Another “unprecedented” decline due to Climategate

It seems not a lot of people are interested in paying 100,000 dollars to hear Al Gore speak anymore. Or even to have some of the trained presenters do it for free.

http://www.skyfall.fr/wp-content/tcp_month1.png

From: http://www.skyfall.fr/?p=608

Al Gore, a victim of climate change (translated from French by Google)

“Al Gore’s program The Climate Project (TCP) goal is to widely spread the film An Inconvenient Truth and to raise awareness about the climate emergency by a series of conferences throughout the world. He has suffered in recent months the Copenhagen setback and various ClimateGates. According to the list of events planned at the TCP site (link above), the monthly number of conferences reached a peak of 193 just before Copenhagen in October 2009 before a continuing “unprecedented” and “irreversible” decline down to a ‘collapse’ in recent months. For now, no conference is scheduled for 2011, which bodes ill for the continuation of the project. This is unquestionably one more sign of “climate fatigue” that affects the warming movement. We congratulate the performance of TCP fans who managed to mobilize 19,613 conferences so far! If they are angry at the idea that so much effort may also produce so meager results, it would be understandable.”

===================================================

Yeah, it doesn’t look good for them, down 70% of an already minuscule market share in the last month. They didn’t even get much of a Climategate bump. I’d call it “flatlining”.

Graph from Alexa.com

This reminds me to remind you that WUWT succeeds via linkage. So please link to WUWT whenever you can in comments and encourage news articles and blog posts from content here.

Also, thanks to WUWT reader Marcos José for the tip on the bookings and to reader Eduardo Ferreyra the translation.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
44 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GregO
September 14, 2010 5:39 pm

Such is the fate of all fashionable faddish ideas like CAGW – they sound good, or disturbing, or somehow relevant and important; then nothing or not much happens and the public moves on to the next distraction.
Can you blame them? After all; where is the heat; the flooding; the climate refugees…For a time there he really had everybody going.

JRR Canada
September 14, 2010 6:45 pm

Actually AL’s movie tipped me from sarcastic comment to actual investigation of the professed science.When so many BS detectors go off at once and the local do gooders are all aghast about CO2 its time to check the facts. My conclusion is it is time to tax or physically attack any dogooder who is out to help/save me. Stupid is as stupid does indeed and they have done it all over the place on this scam. we will be tossing senseless bylaws, provincial laws and taxes for decades. I love the internet, Utube , future quote, my opponent is so stupid he/she bought into AWG. Question, can Al Gore be prosecuted for spreading lies for profit?

September 14, 2010 7:13 pm

If you thought big Al was steamed about attendance to his site, you should have heard him vent when he found out, most of his hits came from here every time WUWT mentioned the decline.

E.M.Smith
Editor
September 14, 2010 9:42 pm

So, would that make them “Goreites” (in emulation of Millerites?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millerism )
No ‘end of the world’ on schedule and all that?…
Or maybe “Algoreites?”

P.G. Sharrow
September 14, 2010 11:08 pm

Looks like Big Al needs a new gig. Or better yet just fade away.

September 15, 2010 2:50 am

Yes Al. The word you are looking for is “rumbled”.

Brian D Finch
September 15, 2010 3:17 am

I suppose Al and the Go-Rhythmics are the chief victims
of Skepticological Climate Change.

Lew Skannen
September 15, 2010 4:40 am

Cheer up Al.
Because the death spiral of your website has been posted on WUWT I actually heard about your website and visited it!
So that is at least one hit you got today!
🙂
Lew

Ralph
September 15, 2010 8:54 am

Am I the only person that thinks Al Gore might have lost some credibility buying a $9 million seaside home and owing a multimillion dollar seaside condo?

Milwaukee Bob
September 15, 2010 8:59 am

Al Gore – who? Wasn’t there a VP by that name sometime back? He has a movie out?
Oh! Is that the guy that has been wrong on so many issues that nobody pays any attention to him – anymore? including his wife? or ex-wife….?? or is that the current VP?

Brian H
September 15, 2010 10:17 am

Yeah, I visited once after a mention here. It was so bad I will never repeat the experience.

nandheeswaran jothi
September 15, 2010 11:26 am

Scott Covert says:
September 14, 2010 at 1:52 pm
Poor Al, he didn’t get to be President and now this. Maybe he can try his hand at infomercials.
scott,
i thought the “inconvenient truth” was his Infomercial!!

Will Nelson
September 15, 2010 11:36 am

Alexa graph x-axis: proudly brought to you in color by TCP!

September 15, 2010 12:52 pm

How will he afford that ocean front beach house? Guess he is going to have to file chapter 13. Poor soul.

kwik
September 15, 2010 1:05 pm

I think he should return all that money.Imagine all the DDT Africa could buy for it.

Djozar
September 15, 2010 1:57 pm

I can’t complain about Mr. Gore – he made me sceptical and brought us Man-Bear-Pig.

September 15, 2010 4:49 pm

You know, if I squint real hard at the “skyfall” graph, I can almost see a hockey stick!

James Bull
September 15, 2010 11:20 pm

Maybe they are using the wrong Al Gore-ithm.

September 17, 2010 8:52 am

James Bull says:
September 15, 2010 at 11:20 pm
Maybe they are using the wrong Al Gore-ithm.

Is that a 4/3 beat?