The Midge Warm Period

No that’s not a typo. Midges have just helped define the MWP, despite the claims of “proof” yesterday.

Another recent contradictory study to involving those pesky Chironomids. In this case, more fish during warming periods seem to account for less larval midge remains.

http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/ent/notes/Urban/images/midge-lc.jpg

Summer Temperatures Reconstruction in the Northern French Alps

The Abstract below is from a recent paper by Millet, L., Arnaud, F., Heiri, O., Magny, M., Verneaux, V. and Desmet, M. 2009, entitled: Late-Holocene summer temperature reconstruction from chironomid assemblages of Lake Anterne, northern French Alps. The Holocene 19: 317-328:

ABSTRACT

We present a chironomid-based reconstruction of late-Holocene temperature from Lake Anterne (2060 m a.s.l.) in the northern French Alps. Chironomid assemblages were studied in 49 samples along an 8 m long sediment core covering the last 1800 years. July air temperatures were inferred using an inference model based on the distribution of chironomid assemblages in 100 Swiss lakes. The transfer function has a leave-one-out cross-validated coefficient of determination (r ) of 0.88, a root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 1.40°C. Despite possible biases induced by methodological aspects and the ecological complexity of the chironomid response to both climate and environmental changes, the concordance of the Lake Anterne temperature reconstruction with other Alpine records suggests that the transfer function has successfully reconstructed past summer temperature during the last two millennia. The twentieth century is the only section of the record which shows a poor agreement with other climate reconstructions and the distinct warming found in most instrumental records for this period is not apparent in the Lake Anterne record. Stocking of the lake with fish from the early twentieth century onwards was found to be a possible cause of changes in the chironomid fauna and subsequent distortion in the inferred climate signal. Evidence was found of a cold phase at Lake Anterne between AD 400 and 680, a warm episode between AD 680 and 1350, and another cold phase between AD 1350 and 1900. These events were possibly correlated to the so-called `Dark Age Cold Period’ (DACP), the `Mediaeval Warm Period’ (MWP) and the `Little Ice Age’ (LIA). The chironomid-based inference model reconstructed a July air temperature decrease of c. 0.7°C for the DACP and 1.3°C for the LIA compared with the temperature prevailing during the MWP.

Key Words: Climate reconstruction • late Holocene • July air temperature • chironomids • northern French Alps.

CO2 Science.org’s take on this paper is here:

Background

The authors write that “among biological proxies from lake sediments, chironomid [non-biting midge] assemblages are viewed as one of the most promising climatic indicators,” and that “the accuracy of chironomid assemblages for the reconstruction of Lateglacial temperatures is now broadly demonstrated.”

What was done

Millet et al. (1) “present a new chironomid-based temperature record from Lake Anterne (northern French Alps) covering the past two millennia,” (2) “compare this reconstruction with other late-Holocene temperature records from Central Europe,” and (3) “address the question of whether previously described centennial-scale climate events such as the ‘Medieval Warm Period’ [MWP] or the ‘Little Ice Age’ [LIA] can be detected in this new summer temperature record,” noting that “at a hemispheric or global scale the existence of the LIA and MWP have been questioned.”

What was learned

The six scientists report that “evidence was found of a cold phase at Lake Anterne between AD 400 and 680, a warm episode between AD 680 and 1350, and another cold phase between AD 1350 and 1900,” and they say that these events were “correlated to the so-called ‘Dark Age Cold Period’ (DACP), the ‘Medieval Warm Period’ and the ‘Little Ice Age’.” In addition, they say that “many other climate reconstructions across western Europe confirm the existence of several significant climatic changes during the last 1800 years in Central Europe and more specifically the DACP, the MWP and the LIA.”

Last of all, they report that the reconstructed temperatures of the 20th century failed to show a return to MWP levels of warmth, which failure they attributed to a breakdown of the chironomid-temperature relationship over the final century of their 1800-year history.

What it means

Ever more evidence continues to indicate that the Medieval Warm Period was a real and global phenomenon (see our Medieval Warm Period Project). It also continues to indicate that the MWP was likely warmer than the Current Warm Period (CWP) has been to date. Such could also be said about the new evidence provided by the study of Millet et al., although we tend to agree that there was indeed a breakdown of their chironomid-temperature relationship when it mattered most and disallowed a valid (apples-to-apples) comparison to be made between the warmth of the MWP and the CWP. However, the fact that Millet et al.’s reconstructed summer temperature dropped by about 1.3°C during the MWP to LIA transition would indeed suggest that the MWP was warmer than the CWP has yet been, since post-LIA warming is generally considered to have been somewhat less than 1.3°C … even when comparing apples to oranges!

