![54558main_world_med1[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/54558main_world_med11.gif?resize=258%2C267)
Earth’s internal dynamo generates average field in outer core 50 times that at surface
A University of California, Berkeley, geophysicist has made the first-ever measurement of the strength of the magnetic field inside Earth’s core, 1,800 miles underground.
The magnetic field strength is 25 Gauss, or 50 times stronger than the magnetic field at the surface that makes compass needles align north-south. Though this number is in the middle of the range geophysicists predict, it puts constraints on the identity of the heat sources in the core that keep the internal dynamo running to maintain this magnetic field.
“This is the first really good number we’ve had based on observations, not inference,” said author Bruce A. Buffett, professor of earth and planetary science at UC Berkeley. “The result is not controversial, but it does rule out a very weak magnetic field and argues against a very strong field.”
The results are published in the Dec. 16 issue of the journal Nature.
A strong magnetic field inside the outer core means there is a lot of convection and thus a lot of heat being produced, which scientists would need to account for, Buffett said. The presumed sources of energy are the residual heat from 4 billion years ago when the planet was hot and molten, release of gravitational energy as heavy elements sink to the bottom of the liquid core, and radioactive decay of long-lived elements such as potassium, uranium and thorium.
A weak field – 5 Gauss, for example – would imply that little heat is being supplied by radioactive decay, while a strong field, on the order of 100 Gauss, would imply a large contribution from radioactive decay.
“A measurement of the magnetic field tells us what the energy requirements are and what the sources of heat are,” Buffett said.
About 60 percent of the power generated inside the earth likely comes from the exclusion of light elements from the solid inner core as it freezes and grows, he said. This constantly builds up crud in the outer core.
The Earth’s magnetic field is produced in the outer two-thirds of the planet’s iron/nickel core. This outer core, about 1,400 miles thick, is liquid, while the inner core is a frozen iron and nickel wrecking ball with a radius of about 800 miles – roughly the size of the moon. The core is surrounded by a hot, gooey mantle and a rigid surface crust.
The cooling Earth originally captured its magnetic field from the planetary disk in which the solar system formed. That field would have disappeared within 10,000 years if not for the planet’s internal dynamo, which regenerates the field thanks to heat produced inside the planet. The heat makes the liquid outer core boil, or “convect,” and as the conducting metals rise and then sink through the existing magnetic field, they create electrical currents that maintain the magnetic field. This roiling dynamo produces a slowly shifting magnetic field at the surface.
“You get changes in the surface magnetic field that look a lot like gyres and flows in the oceans and the atmosphere, but these are being driven by fluid flow in the outer core,” Buffett said.
Buffett is a theoretician who uses observations to improve computer models of the earth’s internal dynamo. Now at work on a second generation model, he admits that a lack of information about conditions in the earth’s interior has been a big hindrance to making accurate models.
He realized, however, that the tug of the moon on the tilt of the earth’s spin axis could provide information about the magnetic field inside. This tug would make the inner core precess – that is, make the spin axis slowly rotate in the opposite direction – which would produce magnetic changes in the outer core that damp the precession. Radio observations of distant quasars – extremely bright, active galaxies – provide very precise measurements of the changes in the earth’s rotation axis needed to calculate this damping.
“The moon is continually forcing the rotation axis of the core to precess, and we’re looking at the response of the fluid outer core to the precession of the inner core,” he said.
By calculating the effect of the moon on the spinning inner core, Buffett discovered that the precession makes the slightly out-of-round inner core generate shear waves in the liquid outer core. These waves of molten iron and nickel move within a tight cone only 30 to 40 meters thick, interacting with the magnetic field to produce an electric current that heats the liquid. This serves to damp the precession of the rotation axis. The damping causes the precession to lag behind the moon as it orbits the earth. A measurement of the lag allowed Buffett to calculate the magnitude of the damping and thus of the magnetic field inside the outer core.
Buffett noted that the calculated field – 25 Gauss – is an average over the entire outer core. The field is expected to vary with position.
“I still find it remarkable that we can look to distant quasars to get insights into the deep interior of our planet,” Buffett said.
The work was funded by the National Science Foundation.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Whoooo hoooo! Structure of our planet is first out of the chute when we come back from our Christmas holiday. Perfect lead-in!
[Reply]Please repost in ‘tips and notes’. Thanks. RT-mod
what? Nature published some real science…for a change…( non climate -that is)
Very interesting!
Interesting indeed. I don’t quite understand how you can have a frozen inner core of iron and nickle surrounded by a molten core of iron and nickle. I’m thinking the inner core is something else besides frozen.
It is not hot in there then, as heat demagnetizes?
“I still find it remarkable that we can look to distant quasars to get insights into the deep interior of our planet,” Buffett said.
So do I! Quite amazing. but I do worry about his approach “based on observations, not inference” certainly not the mannly thing to do.
Can we get the climatologists to model this and its effects on climate 1,000 years into the future so that we can start panicking now?
