Asteroid explosion over Indonesia

From NASA’s Spaceweather.com

INDONESIAN ASTEROID: Picture this: A 10-meter wide asteroid hits Earth and explodes in the atmosphere with the energy of a small atomic bomb. Frightened by thunderous sounds and shaking walls, people rush out of their homes, thinking that an earthquake is in progress. All they see is a twisting trail of debris in the mid-day sky:

This really happened on Oct. 8th around 11 am local time in the coastal town of Bone, Indonesia. The Earth-shaking blast received remarkably little coverage in Western press, but meteor scientists have given it their full attention. “The explosion triggered infrasound sensors of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) more than 10,000 km away,” report researchers Elizabeth Silber and Peter Brown of the Univ. of Western Ontario in an Oct. 19th press release. Their analysis of the infrasound data revealed an explosion at coordinates 4.5S, 120E (close to Bone) with a yield of about 50 kton of TNT. That’s two to three times more powerful than World War II-era atomic bombs.

The asteroid that caused the blast was not known before it hit and took astronomers completely by surprise. According to statistical studies of the near-Earth asteroid population, such objects are expected to collide with Earth on average every 2 to 12 years. “Follow-on observations from other instruments or ground recovery efforts would be very valuable in further refining this unique event,” say Silber and Brown.

###

I worry about asteroid events more than I do climate change. Here’s why, Spaceweather.com has this summary:

near_earth_asteroids

A bunch of that “stimulus” money would be better spent for humanity if we worked on building an asteroid detection and defense system.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
75 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Sticker
October 28, 2009 8:04 pm

An asteroid explodes with the force of two or three Hiroshima bombs and what are the politicians and protesters shouting about? A pitiful 380 ppm Carbon Dioxide.
What annoys me is only hearing about the detonation 19 days later. Could have been worse I suppose, it could have explodeded locally.

Bill Sticker
October 28, 2009 8:06 pm

Sorry, keyboard hiccup there. I meant to write ‘exploded’.

Jason
October 28, 2009 8:40 pm

A random human has a 1 in 25000 chance of their death being by asteroid. I like them odds.

David
October 28, 2009 8:47 pm

Wow. This wasn’t in the news? I mean, I know that if it bleeds it leads, but damn. THREE atomic bombs worth of force is newsworthy in any event.

David
October 28, 2009 8:48 pm

Maybe if someone studied the carbon footprint of the explosion it would make the news???

Fluffy Clouds (Tim L)
October 28, 2009 9:03 pm

I saw one 10 years ago, bright red, loud, over head it turned to dark red then black.
don’t know if it hit the water at lake Michigan or reentered space!
it was an eye opening experience. sleep well.

