Guest post by Dr. Don J. Easterbrook
1934 has long been considered the warmest year of the past century. A decade ago, the closest challenger appeared to be 1998, a super-el nino year, but it trailed 1934 by 0.54°C (0.97°F). Since then, NASA GISS has “adjusted” the U.S. data for 1934 downward and 1998 upward (see December 25, 2010 post by Ira Glickstein) in an attempt to make 1998 warmer than 1934 and seemingly erased the original rather large lead of 1934 over 1998. The last phases of the strong 2009-2010 el nino in early 2010 made this year another possible contender for the warmest year of the century. However, December 2010 has been one of the coldest Decembers in a century in many parts of the world, so 2010 probably won’t be warmer than 1998. But does it really matter? Regardless of which year wins the temperature adjustment battle, how significant will that be? To answer that question, we need to look at a much longer time frame‒centuries and millennia.
One of the best ways to look at long-term temperatures is with isotope data from the GISP2 Greenland ice core, from which temperatures for thousands of years can be determined. The ice core isotope data were obtained by Minze Stuiver and Peter Grootes from nuclear accelerator measurements of thousands of oxygen isotope ratios (16O/18O), which are a measure of paleo-temperatures at the time snow fell that was later converted to glacial ice. The age of such temperatures can be accurately measured from annual layers of accumulation of rock debris marking each summer’s melting of ice and concentration of rock debris on the glacier.
The past century
Two episodes of global warming and two episodes of global cooling occurred during the past century:

1880 to 1915 cool period. Atmospheric temperature measurements, glacier fluctuations, and oxygen isotope data from Greenland ice cores all record a cool period from about 1880 to about 1915. Many cold temperature records in North America were set during this period. Glaciers advanced, some nearly to terminal positions reached during the Little Ice Age about 400 years ago. During this period, global temperatures were about 0.9 ° C (1.6 ° F) cooler than at present. From 1880 to 1890, temperatures dropped 0.35 ° C (0.6° F) in only 10 years. The 1880 –1915 cool period shows up well in the oxygen isotope curve of the Greenland Ice Sheet.
1915 to 1945 warm period. Global temperatures rose steadily in the 1920s, 1930s, and early 1940s. By the mid-1940s, global temperatures were about 0.5 °C (0.9° F) warmer than they had been at the turn of the century. More high temperature records for the century were recorded in the 1930s than in any other decade of the 20th century. Glaciers during this warm period retreated, temperatures in the 1930s in Greenland were warmer than at present, and rates of warming were higher (warming 4°C (7° F) in two decades). All of this occurred before CO2 emissions began to soar after 1945, so at least half of the warming of the past century cannot have been caused by manmade CO2.
1945 to 1977 cool period. Global temperatures began to cool in the mid–1940’s at the point when CO2 emissions began to soar. Global temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere dropped about 0.5° C (0.9° F) from the mid-1940s until 1977 and temperatures globally cooled about 0.2° C (0.4° F). Many of the world’s glaciers advanced during this time and recovered a good deal of the ice lost during the 1915–1945 warm period. Many examples of glacial recession cited in the news media show contrasting terminal positions beginning with the maximum extent at the end of the 1880-1915 year cool period and ending with the minimum extent of the recent 20 year warm period (1977-1998). A much better gauge of the effect of climate on glaciers would be to compare glacier terminal positions between the ends of successive cool periods or the ends of successive warm periods.
1977 to 1998 global warming The global cooling that prevailed from ~1945 to 1977 ended abruptly in 1977 when the Pacific Ocean shifted from its cool mode to its warm mode in a single year and global temperatures began to rise, initiating two decades of global warming. This sudden reversal of climate in 1977 has been called the “Great Pacific Climate Shift” because it happened so abruptly. During this warm period, alpine glaciers retreated, Arctic sea ice diminished, melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet occur.
The abruptness of the shift in Pacific sea surface temperatures and corresponding change from global cooling to global warming in 1977 is highly significant and strongly suggests a cause-and-effect relationship. The rise of atmospheric CO2, which accelerated after 1945 shows no sudden change that could account for the “Great Pacific Climate Shift”.
1999 to 2010 global cooling. No global warming has occurred above the 1998 level and temperatures have declined slightly.
The past 500 years
Temperature oscillations recorded in Greenland ice cores over the past 500 years (Fig. 2) are truly remarkable. At least 40 periods of warming and cooling have occurred since 1480 AD, all well before CO2 emissions could have been a factor.

