A group called http://www.coolemotion.org/ got funding from WWF to build a giant sculpture on an iceberg. As of May 6th the iceberg was still trapped in pack ice;
http://coolemotion.blogspot.com/2010/05/iceberg-still-stuck.html

But now they claim that the iceberg sunk/melted after just a few weeks:
http://coolemotion.blogspot.com/2010/06/no-iceberg-anymore-comments-of-ap-1.html
Iceberg disappeared, GPS signals from Satut. What happened?
“In the very early morning, 2nd of June, we could see at our GPS tracker that something was going on. Later we noticed that our signal moved constantly to the South East faster than the iceberg ever moved , and then suddenly moved to the North into the settlement of Satut.”
You have to read this below to really experience the cool-E-motion of it all:
The iceberg sunk………. Can you believe that an iceberg like this one disappears in only a matter of weeks? Last week I interviewed my very good friend Ole Jorgen Hammeken, standing in the sun, sweating because of the heat, while normally they can go for dogsledding untill [sic] June. It raises some questions… The whole day and night you can hear icebergs exploding, or collapsing because of this heat. What is going on? I am an artist who travelled [sic] many times through the Arctic and every year it becomes warmer and warmer. I am not a scientist, but only listen to the stories that people tell me. I am not interested in the question: Who’s guilty at this situation? Is there global warming? Not at all, I am asking the question: What if Climate Change enters my world: Can we anticipate on these fast changes? In Uummannaq the extremes started only a couple of years ago, and now it is warmer as ever before, with all consequences. I am personally convinced that we soon will experience what is happening over there, even if we only feel the tail. We need all energy and focuss [sic] on the future. My question is: How can we create a more flexible society? Climate Change is from all times, people always adapted to these changes, but are we now capable to cope with these extreme changes? We have to stop naming, blaming and shaming, and put this energy in another direction.
“What is going on?” he asks. Gosh, exploding icebergs! Gaia must be really angry right now. Since we are talking about “art” here, let’s venture back to artists of the past that traversed the Arctic, like this one.
From the website: In Search of Icebergs: Tracing the 1859 expedition of the painter Frederic Edwin Church to Newfoundland and Labrador
An excerpt from the link above, reading from the book:
Reading from the book: After Icebergs with a Painter: A Summer Voyage to Labrador and Around Newfoundland, 1861, by Louis Legrand Noble
Warnings passed down through local lore flowed with stories of exploding and capsizing icebergs. The author registers a sigh of relief each time the captain signals the return to a sheltered cove. On one occasion, the two companions enjoyed the sounds and sights of a collapsing berg from a safe distance. The painter, known throughout the book merely as C—, contributed a sketch of this astonishing event to Noble’s book.
Huh, exploding and capsizing icebergs in 1859. Whooda thunk?
Some in the press are eating this “iceberg sculpture cum Titanic disaster” up:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/north/story/2010/06/08/iceberg-sculptures-sink.html?ref=rss
What’s really funny is the pic of the sculpture, iceberg and boaters for reference in this article: http://www.adn.com/2010/06/08/1313027/global-warming-sinks-dutch-artists.html

The iceberg looks to extend about 3.5 meters above the waterline. According to DMI, Arctic temps have been trending below average and are still mighty cold;

Thus it seems likely the sculpture probably slid off the iceberg when it tipped/flipped something like this:
or this
or this
Mega hat tip to WUWT reader “Just the Facts”, who gathered most of the content and links and placed them in comments.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



