Livetooning the ICCC

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

Well, I’m at the International Conference on Climate Change in Chicago, where I’m one of the speakers. Since I’m a cartoonist, rather than liveblogging the conferenceI figured I’d livetoon it instead … these are my summaries of the main points that each scientist made in their presentation:

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
52 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
May 17, 2010 5:54 pm

“Boats out looking for the oil slick report that it’s mostly clear water between distant occurrences of oil. What ever happened to common sense?”
Sounds a lot like what happened with the Icelandic volcano. Airports shut down based on the theory that maybe there was a possibility that engines could be damaged. The system is skewed in favor of such over-reacting too cautiously. No one ever gets fired for shutting down unnecessarily, but if you fail to DO SOMETHING and Something Bad happens, it’s your fault.

Lady in Red
May 17, 2010 6:00 pm

These cartoons need to be reproduced and sold…. postcards, a box of writing cards, posters… dunno. But the collection would be a wonderful remembrance of the affair for attendees — and those who did not make it…
To raise funds for …?
….Anthony’s tip jar? dunno. ….Lady in Red
PS: You could do a new set each year, so they become a series.

Editor
May 17, 2010 6:01 pm

Willis Eschenbach says:
May 17, 2010 at 5:43 pm
Lots of interesting folks, it is a privilege to be here. For me, I feel like a starry-eyed kid at a rock star convention, I’ve gotten to meet a lot of folks who are my scientific heroes.
Me too – I reminded myself several times on the way to not act like some fool starry-eyed kid, and I think think I’ve done a good job of not hanging on to anyone. (It helps that there are so many people to hang onto.) I’m 59, so just being able to shake hands with the only geologist who has walked on the Moon is a remarkable privilege. Bill Gray too – I’ve read his hurricane predictions (and flops) for wow, something like 20 years, the next one is due I think on June 4, I’ve learned a huge amount from them. My first web page (click above) after deciding to become active in this sorry field was inspired in part by a Bob Carter talk I saw on the web, it was nice to be able to thank him in person. And Lord Monckton, E.M. Smith, and Anthony, but I haven’t found Willis yet.

CRS, Dr.P.H.
May 17, 2010 6:07 pm

Well done, Willis! I think Anthony owes you a nice steak dinner from Gene & Georgetti’s!

R. de Haan
May 17, 2010 6:29 pm

Just for the record, the UN has a new climate change chief replacing Mr. de Boer.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10119753.stm

maz2
May 17, 2010 6:35 pm

Al Gore’s AGW: It’s not funny.
…-
“Cold, rainy weather coming to Bay Area”
“Expect a quarter-inch of rain throughout the day as late-season showers and cold weather hit the Bay Area. Temperatures will drop to the mid-50s, said Ryan Wallbrun, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service.
By Tuesday, rain is expected to let up and it will be dry but cold till Wednesday, when another storm front is predicted to move through the Bay Area. Rain is expected in the North Bay, with possible showers to the south, Wallbrun said.
Thursday and Friday will be “quite cool” for this time of the year, with temperatures in the 50s and high, strong winds, he said.”
http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/Cold-rainy-weather-coming-to-Bay-Area-93909879.html

DoctorJJ
May 17, 2010 6:50 pm

How about “showed that the NWS and USHCN and NOAA and CRU and GHCN were basically… FOS”

mack28
May 17, 2010 6:50 pm

Meantime, when you’ve finished cheering, take a look at the Met Office’s latest computer modelling clanger:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1279221/The-ash-cloud-Inaccurate-Met-Office-forecast-causes-airport-chaos-50-000.html

Tom Bakewell
May 17, 2010 7:02 pm

Wahoo! try taking a turn in the pfun seat RC and others. Oops, some stiff egos can’t take even the mildest of critisisms, real or just perceived.

Bill Parsons
May 17, 2010 7:16 pm

If these are “most-wanted” playing cards for the enemy, you have too many face cards.
Nice.

