Micro satellite to study atmospheric gamma ray flashes

From NASA Science News: Firefly Mission to Study Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes

High-energy bursts of gamma rays typically occur far out in space, perhaps near black holes or other high-energy cosmic phenomena. So imagine scientists’ surprise in the mid-1990s when they found these powerful gamma ray flashes happening right here on Earth, in the skies overhead.

They’re called Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes, or TGFs, and very little is known about them. They seem to have a connection with lightning, but TGFs themselves are something entirely different.

Right: An artist’s concept of TGFs. Credit: NASA/Robert Kilgore [more]

“In fact,” says Doug Rowland of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, “before the 1990s nobody knew they even existed. And yet they’re the most potent natural particle accelerators on Earth.”

Individual particles in a TGF acquire a huge amount of energy, sometimes in excess of 20 mega-electron volts (MeV). In contrast, the colorful auroras that light up the skies at high latitudes are powered by particles with less than one thousandth as much energy.

At this stage, there are more questions about TGFs than answers. What causes these high-energy flashes? Do they help trigger lightning–or does lightning trigger them? Could they be responsible for some of the high-energy particles in the Van Allen radiation belts, which can damage satellites?

To investigate, Rowland and his colleagues at GSFC, Siena College, Universities Space Research Association, and the Hawk Institute for Space Sciences are planning to launch a tiny, football-sized satellite called Firefly in 2010 or 2011. Because of its small size, Firefly will cost less than $1 million — about 100 times cheaper than what satellite missions normally cost. Part of the cost savings comes from launching Firefly under the National Science Foundation’s CubeSat program, which launches small satellites as “stowaways” aboard rockets carrying larger satellites into space, rather than requiring dedicated rocket launches.

Below: An artist’s concept of Firefly on the lookout for TGFs above a thunderstorm. Firefly will make simultaneous measurements of energetic electrons, gamma rays, and the radio and optical signatures of the lightning discharge. [more]

see caption

If successful, Firefly will return the first simultaneous measurements of TGFs and lightning. Most of what’s known about TGFs to date has been learned from missions meant to observe gamma rays coming from deep space, such as NASA’s Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, which discovered TGFs in 1994. As it stared out into space, Compton caught fleeting glimpses of gamma rays out of the corner of its eye, so to speak. The powerful flashes were coming–surprise!–from Earth’s atmosphere.

Subsequent data from Compton and other space telescopes have provided a tantalizingly incomplete picture of how TGFs occur:

In the skies above a thunderstorm, powerful electric fields generated by the storm stretch upward for many miles into the upper atmosphere. These electric fields accelerate free electrons, whisking them to speeds approaching the speed of light. When these ultra-high speed electrons collide with molecules in the air, the collisions release high-energy gamma rays as well as more electrons, setting up a cascade of collisions and perhaps more TGFs.

Right: Doug Rowland, principal investigator for Firefly stands next to the a life-sized model of the tiny satellite. Credit: NASA/Pat Izzo

To the eye, a TGF probably wouldn’t look like much. Unlike lightning, most of a TGF’s energy is released as invisible gamma rays, not visible light. They don’t produce colorful bursts of light like sprites and other lightning-related phenomena. Nevertheless, these unseen eruptions could help explain why brilliant lightning strikes occur.

A longstanding mystery about lightning is how a strike gets started. Scientists know that the turbulence inside a thundercloud separates electric charge, building up enormous voltages. But the voltage needed to ionize air and generate a spark is about 10 times greater than the voltage typically found inside storm clouds.

“We know how the clouds charge up,” Rowland says, “we just don’t know how they discharge. That is the mystery.”

TGFs could provide that spark. By generating a quick burst of electron flow, TGFs might help lightning strikes get started, Rowland suggests. “Perhaps this phenomenon is why we have lightning,” he says.

If so, there ought to be many more TGFs each day than currently known. Observations by Compton and other space telescopes indicate that there may be fewer than 100 TGFs worldwide each day. Lightning strikes millions of times per day worldwide. That’s quite a gap.

Then again, Compton and other space telescopes before Firefly weren’t actually looking for TGFs. So perhaps it’s not surprising that they didn’t find many. Firefly will specifically look for gamma ray flashes coming from the atmosphere, not space, conducting the first focused survey of TGF activity. Firefly’s sensors will even be able to detect flashes that are mostly obscured by the intervening air, which is a strong absorber of gamma rays (a fact that protects people on the ground from the energy in these flashes). Firefly’s survey will give scientists much better estimates of the number of TGFs worldwide and help determine if the link to lightning is real.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
71 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard Heg
February 1, 2010 8:52 am

“Wade (05:26:10) :
Great name for a satellite. I have to wonder if they named the satellite after the really good, but short lived, TV show Firefly.”
Well they named a shuttle enterprise so if it is named for the TV show a micro satellite is the least it deserves.

Editor
February 1, 2010 9:04 am

TFN Johnson (06:20:40) :
> But more seriously – why is it safe to sail boats with aluminium masts in thunderstorms, but not play golf with metal shafted clubs?
Lightning hits mast, current flows down mast, may find another conductor to get to water or arcs a short distance. Human likely out of current path.
Lightning hits golf club, current travels to grip, arcs to human, travels through body and over wet skin, arcs through soles of shoes. Current that flow over wet skin flashes wet into steam which blows clothing off body.
Several years ago I read a newspaper article that recommended golfers carry a club pointed at the sky as a lightning rod. The source apparently didn’t realize that one role of lightning rods is to attract lightning so that it hits a well grounded conductor instead of entering the building.
There are advantages for folks to know something about science….

JonesII
February 1, 2010 9:07 am

“The Electric Sky” or “The Electric Universe” or a “Plasma Universe”…,etc. just simple and beautiful.

Editor
February 1, 2010 9:12 am

James Sexton (07:37:34) :

Way OT, but I had a good laugh over it. It seems it is time for 007 to come out of retirement!!! http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/02/01/scientist-climate-e-mails-possibly-stolen-spies/?test=latestnews
It would be nice one day just to hear the acknowledgment of the content of the e-mails. (In a reality based manner.)

Wow – it sounds like it never occurred to him it might have been an inside job. Another scientist whose reputation is harmed by Climategate?

Retired Engineer
February 1, 2010 9:18 am

“they named a shuttle enterprise” True, but a name long revered in U.S. maritime history, James Kirk not withstanding. Granted, NASA picked the shuttle names by popular vote, and Enterprise got the most. It also never flew, was dropped a few times from a 747. (that had to be exciting, at least for the 747 crew).
Microsats have been a Pop-Sci staple for years, “the way of the future”. But, how do they communicate with the ground? Antenna theory hasn’t changed. You still need certain size for a given frequency. And things like gyros or thrusters to maintain alignment. Paper mock-ups are nice, I’ll wait for a working version.
All goes to show that we don’t know a lot of things. About many things. The science is never settled. Makes life interesting.

Baa Humbug
February 1, 2010 9:24 am

Oh great, now the alarmists will claim CO2 is causing lightning strikes and gamma thingamygies. We’ll be told to walk around with aluminium hats on.
On a serious note, I don’t like this spies stole emails thing. It’s a good way for the govt. to shut up shop on it. National security and all that.

cba
February 1, 2010 9:25 am

“”TFN Johnson (06:20:40) :
But more seriously – why is it safe to sail boats with aluminium masts in thunderstorms, but not play golf with metal shafted clubs?
How often do lightning conductors get struck? There seems to be a role for tall metal objects to seep away charge
“”
Usually, sailboats have metal plates in the water that act as a ground and a sacrificial electrode to prevent massive corrosion of other metal parts. This is grounded to the mast as I recall making the mast and metal rigging more of a faraday safety cage than potentially instant death like a metal golf club with you acting to complete the circuit. Actually though, it’s not that sure a result but it certainly can be fatal.

February 1, 2010 9:53 am


cba (05:21:25) :
It also makes me wonder just how much effect cosmic ray bursts have in the triggering (and maybe path determination) also.

Look to the physical and electrical processes that establish the ‘leader’ strokes (much studied for decades now) involving such known processes as corona (not the beer!) discharge (for instance) for part of this answer; be careful not ascribe too much to newly-found anomalies …
.
.

February 1, 2010 10:00 am


cba (09:25:42) :
of a faraday safety cage

The protection aspect has less to do with ‘Faraday’ (electrostatic fields) than it does with both a dynamic electric and magnetic fields and ‘propagation of RF energy (a pulse even) in a waveguide beyond cutoff’; INSIDE an enclosure at << 1/4 Lamda per dimension their is a reluctance (attenuation) in allowing the 'wave' to propagate – this is the active effect to the 'cage' not Faraday protection or effect.
When 'Faraday' mentioned as an agent in a situation usually it is 'arm waving'.
.
.

February 1, 2010 10:07 am


G. Varros (07:02:03) :
Going back a few years, I do remember reading that someone was studying whether cosmic rays possibly lay down ion channels which allows lightning to do its thing

Right; this accounts for the lightning at all manner of angles (not!), as seen here:
http://www.stormtrack.org
Again, be careful not to attribute too much newly discovered phenomenona when much is already known (to only researchers, perhaps) about other physical and electrical causes.
.
.

rbateman
February 1, 2010 10:08 am

OT – the recent re-focusing of attention from the content of the emails and data release to the manner of thier escaping the confines … is heating up.
Spy vs Spy is interesting:
The Agendist take is that the oil-producing nations have a vested interest in global consumption of fossil fuels.
The producing nations may have motive to counter what they see as propaganda to take their market away from them.

JonesII
February 1, 2010 10:08 am

The 22 years of research on atmospheric astrophysics since then have convinced me that not only this solar prominence, but also the universe is, so to speak, all-electric, and that electric fields and their breakdown in electrical discharges account for the observed phenomena and accelerate the process of universal evolution from universe to galaxies, from galaxies to stars, from stars to planets and, possibly, from large planets to satellites. In short, atmospheric astrophysics is merely an extension of atmospheric electricity.
C. E. R. Bruce
http://www.catastrophism.com/texts/bruce/atmos.htm

February 1, 2010 10:12 am


Retired Engineer (09:18:47) :
Microsats have been a Pop-Sci staple for years, “the way of the future”. But, how do they communicate with the ground? Antenna theory hasn’t changed. You still need certain size for a given frequency.

What length is a 1/2 Lamda dipole for 2.4 GHz? (A little under 2.5 inches)
(For GAIN you then add an appropriate reflector behind it; gain proportional to size as needed)
Uplink/down link frequencies are usually measured in the GHz range for these applications, not MHz.
.
.

Phillep Harding
February 1, 2010 10:14 am

This has not been noticed by people studying Venus?
Yes, sailboats often have metal under the hull, usually to provide a ground for the radio. However, most masts are stepped on the deck, far from the water, so the shroud lines (fastened to the gunnel) are closer to the water and the hull above the water line is usually wet from rain. That would seem a much easier path to the water. This is more a question for someone who makes sailboats.

BOP
February 1, 2010 10:21 am

At what distance could these TGFs be detected? Could spaceborne detectors use the presence of these bursts to locate a planet around a distant star? These would surely be too weak and intermittent for that purpose?
Just wonderin’.
Ben

richard
February 1, 2010 10:29 am

It’s probably just discharge from all the micro-black holes generated by the Large Hadron Collider.
Nothing to worry about.

JonesII
February 1, 2010 10:39 am

richard (10:29:40) :
It’s probably just discharge from all the micro-black holes generated by the Large Hadron Collider

That Large Haldron Collider Phantom Producer does not produce any black holes but big financial holes, which will surely be sold afterwards as “hedge funds”.

nigel jones
February 1, 2010 10:45 am

James Sexton (07:37:34) :
“Way OT, but I had a good laugh over it. It seems it is time for 007 to come out of retirement!!! http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/02/01/scientist-climate-e-mails-possibly-stolen-spies/?test=latestnews
It would be nice one day just to hear the acknowledgment of the content of the e-mails. (In a reality based manner.)”
Also in The Independent and the Daily Telegraph. No comments allowed for these articles. Presented as news, despite being confessed speculation.
There’s a sort of reinforcing article in the DT, also in the news section, slyly associating Climategate with some notorious hacks.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/7127739/Climategate-five-notorious-hacks.html
A desperate attempt at damage limitation. The cat’s out of the bag and who let it out is
irrelevant.

dave ward
February 1, 2010 10:51 am

I worked in a luxury GRP yacht builders for a few years. The aluminium masts sat on a base just below the saloon floor. The cast lead Keel was several feet lower down, and if a lightning strike tried to jump this gap it would do serious damage. Most of the boats we made had additional heavy gauge cable to bond the rigging and mast to the keel.

February 1, 2010 11:11 am

jmrSudbury (08:02:51) :
Carbon-based life form (07:38:11) , possibly there is lightening on Jupiter or some moons that have atmospheres, but wouldn’t it be easier to see the effect on Mars and Venus which are closer to us? — John M Reynolds
My reply; there has long been satellite photos of Jupiter atmospheric lightning,
(“Images taken of Jupiter’s day and night sides by Cassini on Jan. 1, 2001 show that storms visible on the day side are the sources of visible lightning when .”)
search of Google “Jupiter lightning” gives lots of nice stories and images, Saturn as well. Most seems to be forming as the surface rolls over into the twilight / Night side.

AndrewWH
February 1, 2010 11:14 am

The sailing question is an interesting one. I am a dinghy sailor and the boat, a wooden GP14, has no metal ground for any lightning striking the mast. Even the shroud plates are mounted internally so even if the boat is heeling it will not make any difference. Any lightning hitting our boat will just have to ground through the bottom veneer – unless it decides to flow through any water in the boat and down the drains into the self-bailers (which are metal).
As the crew, if it is none too windy I will probably be crouched in the boat (and wet boots in the likely path of least resistance), or if it is windy I will be hiking out and probably with legs jammed up against the shroud to trim the boat, so bound to get a bit of a tingle one way or the other.
I often wonder why we go out racing in thunderstorms. There you are, soaking wet, in a great big open space underneath a big metal pole. Might as well paint Hit Me on the sails.

February 1, 2010 11:29 am

That’s great news!
Folks at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center have taken the first step in the scientific method:
Admitting* that they do not know everything!
Congratulations!,
* “before the 1990s nobody knew they even existed. And yet they’re the most potent natural particle accelerators on Earth.”
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Emeritus Professor of
Nuclear & Space Sciences
Former NASA PI for Apollo

February 1, 2010 11:37 am

Runaway Breakdown and the Mysteries of Lightning
Gurevich, Alexander V.; Zybin, Kirill P.
Physics Today, Volume 58, Issue 5, pp. 37-43 (2005).
http://www.phy.olemiss.edu/~jgladden/phys510/spring06/Gurevich.pdf

Sören
February 1, 2010 11:42 am

I’m reminded of a paperback I read some 20 years ago but later lost – along with the author’s name (anyone?) – on the expanding earth hypothesis. The author saw atmospheric spots caught on satellite pictures and interpreted them as impacts of small watery comets. These would account for the water necessary to fill up the expanding earth’s oceans.

John Trigge
February 1, 2010 11:58 am

They could have spoken to NOAA as:
“NOAA understands and predicts changes in the Earth’s environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and conserves and manages our coastal and marine resources.”
NOAA should also have been on hand to conserve and manage the dead/dying Florida corals reported in another WUWT story.