October 28, 2009 9:59 pm

Wish there was some tracking on this…
I have been attracted to Comet 2P/Encke and the Taurid complex on several occasions.
“Some consider the Bronze Age breakup of an originally larger comet of which Comet Encke is a member to be responsible for ancient destruction in the Fertile Crescent, perhaps evidenced by a large (unconfirmed) meteorite crater in Iraq identified as Umm al Biinni lake.[2] The origin of the swastika has also been connected with Comet Encke. It has also been suggested that the object likely to have been responsible for the Tunguska event in 1908 was a fragment of Comet Encke.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_Encke
“The Taurids are an annual meteor shower associated with the comet Encke.”
“Encke and the Taurids are believed to be remnants of a much larger comet, which has disintegrated over the past 20,000 to 30,000 years,”
“In total, this stream of matter is the largest in the inner solar system. Due to the stream’s size, the Earth takes several weeks to pass through it, causing an extended period of meteor activity, compared with the much smaller periods of activity in other showers. ”
“The Taurid stream has a cycle of activity that peaks roughly every 2500 to 3000 years, when its core passes nearer to Earth and produces more intense showers. In fact, because of the separate “branches” (night-time in one part of the year and daytime in another; and Northern/Southern in each case) there are two (possibly overlapping) peaks separated by a few centuries, every 3000 years. Some astronomers note that dates for megalith structures such as Stonehenge are associated with these peaks.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Taurids
“The Taurid Complex, related to Comet 2P/Encke, is a massive stream of material in the inner solar system”
“while the orbits of some particles are quite dispersed, it is still likely that the Taurid stream has a narrow and dense core consisting of particles concentrated near the orbit of the stream’s parent object, which is presumably related to Comet 2P/Encke. As the orbits of the material constituting this narrow, dense core have been subject to perturbations over thousands of years, it may be inferred that intense bombardment episodes have resulted at epochs when the material reaches Earth intersection”
(the broader darker line of orbit designates above or below the ecliptic plane, opposite for the thinner line)
[attachment=1]north taurids.png[/attachment]
[attachment=0]south taurids.png[/attachment]
“action of a mean motion resonance with Jupiter can produce structure in a meteoroid stream, concentrating meteoroids in a dense swarm. More specifically, predictions tabulated by Asher & Clube of enhanced meteor and fireball activity from a Taurid Complex swarm in the 7:2 resonance are compared with observational data collected in Japan over several decades. This allows increased confidence in the Taurid swarm theory, and more generally could mean that resonant trapping is a dynamical mechanism affecting a significant amount of meteoroidal material in the inner Solar system. ”
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1998MNRAS.297…23A&db_key=AST&page_ind=0&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_VIEW&classic=YES
“We show that a statistically significant number of Earth-crossing asteroids are part of the Taurid Complex of interplanetary objects”
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1993MNRAS.264…93A&db_key=AST&page_ind=0&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_VIEW&classic=YES
“It is shown that the giant comet breakup hypothesis has a clear basis in astronomical fact”
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1987MNRAS.225P..55C&db_key=AST&page_ind=0&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_VIEW&classic=YES
“Recent astronomical data are employed to make a detailed analysis of periodic terrestrial bombardment by molecular cloud debris during revolution around the Galaxy. Passage through the Gould Belt 3-6 Myr ago would have resulted in glaciation, geomagnetic reversals, and extinction events, all of which have left evidence. The break up of large comets in the solar system after passage through the Belt would produce a large dust and meteor input to the atmosphere, causing a rise of up to 1 percent of C-14 in the atmosphere. The level would be sufficiently high to affect a full climatic cycle. Some glaciation could also occur, and the last Ice Age could have been caused by the progenitor of comet Encke, part of which was the Tunguska meteorite, an interstellar object. It is estimated that further debris from the zodiacal cloud will intersect earth during the period 2000-2400 AD.”
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1984MNRAS.211..953C&db_key=AST&page_ind=0&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_VIEW&classic=YES
From this information we can deduce the following:
a. there is a system of asteroids/cometary debris that intersects earths’ orbit periodically
b. the streams intersect each other at the point of earth orbit intersection
c. the streams have large, dense objects, concentrated in a stream core
d. the earth intersects these ‘cores’ about every 3000 years, and we are due about now
e. it may take two weeks for the earth to pass through the stream core
therefore, we can surmise that a catastrophic, extinction level event ‘could’ occur every 3000 years approximately….
this event would be a constant bombardment by many asteroids and cometary impacts at 65,000 MPH (not including earths velocity) lasting about two weeks in duration, giving all corners of the globe the destruction required to eliminate civilizations on a macro scale…..
this is a justifiable hypothesis, so far….

Howard
October 28, 2009 10:03 pm

What a bunch of ‘fraidy cats. We all gotta die sometime.

Jim Stegman
October 28, 2009 10:03 pm

Astronomy is a field in which amateurs can provide useful data if they have a decent telescope.

Methow Ken
October 28, 2009 10:21 pm

A definition of governmental insanity:
Propose to incur costs of 100s of BILLIONS of $ to combat the computer-generated ”threat” of AGW, while the earth has been stable or cooling since 1998. BUT:
Refuse to spend a few paltry 10s of Millions of $ to properly catalog and plot all detectable NEOs.
One of these days a 100+ meter NEO will come wandering into the atmosphere at a speed of 10-12 miles per SECOND or so. . . . Or maybe something the size of Apophis (~350 meters) that hasn’t been detected yet. . . . . and Planet Earth will have a REALLY bad day.
FOOTNOTE: Yeah; I know: Apophis is NOT going to smack us in 2029; and the odds it will thread the keyhole and then hit us in 2036 are now down to about 1 out of 250K. There are other rocks out there; count on it.

