According to Wikipedia, the Medieval Warm Period was a time of warm weather around AD 800-1300 during the European Medieval period. Initial research on the MWP and the following Little Ice Age (LIA) was largely done in Europe, where the phenomenon was most obvious and clearly documented. It was initially believed that the temperature changes were global. However, this view has been questioned; the 2001 IPCC report summarises this research, saying
“…current evidence does not support globally synchronous periods of anomalous cold or warmth over this time frame, and the conventional terms of ‘Little Ice Age’ and ‘Medieval Warm Period’ appear to have limited utility in describing trends in hemispheric or global mean temperature changes in past centuries”.
Of course, there’s many researchers, such as Michael Mann and his thoroughly discredited “hockey stick” that try mightily to make the MWP disappear.
News flash to IPCC. Now a scientist has linked the MWP to success of the Inca civilization in the southern hemisphere. It is not going away any time soon, it is spreading.
The new study is called “Putting the Rise of the Inca within a Climatic and Land Management Context” and was prepared by Alex Chepstow-Lusty, an English paleo-biologist working for the French Institute of Andean Studies, in Lima. Link to paper (PDF) is here (h/t to WUWT reader Corey)
Here is the abstract:
The rapid expansion of the Inca from the Cuzco area of highland Peru produced the largest empire in the New World between ca. AD 1400–1532. Although this meteoric rise may in part be due to the adoption of innovative societal strategies, supported by a large labour force and standing army, we argue that this would not have been possible without increased crop productivity, which was linked to more favourable climatic conditions. A multi-proxy, high-resolution 1200-year lake sediment record was analysed at Marcacocha, 12 km north of Ollantaytambo, in the heartland of the Inca Empire. This record reveals a period of sustained aridity that began from AD 880, followed by increased warming from AD 1100 that lasted beyond the arrival of the Spanish in AD 1532. These increasingly warmer conditions allowed the Inca and their predecessors the opportunity to exploit higher altitudes from AD 1150, by constructing agricultural terraces that employed glacial-fed irrigation, in combination with deliberate agroforestry techniques. There may be some important lessons to be learnt today from these strategies for sustainable rural development in the Andes in the light of future climate uncertainty.
Here is a news article about it that talks of the findings. (h/t to WUWT reader “cotwome”) – Anthony

Opportunity knocks, again, in the Andes
The four centuries coincided directly with the rise of this startling, hyper-productive culture that at its zenith was bigger than the Ming Dynasty China and the Ottoman E
mpire, the two most powerful contemporaries of the Inca.
“This period of increased temperatures,” the scientists say, “allowed the Inca and their predecessors to expand, from AD 1150 onwards, their agricultural zones by moving up the mountains to build a massive system of terraces fed frequently by glacial water, as well as planting trees to reduce erosion and increase soil fertility.
“They re-created the landscape and produced the huge surpluses of maize, potatoes, quinua and other crops that freed a rapidly growing population to build roads, scores of palaces like Machu Picchu and in particular the development of a large standing army.”
No World Bank, no NGOs.
The new study is called “Putting the Rise of the Inca within a Climatic and Land Management Context” and was prepared by Alex Chepstow-Lusty, an English paleo-biologist working for the French Institute of Andean Studies, in Lima. Alex led a team that includes Brian Bauer, of the University of Illinois, one of today’s top Inca-ologists. The study is being published in Climate of the Past, an online academic journal.
Alex spends a lot of time in Cuzco and he told me the other day that the report “raises the question of whether today’s global warming may be another opportunity for the Andes.”
The core samples from the sediment of the little lake, Marcacocha, in the Patakancha valley above Ollantaytambo, show that there was a major cold drought in the southern Andes beginning in 880 AD lasting for a devastating century-plus through into 1000AD. This cold snap finished off both the Wari and the Tiahuanaco cultures which had between them dominated the southern Andes for more than a millenium.
It was at this same time that the Classic Maya disappeared in Yucatan. It was also a time, on the other side of the Pacific when major migrations from East Asia took place into Polynesia, an indication of a major Niño event; a Niño sees western Pacific currents switch to flow from West to East.
Core samples from glaciers and from the mud beneath lakes in the Andes, the Amazon and elsewhere have built up a history of the world’s climate and the message is crystal clear. It is that changes have taken place in the past, during the six or seven thousand years of our agriculture-based civilizations, that are just as big as the ones we are facing from today’s CO2 warming.
The message may be, too, that climate change is especially forceful in the Andes. Here we are, sandwiched thinly between the world’s biggest ocean and the world’s biggest jungle. The peaks are so high that they have had until just a few years ago deep ice on or near the Equator.
The valleys and surrounding hills have formed the roof of the human world for at least three millennia, according to Alex Chepstow-Lusty’s core samples. Nowhere else do millions of people live at or even near 4,000ms above sea level where it is cold, but getting warmer.
Today’s warming is also following on a colder spell that started, the core samples say, not long after the arrival of the Spaniards in the 16th century.
For instance, the pollen in the cores says that there was maize being grown under the Incas around the lake at 3,300ms a.s.l. Until recently the upper level for maize around the Urubamba valley was 3,000-3,100ms. In the past few years the maize level has moved up and today there is maize being grown again above Marcacocha.
Alex’s records show that hundreds of terraces were being built around the lake between 1100 and 1150 AD -“lots of mud followed by the heavy pollen of maize.”
Enrique Mayer, at Yale, tells me that “the question of the expansion of maize together with the Inca state is now a proven archeological fact, notably in the Mantaro Valley (Tim Earle).
“The question of why terraces are not worked now as intensively as they could has been worked on (Bill Devevan) in the Colca Valley where the terraces are actually in franco retroceso.
“Also, you have John Treacy’s book on Coporaque which is probably the most technically accessible to the argument that terraces are, like flower pots, expensive to maintain.”
There is also, of course, the work of John Earls on the terracing at Moray.
Today there are thousands upon thousands of fine flights of Inca terraces all over the upper ends of the valleys of Central and Southern Peru but few of them are used on a regular basis.
Efforts have been made, among them by Ann Kendall, the English archaeologist, to rescusitate the old irrigation channels and the use of the terraces in the valleys above Machu Picchu. But most have been re-abandoned.
In the same vein the great forests of polylepis, the world’s highest tree, which capture and conserve moisture, have mostly been cut down for firewood.
As they say, you only have to look in the mirror to see where the problem is.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Jakers (14:13:53), Steve Keohane (13:48:02), Sam the Skeptic (10:00:17)
Rather than drought, what may have over-stressed the Anasazi culture was a change from a weather pattern with regular, moderate rains to a pattern with deluges and heavy thunderstorms.
The first pattern allowed the construction of irrigation systems which scooped waters from streams and ran them in canals along the sides of canyons to terraces with corn fields. The shift to heavier rains not only knocked down the small dams, but eroded the stream beds to a lower level, which made the former canals out-of-reach of water-diversion-projects on a small scale.
When I lived in that area I watched a stream bed hold little more than a trickle of snow-melt for over two years. During that time a sand dune was slowly building across the stream bed, which was about fifty feet wide and eight feet below the flood plain. Then, in a single big thunderstorm, the entire stream bed was filled to the brim with swirling red water, with entire cottonwood trees charging by in the surge. Two hours later the water was gone. So was the sand dune.
Imagine building any sort of small-scale irrigation system under such conditions! It’s basically impossible. However the Anasazi managed to feed a large population. They were so numerous that (in the 1980’s) the local people often hushed up the discovery of a dump of broken Anasazi pottery shards. Those shards were everywhere, and officially you were suppose to stop all construction and wait for an archeologist to come and investigate. Local folk often didn’t want to be bothered, (especially for small stuff that held no promise of attracting tourists,) so often the law was ignored.
Much about the Anasazi culture is mysterious and fascinating. For example, each pueblo may have spoken a different language. I think research money ought be taken from Hansen and Mann and either sent to people studying the Anasazi, or to me. ( I’d figure out something to study, if I had the money and time.)
If memory serves me correctly, the ebb and flow of the Franz Josef glacier in New Zealand coincides with the ebb and flow and several Swiss glaciers. That is, the rapid expansion of the New Zealand glaciers coincided with European glacier advancement during the coldest periods of the LIA. Ditto for thier retreat.
While precipitation patterns also play a major role in glacier advancement or contraction, it is coincidental that glaciers located on opposite locations on the globe and in different hemispheres would grow and contract at the same time. I think this points to a synchronous period of cooling and warming in both hemispheres.
In the tropics and subtropics, changes in precipitation patterns are probably a more accurate metric for following the global temperature signal in lieu of any better proxy. Dr. Brian Fagan has done a great job in outlining this idea.
Sorta OT (Off) relative the headline, sorta OT (On) relative a timeline.
After a flurry of articles centered aroung 6,000 years ago, I put together Glacial Retreat of 5,000-7,000 Years Ago. It’s a pretty broad time period, but includes accounts from Otzi in the Alps to newly exposed ancient forests in Peru:
Glacier melts are erasing climate record
“The largest glacial ice cap in the tropics, Quelccaya, lies in Peru. As it’s been retreating, it occasionally uncovers surprises that had been buried as the glacier grew. Melting recently uncovered one wetland region that had been buried under ice for more than 5,000 years, revealing some 50 different members of the botanical community that once thrived there.”
—–
Ric Locke (09:30:13) :
Another Ric? Anecdotal evidence of the large readership here. There’s
another Werme here too, but he’s my brother, so the relationship there
is questionable. Err, unquestionable. Umm, whatever.
Actually the Anastasi fell off the cliff and landed in Russia where they became the Royal Family. The last survivor of this family, Anastasia, having never relinquished her claim to the Russian throne, died in 1984. Unfortunately, pesky DNA tests have proved that the woman who died in 1984 was not related to the Romanovs. Here endeth the tale.
E.M.Smith (00:27:49) :
Potatoes are a nice starchy root, but there are lots of nice starchy roots (Parsnips are one of my favorite, as are yams or sweet potatoes).