May 17, 2010 7:35 pm

Willis, thanks for sharing your talents yet again. Wish I could be there too. I’d be starry-eyed if I had a chance to meet you and the other anti-hysteria heroes.

Almost Anonymous
May 17, 2010 8:14 pm

Does anyone have video of the talks that already happened? The PJTV link only has live stream.

Almost Anonymous
May 17, 2010 8:29 pm
Fred
May 17, 2010 8:45 pm

Wow! you guys are really, really nerdy… you should keep this kind of posts to a nerd-only mailing list. You’re scaring off the regular folks.

AnonyMoose
May 17, 2010 8:46 pm

Is Sharp suggesting going after sardines with a harpoon gun? I think there are problems with that. Or is he hunting refugee populations with it? There are different problems with that.

May 17, 2010 8:48 pm

Willis Eschenbach says:
Mike McMillan says: “Using your proxy evidence and applying principal component analysis, I find for PC 1 that everyone but Gary Sharp wore ties . . . ”
Yeah, Gary wore a great orange patterned shirt.

I think there’s a sobering lesson here for all of us.
We have long excoriated Dr Mann for using PCA on the Graybill tree-ring data to make the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age disappear in his “Hockey Stick” graph.
Yet here we have seen demonstrated that with conscious intent and no collusion between Willis and me, PCA may tease an orange shirt from a black and white line sketch.
Despite the ice-entombed Viking farms of Greenland, Brueghel’s frozen landscapes of temperate Holland, and megabytes of embarrassing emails, how can we continue to doubt Dr Mann and his methods?
I shall email an apology immediately.

anna v
May 17, 2010 8:56 pm

Thanks Willis.
It gives us a feeling for the fun you are all having.
BTW are you sure you are not a reincarnation of da Vinci 🙂
A real renaissance man.

Annabelle
May 17, 2010 10:03 pm

Renaissance man indeed. Is there anything Willis can’t do? Lucia tells us he also plays the piano rather well.
Great cartoons. Looking forward to more of them.

John Hooper
May 18, 2010 12:55 am

I found these cards somewhat alienating and not at all endearing. I wouldn’t expect to recruit any new followers through these tactics, nor take away any marketable points.

Zeke the Sneak
May 18, 2010 1:39 am

Sen. Harrison Schmidt, “Constitutional Restraints on Regulation Related to Climate and Energy” video, here!
http://www.globalwarmingheartland.org/
Kind of quiet out there for the mainstream meeja coverage!
That’s alright, they didn’t say a word about the leaked emails for weeks, either. 🙂

Editor
May 18, 2010 2:57 am

John Hooper says:
May 18, 2010 at 12:55 am
“I found these cards somewhat alienating and not at all endearing. I wouldn’t expect to recruit any new followers through these tactics, nor take away any marketable points.”
And we have a WINNER for first alarmist attempting a lame FUD post.

Tim Clark
May 18, 2010 5:55 am

John Hooper says: May 18, 2010 at 12:55 am
I found these cards somewhat alienating and not at all endearing. I wouldn’t expect to recruit any new followers through these tactics, nor take away any marketable points.

The success of WUWT in confronting alarmist AGW propaganda is unrelated to fluffy photo ops and psuedoscience journalism. It is essentially an award winning Science blog. If people can’t discern that, they are probably incapable of comprehending the discussion and are doubtless programmed to reject the science refuting CAGW.

Atomic Hairdryer
May 18, 2010 6:44 am

re: John Hooper says:
May 18, 2010 at 12:55 am
I found these cards somewhat alienating and not at all endearing. I wouldn’t expect to recruit any new followers through these tactics, nor take away any marketable points.

I don’t know, I think they’d make great t-shirts. Nicely done Willis!

1DandyTroll
May 18, 2010 8:45 am

@Willis Eschenbach
‘any revolution that you can’t laugh at’
is a kin to religion, if not religion itself.
In religion you are only allowed to laugh at hinduism, buddhism, and proper christianity. In politics you can laugh at pretty much everything except socialism and its extreme derivatives.
In science you can laugh at everything except apparently sociology and climatology.