October 28, 2009 10:29 pm

In 1908 a meteorite exploded above Tunguska, it was larger than this one in Indonesia, about a 100 meters and it exploded with an estimated yield of 10-15 megatons, that is the size of large nuclear weapon. A forrested area of about 2100 square km was leveled and the explosion measured 5 on the Richter scale. That is good enough to destroy a large city if it was in the right place.
The list of incidents since that june day in 1908 is long. With the explosion over Indonesia being the largest since 1908. And they could be mistaken for nuclear explosion, its what happend in 1979 when a Vela satellite detected a small nuclear explosion, or so they thought since no radioactive fallout was found.
With several countries around the world trying to obtain nuclear weapons or already having them the chance that we would make that same mistake again is rather high and therefore the risk of smaller or larger nuclear exchange of weapons is also a possible thing that could happen in the near future.
Nuclear weapons and meteorites are real, they are not some output of a model.

Molon Labe
October 28, 2009 11:19 pm

Meanwhile, it’s snowing in El Paso, TX.
http://www.kvia.com/Global/story.asp?S=11401009

October 28, 2009 11:28 pm

To add… the entire premise is that the Taurid Complex was once a large body…and the assumption of it’s demise ‘about’ 20,000 years ago…..leaving a tremendous amount of large and small debris….which is now concentrated in a narrow, dense, core….
the earlier ‘passes’ were readily noticeable and destruction was periodic….therefore, the ‘planet/comet’ WAS there, which would account for the ancient ‘myths/tales’…..
there are several different avenues of thought and research on the ‘comet stream’….different timelines of intersection, things like that….one researcher says every 2000 years, another says we intersect every 3000 years, etc….
“Therefore, although the Taurid stream is very broad, at the core of the stream we expect a concentration of meteoroids and cometary fragments, including objects of Tunguska size. As a result of Jupiter’s gravity, the orbit of this central concentration changes over thousands of years, sometimes being brought into intersection with the Earth’s orbit (Figure 1). That is, in 3 dimensions, the central concentration usually misses the Earth’s orbit, but there will be times when it intersects the Earth’s orbit. At these times, the impact frequency on the Earth is much higher. Assuming the parent object is closely related to Comet Encke, it seems that the last intersections were around AD 300 to 500, and before that somewhat earlier than 2000 BC (Figure 1), although there is some uncertainty in these calculations. The most recent intersections may have been a couple of centuries earlier, and the intersections before that could have been as early as 3000 BC. Despite the uncertainty, the calculations always show that there are `dangerous times’ lasting a couple of centuries, when there is a greatly increased impact frequency, followed by a few thousand years when the Earth’s orbit is not intersected by the Taurid core. The next intersection in the future will be around AD 3000”
http://www.perigeezero.org/treatise/timeline/index.html
the above site suggests the rise in sea level and ice ages were caused by intersections with the meteor/asteroid stream, as well as the destruction of civilizations….due to the ice composition of the huge comet that broke up and rained on earth…
I’ve seen ‘expected’ intersection dates of 2000 AD to 3000AD….so, they don’t really know exactly where the dense core stream is, and are not sure if it drifts up and down or not, which would change intersection dates greatly….
“Theoretical radiants for macroscopic Taurid objects are then presented and compared with observations of the nighttime and daytime Taurid meteor showers. These are found to be broadly similar in form, given the sparsity of some of the data, adding weight to the hypothesis that this sub-jovian complex contains kilometre-plus asteroids. ”
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995EM&P…68..155A
the debris is large enough, in sufficient quantity, appears periodic in nature, is relative to the ancient myths/tales/prophecies, and fits some of the timelines for previous abrupt climate change and near extinction events….
plus, the astrophysicists and astronomers aren’t sure when we would intersect, as they are only now figuring out that it does exist, and why it does….

RhudsonL
October 28, 2009 11:56 pm

Darn! That’s why the local dinosaur died and I started to evolve.

Jean Meeus
October 29, 2009 12:07 am

a jones (18:18:38) :
“Did you not know that in 1812 the Paris Institut, in terms of natural Philosophy second only in prestige to the Royal Society, solemnly declared the idea that stones fell from the sky was an absurd old wives tale.
A few months later there was a fall of meteorites just outside Paris. ”
That occurred about 10 years earlier. The meteorite fall was the famous event of April 26, 1803 (not 1813), at l’Aigle, in northern France.

October 29, 2009 12:19 am

Copenhagen is a really beautiful city and I would be devastated if anything happened to it – and of course the fine and friendly Danish people who live there.
But sometimes even the blackest cloud has a silver lining. Now, if one of these asteroids was to …… [snip]

Tanner Waterbury
October 29, 2009 12:58 am

Did I read that Correctly? 10 METERS WIDE?! Good god, if that did impact, that would of heavily damaged a small city. Ok, perhaps this should be a wake up call to the government to stop worrying about climate change and start worrying about NEO’s.