The past 5,000 years
Figure 3 shows oxygen isotope ratios from the GISP2 Greenland ice core for the past 5,000 years. Note that temperatures were significantly warmer than present from 1500 to 5000 years ago.

The past 10,000 years
Most of the past 10,000 have been warmer than the present. Figure 4 shows temperatures from the GISP2 Greenland ice core. With the exception of a brief cool period about 8,200 years ago, the entire period from 1,500 to 10,500 years ago was significantly warmer than present.

Another graph of temperatures from the Greenland ice core for the past 10,000 years is shown in Figure 5. It shows essentially the same temperatures as Cuffy and Clow (1997) but with somewhat greater detail. What both of these temperature curves show is that virtually all of the past 10,000 years has been warmer than the present.

So where do the 1934/1998/2010 warm years rank in the long-term list of warm years? Of the past 10,500 years, 9,100 were warmer than 1934/1998/2010. Thus, regardless of which year ( 1934, 1998, or 2010) turns out to be the warmest of the past century, that year will rank number 9,099 in the long-term list.
The climate has been warming slowly since the Little Ice Age (Fig. 5), but it has quite a ways to go yet before reaching the temperature levels that persisted for nearly all of the past 10,500 years.
It’s really much to do about nothing.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Good luck getting your study published in a reputable scientific journal.
I don’t put much stock in “data” posted on obscure websites I’ve never heard of, submitted by random anonymous people with on the interwebs allegededly studying their local weather stations, with no way of knowing if the data is representative, robust, or if the anonymous internet posters “analyzing” the data have the foggiest clue what the F they are doing.
Let me know when you get it published. Good luck!
REPLY: Good job on flogging anonymity while keeping your own intact.
Excuse me, but have the author been drinking, or what!?
This post was really poorly written!
Already in the first sentence, the post stumbles and fall:
“1934 has long been considered the warmest year of the past century. A decade ago, the closest challenger appeared to be 1998, a super-el nino year, but it trailed 1934 by 0.54°C (0.97°F).”
No, this is not true. It is true that 1934 was as warm as 1998 FOR THE CONTIGOUS USA – NOT THE WHOLE WORLD!!!
How long shall we continue to read this rubbish!
And furthermore, 1998 did not trail 1934 by half a degree! However, the 1969-1990 average is trailing 1934 by 0.54 degrees.
To me, it looks like the author has problems with getting basic numbers right.
Then it continues with a bizarre statement:
“The last phases of the strong 2009-2010 el nino in early 2010 made this year another possible contender for the warmest year of the century.”
HELLO!! WAKE UP!! We’ve entered a new century – in fact a new millenium! And it actually happened more than 10 years ago! 1934 and 2010 does NOT belong to the same century. A person that haven’t even noticed this cannot possibly be trustworthy in climate issues..
After this disaster, it gets perhaps even worse, as there are a lot of figures that supposedly should show that it has been a lot warmer before. However, except that the scale seems to be different in each figure, the figures are comparing earlier temperatures from the top of the Greenland glacier with global surface temperatures (Fig. 1).
I’ll try to take you thruogh the graphs:
In Fig. 1, we see that the end of the 20th century was about 0.5 degrees warmer than the 1960s, and 0.8 degrees warmer than at the start of the 20th century.
Ok. So far, so good.
Then we start looking at the temperature at Greenland in Fig. 2., and this is where we hit into trouble… Except that the figure ends in 1960 (in the middle of a cold spell), we see that the temperature, represented by the oxygen ratio, shows a value of ~-34 in the 1920s. We know that it is as warm on Greenland today as it was then, so one would suspect the values to be about the same today. Note that this also clearly shows that the variability at Greenland deviates from the global variability.
Then we look into longer time-series in Fig. 3., and now it gets totally confusing!!
In this figure, the time-series ends at the start of the 20th century (why??), and from the values, we see that the value of almost -34 in 1920 (and hence, also today’s value), that would actually have been “all time high” in the 5000 year time-series. But still, we are left with the impression that it was by far warmer some thousand years ago, than it is today. How come?
