Guest post by Dr. Don J. Easterbrook
1934 has long been considered the warmest year of the past century. A decade ago, the closest challenger appeared to be 1998, a super-el nino year, but it trailed 1934 by 0.54°C (0.97°F). Since then, NASA GISS has “adjusted” the U.S. data for 1934 downward and 1998 upward (see December 25, 2010 post by Ira Glickstein) in an attempt to make 1998 warmer than 1934 and seemingly erased the original rather large lead of 1934 over 1998. The last phases of the strong 2009-2010 el nino in early 2010 made this year another possible contender for the warmest year of the century. However, December 2010 has been one of the coldest Decembers in a century in many parts of the world, so 2010 probably won’t be warmer than 1998. But does it really matter? Regardless of which year wins the temperature adjustment battle, how significant will that be? To answer that question, we need to look at a much longer time frame‒centuries and millennia.
One of the best ways to look at long-term temperatures is with isotope data from the GISP2 Greenland ice core, from which temperatures for thousands of years can be determined. The ice core isotope data were obtained by Minze Stuiver and Peter Grootes from nuclear accelerator measurements of thousands of oxygen isotope ratios (16O/18O), which are a measure of paleo-temperatures at the time snow fell that was later converted to glacial ice. The age of such temperatures can be accurately measured from annual layers of accumulation of rock debris marking each summer’s melting of ice and concentration of rock debris on the glacier.
The past century
Two episodes of global warming and two episodes of global cooling occurred during the past century:

1880 to 1915 cool period. Atmospheric temperature measurements, glacier fluctuations, and oxygen isotope data from Greenland ice cores all record a cool period from about 1880 to about 1915. Many cold temperature records in North America were set during this period. Glaciers advanced, some nearly to terminal positions reached during the Little Ice Age about 400 years ago. During this period, global temperatures were about 0.9 ° C (1.6 ° F) cooler than at present. From 1880 to 1890, temperatures dropped 0.35 ° C (0.6° F) in only 10 years. The 1880 –1915 cool period shows up well in the oxygen isotope curve of the Greenland Ice Sheet.
1915 to 1945 warm period. Global temperatures rose steadily in the 1920s, 1930s, and early 1940s. By the mid-1940s, global temperatures were about 0.5 °C (0.9° F) warmer than they had been at the turn of the century. More high temperature records for the century were recorded in the 1930s than in any other decade of the 20th century. Glaciers during this warm period retreated, temperatures in the 1930s in Greenland were warmer than at present, and rates of warming were higher (warming 4°C (7° F) in two decades). All of this occurred before CO2 emissions began to soar after 1945, so at least half of the warming of the past century cannot have been caused by manmade CO2.
1945 to 1977 cool period. Global temperatures began to cool in the mid–1940’s at the point when CO2 emissions began to soar. Global temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere dropped about 0.5° C (0.9° F) from the mid-1940s until 1977 and temperatures globally cooled about 0.2° C (0.4° F). Many of the world’s glaciers advanced during this time and recovered a good deal of the ice lost during the 1915–1945 warm period. Many examples of glacial recession cited in the news media show contrasting terminal positions beginning with the maximum extent at the end of the 1880-1915 year cool period and ending with the minimum extent of the recent 20 year warm period (1977-1998). A much better gauge of the effect of climate on glaciers would be to compare glacier terminal positions between the ends of successive cool periods or the ends of successive warm periods.
1977 to 1998 global warming The global cooling that prevailed from ~1945 to 1977 ended abruptly in 1977 when the Pacific Ocean shifted from its cool mode to its warm mode in a single year and global temperatures began to rise, initiating two decades of global warming. This sudden reversal of climate in 1977 has been called the “Great Pacific Climate Shift” because it happened so abruptly. During this warm period, alpine glaciers retreated, Arctic sea ice diminished, melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet occur.
The abruptness of the shift in Pacific sea surface temperatures and corresponding change from global cooling to global warming in 1977 is highly significant and strongly suggests a cause-and-effect relationship. The rise of atmospheric CO2, which accelerated after 1945 shows no sudden change that could account for the “Great Pacific Climate Shift”.
1999 to 2010 global cooling. No global warming has occurred above the 1998 level and temperatures have declined slightly.
The past 500 years
Temperature oscillations recorded in Greenland ice cores over the past 500 years (Fig. 2) are truly remarkable. At least 40 periods of warming and cooling have occurred since 1480 AD, all well before CO2 emissions could have been a factor.

The past 5,000 years
Figure 3 shows oxygen isotope ratios from the GISP2 Greenland ice core for the past 5,000 years. Note that temperatures were significantly warmer than present from 1500 to 5000 years ago.

The past 10,000 years
Most of the past 10,000 have been warmer than the present. Figure 4 shows temperatures from the GISP2 Greenland ice core. With the exception of a brief cool period about 8,200 years ago, the entire period from 1,500 to 10,500 years ago was significantly warmer than present.

Another graph of temperatures from the Greenland ice core for the past 10,000 years is shown in Figure 5. It shows essentially the same temperatures as Cuffy and Clow (1997) but with somewhat greater detail. What both of these temperature curves show is that virtually all of the past 10,000 years has been warmer than the present.

So where do the 1934/1998/2010 warm years rank in the long-term list of warm years? Of the past 10,500 years, 9,100 were warmer than 1934/1998/2010. Thus, regardless of which year ( 1934, 1998, or 2010) turns out to be the warmest of the past century, that year will rank number 9,099 in the long-term list.
The climate has been warming slowly since the Little Ice Age (Fig. 5), but it has quite a ways to go yet before reaching the temperature levels that persisted for nearly all of the past 10,500 years.
It’s really much to do about nothing.
[Reply: I don’t know why you can’t access the image, but it’s this one.~dbs]
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/nvst.jpg
is the same as
http://www.canadafreepress.com/images/uploads/ball120610-2.jpg <— that?
If so, I hope that helps.
[Yes, same original source. ~dbs.]
Excellent presentation, Don.
I did see a type-o though:
“With the exception of a brief warm period about 8,200 years ago, the entire period from 1,500 to 10,500 years ago was significantly warmer than present.”
Should say “brief COOL period.”
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA
[Fixed, eagle-eye. Thanks. ~dbs, mod.]
Geoff Sharp says:
December 28, 2010 at 6:34 pm
The long term temperature graph does not look to allow for the recent temperatures but it matches up very nicely with the Holocene isotope record further strengthening the Sun/climate link.
Unfortunately the records do not match very nicely: http://www.leif.org/research/MisMatch-Geoff-Don.png
Thanks Brian H, James Sexton and dbs, I don’t believe I’ve seen that graphic before.
I’ve read it referenced here but had no idea the jump in temp and decline in station count was that dramatic.
Is anyone aware of a reconstruction from 1990-2010 that includes the stations axed in 1990? Surely, they are still collecting data and just deemed not worthy by the gate keepers?
Your all wrong! The world is in fact warming, the snow and wintry conditions that you apparently see are only signs of the warming global temperatures, Your stealing all the perception from Africa! Yes you are! you are all evil and you hate Africans and Nazi Jews and polar bears.
/classic! sarc off
So which is better for us, to go back to the higher temperatures of the last 10,000 years, or to go back further to the most recent ice age?
In any case, I guess we should thank the antediluvians for burning so much fossil fuel that they brought us out of the ice age. Nothing else could have done it, obviously.
@JohnWho who said on December 28, 2010 at 6:52 pm
Yes, John, he meant 1998 … quintessential cherry-picking – just like a Lindzen/Choi study – which makes his comment not very credible. The lack of understanding of what the “G” stands for in “GW” on display in this thread is stunning.
Okay. So returning from dinner I was able to get the image via the link provided by ~dbs. Thanks. Google Chrome still returns the “forbidden” message and Internet Explorer hangs and claims it can’t open that page. Compared to establishing a global temperature for thousands of years ago this ought to be a piece of cake. Maybe I’ll take the side off the computer and blow the dust out – That’s the equivalent of opening the hood of a car that won’t start and wiggling things. No help, but makes one feel better.
I’m a bit confused about your comment here—
1915 to 1945 warm period. Global temperatures rose steadily in the 1920s, 1930s, and early 1940s. By the mid-1940s, global temperatures were about 0.5 °C (0.9° F) warmer than they had been at the turn of the century. More high temperature records for the century were recorded in the 1930s than in any other decade of the 20th century. Glaciers during this warm period retreated, temperatures in the 1930s in Greenland were warmer than at present, and rates of warming were higher (warming 4°C (7° F) in two decades). All of this occurred before CO2 emissions began to soar after 1945, so at least half of the warming of the past century cannot have been caused by manmade CO2.
Shouldn’t the rates of warming be 0.4C/ 0.7F in 2 decades?
Also are the graphs attributed to Alley etc or are they drawn by yourself using his numbers or by some one else? Thank you.
When you die, there must be a prominent individual you must go after and destroy.
I plan on going after and destroying (Jay) John D. Rockefeller when I die, even if prematurely.
These people have more sway over your lives that you can possibly imagine. The way to deal with them is in the afterlife and make sure they never come back.
Aside from not knowing what “global” means, does anyone have a comment about Earth’s orbital features over the periods discussed by Dr. Easterbrook? Milankovich Cycle? Holocene Climate Optimum? Impact on Greenland data?
1934, 1998 and 2010 have something else in common that I see by looking at the Smithsonian volcano eruptive history. A clear or recently cleared stratosphere and a troposphere with plenty of volcanic aerosols. A smoke filled greenhouse under the sun is just plain hotter than one with clean, clear air in it. Think about it.
It probably has to do with where you are trying to load the page (ie business IP or consumer IP). I am at work and if I click on the link I get the “forbidden” error you talk about, but if I cut and past the original link into a new browser window (so it is not a re-direct from WUWT) the image loads just fine.
Larry
Far better to deal with them in the here and now rather than in an assumed afterlife, which may or may not provide such an opportunity.
Thanks for letting Don put up a post. He usually gets disqualified since he has actually done things like ‘measurements’ and ‘field work’. And he has a track record of making forecasts which can be compared to the observed record.
Also of interest is how well these graphs seem to track with a lot of the material originally presented by HH Lamb in his book (Climate History of the World? Away from home and can’t reach for it right now, sorry).
Terry
A couple of comments.
1. The temperature reconstruction of greenland needs error bars.
2. Folks who moan about the “existence” of a global average should moan now.
3. Greenland is not the world. If you want to characterize the whole world by one spot then take it up with the people who complain that 7000 stations is not enough.
That said, proxies of winter seasons are better than proxies of summer seasons.
The operative question is not “has it been this warm before” the operative questions are.
1. What’s our best estimate of the temp over the next 100 years.
2. Can we do anything about it
3. should we, if we can.
Jantar wrote, “[…] graph 1. It appears that you have used Hansen’s trick of making 1934 appear cooler, not just cooler than 1998, but even cooler than 1937 – 1939. Is there a data source for this graph? An incorrect graphic this early in the paper may turn people off from reading further.”
Jantar, did you notice the word “Global” on the y-axis?
You appear to have accidentally conflated the USA with the globe.
Barack H. Obama has presided over the formation of the largest police state ever created in the history of man. [snip]
FrankK wrote, “This post would be improved if Figures 1 and 2 were brought up to date. It will always gives some the impression that there is something to hide. Isn’t there any data beyond the years shown ??”
Regarding Figure 2: That’s from an ice core (that’s not growing).
Floods, freeze not the end of global warming: CSIRO. Once more their ABC leads the chant – high temperatures mean climate change/global warming, cooler temperatures are just natural weather variability. So 2010 may or may not prove to be the warmest year in the last 100 years, why should that surprise. After all, wide spread temperature records started only about 100 years ago during a rising planetary temperature trend that commenced at the low point of the little ice age about 300 years ago. Clearly that was long before man made CO2 emissions could have influenced planetary temperature.
Also problematic for the man made warming hypothesis, observational evidence has invalidated the warming projections of the gaggle of grants financed climate models including that of CSIRO. During the last 10 – 15 years there has been no statistically significant planetary warming (a point agreed by Professor Phil Jones of “Climategate” fame) while during that same period man made CO2 emissions have continued unabated?
“Pet Death Wish Rocks” are my idea and may become very popular in the future. Please give me credit for the idea.
Scott Ramsdell says:
December 28, 2010 at 7:55 pm
There is a post with comments on the station dropout issue:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/08/on-the-march-of-the-thermometers/
————————————————————–
hotrod (Larry L) says: “cut and paste”
That worked. Thanks. John
Christopher Hanley says:
December 28, 2010 at 7:06 pm
“A comment on the notation on figure 1… ” etc.
“The discrepancy is puzzling.”
Even more puzzling when you actually look at real-time measurements of carbon dioxide from real scientists instead of creative interpretations from government-funded lackeys:
http://www.biomind.de/realCO2/
http://www.warwickhughes.com/icecore/
In 2008 Dr. Easterbrook predicted global cooling for the next 3 decades:
http://westinstenv.org/palbot/2008/10/30/global-cooling-is-here-evidence-for-predicting-global-cooling-for-the-next-three-decades/
AWEFUL
GRISP2 Ice Core drilling was completed in 1992.
What year is “the present” in its “before present” timeline(s)?
Figure 1. is biased. Atmospheric CO2 ppm (on year average) has been rising since at least 1900 AD, with no periods of “without change / without increase” since. While CO2 soared during the pre-1980 global cooling period, it ‘soared’ also and even more so during the warming period that followed, but the text just says “CO2 increase”, which makes it sound like it increased less than the previous period, which isn’t the case. In short: Fig. 1. is both biased and factually incorrect (a.k.a. bullshit).
Please state exact sources for any graph, and if possible where the data for a graph came from (especially when datasets are combined with different smoothing, etc. – we know how easily one can manipulate perceptions doing this).
For instance, it would be nice to know what “the present” is in Fig. 4. Is it 2000 AD in Figure 4? “Modified from Cuffy and Clow, 1997″… how modified? Were years of temperature data added after 1992, after 1997… after… when? If so, how many years and where did the other data (of an additional 8-18 years) come from?
Figure 5. at least shows that “the present” is 2000 AD, though it also doesn’t say where the additional 8+(?) temperature data came from, and at which point they’re grafted onto the ice core data. Or did they send the snow to the lab for isotope analysis as it fell since?
You wrote: “Figure 3 shows oxygen isotope ratios from the GISP2 Greenland ice core for the past 5,000 years. Note that temperatures were significantly warmer than present from 1500 to 5000 years ago.”
Than present? You’re talking about 2010! The timeline ends in 2000, and… -wuwt- the data actually end in… doesn’t say, but it looks like around 1850, not showing ANYTHING about the last century, let alone “the present”. Note THAT.
One of the worst science (?) postings I’ve seen here at WUWT.