Les Francis
October 29, 2009 1:22 am

Robert van der Veeke (22:29:47) :
In 1908 a meteorite exploded above Tunguska, it was larger than this one in Indonesia

The jury is still out on Tunguska. No incriminating evidence has yet been found to pinpoint the exact cause as yet.
However you may or maybe not correct in suggesting that this latest event in Sulawesi is the largest since Tunguska. The reality is that other events in the last 100 years may have happened and never had widespread coverage. It’s taken a couple of weeks to get worldwide media exposure to this event. The only reason it’s in the worldwide media now is because on modern mass communications and the internet. Sulawesi had very poor communications only 20 years ago.

Tanner Waterbury (00:58:47) :
Did I read that Correctly? 10 METERS WIDE?! Good god, if that did impact, that would of heavily damaged a small city.

More like a large city.

Alan the Brit
October 29, 2009 2:08 am

Robert van der Veeke (22:29:47) :
“The list of incidents since that june day in 1908 is long. With the explosion over Indonesia being the largest since 1908. And they could be mistaken for nuclear explosion, its what happend in 1979 when a Vela satellite detected a small nuclear explosion, or so they thought since no radioactive fallout was found.”
I seem to recall something similar at around the same time. Weren’t the colonials up in arms about suspected high altitude thermo-nuclear explosions being detected by their satellites, they checked with us good old Brits but our defence chaps had heard nothing. I believe it did make the news at the time, but of course that was when the BBC was a reliable, impartial, professional news gathering & reporting organisation, beholden to no one. A few commentators at the time suggested the Americans needed to check their equipment, under the friendly rivalry of who has the best kit. However there was a good quality BBC Horizon (science & I have said this before ;-)) prog on it around 12+ years ago, which noted this occurrence where US satellites detected what appeared to be sizable upper atmospheric explosions which quite naturally suggested that they may be under attack, but which also high-lighted the regular nature of these NEO hitting the atmosphere. It also high-lighted the checks & balances in place for western powers as opposed to anti-nuclear campaigners always complaining that the US could & would launch a first strike out of hand. Now of course we have today’s politically correct version of armageddon group hug theory, so that WAGTD, poor, as a result of man’s folly! Nothing personal but one can take this group hugging theory a bit too far. At least I hear our “Beautiful Leader” is meeting his European counter parts to discuss this further. (I am also alarmed to hear that “European Union” warships are out on patrol somewhere, last I heard we still had the Royal Navy, oh well ho hum.)

warlock6
October 29, 2009 2:24 am

one day we all will be killed by such a stone.. and we’ll not be able to do anything.

October 29, 2009 2:25 am

Real news, no coverage. What a surprise. If that thing would have hit Lindsay Lohan, then it would have been covered, ad nauseam.

Jack Green
October 29, 2009 2:26 am

The AGW liberal elites would welcome an asteroid strike because it would instantly reduce the worlds population that is the real threat to the earth. At least that’s what they think.
I check the spaceweather.com web page a lot and it is scary to see the Lunar Distances recent space debris has missed the earth by. I wonder about the ones that aren’t seen until the last minute? Maybe a “thicker” atmosphere is better to help shield us from this stuff.

October 29, 2009 2:40 am

Does anyone know what the warmist’s/green’s views are on possible asteroid impacts? Do they even have a view?

Adam Gallon
October 29, 2009 2:52 am

RE Tanner Waterbury (00:58:4
A 10m body explodes in the atmosphere due to stress and therma effects, so it’s not something to worry about.
Here’s a website that shows 50 impact structures globally.
http://geology.com/meteor-impact-craters.shtml
One of the most recent impact events occured at Wabar in the Empty Quarter of what is now Saudi Arabia, some 2-400 years ago.
The biggest surviving piece found to date, weighs 2.4 tons.
A fall was reported in 2002 near Vitim in Siberia, possibly a cometary fragment some 50-100m in diameter that also airburst.

Atomic Hairdryer
October 29, 2009 3:34 am

I guess that was a real Bone shaker.
Improving our observing capabilities sounds like a much better use of public money than sending 20,000 people to Copenhagen for some xmas shopping. Presumably this was missed on the way in because current observing systems focus on known or assumed high risk areas of space?