Thanks to Alan Siddons for collecting this material.

Another contradictory study (recent too) involving those pesky Chironomids. In this case, more fish seem to account for less larval remains.

Summer Temperatures Reconstruction in the Northern French Alps

The Abstract below is from a recent paper by Millet, L., Arnaud, F., Heiri, O., Magny, M., Verneaux, V. and Desmet, M. 2009, entitled: Late-Holocene summer temperature reconstruction from chironomid assemblages of Lake Anterne, northern French Alps. The Holocene 19: 317-328:

We present a chironomid-based reconstruction of late-Holocene temperature from Lake Anterne (2060 m a.s.l.) in the northern French Alps. Chironomid assemblages were studied in 49 samples along an 8 m long sediment core covering the last 1800 years. July air temperatures were inferred using an inference model based on the distribution of chironomid assemblages in 100 Swiss lakes. The transfer function has a leave-one-out cross-validated coefficient of determination (r ) of 0.88, a root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 1.40°C. Despite possible biases induced by methodological aspects and the ecological complexity of the chironomid response to both climate and environmental changes, the concordance of the Lake Anterne temperature reconstruction with other Alpine records suggests that the transfer function has successfully reconstructed past summer temperature during the last two millennia. The twentieth century is the only section of the record which shows a poor agreement with other climate reconstructions and the distinct warming found in most instrumental records for this period is not apparent in the Lake Anterne record. Stocking of the lake with fish from the early twentieth century onwards was found to be a possible cause of changes in the chironomid fauna and subsequent distortion in the inferred climate signal. Evidence was found of a cold phase at Lake Anterne between AD 400 and 680, a warm episode between AD 680 and 1350, and another cold phase between AD 1350 and 1900. These events were possibly correlated to the so-called `Dark Age Cold Period’ (DACP), the `Mediaeval Warm Period’ (MWP) and the `Little Ice Age’ (LIA). The chironomid-based inference model reconstructed a July air temperature decrease of c. 0.7°C for the DACP and 1.3°C for the LIA compared with the temperature prevailing during the MWP.

Key Words: Climate reconstruction • late Holocene • July air temperature • chironomids • northern French Alps.

CO2 Science.org’s take on this paper is here:

Background

The authors write that “among biological proxies from lake sediments, chironomid [non-biting midge] assemblages are viewed as one of the most promising climatic indicators,” and that “the accuracy of chironomid assemblages for the reconstruction of Lateglacial temperatures is now broadly demonstrated.”

What was done

Millet et al. (1) “present a new chironomid-based temperature record from Lake Anterne (northern French Alps) covering the past two millennia,” (2) “compare this reconstruction with other late-Holocene temperature records from Central Europe,” and (3) “address the question of whether previously described centennial-scale climate events such as the ‘Medieval Warm Period’ [MWP] or the ‘Little Ice Age’ [LIA] can be detected in this new summer temperature record,” noting that “at a hemispheric or global scale the existence of the LIA and MWP have been questioned.”

What was learned

The six scientists report that “evidence was found of a cold phase at Lake Anterne between AD 400 and 680, a warm episode between AD 680 and 1350, and another cold phase between AD 1350 and 1900,” and they say that these events were “correlated to the so-called ‘Dark Age Cold Period’ (DACP), the ‘Medieval Warm Period’ and the ‘Little Ice Age’.” In addition, they say that “many other climate reconstructions across western Europe confirm the existence of several significant climatic changes during the last 1800 years in Central Europe and more specifically the DACP, the MWP and the LIA.” Last of all, they report that the reconstructed temperatures of the 20th century failed to show a return to MWP levels of warmth, which failure they attributed to a breakdown of the chironomid-temperature relationship over the final century of their 1800-year history.

What it means

Ever more evidence continues to indicate that the Medieval Warm Period was a real and global phenomenon (see our Medieval Warm Period Project). It also continues to indicate that the MWP was likely warmer than the Current Warm Period (CWP) has been to date. Such could also be said about the new evidence provided by the study of Millet et al., although we tend to agree that there was indeed a breakdown of their chironomid-temperature relationship when it mattered most and disallowed a valid (apples-to-apples) comparison to be made between the warmth of the MWP and the CWP. However, the fact that Millet et al.’s reconstructed summer temperature dropped by about 1.3°C during the MWP to LIA transition would indeed suggest that the MWP was warmer than the CWP has yet been, since post-LIA warming is generally considered to have been somewhat less than 1.3°C … even when comparing apples to oranges!

