WUWT readers may remember this popular article from August 30th, 2010 New paper makes a hockey sticky wicket of Mann et al 98/99/08 and then The Team’s response RC’s response to McShane and Wyner: a case of orange cones which gave rise to Josh’s cartoon and this cartoon coffee mug:
Patrick Hadley writes in comments today:
OT – The McShane & Wyner discussion is now available at the Annals of Applied Statistics.
There is a lot of fascinating material to read there – the original paper, criticisms from the Hockey Team, support from others and, what seems to me at least, a brilliant rejoinder from McShane and Wyner.
I’ll say. Wow, this paper stirred up a statistical hornet’s nest, just have a look at the table of contents related to this paper. It reads like a who’s who of paleohockey. Each article is fully open, no paywalls; which I see as a testament to the journal integrity. If nothing else, read the editorial by Michael Stein which speaks to the entire table of contents.
There is so much here, I can’t even begin to dig into it all (It’s a workday for me) but if readers wish to place excerpts below of interest, I’ll do a follow up post with them. – Anthony
[Something a bit odd here, I can no longer get the page with 02 comparison from the link, but it still appears from my original attempt when pulled down from history when typing in the URL..]
Late to the game here, but I am reading these papers with interest. First SMR and now McShane and Wyner. By me reading so far, M&W have taken SMR to the woodshed on statistical analysis. Am I wrong?