Now it's Wolverines threatened by global warming

wolverine 

Wolverines make their home mainly in the boreal forests and tundra regions of North America, Europe, and Asia. (Photo by Vince Maidens, Creative Commons License.)

No mention though of the “adopt a wolverine” program that has proven so popular with polar bears and NGO’s looking for cold cash from the gullible. I guess they just aren’t cuddly enough.  According to Wikipedia:

“The world’s total wolverine population is unknown.”

The Wildlife Conservation Society reported in June 2009 that a wolverine which researchers had been tracking for almost three months had crossed into northern Colorado. Society officials had tagged the young male wolverine in Wyoming near Grand Teton National Park and it had traveled southward for approximately 500 miles. It was the first wolverine seen in Colorado since 1919, and its appearance was also confirmed by the Colorado Division of Wildlife.

Here are some photos of wolverines in northern California in 2008 near Tahoe.

wolverine photo taken in the Tahoe National Forest on March 16, 2008 wolverine photo taken in the Tahoe National Forest on March 16, 2008 wolverine photo taken in the Tahoe National Forest on March 16, 2008

And again in 2009. They say that “Wolverines have not been scientifically confirmed in California since the 1920s.” With a former range like that, I suppose they won’t have trouble adapting to a warmer place. Last time I checked, it was warmer in Colorado and California than in Canada.

Wolverines have been seen in Michigan in the last decade too, the first time in 200 years.

Nature is pretty darn tough, very adaptable, and the wolverine is no exception. IMO, the bigger threat, like with bears, is clashes with human developments. I just don’t buy the claim of this study, note the weasel words “highly uncertain” in the highlighted portion of the press release.

=============================================================

From NCAR/UCAR: Wolverine population threatened by climate change

BOULDER—The aggressive wolverine may not be powerful enough to survive climate change in the contiguous United States, new research concludes.

Wolverine habitat in the northwestern United States is likely to warm dramatically if society continues to emit large amounts of greenhouse gases, according to new computer model simulations carried out at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). The study found that climate change is likely to imperil the wolverine in two ways: reducing or eliminating the springtime snow cover that wolverines rely on to protect and shelter newborn kits, and increasing August temperatures well beyond what the species may be able to tolerate.

“Species that depend on snow cover for their survival are likely to be very vulnerable to climate change,” says NCAR scientist Synte Peacock, the author of the study. “It’s highly uncertain whether wolverines will continue to survive in the lower 48, given the changes that are likely to take place there.”

Peacock’s research focused on mountainous regions of the Northwest, the primary habitat of the wolverine population in the contiguous United States. The study did not look into the impacts of climate change on regions where wolverines are more numerous, such as Canada, although other research has indicated those areas will likely warm significantly as well.

The study was published last week in Environmental Research Letters. It was funded by the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor.

An animal built for the cold

Wolverines make their home mainly in the boreal forests and tundra regions of North America, Europe, and Asia. Their thick, oily fur insulates them from frost and large padded paws help them run through deep snow. While some 15,000 or more wolverines are believed to roam Canada and an unknown number in Alaska, only a few dozen to a few hundred are believed to live in the contiguous United States, almost entirely in mountainous areas in Wyoming, Idaho, Montana, and Washington.

Wolverines inhabit regions that have late-season snow cover and relatively cool summer temperatures. Female wolverines make their springtime dens in the snow, which provides warmth to the newborn kits and protects them from predators.

Biologists are dubious that the species could survive in regions with little spring snow or significantly higher summertime temperatures. Concerned over habitat loss and the potential threat of climate change, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service announced in December 2010 that the wolverine warrants protection under the Endangered Species Act, but delayed that protection because other species took higher priority.

To project the future climate in regions of the contiguous United States where wolverines live, Peacock analyzed results from new simulations carried out by a team of researchers at NCAR using the newest version of the Community Climate System Model (which was developed by scientists at the Department of Energy and NCAR with colleagues at other organizations). She analyzed three scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions: low (carbon dioxide emissions stay at present-day levels until 2020 and then decline to zero by the early 2080s); medium-low (emissions rise slightly until 2040 and then decline sharply toward the end of the century); and high (emissions continue to increase unabated).

In the high emissions scenario, the computer simulations showed spring snow cover nearly or completely vanishing during the second half of this century in present-day wolverine habitat. Similarly, spring snow cover in the medium-low scenario became greatly diminished, with many years experiencing zero snow cover. Under the low emissions scenario, springtime snow cover conditions remained similar to those of the present day.

Synte Peacock 

Synte Peacock (©UCAR, Photo by Carlye Calvin. This image is freely available for media use. For more information, see Media & nonprofit use.*)

The computer projections also showed that August temperatures may increase dramatically. Whereas August temperatures currently top off at about 72 degrees F (22 degrees C) in areas where wolverines live, maximum daily temperatures by the end of the century were projected to frequently exceed 90 degrees F (32 degrees C) under the two higher-emissions scenarios.

“Unless the wolverine is able to very rapidly adapt to summertime temperatures far above anything it currently experiences, and to a spring with little or no snow cover, it is unlikely that it will continue to survive in the contiguous U.S. under a high or medium-low emissions scenario,” the study concludes.

The model simulations also indicated the extent to which climate change may transform the West, where society depends on mountain snowpack. This critical source of water could decrease by a factor of three to four over Idaho, western Montana, and western Wyoming by the end of this century under the high emissions scenario. Even under the medium-low emissions scenario, snowpack could drop by a factor of two to three in these regions.

Peacock checked the accuracy of the model by comparing simulations of late 20th century climate with observations. Results indicated that the model did a good job simulating climate conditions in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Since the model tended to underestimate snowpack in Washington, Peacock did not include that state in the study.

About the article

Title: Projected 21st century climate change for wolverine habitats within the contiguous United States

Author: Synte Peacock

Publication: Environmental Research Letters, January 27, 2011

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

136 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dan
February 4, 2011 5:35 am

Hold everything! My global warming friends have been telling me that this winter’s cold temperatures and deep snow cover are the result of climate change. How is this not good for wolverines?

Frank K.
February 4, 2011 5:42 am

I stopped reading after I saw…
“From NCAR/UCAR…” —-> yet another CAGW press release to secure funding [sigh]
and
“the computer simulations showed…” —-> enough said

February 4, 2011 5:45 am

This sounds more like the spiel of those pumping lousy stocks than scientific research. At least with polar bears we could do a count and see one way or the other what is happening to the population.
It would be nice to get a definitive statement on the range of wolverines and the population dynamics in any particular area.

jaymam
February 4, 2011 5:49 am

Why not move the wolverines and polar bears to Antarctica? There’s record levels of snow and ice there, and plenty of food – millions of penguins, and a few scientists, but those are no loss if they are just looking at the climate!
/sarc

Wondering Aloud
February 4, 2011 5:51 am

I didn’t see any dogs today therefore their survival is threatened by global warming. There, can I get a huge government funded research grant now?
There never were a lot of wolverines, and if there is some large niche in the ecology that they are required to fill we’d be in a lot of trouble for centuries already. Heck with wolverines I prefer badgers any day.
A little related anecdote; It is widely known that mountain lions do not exist in the wild in Wisconsin. Our DNR tells us so and for years dismissed all sightings as non credible. When two mountain lions were killed the same weekend in auto accidents 200 miles apart the DNR gave a very grudging admission that maybe they did exist.

Joe Lalonde
February 4, 2011 5:54 am

Let’s put them together in the same room and see who comes out? 🙂

Ralph
February 4, 2011 5:54 am

“The aggressive wolverine >MAYMAY< transform the West"
I really like the climate change speak, may, might, could, alarmist use when predicting the future weather/climate. It's so exact.

Pamela Gray
February 4, 2011 5:54 am

Poor, poor things. Maybe they can come live in Enterprise, Oregon along with the cougar that was seen roaming the streets last week.

Harold Ambler
February 4, 2011 5:59 am

Doesn’t seem like the contiguous U.S. has been their habitat of late anyway:
http://tinyurl.com/4hmxoen
But, putting together the story on ocean ridges and climate models just before this on WUWT, and the information that Marten fossils have been found from the mid-Miocene (or more than 10 million years before present), the animals appear to have survived a warming much like the one computer models claim will befall us any minute.

Bob B
February 4, 2011 6:01 am

Thanks for the post but I didn’t bother reading past…
Wolverine habitat in the northwestern United States is likely to warm dramatically if society continues to emit large amounts of greenhouse gases, according to new computer model simulations carried out at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR).

Gary Pearse
February 4, 2011 6:05 am

I, and on a different occasion, one of my sons, encountered female wolverines in Northern British Columbia. These are the meanest, most aggressive creatures you ever want to meet. I risked my life climbing a rock ledge, my son jumped into a pickup truck to get away. Its hard for me to imagine predators that could take young away from one of these! Why wouldn’t a scientist mention which predators they are worried about and how abundant are these predators in the lower 48.

ddpalmer
February 4, 2011 6:08 am

From Ms. Peacocks info at http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~synte/index_uchicago.html
“Much of my work involves using large global ocean general circulation models to investigate the uptake and redistribution of natural and anthropogenic trace gases in the ocean. I have worked mainly with the POP and MICOM ocean models. I am also interested in glacial-interglacial CO2, interpretation of records from deep-sea sediment cores, and I also like to play with box models (which have the beautiful property of actually allowing one to understand exactly what is happening and why).”
So a geophysicist who deals with global ocean circulation and deep sea sediment cores writes a paper on wolverines in the middle of the North American continent.
Correct me if I am wrong but North American is land not ocean and wolverines are land animals not ocean animals.
I also see she likes ‘box models’ because you can actually understand what is happening and why”. Might that be because box models aren’t really good at simulating real world chaotic systems like climates and the oceans?

John from CA
February 4, 2011 6:10 am

LOL, “adopt a wolverine”.
Wolverines are scavengers and one of the orneriest animals on Earth. They will not have a problem in warmer weather — makes it easier to hunt. Their probably moving into Colorado to pick off chubby tourists. ; )

Espen
February 4, 2011 6:11 am

It’s easy to be a biology researcher today, you just have to swallow a Warming Camel, like this one: Whereas August temperatures currently top off at about 72 degrees F (22 degrees C) in areas where wolverines live, maximum daily temperatures by the end of the century were projected to frequently exceed 90 degrees F (32 degrees C) under the two higher-emissions scenarios.
… and then you get paid double: A research grant, and an easy research task: Show that there will be dramatic ecosystems changes “when” climate changes from temperate to tropic, arctic to temperate etc.

Bob B
February 4, 2011 6:11 am

I am putting the final touches on a computer model that is showing a likely increase in chess playing among Wolverines due to the increase in consumption of diet soda among teenage girls.

JohnH
February 4, 2011 6:19 am

Have they looked outside the window recently ?

David S
February 4, 2011 6:28 am

This happens with the poley bears as well. The animals are so dumb that when their habitat is threatened by global warming, they move south instead of north where it is colder.

Roger Knights
February 4, 2011 6:29 am

Biologists are dubious that the species could survive in regions with little spring snow …

No worries then!

February 4, 2011 6:31 am

Wolverine…. basically a 40 pound weasel with an attitude that the Pitsburgh Steelers defence aspires to attain…..
Interesting that the climate change proponants always seem to select really nasty carnivores as their poster children, Polar bears… 1500 lbs of walk/swimming appetite, wolverines, probably the nastiest critter on the planet… whats next canabalistic tribespeople from some southern pacific island.

Jeff K
February 4, 2011 6:40 am

I’ve been noticing that articles have been referring to “according to computer model simulations,” more. We can all doubt a human due to bias and such but not a computer model as if it is it’s own entity, without emotion and bias.

Kevin_S
February 4, 2011 6:44 am

But what the AGW believers’ cousins, the cryptozoologists, want to know is if this will affect Bigfoot or the chupacabra? Another pro-AGW article filled with “likely” and “models,” one day one of these people will accidentally conduct real research and will be found in a state of shock at the realization that they had been wrong.

Richard M
February 4, 2011 6:44 am

Let me understand this … the loss of a couple dozen of these critters is considered an environmental disaster even if what really happened was they migrated to Canada.
Wow, could these scientists find something less valuable to do with OUR money?

John K. Sutherland
February 4, 2011 6:45 am

There is so much unscientific and unjustified speculation in this lady’s asinine claims, that I am surprised she dare put her name to it.

Katherine
February 4, 2011 6:52 am

Seems like no one told her that all the snow coming down in the States is due to global warming. Imagine that.
/sarc

February 4, 2011 6:55 am

Computer: USD 500
Climate model: USD 5,000
Claiming less snow threatening peacocks wolverines when most of US is covered by mother of all snows: priceless

1 2 3 6