Some supporting research conducted at New York City follows the news item below. h/t to WUWT reader Phil (not the grouchy one) -A

Heat islands: Cities heat quickly, cool slowly
By DEEPTI HAJELA
Associated Press Writer
NEW YORK (AP) — Hot town, summer in the city? No kidding.
The high temperatures blanketing the Northeast and mid-Atlantic regions of the country are making many people miserable, but those in New York City, Philadelphia and other dense, built-up areas are getting hit with the heat in a way their counterparts in suburbs and rural areas aren’t.
Cities absorb more solar energy during the day and are slower to release it after the sun sets, making for uncomfortable nights and no real relief from the heat. And because they haven’t cooled down as much overnight, mornings are warmer and the thermometer goes right back up when the sun starts beating down the next day.
Scientists have known for years about so-called heat islands, urban areas that are hotter than the less-developed areas around them.
Cities are just “not well designed to release that summertime heat,” said William Solecki, geography professor at Hunter College and director of the City University of New York’s Institute for Sustainable Cities.
The lack of nighttime relief can make the daytime high temperatures even more difficult for people to take as the days pass and the heat continues, he said.
That’s “where you start to have real problems, if your body’s not cooling down,” Solecki said. “You’re not getting that break.”
Deaths blamed on the heat included a 92-year-old Philadelphia woman whose body was found Monday and a homeless woman found lying next to a car Sunday in suburban Detroit.
The heat-islands effect is significant in the East because “we have a large population living in heavily built-up areas with lots of concrete and lots of steel, good absorbers of heat,” National Weather Service spokesman Sean Potter said.
full story here at Tampa Bay Online
=================================================
Here is some supporting research from NASA (not NASA GISS).
Keeping New York City “Cool” is the Job of NASA’s “Heat Seekers”
Jan. 30, 2006
The “heat is on” in New York City, whether it’s summer or winter. This is due to a phenomenon called the urban heat island effect that causes air temperatures in New York City and other major cities to be warmer than in neighboring suburbs and rural areas. And, in a big city, warmer air temperatures can impact air quality, public health and the demand for energy.
Image to right: A thermal satellite image of New York City captured by NASA’s Landsat satellite on August 14, 2002 at 10:30 a.m., shows the locations of the warmest air temperatures as seen in red. The blue indicates areas with cooler air temperatures. Click on image to enlarge. Credit: NASA
Recently, several innovative approaches developed by scientists, public officials, environmental activists, community organizations and others have been put in place to take a bite out of the Big Apple’s temperature problem. NASA researchers, using NASA satellite observations, weather pattern data and computer models, have recently assessed how well those strategies are working. Their study results will be discussed during the 2006 American Meteorological Society’s annual meeting in Atlanta, Ga., Jan. 29 through Feb. 2.
“We need to help public officials find the most successful ways to reduce the heat island effect in New York. With ever-increasing urban populations around the world, the heat island effect will become even more significant in the future,” said Stuart Gaffin, an associate research scientist at Columbia University, New York, and a co-author of the new NASA study. “The summertime impacts are especially intense with the deterioration of air quality, because higher air temperatures increase ozone. That has health effects for everyone. We also run an increased risk of major heat waves and blackouts as the heat island effect raises demand for electricity.”
In cities, the urban heat island effect is caused by the large number of buildings, sidewalks and other non-natural surfaces that limit the amount of land covered with vegetation like grass and trees. Land surfaces with vegetation offer high moisture levels that cool the air when the moisture evaporates from soil and plants.
Image to left: This image indicates case study areas in New York City used in the NASA study, and weather stations. Click on image to enlarge. Credit: NASA
In large cities, land surfaces with vegetation are relatively few and are replaced by non-reflective, water-resistant surfaces such as asphalt, tar and building materials that absorb most of the sun’s radiation. These surfaces hinder the natural cooling that would otherwise take effect with the evaporation of moisture from surfaces with vegetation. The urban heat island occurrence is particularly pronounced during summer heat waves and at night when wind speeds are low and sea breezes are light. During these times, New York City’s air temperatures can rise 7.2 degrees F higher than in surrounding areas.