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

44 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 21, 2009 6:03 am

SHOCKING I tell you!!! Scientific evidence that refutes AGW claims??
SHOCKING!!!

DaveE
October 21, 2009 6:22 am

Jack Simmons (05:12:18) :
Paul (05:43:20) :
It is pointless trying to argue the logic of Rob Vermeulen (02:48:47).
Fact is, we don’t know what caused the RWP, DACP, MWP & LIA.
Our logic says that as we don’t know and the timing for the CWP is about right, it’s highly likely that the cause is the same, even if we still don’t know that cause.
Robs logic is that we still can’t definately exclude CO2. This is true but as the original logic holds water, (natural, unexplained variability), it is not for us to prove we are right, it is for Rob to prove we are wrong & this time it isn’t natural.
So far, the AGW brigade have failed to disprove natural variability and have gone to extremes to try to prove there is no such variability and even if there was, this time it’s different.
Hockey anyone?
DaveE.

DaveE
October 21, 2009 6:24 am

Mmmmm.
Didn’t even get post awaiting moderation 🙁
DaveE.
[Reply: Post rescued from the spam filter. Please be patient, sometimes moderator coverage is sparse in the early a.m. PST. ~ dbs, moderator]

DaveE
October 21, 2009 6:39 am

Sorry dbs, didn’t realise that spam filter totally bypassed the moderator stage, (hence no awaiting moderation message)
DaveE.

Gacooke
October 21, 2009 6:58 am

Yes, the burden of proof is with the AGW hypothesis.
As noted on the IPCC thread, the failure to properly account for “internal forcings” that controlled past climate, (The stick part of the hockey stick) damages their case.
The failure of AGW models to predict the last decades flat to dropping temperatures clearly does not help their case.
Geologically speaking, it’s all about incident solar radiation.

October 21, 2009 6:58 am

I wonder if the researchers considered the effects of pesticides in their 20th century data? (reiterating Anthony’s suggestion about the effects of DDT in another post regarding Baffin Island diatoms) I would think that pesticide use and residues would have as important an effect as fish? But perhaps the authors already corrected for the effects of man-made chemicals. Does anyone know if this is the case?

TJA
October 21, 2009 7:11 am

Neville,
There is adequate historical evidence that it was warmer in Greenland. Evidence such as records of beef exports, changes in shipping routes due to changes in the patterns of sea ice. You don’t really have to go to the Sagas. Stay away from Wikipedia when researching this. Use the library. There are some great, pre – political correctness histories from the 19th century that are great resources and had access to the written records of the time. This will require you to read from dead trees.
There is also data from the GRIP ice core. Incidentally, the warmers have given up arguing that there was no MWP in Greenland. They are now saying that it was a local phenomenon. So the goalpost has already been moved. That is why this is so important, it shows a wider scope for the MWP than is conceded by the political officers in the IPCC science crew.

TJA
October 21, 2009 7:26 am

Some on this thread have pointed out that the existence of the MWP does not disprove AGW. They are both right and wrong. There is nobody in the scientific mainstream of the skeptical community who argues that there is no AGW. The argument is about the scope of it. Warmers have been arguing that the climate has been stable for thousands of years, like Camelot in the ’60s musical. so the current warming episode must be caused by Man. I call them “flat climaters”, Skeptics argue that the current warming is within the range of natural variability, that the effect of CO2 is small enough to be lost in the noise of natural variability, they call us “flat earthers”. The existence of the MWP is huge in this regard, as is the LIA, which they desperately try to explain away with vulcanism, which no doubt played a role., but which skeptics think they exaggerate to fit their theory.

Gacooke
October 21, 2009 7:47 am

This site can always bring me hours of fun:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/recons.html
Anyone care to comment on how objective and up-to-date this list of studies are at NCDC?

G. Karst
October 21, 2009 7:50 am

We may not be able to definitively know what caused the Roman warm period or the Medieval warm period, but we can certainly conclude that these warm periods were NOT catastrophic. Quite the opposite… the biosphere and Mankind thrived. Those who build on flood plains, given sufficient time, will always get their feet wet and suffer loss. Nothing can change this.