In the last two figures, we get a 10.000 year time-series, showing that the temperatures have mostly been on the warmer side for the last 10.000 years, but with substantially lower temperatures in the last few hundred years. However, we see that the temperatures were slightly higher several thousand years ago compared to a few thousand years ago – BUT: according to the values in figure 2 put into figure 3, the temperatures in 1920 BY FAR exceeded the temperatures a few thousand years ago – and we know that it is as warm today as it was in the 1920s, which means that today’s temperature EXCEED the temperatures several thousand years ago!
If you didn’t fall down on the same conclusion, you are, however, excused: The last two figures show temperature and not oxygen ratio, so the scale must not be confused with the scale of the earlier figures! But from the conclusion that we deduce from the first figures, it is clearly seen that the temperature around 1920 must have been the “highest on record”, and hence, also today’s temperature must rank as “all time high”!
Of course, one issue is the different smoothing in each of the time-series.
Thanks to the author for not discussing this!
Thanks to Don Easterbrook for this clear and excellent post – NOT!
Vidar says
Excuse me, but have the author been drinking, or what!?
This post was really poorly written!
Already in the first sentence, the post stumbles and fall:
“1934 has long been considered the warmest year of the past century. A decade ago, the closest challenger appeared to be 1998, a super-el nino year, but it trailed 1934 by 0.54°C (0.97°F).”
No, this is not true. It is true that 1934 was as warm as 1998 FOR THE CONTIGOUS USA – NOT THE WHOLE WORLD!!!
No Vidar, it seems you have been drinking?
“have the author been drinking”? where are you from?
“Contigous?” What’s that?
[it’s hard to see how calling someone a drunkard adds to the debate . . make your point by all means but trashing someone with whom you disagree is not helpful . . thank you]
Why don’t you check the weather station in your own area and find out that way if it has been warming. Here where I live it has not been warming for 37 years…
http://www.letterdash.com/HenryP/assessment-of-global-warming-and-global-warming-caused-by-greenhouse-forcings-in-pretoria-south-africa
Please remember that carbon dioxide is good for life!
http://www.letterdash.com/HenryP/more-carbon-dioxide-is-ok-ok
I will not call anyone “drunk”. It is not correct to insult and offend, even in response to a data massacre such as what Don Easterbrook has done. I will instead call him a “Data deleter”.
In the Easterbrook graph there are shown the temperatures in Greenland during the Holocene. But that beautiful graph ends in 1905. That’s 105 years ago!
What has happened in Greenland all those years?
Answer:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2010&month_last=12&sat=4&sst=1&type=anoms&mean_gen=0112&year1=2001&year2=2010&base1=1900&base2=1910&radius=250&pol=reg
In 2010, the Greenland warmest year on record (and probably in the entire Holocene), the situation turns worse:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2010&month_last=12&sat=4&sst=1&type=anoms&mean_gen=0112&year1=2010&year2=2010&base1=1900&base2=1910&radius=250&pol=reg
If you prefer timeseries:
http://bprc.osu.edu/mediawiki/images/c/ca/Greenland_ice_sheet_average_surface_air_temperature_1840-2010_after_Box_et_al_2009_calendar_year_with_fits.png
http://www.meltfactor.org/blog/?p=294
Quite a big warming, isn’t it?
Hi Peru
Earlier in the thread, we discussed the paper that you are quoting , noting that where the sample came from in Greenland it is marked grey: no data available
In your last quoted graph they clearly say that the average rate of increase from 1840 to 2010 was 0.07 degrees C per decade> if you add this to Easterbrooks graphs you can see that we are still well below MWP or the RWP and others. We know that in those days people were not using fossil fuels?
Anyway, remember my results in Pretoria (dry winter months) during the past 37 years?
Means temps. o.o degrees C/decade (no change)
Max. temps. rising at a rate of 1.0 degrees C /decade
Min. temps. decreasing at a rate of 0.35 degreesC/ decade
I have now also looked at La Paz, Bolivia which apparently is also dry in winter
http://www.tutiempo.net/en/Climate/La_Paz_Alto/06-1974/852010.htm
for the past 37 years
My finding is:
Mean temps. going down at a rate of 0.25 degrees C/decade
Max. temps. increasing at a rate of 0.5 degrees C/decade
Minimum temp decreasing at a rate of 0.35 degrees C/decade
Interesting?
this is all happening when CO2 is rising at its fastest rate.
It is alleged that the rise in Co2 traps heat.
We are agreed that if warming is as a result of an increase in GHG’s we must see minimum temps. rising at a rate faster than max and means?
Well, that is not happening. Accept it. People do not cause warming. If need be, find another job. You can always join us.
[fixed ~ac]