In the recent project, NASA researchers set out to recommend ways to reduce the urban heat island effect in New York City. They looked at strategies such as promoting light-colored surfaces such as roofs and pavements that reflect sunlight, planting “urban forests” and creating “living roofs” on top of buildings where sturdy vegetation can be planted and thrive. Using a regional climate computer model, the researchers wanted to calculate how these strategies lower the city’s surface and close-to-surface air temperatures and what the consequences of these strategies would be on New York’s energy system, air quality and the health of its residents.
The researchers conducted a city-wide case study over the summer of 2002 to measure changes in air temperatures. They also used six smaller case studies during the same period in places like Lower Manhattan, the Bronx’s Fordham section, Brooklyn’s Crown Heights section and the Maspeth section of Queens. The areas were chosen for the different ways land is used and their nearness to areas with high electrical use. They also had warmer-than-average near-surface air temperatures called “hot spots” and boasted available spaces to test ways to reduce the urban heat island effect.
“We found that vegetation is a powerful cooling mechanism. It appears to be the most effective tool to reduce surface temperatures,” Gaffin said. “Another effective approach is a man-made approach to cooling by making very bright, high albedo, or reflected light, on roof tops. These light-colored surfaces, best made using white coatings, reflect the sun’s light and thereby, its heat. Interestingly, more area is available to create the lighter surfaces than to add vegetation in a city such as New York.”
This project is being conducted by and funded by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA). For more information on the NYSERDA’s Environmental Monitoring, Evaluation, andProtection (EMEP) project, please visit on the Web: http://www.nyserda.org/programs/Environment/EMEP/project/6681_25/6681_25_pwp.asp.
Reference
Rosenzweig, C., W. Solecki, L. Parshall, S. Gaffin, B. Lynn, R. Goldberg, J. Cox, and S. Hodges 2006. Mitigating New York City’s heat island with urban forestry, living roofs, and light surfaces. Presentation at 86th American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting, Jan. 31, 2006, Atlanta, Georgia.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Phil:
Your posts are long, and your explanations are wordy and full of blocks of quotes and marvelous wisdom.
“In addition, observed warming has been, and transient greenhouse-induced warming is expected to be, greater over land than over the oceans (Chapter 10)”
Observed = From which data set?
Transient? Quantify please?
Expected? Quantify please?
Greater? By what gradient for which temperature change from which data set?
Global warming from CO2 from humans can’t CAUSE EVERYTHING and fit EVERY EXPECTATION.
I have YET to read the AGW paper that says “contrary to our expectation, X happened instead of Y.” where X is against the fundamental concept of AGW. NEVER. NOT ONE.
That is a magically conspicuous element of experimenter bias. Large bodies of researchers publishing things honestly ALWAYS produce research that is decidedly inconclusive, disproves the original hypothesis or validates an alternate viewpoint, and an honest scientist does well by himself to point it out. 100’s of papers that say “this is in-line with expectation but requires more research” is n-rays.
Unfalsifiable hypothesis is unfalsifiable
Bad news…truth will prevail:
y=sin x
♫♫♫
What goes up must come down
spinning wheel got to go round
Talking about your troubles it’s a crying sin
Ride a painted pony
Let the spinning wheel spin …………….♫♫♫
Theo Goodwin said @ur momisugly July 8, 2010 at 11:23 am:
“Have we heard from Phil Jones on this? Has he called in to explain that, according to his gold plated research, there is no significant urban heat island effect? I just cannot wait to read or hear what he has to say.”
David Parker already said it in Journal of Climate:
“Parker 2006:
The main impact of any urban warming is expected to be on Tmin on calm nights (Johnson et al. 1991). However, for 1950-2000, the trends of global annual average Tmin for windy, calm, and all conditions were virtually identical at 0.20°C – 0.06°C decade^{-1} (Fig. 4a,b and Table 1).”
No room for UHI in CAGW…
Climate: The weather in some location averaged over a long period of time.
