Taiwan sinking: Subsidence or Global Warming Induced Sea Level Rise?

This news story about Taiwan has been making the rounds with the usual alarming news outlets. My view is clearly on subsidence, caused by poor land use practice. See below the Continue Reading line for the easily found reasons.

Rising sea levels threaten Taiwan
File picture of rescuers searching for residents trapped by the rising flood waters sparked by typhoon Morakot in Pingtung, southern Taiwan last year

Excerpts: from AFP via Yahoo News

Rising sea levels threaten Taiwan

TUNGSHIH, Taiwan (AFP) – When worshippers built a temple for the goddess Matsu in south Taiwan 300 years ago, they chose a spot they thought would be at a safe remove from the ocean. They did not count on global warming.

Now, as the island faces rising sea levels, the Tungshih township is forced to set up a new temple nearby, elevated by three metres (10 feet) compared with the original site.

“Right now, the temple is flooded pretty much every year,” said Tsai Chu-wu, the temple’s chief secretary, explaining why the 63-million-dollar project is necessary.

“Once the new temple is completed, we should be able to avoid floods and the threat of the rising sea, at least for many, many years,” he said.

The temple of Matsu, ironically often described as the Goddess of the Sea, is only one example of how global warming is slowly, almost imperceptibly piling pressure on Taiwan.

And unlike the temple, none of these crucial economic establishments can possibly be lifted, leaving them exposed to the elements.

“If the sea levels keep rising, part of Taiwan’s low-lying western part could be submerged,” said Wang Chung-ho, an earth scientist at Taiwan’s top academic body Academia Sinica.

Still, environmentalists consider the risk too high to ignore, and they point out that it is compounded by the overpumping of groundwater both for traditional agriculture and for fish farming.

This has caused the groundwater level to fall and land to subside below sea level in some coastal areas, experts warn.

The greatest extent of seawater encroachment has been estimated to be as far as 8.5 kilometres inland with an affected area of about 104 square kilometres (40 square miles) in southern Taiwan’s Pingtung county, according to a study co-written by Wang.

Once low-lying areas are routinely invaded by sea water, it is very hard to turn back the tide, analysts warned.

In its 2007 assessment report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of the United Nations said that due to the global warming, the world’s sea level is projected to rise by up to 0.59 metres before the end of this century.

However, Wang was more pessimistic, citing recent findings that greenhouse gas emissions are growing faster than previously believed.

Read the rest of the story here: AFP via Yahoo News

===================================

And where is Pingtung County in Taiwain?

Taiwan ROC political division map Pingtung  County.svg

But that is not where the Matsu temple that is the focus of the story is, it is a misdirection. Read on.

Now consider this news story about a hi-speed rail system in Taiwan from China Daily that says:

Safety concerns were raised after according to the Taiwan High-Speed Rail Corp. (THSRC) figures revealed that at its worst, the land at one site along the stretch in Yunlin County has sunk 55 centimeters over the past seven years.

Over-pumping of underground water for irrigation has been blamed for the subsidence, and the Water Resources Agency (WRA) has identified 1,115 wells in the area that need to be sealed to stop the sinking.

Seems pretty clear that subsidence is happening quickly in that county. Here’s a paper studying the Yuanlin area, Changhua County. PDF here. Note the mention of Yunlin County, save that for later.

Using Radar Interferometry to Observe Land Subsidence in Yuanlin area, Changhua County, Taiwan

Abstract: The behavior of land subsidence in Yuanlin area, Changhua County, Taiwan has been monitored by the two-pass method of Differential Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (DInSAR) during the period from 1995 to 2002. Our interferometric result has shown that the subsidence behavior is unusual right before and after the Chi-Chi earthquake. Two-month before the earthquake, the pre-seismic differential interferogram detects a substantial increase in land subsidence with a prominent U-shaped pattern of groundwater level change. Two days after the devastating earthquake, our one-month image-pair shows a five-fold increase in land subsidence and an apparent shift of subsidence center. In this study, we suggest mechanisms that contribute to land subsidence in pre-seismic, co-seismic and post-seismic. We tend to believe that the circular/elongated pattern shown in our interferograms are caused by a point-source deformation. Besides, strain also plays a very important role in accelerating land subsidence shown in the post-seismic differential interferogram. It causes a very sudden, step-like surge in groundwater. The shaking of the earthquake as well as the increase of groundwater trigger the occurrence of soil liquefaction, in return, accelerating land subsidence. We propose there are two center of land subsidence right after the Chi-Chi earthquake though only one subsidence center can be observed in our differential interferogram.

Here’s what the Taipei Times shows happening as a result of land subsidence:

Land subsidence causes damage to a house in Tungan village, Kaohsiung County. PHOTO: HSU PAI-YING, TAIPEI TIMES

Here’s an interesting passage from the Geography Department at NTU titled The Hazards of Taiwan:

The fish-farming industry in western and northeastern Taiwan requires several times more ground water than is needed for irrigation. This kind of over-pumping of ground water results in serious land subsidence or sinking in the coastal areas. According to a recent survey, an area of up to 1,097 square kilometers suffers from subsidence: this is 3% of the island’s total land area and 9% of its flat area. This problem obviously needs an immediate and effective solution.

So even though there is plentiful evidence that local land use abuse resulting in subsidence is the primary cause of seawater incursions, the reporter, Benjamin Yeh, chooses instead to make “global warming” the primary culprit.

His paragraph says it all:

The temple of Matsu, ironically often described as the Goddess of the Sea, is only one example of how global warming is slowly, almost imperceptibly piling pressure on Taiwan.

Religion and global warming, a match made in heaven.

From this Taiwan Government Report on Water Resources we find this paragraph, red emphasis mine:

Land Subsidence

Lured by profits, many farmers in the coastal areas of Yunlin, Changhua, Pingtung, Chiayi, and Ilan have expanded into aquaculture. Aquaculturalists have dug 170,000 illegal wells and pumped excessive amounts of groundwater, because it is cheap and stable in temperature. In addition to being used in aquaculture, groundwater is also pumped for industrial, residential, and standard agricultural uses. Recent data shows that while 5.94 billion cubic meters of groundwater is being pumped annually, only four billion cubic meters is being replaced. This deficit has caused land in many areas to subside, especially along the southwestern coast and on the Ilan Plain. Overall, almost 865 square kilometers of Taiwan’s plains, or a full 8 percent, tend to subside. The most serious subsidence has occurred around Chiatung in Pingtung County, where sites have sunk by as much as 3.06 meters. The average rate of subsidence in the coastal areas is between five and 15 centimeters each year.

The Temple of Matsu is in Yunlin County which is located on this map:

Taiwan ROC political division map Yunlin  County.svg

Another study on groundwater and subsidence from the Department of Geomatics, National Cheng Kung University says:

For example, the overall amount of subsidence in Yunlin area in the past 30 years reaches about 2 meters, and the total affected area of subsidence is about 516 km2. Land subsidence has increased the vulnerability in this area, and a large portion of which lies below the mean sea level.

When badly flawed articles like this one from AFP’s Benjamin Yeh appear, blaming global warming for flooding clearly caused by land subsidence as a result of poor land use practice, we need to complain loudly to editors.

http://www.afp.com/afpcom/en/contact

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

82 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
May 11, 2010 3:50 am

I blame the whales for sea-level rise.
Well, more particularly, the world-wide whaling bans, that have caused our Cetacean friends to breed like, well, terrestrial rabbits.
How many whales can displace metres of sea-water? Every time one of the jolly grey giants sounds, the sea-level goes up!
Bring back whaling, and the sea-levels will return to normal.
QED.

Mike H
May 11, 2010 6:18 am

AP has a long history of publishing articles that have scary global warming headlines and opening paragraph commentary followed by more details that begin to erode their initial scary position. Until, if you read right to the end, you find that the entire headline is undermined completely and utterly rendered fallacious by the content of the body of the article itself. It has been going on for so long now that my level of frustration has pushed me almost to the point where I would create a website just to debunk each one of these pathetic articles as soon as they appear. The manner in which the headlines are in dramatic dissonance with the content of the article body makes you wonder if the editorial team is heavily biased or doing the bidding of their owners. Or is the reporters on the ground that are being asked to send up material that fits the meme. Either way, it’s awful reporting and it makes AP look like a tool of the some nefarious program. Conspiracy theories begin to look plausible when you read their agitprop that has been ongoing and relentless for years now. For anyone who has “1984”, AP looks like a piece of the grand order of things. Especially when they don’t address these articles with any kind of correction or retraction.

Mike H
May 11, 2010 6:36 am

For what it’s worth, I sent an email to Academia Sinica as follows:
Hello Wang Chung-ho,
I am doing some background research for an article that I may publish that discusses the land subsidence problem affecting some areas of coastal Taiwan. I would like to ask you some questions about this AFP article.
In that article you are quoted as saying: “If the sea levels keep rising, part of Taiwan’s low-lying western part could be submerged,” said Wang Chung-ho, an earth scientist at Taiwan’s top academic body Academia Sinica.”
I find it interesting that you mentioned that sea levels were rising when in fact various studies have been carried out and it is also widely known that the reason for coastal flooding in specific areas of Taiwan is the excessive pumping of ground water.
Did you in fact state to AFP that “sea levels keep rising”? Would you like to clarify your position on this matter? Do you believe that you were misquoted or that your comments were taken out of context?
Also, were you personally interviewed by Benjamin Yeh from AFP? If not, which AFP reporter did interview you? Were you provided with a transcript of any interview that you had with AFP and would you be willing to share it with me?
I would appreciate any comments that you may wish to make and thank you for your time and assistance.
Mike H

May 11, 2010 8:01 am

I worked in Baytown TX for several periods between 1974 and 1978. (Near Houston, right on the coast and bayous in the refinery districts.)
We had lost several entire neighborhoods (and the San Jacinto monument and battleship Texas mooring site) to ground subsidence of between 2 ft and 4 ft (30-48 inches) due to ground water pumping for drinking water and refinery cooling water. (Some oil pumping too, but not much compared to the ground water loss.)
They changed the practice, ground water pool built back up, and “apparent” sea waters levels dropped back to normal.
The worldwide 2-3 mm change in sea water level could just as well be blamed on micrometeroid impacts as global warming, since a “global warming” change of 1/2 of one degree over the entire height of the sea levels CANNOT be used to calculate the water expansion differential.
(The sea temperature below 700 feet hasn’t changed measureably (that’s part of the “missing heat” the AGW alarmists can’t “find” in the pipeline), and the upper sea temps have NOT changed by the (mis-calculated and corrupted (er, “adjusted”) GISS change of 1/2 of one degree in air temps.
The few glaciers that have actually melted worldwide do not have enough volume to change ocean level. Total Antarctic ice is above average, and Arctic Ice changes do NOT change sea level – not that there has been Arctic Ice changes either, since this year Arctic ice is back at its normal levels) ….
So, this AGW alarmist must explain why Taiwan’s ocean has a three meter ocean “bubble” centered right on the island’s epicenter.

R. Craigen
May 11, 2010 1:36 pm

The elevation of Tungshih is 1076 feet, according to this source I imagine even a catastrophic meltdown of every cm^3 of ice in the world would not submerge the township under the China sea.

Montjoie
May 11, 2010 3:04 pm

How does global warming make the ocean rise on only one side of one island in the whole world? Amazing.

Mike H
May 19, 2010 7:29 am

Well, I received an email response from Mr Chung-Ho Wang as follows:
Dear Mr. :
Your questions was forwarded to me, I just came back from a field trip.
I was interviewed by a reporter of AFP (Mr. Noah Buchan) a few months ago regarding issues of climate change and Taiwan environmental problems, but not personally interviewed by Benjamin Yeh.
The PowerPoint file I shared with Mr. Buchan is attached for your reference. I apologize that the contents are mainly presented in Chinese.
Best regards,
Chung-Ho Wang
Of course, Mr Wang did not answer my most important questions but I will continue the correspondence and see how far I (don’t) get.