Discussions on the Viking settlements on Greenland are seen from time to time on WUWT, and its is often in the context of the Medieval Warm Period. While this article from the University of Alberta is a few years old, I thought I’d provide it for our readers interest.
The Viking farm under the sand in Greenland
by Terese Brasen
in Greenland
April 23, 2001 – In 1991, two caribou hunters stumbled over a log on a snowy Greenland riverbank, an unusual event because Greenland is above the tree line. Closer investigation uncovered rock-hard sheep droppings. The hunters had stumbled on a 500-year-old Viking farm that lay hidden beneath the sand, gift-wrapped and preserved by nature for future archaeologists.
Gården under Sandet or GUS, Danish for ‘the farm under the sand,’ would become the first major Viking find in Greenland since the 1920s.
“GUS is beautifully preserved because, once it was buried, it was frozen,” explained University of Alberta anthropologist Dr. Charles Schweger. “Things that are perishable and normally disappear are found at GUS.”
A specialist in Arctic paleo-ecology and geo-archeology, Schweger joined the international archaeological team that would spend the next seven years sifting through sand at GUS.
The famous Viking, Eric the Red, probably didn’t know where he was headed when, adrift on the North Atlantic in AD 981, he bumped into the southern coast of Greenland. Eric returned to Iceland three years later and enticed about 500 fellow Vikings to follow him and settle the new country.
“The Norse arrived in Greenland 1,000 years ago and became very well established,” said Schweger, describing the Viking farms and settlements that crowded the southeast and southwest coasts of Greenland for almost 400 years.
“The Greenland settlements were the most distant of all European medieval sites in the world,” said Schweger. “Then the Norse disappear, and the question has always been: what happened?”
Time was not on the archaeological team’s side. Earlier digs had explored the southern tip of Greenland, the most settled area of the country where Eric the Red first landed. These early digs merely scratched the surface because the archaeologists were interested in the buildings and architecture, not what lay beneath. The GUS site was up the West Coast, deep inside a fjord. The river was advancing, swallowing the site, so it was important to act quickly.
The University of Alberta, Greenland and the Danish government combined resources and pushed ahead on the first Greenland excavation since the 1930s. The team would excavate the complete site, looking at the entire history and development of the farm, not just the surface buildings.
Schweger recalls vividly the day the team uncovered GUS. Smells frozen in permafrost for 500 years exploded into the air. “It stunk to high heavens,” said Schweger. “There was no question about this being a farm.”
The Viking ships that had brought Icelandic adventurers to Greenland may have been mini versions of Noah’s Ark with sheep, goats, horses and Vikings sharing the crowded space. The Greenland Vikings raised sheep and fabricated woollen garments. The centre of the farm was a typical Viking longhouse, the communal building where Vikings gathered around the fire. The settlement flourished. In the North Atlantic, walrus, seal and whale were abundant and the Greenlanders made rope from walrus hide and controlled the European walrus tusk market.
Every summer, the team raced against the river. In 1998, when researchers finally abandoned GUS to the river, 90 per cent of the site had been excavated. Artifacts packaged and taken to the lab include pieces of cloth and sheep combs used to remove wool without shearing the animal. The site gave up metal hinges, locks, keys and wooden barrels. The Vikings appear to have traded their northern wares for metal and wooden products unavailable in Greenland. For them, a trip to Iceland or Norway was like a shopping spree at Home Hardware.
We know about Eric the Red and the Greenland settlement because years after the Vikings had given up their pagan ways, Snorri Sturluson collected Viking stories and penned the Icelandic sagas. “The Icelanders wrote everything down,” said Schweger, puzzled that the literature says nothing about what happened to the Norse in Greenland.
What did happen? Theories abound. In his 1963 book, Early Voyages and Northern Approaches, Tryggvi Oleson proposed a theory that still has some credibility. He believed the Vikings and northern aboriginal people intermarried to produce the unique Thule people, ancestors of the modern Eskimo.
One reigning expert on Norse extinction in Greenland is Dr. Thomas McGovern from City University of New York. McGovern is also chair of the North Atlantic Biocultural Organization, an international research association interested in the relationship between changing climate and people in the North Atlantic. He believes the Norse did not adapt completely to Greenland because they never adopted Inuit ring-seal hunting techniques. The Inuit used buoys or floats and hunted ring seal from kayaks or through the ice. These techniques do not appear in Norse culture. McGovern and other paleo-ecologists also believe the Norse were poor farmers.
But Schweger says the evidence comes from the southern or eastern settlement where the excavations only looked at the surface. “There is a lot of sediment thrown around, and it suggests to these researchers that the Norse were poor farmers. The theory is poor agricultural practices caused the sod to break up, and the winds eroded this and blew sand all over the landscape.”