The question is: how long a time? I suggest at least a thousand years. The whole problem of CAGW has arisen because of the short term memories of humans.
that temp is a normal summers day in sydney, we would be all down at the beach or at the local pub all having a good time . at the moment it is real cold down under . bring on summer
Well at least they are finally talking of something real in this article.
Have you ever wondered what effect the common mirror finished buildings with special IR reflecting coatings is doing to the cities. These coated and mirrored finishes are great to keep nearly all heat out of the buildings and lower their A/C bills but all of that heat does go somewhere.
If the buildings were matte white at lest a large portion of the reflected heat would go upward back to space but these mirror buildings reflect it nearly 100% downward to the streets below. That is probably the biggest factor of why UHI keeps increasing as building after building add these new finishes in the name of efficiency.
You can have it both ways, physics won’t allow it.
Buffoon says:
July 8, 2010 at 12:14 pm
Well said.
On a related point, it’s also noticeable how the “errors” which have been admitted (melting Himalayas, dying Amazon, flooding Netherlands) have always erred on the hysterical side.
Another sign, if one is required, that the IPCC process is institutionally biased to big up CAGW.
“We found that vegetation is a powerful cooling mechanism.”
Well worth the price of the study, no doubt. Cities are great for commerce, life, not so much.
To follow Leon’s “weather is not climate”, here in Central MN, we’ve had a 90 degree day or two in 15 months. After what duration may we start talking ‘climate’ anyway?
The strange thing about AGW is that it affects cities first.
Oh, another one:
If we want to know how the world will look like in the year 2100, we only need to look at New York today.
While over in Australia:
Western Australia’s big chill is continuing with Perth marking a record-breaking 12 consecutive nights of temperatures below 5C, according to the WA Bureau of Meteorology.
Temperatures dipped to a wintry 0.3C in the city overnight, with Jandakot recording a freezing minus -1.4C at 5.22am.
The bureau says it is the longest cold snap on record, beating a July 1997 stretch of nine straight nights of 5C or below.
Perth Zoo pampers animals with hot rocks, sun lamps and heated enclosures
…….
WA is currently experiencing the third driest winter on record, while Antarctica has record snow.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2548850/posts
I do a bus transfer each day in downtown Dallas. There are a lot of glassy buildings here, and those window-walls reflect light and heat into the streets. Shading the rooftops with vegetation isn’t going to help people on the streets. How can they get the walls to reflect the light up and out?
Maybe NASA should remember the Apollo mission, when they deployed the reflectors that sent laser light back to the ground stations no matter what angle they came from. Seems to me such surfaces would send the radiation back up at the sun at any hour of the day.
On the other hand, I bet those yankees like that extra warmth in the winter…
DirkH says:
“If we want to know how the world will look like in the year 2100, we only need to look at New York today.”
… if we don’t act NOW! (sorry, forgot that bit.)
Correction to wayne says: July 8, 2010 at 12:26 pm :
You can’t have it both ways, physics won’t allow it.
jorgekafkazar says:
July 8, 2010 at 10:50 am
“It’s July 8th. Yesterday, we turned on the furnace again. I’m wearing my fleece-lined jacket when I go out. Where is all this Global Warming when we need it? It’s a travesty…”
All of the global warming is in New York, Philly, and Baltimore right now. (Oh, wait up… that’s not global.)
It is refreshing to see UHI discussed by the MSM. (Oh, wait up… 1 article isn’t “global” either. Sigh…)
vigilantfish says:
July 8, 2010 at 10:02 am
Wow Anthony – your message has got across. Instead of global warming warnings, journalists are acknowledging and explaining the urban heat island effect.
VILLABOLO:
URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT?
SO THAT’S WHY THE “HEAVILY URBANIZED” ARCTIC SEA ICE CAP WAS 4-9F ABOVE AVERAGE!
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2010/060810.html
Hellooooo! I live in Los Angeles where, in the past, we’ve had record breaking temps of 122F in my neck of the woods. It’s 64F right now. From what I last noticed, in my almost 40 years of living here, this is the prince(ss) of Urban Centers. So where is my Heat Island Effect?