Mommy! Fishermen stole my GPS and now my iceberg is LOST!!!
WWF doorstep beggar just rang my bell, as soon as he introduced himself I couldn’t help but laugh out loud. I quickly tried to recover from what must have appeared to be a somewhat rude reaction, by politely saying “no thank you”. He asked if I would mind telling him why I wasn’t interested….. As soon as I said that I’ve seen how they spend the money on iceberg scupltures, his face dropped, as though this was becoming a bit of a recurring theme that he could do without. Aawww, I almost felt sorry for him.
“Polar science diary”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/science_and_environment/10273566.stm
“Science writer and broadcaster Sue Nelson is at the world’s largest polar science conference, which is taking place in Oslo, Norway from 8-12 June. Experts have gathered to discuss everything polar – from penguins and sea ice to permafrost and Inuit communities.”
When I was at Cape Hallett (Antarctica) in 1987 we were travelling on sea ice everyday and went past many icebergs that had been trapped at the entrance to the inlet by the winter ice. These were icebergs that had calved off from glaciers and were about 30 to 40 metres high so had about 180m + metres under the sea. In late November as the sea ice starting to melt around the bergs one of the bergs split and the bulbous bottom rotated up breaking though some 3 m of sea ice. What appears to happen is that wave action erodes the berg above sea level (like waves eroding a cliff face) creating a bigger and bigger bulge below the sea level. Eventually the upward forces on the bulge exploit any crack or weakness in the berg to break it up and allow the bulge to float.
Could be something like this happened here.
Rick K says: June 11, 2010 at 4:43 am
The very first photo in this article looks… too perfect.
You’re right by golly. A close-up reveals what appears to be photoshopping!
Merovign says:
June 11, 2010 at 12:29 am
What is the opposite of Occam’s Razor?
The “Precautionary Principle” I should think…But “post-normal science” aka, “just making stuff up for effect” works as well.
…standing in the sun, sweating because of the heat, while normally they can go for dogsledding untill [sic] June.
Artists’ impressions have always been so helpful to science! 🙂
Could be the conning tower of a sub. Covered with Dark Ice.
To-
Przemysław Pawełczyk —
Perhaps you might want to share any
information you have on
the mysterious “powerful ice stream”
mentioned in this article?
http://english.ruvr.ru/2010/06/10/9558839.html
Does not seem very likely. Coming from acrtic land myself I know how long ice takes to melt. And a huge chunk of ice like this would take months even under summery conditions on continental Europe. Remember that what you see is 10% of the real size. I don’t think that temperature is not in the 20C despite the “standing in the sun, sweating because of the heat”. That has to be a “theatrical” exaggeration. I guess they experienced 10-15 dgrC, which by all means is “hoy” in that part of the world. The water temperature would be at 4-6 dgrC. 10% above water and 90% below, estimate a mass and it is just a matter of calculation to realize what energy it takes to melt the ice. Trust me, that piece of ice is not close by a mile to melt “in a matter of weeks”. Games are played and lies served to create attention.
What a dumb project anyway…
Perhaps the ice is melting because of Al Gores’ 2,000,000°C heat two kilometres below the ocean.
Magnify the picture of the sculpture to 400% and you’ll see the pixels (or texture) around the sculpture differs from the actual iceberg.
My conclusion is that we are being had, by clever young artists. They never actually lugged the sculpture to the frozen north and left it there. Nor did they track it with a GPS. That is much too much like Real Work.
I was a young artist once, and remember the lengths we would go to avoid getting a Real Job. The theory was that Real Work would stunt the development of our artistic talent. The very idea that people expected us to pay our bills showed how insensitive they were, and how they crushed our tender sensitivity. Therefore such cruel people were a sort of repressive Gestapo, simply because they asked us to work a Real Job and pay our bills. There was only one way to deal with such a cruel Gestapo, and that was to sneak around being dishonest, in our efforts to avoid getting a Real Job, for this proved we were a noble “underground.”
The problem was that we artists gradually morphed into being con-artists. It was hilarious and good fun at first, involving ridiculous escapades, and all sorts of silly teas with wealthy old ladies, however the sheer dishonesty eventually disgusted the more honest youths, and they gave up on so-called art and became productive members of society. Others used their developed skills of deceit to join Mad Ave, and write advertisements, such as the ones that promote “nutritious” chocolate sugar-bomb cereal, rotting the teeth of innocent children. Very few stuck with their art, even though it never paid.
Real art is based on and about Truth, while a con-artist is the opposite.
In the same way real science is based on the Truth. I fear many forms of “climate Science” are the opposite.
That’s the tenth BSometer I’ve broken this year!
Cheers Anthony!
/sarc
DaveE.
HELPFUL TIP – When reading this scare story it is best to sing, hum or if at work play in your head the Jaws music.
/End public service