Steve Keohane
October 21, 2009 7:51 am

There are many fine statements above with which concur, that the “unprecidented” nature of the CWP is at odds with the fields of history and archaeology at least. As an amateur paleo-anthropologist over the past nearly fifty years, I have a historical climate model from what I have read. The whole climatic scenerio as proposed by Gore et al, disagrees with decades of research, actual observation records and amusingly now we get more and more reports of what seem to be perfectly good proxies in the past mysteriously losing their concordance with modern ‘observations’. Contrasting this with Anthony’s work of the surface stations, one who would concede there was indeed some warming these days but find it hard to parse how much is due to what particular forcing, might have to think there is perhaps little to no actual warming. One may have to concede the anthopogenic farce of effect on climate is ‘worse than we thought’.

Henry chance
October 21, 2009 7:55 am

But there are other variables.
Since the early 70’s, i have kept a sailboat in the water at a midwestern fresh water yacht club.
Our enemy is the chironomid Mayfly. As the water warms, they hatch their eggs and when I go to the boat on a Saturday, they cover everything. They are thick on many surfaces and some are dead. We hose them off and they are back in a few days. In a week or two, we have spiders and webs all over the sailcovers, rigging and cockpits. They flurish and to some extent hamper mayfly reproduction.
How do we know it is about water temps or birds and spider population?
I also know if we have a gully washer t-storm, there is an increase of cooler water on the bottom and less hatching.

October 21, 2009 9:10 am

“Neville (19:51:43) :
I wish that there was verifiable evidence that the Vikings in Greenland actually grew crops (between 900 to 1300AD) and farmed in areas that are now permafrost.”
1408 A wedding is held at Hvalsey Church. This is the last written record of Greenland’s Norse population.
1480-1500 The Norse population of Greenland disappears

http://www.greenland-guide.gl/leif2000/history.htm

P Walker
October 21, 2009 10:26 am

Henry Chance (07:55:03) – Chironomids and mayflies are different critters . Adult chironomids somewhat resemble mosquitos , but don’t bite ( as far as I know ).

George E. Smith
October 21, 2009 10:41 am

“”” a jones (20:44:26) :
Plenty of evidence about the Viking settlements in Greenland, the shells of some buildings still survive, and digs, where possible, show us their agriculture, from seed and grain samples, to domestic animal bones, remnants of wool and cloth ad so forth. It is all very well attested and accurately dated: most of the work was done in 1930’s. ”
I have read articles (most likely from Scientific American) that say that the Vikings on Greenland essentially existed by transplanting (pun intended) ordinary agricultural and farming procedures from europe to the new lands.
The Inuit on the other hand, coming from a culture that existed mostly by hunting in the Arctic, continued to live on Greenland by hunting seals whales and the like, and never adopted any of the European agriculture practices of the Vikings.
As a result, when the rot set in, and the MWP gave way to the LIA, the Vikings were forced to abandon their settlements; but the Inuit; having never adopted the agriculture were able to continue on by their normal hunting for arctic animals.
Sorry I can’t give any reference; my mind is already full just remebering the stories, and I have no corner left to load in library cards.
George

MrAce
October 21, 2009 12:32 pm

We allready know that the MWP was occuring in Europe. Why does this study about France help in showing it is a global phenomenon.

George E. Smith
October 21, 2009 3:26 pm

“”” MrAce (12:32:21) :
We allready know that the MWP was occuring in Europe. Why does this study about France help in showing it is a global phenomenon. “””
Don’t know about France; but a well known study of many other studies, that was done by Dr “Willie” Wei Hok Soon, and Dr Sallie Baliunas, seemed to indicate quite clearly that both MWP and LIA were in fact global phenomena.
Michael Mann’s Hockey stick however was in his own words, just a local phenomenon; sicne it says “Northern Hemisphere” right on the published graph.

E. J. Mohr
October 21, 2009 10:59 pm

For those who love chironomids and would like some further reading, here are some links to studies done in southern British Columbia. Yes, I know it might just be a local phenomenon, but it was warmer here in the past and for the last several thousand years the climate has cooled. Who would have thought?
http://hdl.handle.net/2429/8196
http://www.paleolab.ca/
http://www.erudit.org/revue/gpq/2004/v58/n1/013113ar.pdf

gdn
October 22, 2009 4:27 pm

Greenland farms:
http://www.expressnews.ualberta.ca/article.cfm?id=776
A reference to the GUS site. Doesn’t go into the farm itself much, but it’s a starting point.