And before I’m told some nonsense about variability which is true in general, but absolutely irrelevant in this specific issue, why don’t we simply see the forest for the trees?
Having accused us of ignoring “coolness”, an absolute falsehood since all regions, cooler or warmer, are automatically incorporated in GLOBAL AVERAGES, what about your failure to acknowledge the heat waves throughout Asia? And before you insult my intelligence and ramble about Australia ad nauseum, why don’t you go back to square one and realize what GLOBAL AVERAGES are intended to measure?
This January through June has been a record setting period according to those satellites. That is the GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE versus the egocentric and infantile “It’s snowing in my backyard! It must be the same throughout the planet!”
Have you gathered data together for an assessment of average temperatures throughout the GLOBE? It’s already done for you by those very satellite images that are on NASA’s web site. You know, like the ones that are posted on this thread?
And please don’t tell me about how inauthentic you believe NASA’s data is. Other than mere paranoia, why should one believe that they are legitimate or illegitimate at the convenience of the person using it?
Bottom line, this January through June has been a record setting period according to those satellites.
It’s more than an albedo problem and more than a lack of evaporative cooling by vegetation problem. The air is stagnant, there’s a million vehicles with hot motors and exhaust pipes pouring out heat and another million air conditioners also pouring out hot air. All of it trapped close to the surface by multi-story buildings. Even CO2 is elevated in a densely populated city as all the vehicles and millions of large mammals inhale oxygen and exhale CO2.
The only way to get an honest temperature reading absent land use influences is to place the thermometers well inside land that has not been altered by human activity.
So one needs a retractable white roof. You roll it out during the summer, and reel it in for the rest of the year, leaving the regular darker roof to absorb sunlight when it’s cooler
The foks who adapt are the ones that survive.
DirkH writes:
“If cities heat quickly and cool slowly they are predestined to be used as solarthermal power plants.”
No, they would be used as “hot water bottles,” you know, in bed. The causes of UHI are many and complex, but there is a simple model that might help explain matters. Take an old city such as Baltimore or St. Louis. They have a high number of row-houses built between, say, 1870 and 1940. When they were built, those row houses might have cooled reasonably at night. But now they are loaded down with air conditioners, dryers, and a bazillion more modern appliances. They are surrounded by asphalt, usually black stuff. So, they produce a lot more heat than they were designed to produce. But the air moving among them is probably less than what it was in 1940. The main mechanism of cooling for those old neighborhoods, moving air, simply cannot perform the task that it once performed. So, temperatures are higher at night and stay high longer. Yet it has nothing to do with global warming.
“This January through June has been a record setting period according to those satellites. That is the GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE”
That is also a very short-term perspective, i.e., not climate, comprende?
In Breckenridge, CO, the transition from asphalt and concrete to forest is abrupt. I notice the temperature drop almost instantly as I walk on pavement in town amongst condos and hotels onto a trail leading into the forest, then on my return I feel the warming as I step back onto asphalt from dirt. So the effects of UHI are very obvious even in the tiny town of Breckenridge, although with cool and wet weather almost every day here there isn’t much “heat” for the “island”.
Wow! Just. Wow!
That landsat picture is a fantastic tie-in to the earlier story about record temperatures at BWI.
Why?
Well do you see that dark red blob in the lower right. Above and to the right of the nice blue, cool, islands of Jamaica Bay. That blob is JFK airport.
I’m expecting a huge inner city Homo Sapiens dieback anytime now.
A quantum physicist might disagree with that.
@Nuke
The “models” don’t compensate for UHI. They claim there is no significant influence on the outcome due to it. The official story from our good buddy and paragon of scientific integrity Phil Jones at East Anglia Urbanization effects in large-scale temperature records, with an emphasis on China is that “these UHIs however do not contribute to warming trends over the 20th century because the influences of the cities on surface temperatures have not changed over this time”.
Really, Phil? The number of automobiles and air conditioners and cement structures didn’t change between the years 1900 and 1999? Ooooooooooookay. I’ll believe that. NOT!