While Danish and Greenland researchers look at GUS buildings and artifacts, the U of A’s role is to study organic material. Cross-sections of the GUS soil contain evidence that challenge McGovern’s theories and offer brand-new understanding of the Vikings in Greenland.
“The ring seal is only one species of seal. The Norse hunted everything else–walrus, whales, harbour seals,” Schweger said, moving quickly to part two of his McGovern challenge. The argument that the Vikings were poor farmers doesn’t make sense upon close examination of the GUS organic material. “There is no evidence that they were destroying their fields. Quite the opposite. They were improving upon them.”
It is not surprising that the Greenland Vikings chose to farm at the mouth of a fjord. The Vikings who settled Iceland and later moved to Greenland were originally from Norway, where farming technology grew up around fjords. The centre of a fjord farm is a meadow where animals graze during winter months.
Cross-sections of the GUS soil show the Vikings began their settlement by burning off birch brush to form a meadow. Over the next 300 to 400 years, the meadow soil steadily improved its nutritional qualities, showing that the Greenland Vikings weren’t poor farmers, as McGovern and others have suggested. “At GUS, the amount of organic matter and the quality of soil increased and sustained farming for 400 years,” said Schweger. “If they were poor farmers, then virtually all the farming in North America is poor farming.”
Schweger believes the sand that packaged and preserved GUS also ruined the site, polluting the river the Vikings relied on for fresh water. The soil was healthy and nutritious. Then, suddenly, farming stopped and the soil was encapsulated in sand.
A massive ice sheet covers about 85 per cent of Greenland, about 2,600,000 cubic kilometres of ice–enough to raise sea levels by 6.4 metres if it were to melt. Sheets of ice sliding down the mountain toward GUS may have pushed sand over the eastern coast of Greenland, burying the Viking settlements. The sand slide was probably a major catastrophic event, comparable to an earthquake.
The Danish Antiquity Society will publish the GUS findings once the international lab results have been tabulated and debated. The team that sifted through sand summer after summer may tell the world new stories about the Vikings who farmed and traded in the North Atlantic then suddenly, and inexplicably, disappeared.
Related story:
- Icelandic sagas sail into library collections (ExpressNews, April 10, 2001): http://www.ualberta.ca/ExpressNews/news/2001/041001b.htm
Related link – internal
- The U of A Department of Anthropology Web site: http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/anthropology/index.html
Address of this ExpressNews article:
http://www.expressnews.ualberta.ca/article.cfm?id=776
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I have always doubted that a population which existed for 400 years, or roughly twenty generations, remained stable, and did not produce a surplus of hot-blooded young men who had the urge to go “a-Viking.”
When I was young a silver penny, which eventually was traced to Norway, was the subject of a lot of talk in Maine. It was apparently worn around the neck, but the hole at the edge of the coin had crumbled away after its original discovery. It had been found in a huge heap of clam shells, which occurred because the Indians of New England, like modern people, liked to travel to the coast during the summer.
The discussion basically downplayed the possibility that the coin could indicate Vikings had ever visited the coast of Maine, and suggested the coin had made its way south as a trade item. There was even some suggestions that the penny was a fake, and part of a fraud.
I didn’t blame the scientists involved for being skeptical, for that is part of science. However hand in hand with their skepticism seemed to be a rather absurd idea that young Vikings were prone to living-with-Mommy, or being afraid to make waves because they might not get a grant from the university big-shots. Because many of the scientists and sociologists were themselves timid, they projected timidness onto Greenland Vikings.
I was, and remain, very skeptical that this was what young Greenland farm-boys were like. My own experience of being young involves crazy deeds which I sometimes wake in a cold sweat, recalling. (Inland I drove cars well over a hundred miles an hour, and on the coast I went a-Viking.)
If we are talking twenty generations of Greenland Vikings, and a population of several thousand, then we are likely talking at least fifteen generations which produced a surplus of young men and women, (as many as a thousand each generation,) with no land to inherit, and hot blood.
Where did they go? I feel an answer to this question has never been satisfactorily given. I’m fairly certain they headed west, but until an actual Viking ship is discovered in Hudson Bay or Lake Superior, I don’t expect people who seldom budge from university armchairs will believe it was possible.
Caleb (03:04:27) : “… Where did they go? I feel an answer to this question has never been satisfactorily given. I’m fairly certain they headed west, but until an actual Viking ship…
Or perhaps a Fjord Mustang, Caleb?
dearieme (16:23:57) :
Can you help me with North American English? When you say “meadow”, do you mean what I mean – land used principally for a hay crop, perhaps with grazing on the aftermath – or do you mean what I’d call “pasture” i.e. land used principally for grazing?
______________________________
Could well be either one, or could refer to a natural grassy area rhat is neither farmed nor grazed.
I am sure local usage varies considerably across the country. Here in the Rocky Mountain west my experience is that the word meadow generally implies a naturally occurring open space in a wooded area or brush. Where a pasture would be a more formal area that is set aside for grazing of live stock and generally fenced (although in the mountain west there are large areas used as open grazing but they are not formally maintained and enclosed. That how ever in this part of the country is called “open range” rather than pasture.
In context usage I have experienced would be something like the following:
“As we hiked through the dense forest we suddenly found ourselves in a beautiful mountain meadow. We decided to stop there and eat lunch.”
I would be likely to refer to both of these locations as a meadow
http://www.cotonmanor.co.uk/images/wild_flower_meadow_panorama.jpg
http://kevingong.com/Hiking/Images/199905CrescentMeadow/08Meadow001.jpg
“The old rancher gathered up his things and headed out to the pasture to check on the live stock.”
These are pictures I would refer to as pasture:
http://peachorchardfarm.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/images/group_pasture.201142437_std.jpg
http://media.photobucket.com/image/pasture%20horse%20grazing/bionicdaniel/20080427_0752A-MorningHorseGrazing.jpg
Larry
Here is a fun thing:
http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/4
The one hand of the UN doesn’t know what the other does.
Surely it will be taken of the list?
I wish you could stop calling them “vikings”.
Viking was something some young men were ON at some time. When they were ON viking they could and would be called a “viking”. If they where not ON viking they were NOT “vikings”! Got that?
You don’t call the Spanish and Italians “wops” do you?
Well, do you, punks!?
The first European settlers in North America were Icelanders.
Shows the whole global warming is bologna , changes yes not man made.
Carsten Arnholm, Norway (15:42:32) :
The wedding took place 16. September 1408 between Sigrid Bjørnsdatter and Thorsteinn Olafsson. The wedding was “successful”. Then there was silence for 450 years.
Carsten, correlation is not causeation, I suggest that 450 years of silence made the marriage sucessful.
John Silver,
“The first European settlers in North America were Icelanders.”
Icelanders weren’t Norsemen?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norsemen
Can we just agree that Greenland was part of the Greater Norse Co-prosperity Sphere?
Anthony,
Thank you so much for posting this wonderful study. I have been fascinated by the Norse Sagas since I was a child but good information is hard to come by. The world of the Vineland and Greenland sagas is very different from what we see in these areas today but paleoclimatological reconstructions show Erick the Red to not be quite the huckster he is reputed to be.
In the late 1970s and 1980s I played a small part in the production of the English-language versions of the series of books about mediaeval Iceland by Professor Kirsten Hastrup, the social anthropologist. That experience left me in no doubt at all of the existence, for Iceland at least, of the mediaeval warm period. It also left me in no doubt of the reality of the cooler period, which we seem now to be calling the ‘little ice age’, which subsequently closed down many aspects of the agricultural and social life of Iceland.
So, when I first heard of somebody trying to ‘get rid of the Mediaeval Warm Period’, I knew that we were in a space of propaganda and suppression of truth, rather than science. Thank you to WUWT and its contributors for broadening my understanding of these things so much.
I bought today’s Times (what you call the London Times); this is the one in which Lord Stern says we must all become vegetarians. That means the Global Warmists taking on the farmers of the developed world. Bring it on.
Carsten Arnholm, Norway (15:42:32) :
“- Etter Svartedauden i Norge og på Island rundt 1400 var det nok masse plass, det var ikke noe problem å reise tilbake for disse bosetterne. Og de som reiste tilbake, var de unge. Dermed ble også barna med,”
“- After the bubonic plague in Norway and Iceland around 1400 there was lots of space left over, it wasn’t a problem to go back for these settlers. Those who went back, were the young. The kids went with them”
Absolutely fascinating. So when it was warm population boomed and folks moved out to the newly hospitable areas. When the cold and disease came back, the younger folks moved on again; but this time back to Norway. The older folks did what they usually do, stay to die in their familiar home where they expect to reach their natural end before it gets too bad; but encouraging their children on to a better life.
Simple. Elegant in its completeness. Perfectly rational. And pretty much the same as my family story (modulo the cold, snow, etc.). The lineage moves backward in time from coastal California, to Iowa, to England Ireland and Germany, then on to “somewhere viking” … with parents staying in their home, but young adults moving on “to a better life”. My son has been talking of Australia… My daughter is interested in Ireland…
I think I know what happened to the Vikings of Greenland. The same thing that happened to a lot of Vikings. They were just passing through, but slowly and generationally. The Viking Ship is a generational ship…
Caleb (03:04:27) : Where did they go? I feel an answer to this question has never been satisfactorily given. I’m fairly certain they headed west, but until an actual Viking ship is discovered in Hudson Bay or Lake Superior, I don’t expect people who seldom budge from university armchairs will believe it was possible.
As I recall the hazy memories of 40+ years ago education: There was speculation that the Iroquois were at least partially of European decent. They made “long houses” in the boxy european style, and had somewhat European features. There was also, IIRC, a small tribe of blue eyed “indians” somewhere near Virginia coastline. Since the blue eyed gene evolved around the Baltic Sea and grades out in more or less linear proportion with distance from there, blue eyes in American Indians means somebody traveled… Finally, I once worked with a lady who announced she was headed off to a “tribal reunion”. I commented that her tribe had rather western features (she looked fairly European to me and had green eyes, a brown blue blend of genes…) Her reply was a “thank you” that I had not denigrated her claim to be Indian as so many others had, and recounted that her tribe had always had that “look” and it was fairly common in the East Coast tribes.
So, for my money, your answer is simple. They came to North America and after a few hundred years of intermarriage were the “European looking Indians” you see in the old pictures. When it became “unpopular” to be an indian, many simply chose to “pass” as white and blend in. I’ve also met a guy who looked very European. Stated he was 1/2 Danish and 1/2 pure indian (again from some eastern tribe who’s name I’ve forgotten) but that his mother had decided to ‘pass a white’ back in the 19teens because she could.
So my guess is that they are wandering around various parts of North America today…
The name of the tribe is Abnake (sp). A good friend of mine is a direct descendant. I’ll see if she has time to post.
Philip T. Downman (11:26:50) :
It originated in China after crop failure due to bad climate after volcanism in the area.
It is interesting that Chinese soldiers and explorers from the Ming Dynasty may have been in Canada at the same time. It is believed that a Canadian Indian killed Lief Erikson’s brother in a skirmish on the Eastern coast of Canada. That Canadian Indian may have been a Ming soldier (anecdotal, from art work).
John Galt (11:54:48) :
Obviously Greenland was much farther south a few centuries ago. No other explanation is possible, a least none that I can imagine.
1000 years ago? Come come now John.
Imagine this : it was much warmer 1000 years ago.
L (12:22:53) :
just about the time Europeans were ‘discovering’ the Americas for what, they thought, was the first time.
I was watching a show on Viking in Minnesota a few weeks ago on the History Channel. One man said it was always believed that the Vikings were the first Europeans on the North American continent until about the middle 1880’s. The, he said, the Italians claimed credit by changing the story of Columbus’ journey.
The show went on to say that there was some connection between the Knights Templar, the Vikings, and Christopher Columbus. One man said the symbol on Nina was a Knights of Templar symbol and Columbus was really coming to America to carry on some unfinished mission of the Knights of the Templar.
Nina ship symbol :
http://www.johntoddjr.com/156%20Templar/images/04%20boat.jpg
Knights of Templar symbol :
http://www.knightstemplar-uk.co.uk/creditcard.JPG
Yarmy (12:39:29) :
Pfff, forget these historians and their anecdotes. I’ve got a tree here that tells me Greenland was frozen then.
That’s not a tree. It’s just a hockey stick; a crappy, broken hockey stick. How many times do we have to break it!
I have always enjoyed using the Vikings as a springboard for thought, because they did such amazing things. So did explorers from other lands.
I have also long been annoyed by people who have a it-can’t-be-done attitude, who tend to dismiss amazing examples of human courage and tenacity as being “fiction.” Often they use science to do this, when science was never intended to be used that way.
For example: The word “Russia” came from the root “Rus.” Who were the Rus? The Rus were Vikings, who invaded that area and set up a kingdom, long ago. The invasion is interesting, for their long boats did not come up the Volga River from the sea. (After all, the Volga drains into the Caspian, which is landlocked.) Rather their ships came down the Volga.
How the heck does a fleet come down a river from the headwaters? Well, those crazy Vikings picked the entire fleet up and carried it overland from another river, that drained into the Baltic, to the Volga River.
How do we know this crazy deed isn’t just some fabricated saga invented by some boozing dude who glorifies Vikings? Apparently there is enough written history to verify that it happened.
However suppose some achademic demanded archeological evidence the Vikings had hauled an entire fleet overland. Could proof be provided? I doubt it. After a thousand years, the footprints people leave behind tend to fade away.
Why on earth would an achademic want to prove “it can’t be done?” I have no idea. Maybe it makes them feel better about never daring to leave their armchair. However when I see climate scientists prove there never was a MWP period, I feel I am seeing something I’ve seen before.
I have become resigned to the fact it is difficult to prove some things. There is a world of difference between what is humanly provable and what is humanly possible. However, while accepting that fact, I am never surprised when people ignore those who say “it can’t be done,” and do amazing things.
For example, when Mr. Watts started this website, I’ll bet there were those who said, “It can’t be done. You will never reach more than a handful of people.”
And Columbus himself visited Iceland before he discovered the West Indies.
(He didn’t discover America)
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/doubleissue/mysteries/columbus.htm