Seriously, though, I would love to see how the gravitational component decays over time. Or has this ended and is the core now in the cooling phase?
TGIF
Sorry Mod, reposted in the correct topic.
jack morrow, it’s because of pressure. Pressure at the inner core is estimated at around 350 GPa (billion pascals), and at that pressure the primary elements of nickel and iron solidify.
First we should ask ourselves why does magnetism occur with preference with Iron, Nickel and Cobalt, that share in common having +2 and +3 valences, changing of oxidation states in between the two ( a current), specially in iron magnetite (FeO+Fe2O4=Fe3O4).
We are lacking the vision of a general law, which manifests everywhere and, however, it is not found anywhere. Curious.
Motion of a conductor through a magnetic field generates a current that has been perpetuating the magnetic field for billions of years after the original field has dissipated.
The government should do something.
“This is the first really good number we’ve had based on observations, not inference,”
A novel concept.
“You get changes in the surface magnetic field that look a lot like gyres and flows in the oceans and the atmosphere, but these are being driven by fluid flow in the outer core,”
Anybody got about eleven trillion tons of iron powder? Sounds to me like we could have one hell of a (nearly-)spherical Etch-a-Sketch here.
Frozen means solid and colder than the outer liquid layer!!!
…but I do worry about his approach “based on observations, not inference” certainly not the mannly thing to do.
[groan]
Good one anyway. 🙂
what gets me is that this guy shows that as a real scientist he has a hard time making models without observations to verify them, wish climate science had those issues.
The inner core can be frozen whilst surrounded by a hotter liquid because it is under higher pressure. Water is very unusual in that it expands on freezing, almost all other liquids can be made to ‘freeze’ by pressure so an ocean of petrol say would become solid within a few hundred feet of the surface.
Related news from a couple of days ago from Hebrew University, via Wired:
“Iron Age Copper Reveals Earth’s Stronger, Faster Magnetic Field”
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/12/magnetic-copper-slag/
OK S.
Re: “The cooling Earth originally captured its magnetic field from the planetary disk in which the solar system formed.”
This is what we call “new physics.” Notice that the reporter completely fails to mention that this is a hypothesis.
Re: “That field would have disappeared within 10,000 years if not for the planet’s internal dynamo, which regenerates the field thanks to heat produced inside the planet.”
A problem created by the conventional framework itself …
Re: “The heat makes the liquid outer core boil, or “convect,” and as the conducting metals rise and then sink through the existing magnetic field, they create electrical currents that maintain the magnetic field. This roiling dynamo produces a slowly shifting magnetic field at the surface.”
Never mind the observation that we see lightning going to space now, and that each time a lightning stroke occurs, the Van Allen Radiation Belts blink.
Re: “You get changes in the surface magnetic field that look a lot like gyres and flows in the oceans and the atmosphere, but these are being driven by fluid flow in the outer core,” Buffett said.
Electrical processes are always second-order effects in the conventional theories.
Re: “Buffett is a theoretician who uses observations to improve computer models of the earth’s internal dynamo. Now at work on a second generation model, he admits that a lack of information about conditions in the earth’s interior has been a big hindrance to making accurate models.”
In science, we are supposed to be skeptical of concepts which are invisible and theoretical. Philosophy of science dictates that we — reporters included — speak in terms which are unbiased, and hold out for the possibility that our assumptions might be wrong.
One need not be a professional scientist to determine the philosophical errors here. These guys are pretending as though philosophy of science does not even exist.
Magnetic reversals. Are we not overdue for one?
The magnetic field is weaking, or so I have read.
Would another reading in a year or so confirm the direction?
I don’t know what “philosophy of science” is. Maybe that’s like the theory of science as opposed to the practice of science. I do know what the difference between philosophy and science is. Philosophy came first. It is pure speculation, attempting to think or “reason” about things, what we would now call “hand-waving”. If you add to that better logic, mathematics and even statistics, experiments, ways to falsify claims, an attempt to separate claims from facts, then you start to have science. The problem with “climate scientists” is that many of them are at best philosophers not real scientists. They might as well be science-fiction writers or the priests of a new religion. end rant.
Diameter of earth approx 12.000 kilometers
Deepest borehole approx. 12 kilometers
So. We have ‘observed’ the composition of earth two thousands (0.2 %) of the way down towards the center. What would we be able to say about an apple or a an animal cell if we only could study a small part of the way into the peel/cell membrane ?
related story: “European scientists are going to try to measure the movement of the oceans by tracing their magnetism alone.” Swarm satellite mission.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11980315
Mike McMillan says:
December 17, 2010 at 8:12 am
A Unified Field needed.
I didn’t really intend to be this active a poster on my first day, but I find it interesting that the potential for serious effects on civilization lie in the periodic fading of the Earth’s magnetic field (we are quite overdue for the next “outage”, apparently) exceeds in some respects any of those speculated to arise from climate change. Homing pigeons, I cry for you!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal