott

PITTSBURGH—University of Pittsburgh-led researchers extracted a 6,000-year climate record from a Washington lake that shows that the famously rain-soaked American Pacific Northwest could not only be in for longer dry seasons, but also is unlikely to see a period as wet as the 20th century any time soon. In a recent report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the team linked the longer dry spells to the intensifying El Niño/La Niña climate pattern and concluded that Western states will likely suffer severe water shortages as El Niño/La Niña wields greater influence on the region.

The researchers analyzed a sediment core from Castor Lake in north central Washington to plot the region’s drought history since around 4,000 BCE and found that wet and dry cycles during the past millennium have grown longer. The team attributed this recent deviation to the irregular pressure and temperature changes brought on by El Niño/La Niña. At the same time, they reported, the wet cycle stretching from the 1940s to approximately 2000 was the dampest in 350 years.

Lead researcher Mark Abbott, a Pitt professor of geology and planetary science, said those unusually wet years coincide with the period when western U.S. states developed water-use policies. “Western states happened to build dams and water systems during a period that was unusually wet compared to the past 6,000 years,” he said. “Now the cycle has changed and is trending drier, which is actually normal. It will shift back to wet eventually, but probably not to the extremes seen during most of the 20th century.”

Abbott worked with his former graduate student, lead author and Pitt alumnus Daniel Nelson, as well as Pitt professor of geology and planetary science Michael Rosenmeier; Nathan Stansell, a Pitt PhD graduate now a postdoctoral researcher at Ohio State University; and Pitt geology and planetary science graduate student Byron Steinman. The team also included Pratigya Polissar, an assistant research professor at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory; Joseph Ortiz, associate professor of geology at Kent State University; Bruce Finney, a professor of geology at Idaho State University; and Jon Riedel, a geologist at North Cascades National Park in Washington.

The team produced a climate record from the lake mud by measuring the oxygen isotope ratios of the mineral calcite that precipitates from the lake water every summer and builds up in fine layers on the lake floor. More calcite accumulates in wet years than in dry years. They reproduced their findings by measuring grayscale, or the color of mud based on calcite concentration, with darker mud signifying a drier year.

The record in the sediment core was then compared to the Palmer Drought Severity Index, which uses meteorological and tree-ring data to determine drought cycles dating back 1,500 years, Abbott explained. The Castor Lake core matched the Palmer Index reconstructed with tree-ring data and expanded on it by 4,500 years, suggesting that lakebeds are better records of long-term climate change, the authors contend.

Analysis of the sediment core revealed that the climate of the Pacific Northwest fluctuated more or less evenly between wet and dry periods for thousands of years, the researchers wrote. Droughts tended to be lengthier with 25 percent of dry periods during the past 6,000 years persisting for 30 years or more and the longest lingering for around 75 years. Wet periods tended to be shorter with only 19 percent lasting more than 30 years and the longest spanning 64 years.

Duration of dry and wet cycles by percentage over 6,000-year period. Credit: Mark Abbott

But since around 1000 AD, these periods have become longer, shifted less frequently, and, most importantly, ushered in more extreme conditions, Abbott said. The two driest cycles the researchers detected out of the past 6,000 years occurred within only 400 years of each other—the first in the 1500s and the second during the Great Depression. Wet periods showed a similar pattern shift with five very wet eras crammed into the past 900 years. The wettest cycle of the past 6,000 years began around the 1650s, and the second most sodden began a mere 300 years later, in the 1940s.

The change in cycle regularity Abbott and his colleagues found correlates with documented activity of El Niño/La Niña. When the patterns became more intense, wet and dry cycles in the Pacific Northwest became more erratic and lasted longer, Abbott said.

###
h/t to WUWT reader “polistra”
Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
56 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MattN
February 22, 2011 9:39 am

So the typical definition of “normal” includes a time period (1940s) in which it was wetter than virtually any other time in the last 6000 years. Think that might skew your data a little?
Probably why they are also always arguing over water out west. They did their calculations of how many people they could sustain with an outlier data point (1940s).

February 22, 2011 9:41 am

Can someone let me know where I can find the data underlying this study?

February 22, 2011 9:44 am

Impressive that he didn’t link climate change in there at all. Too bad he didn’t publish a temperature reconstruction along with the rainfall data. At least warmer and cooler periods association with the rainfall. Especially since the oxygen isotope is commonly used to reconstruct temperature.
That climate started to shift naturally 1,000 years ago is evident in many of the reconstructions from the ice cores in Greenland to the Antarctica. Of course they are already trying to blame this on mankind by saying that land change was causing the climate change back then.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/01/24/another-mankind-as-evil-carbonator-even-way-back-then-study/
So it is only a matter of time before the papers like this will show that land usage change by locals was the cause of the previous droughts and such….
John Kehr

Doug in Seattle
February 22, 2011 10:02 am

While I expect the authors accounted for compaction, I wonder how that affected the certainty of older (deeper) layers in their section.
I also expect that older layers are susceptible to diagenetic processes that could affect the “graynesss” they used for their moisture proxy.
Still an interesting study for a couple of reasons. First, no apparent warmist bias, and second its close to home for me.

Editor
February 22, 2011 10:06 am

If lake rainfall records were collected all down the west coast, it might be possible to deduce a useful paleo-ENSO reconstruction.

pat
February 22, 2011 10:07 am

You mean tree rings differ in size because of precipitation? Who knew? Not CRU.

ShrNfr
February 22, 2011 10:12 am

I blame it on dihydrogen oxide in the atmosphere.
At least somebody someplace is doing some real research.

Herman Muntz
February 22, 2011 10:15 am

Why the oddball use of ‘BCE’: “…since 4,000 BCE…”?
99+ percent of people in the Western world use ‘BC’ and ‘AD’ and see ‘BCE’ as peculiar. Please cater to the vast majority of your readers instead of a tiny minority.

Latitude
February 22, 2011 10:17 am

I’m sorry, but here they go again…
..at least this time they didn’t claim to need a multi-million dollar computer
They are acting just like weathermen, climate scientists – if this trend continues
and making some prediction based on “if this trend continues”

Bob Diaz
February 22, 2011 10:19 am

IF our lives were in the range of 10,000 to 100,000 years, we would be able to see the very long term changes that occur in the climate. Sadly, many fail to see the bigger picture of the long term changes that occur naturally. These are the people who are more likely to be suckered into believing the “Global Warming” hoax.

Zeke the Sneak
February 22, 2011 10:27 am

“From the University of Pittsburgh, refreshingly, no mention of AGW in this latest paper.”
Yes but there is mention of water policy and regulation.
I predict that these studies of local water supplies will always, in every single solitary case, tilt toward the need for greater water control by authorities.

Geo
February 22, 2011 10:39 am

Nuclear icebreaker ready for Gulf of Finland
The ice situation in the Gulf of Finland is now extremely difficult and 58 vessels are waiting for icebreaker aid. Russia plans to send the nuclear-powered icebreaker “Vaygach” from Murmansk to the Gulf of Finland to facilitate the escort of vessels.
According to web site Sea News.ru, “Vaygach” is ready to sail to St. Petersburg, but is being delayed while the operating company waits for permissions to sail through the Danish belts. Eight European states will have to give their permit before a nuclear-powered vessel can sail through the narrow and busy waters.
On Tuesday morning 58 vessels were waiting for icebreaker aid in the Gulf of Finland, RZD-partner writes. 30 of the vessels are eastbound ships, heading for the Russian ports, and 28 are westbound. The Murmansk-based diesel-powered ice breaker “Kapitan Dranitsyn” has already been sent to the Gulf of Finland to assist the local ice breakers.
The ice situation in the White Sea is also extraordinary this year, and nuclear ice breakers have been sent there for assistance, which is quite rare. Both “Rossiya” and “Yamal” have been escorting tankers to the port of Vitino during the last weeks, Korabelnaya Storona writes. Source : BarentsObserver

dbleader61
February 22, 2011 10:42 am

Sorry mods…errors there. Please delete previous post.
Mark Abbot’s (et al) work lines up with that of Dr. Tim Patterson at Carleton University off the coast of British Columbia. This article is from 2005 and reports on his earlier work but he is continuing analysis of coastal fiord and lake sediments.
Dr. Patterson does reference climate change – a decidedly “natural” process in his mind.
http://www.ideasinactiontv.com/tcs_daily/2005/01/the-geologic-record-and-climate-change.html

February 22, 2011 10:43 am

Herman Muntz points out how deeply PNS has infiltrated science. “BCE” is a vague, nebulous term that is ill-defined. OTOH, when using “BC” and “AD” the reader knows to the exact year what is being referenced.

Paddy
February 22, 2011 10:49 am

ShrNfr: I believe the correct term is dihydrogen monoxide. See:

DesertYote
February 22, 2011 10:54 am

Couldn’t have anything to do with the end of the Holocene Climatic Optimum. Better not mention that connection or next thing you know people will start talking about climatic cooling being associated with decreased rainfall, as the entire paleo-record indicates.
BTW, it was not to long ago that everyone pretty much agreed that the world has gotten cooler and dryer since the end of the Atlantic.
The world is either Cool and Dry or Warm and Wet.

Fernando (in Brazil)
February 22, 2011 10:54 am

pat says:
February 22, 2011 at 10:07 am
You mean tree rings differ in size because of precipitation? Who knew? Not CRU.

Surprise
hygrometer
A new study that shows their internal temperature remains constant at 21.4deg could challenge the way trees are used to determine historical climate data
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/13/surprise-leaves-maintain-temperature-new-findings-may-put-dendroclimatology-as-metric-of-past-temperature-into-question/

Oliver Ramsay
February 22, 2011 11:09 am

Smokey says:
February 22, 2011 at 10:43 am
Herman Muntz points out how deeply PNS has infiltrated science. “BCE” is a vague, nebulous term that is ill-defined. OTOH, when using “BC” and “AD” the reader knows to the exact year what is being referenced.
———————————————
AFAIK, BCE & CE are PC versions of BC & AD, rather than PNS. IMHO 90% of those with a PhD or BSc would be happy with BCE.

Rhoda R
February 22, 2011 11:09 am

BCE (Before Common Era) is a politically correct term from BC (Before Christ). Can’t upset the non-Christians out there, ya know.

KV
February 22, 2011 11:27 am

At what point in time was the climate perfect/optimum and what organisms thrived?

Layne Blanchard
February 22, 2011 11:39 am

As someone outdoors here every day, I can tell you the Northwest is awash in precipitation. Sure we have dry spells too, but just a few years ago, we set a record for Precipitation with about 18 inches in November. I think that was 2008. A lake formed in my backyard. We had 2 cold winters, then followed by El Nino last year, which was fantastic. Much warmer and drier.
We are often overcast, and have a lot of intermittent showers. The prevailing condition here is change. People joke that if you don’t like the rain, wait 5 minutes. And it’s true.
This area is dotted with bodies of water. Many of them are full of rotting tree stumps, so I assume there was a much drier period in the past. It also has heavy vegetation and plentiful wildlife, who often wander thru my yard.
It’s good to see a report that doesn’t assume some terrible outcome is afoot.

Oliver Ramsay
February 22, 2011 11:42 am

Rhoda R says:
February 22, 2011 at 11:09 am
BCE (Before Common Era) is a politically correct term from BC (Before Christ). Can’t upset the non-Christians out there, ya know.
————————————–
See! Atheists and non-atheists can agree!

Edim
February 22, 2011 11:46 am

“IF our lives were in the range of 10,000 to 100,000 years, we would be able to see the very long term changes that occur in the climate. Sadly, many fail to see the bigger picture of the long term changes that occur naturally. These are the people who are more likely to be suckered into believing the “Global Warming” hoax.”
Agreed. It was increasing denial of (natural) climate changes by the establishment science that ringed the bell for me in the 90s.

Doug in Seattle
February 22, 2011 11:52 am

dbleader61 says:
February 22, 2011 at 10:42 am
. . .
Mark Abbot’s (et al) work lines up with that of Dr. Tim Patterson at Carleton University off the coast of British Columbia.

I’m sure you are referring to Dr. Tom Pederson of the University of Victoria in Beautiful Victoria, BC.
http://web.uvic.ca/~tfp/Research.html
Dr. Pederson has done extensive work on sediments in fjords along the west coast of BC and has correlated that work with the PDO.
His work contradicts much of the warmist paleoclimate junk science and he works in a den of warmists at UVic.

Gary Hladik
February 22, 2011 12:29 pm

Wow! So the climate in the Pacific Northwest went to hell a thousand years before humans wrecked it with their CO2-spitting SUVs! That’s some teleconnection!
Is there anything CO2 can’t do?

1 2 3