In my time on this blog, this is the first time I must disagree with you. We both were raised frugally, and our family(s) survived on every imaginable garden produce, fresh and canned. One of my favorites was kohlrabi. But parsnips, yams, and sweet potatoes?
I’d rather die.
Like the MWP, the Inca Empire and Machu Picchu never happened.
Seriously, I also would like to know how our brighter minds on this site reconcile the difference in timeline given for the “European” MWP and the SH MWP (if that is an appropriate way to distinguish) as implied by the subject paper.
The references on Wiki re: MWP cite a 1979 paper (presumably untainted by a zeal for AGW-targeted grant funding) that says a stalagmite in New Zealand indicated a MWP of 1050-1400. This seems to correspond more closely to the warm period that caused the Incas, also in SH, to flourish although it ends 100+ years earlier.
Does this imply that there were warm periods in both hemispheres but that regionally these phenomena were far from simultaneous? Would this in turn imply that something other than well-mixed GHG (or even sunspots), which presumably would impact global temps more uniformly, is the primary driver?
To my little pea-brain, it would seem that oceans are the regulators and have the capacity to regulate on a short-term (El Nino/La Nina) as well as longer-term MWP/LIA basis. But don’t they have to get the heat they absorb/release from somewhere…?
Tim Clark said
“But parsnips, yams, and sweet potatoes?
I’d rather die.”
Have you ever had young parsnips roasted to a golden brown. Better than roast potatoes- Truly delicious. Sweet potatoes are great in Curries.
tonyb
I think I know why great civilizations collapse one it get cold…
People stay indoors and don’t socialise anymore. All the bonds in society break down and nobody cares anymore. I see that every winter.
Actually, I have heard it claimed that the genius that informed the American and industrial revolutions, and the intellectual fervor that accompanied them, were a result of the cold weather in places like Boston keeping one’s mind on indoor studies, as opposed to the torpid South, where people lay around on their porches languidly sipping mint juleps and visiting.
That, of course, is a conceit one hears in places like Harvard.
/Mr Lynn
Let`s not forget the Mississippian culture centered around Cahokia which flourished between 900 and 1600; there is evidence that the great city collapsed do to food shortages. By the time Columbus arrived in America Cahokia was seriously deteriorating-and the mound builder culture withered after that, by the early 1500`s this empire was largely kaput.
Now let me see; what was happening in Europe around this time? Gee, I wonder if there was any connection between warm weather in Europe and a large civilization flourishing in North America?
How about those Mongols, too; Temujin was declared Great Ruler (Genghis Khan) in 1206, but of course this nomadic tribe had been growing in power for a number of years. After Genghis Khan lead the explosion out of the Gobi (a place traditionally limited in food supply because it`s a desert) his band of horseback nomads conquered much of the civilized world and ruled an empire far larger than that of Julius Caesar`s for over a century. Now, why did a bunch of ignorant horsemen living in the desert suddenly unite and invade all of the surrounding country?
The Maori first discovered New Zealand around 950 and the “great fleet” of settlers came sometime during the 11th century. Why was that? What was it driving thousand of people to risk their lives in canoes to resettle at this particular time?
We could go on and on with this.
“”” Timothy Birdnow (18:04:36) :
The Maori first discovered New Zealand around 950 and the “great fleet” of settlers came sometime during the 11th century. Why was that? What was it driving thousand of people to risk their lives in canoes to resettle at this particular time? “””
They probably heard that there were 20 sheep for every person in New Zealand, and that they made some pretty good wines; the Kiwis that is; not the sheep.
Supposedly Kupe discovered the place around 960 AD, but the actual migrations were spread out over several hundred years. They talk about the seven great canoes; but there were a bunch more than that; I can only remember the Arawa, and the Tainui; maybe there was a Takitimu, or is it Takitumu ?
Maori is a very simple language; only 14 letters; plus that impossible ng sound, and every syllable ends in a vowel; so there are no esses to make plurals, so singular and plural are the same. The vowel sounds are absolutely identical to Spanish; I happen to have a resident Spanish expert, and she says Maori is identical in vowel sounds.
To bad they killed off all the Moa; I could use a 12 foot pet bird to kick some A***.
George
RE: George E. Smith (18:47:00) :
Kiwi wit at its finest. 🙂
I always love it when the AGW types proclaim that the LIA and the MWP were not global. The funny thing is that there is more evidence in the paleo record that these episodes where global than exists for the current warm period.
Current global warming is almost exclusively in the high northern latitudes, more localized than the MWP.
Sam the Skeptic (13:11:06) :
Nasif Nahle (11:25:05)
There is at least one warmist who is convinced of the toxicity of CO2.
I’ve lost the link unfortunately but his reply to someone who said that CO2 was not a pollutant was to suggest that he shut himself in a garage with has car engine running!
IF that’s the standard of science of the eco-fascists I think we probably have more to worry about than previously thought.
You have a problem with that?
REPLY: I sure do Phil. I find it abhorrent that you think such comments are OK. Explain yourself – Anthony
[REPLY – Then perhaps explain the difference between carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide . . . ~ Evan]
Thanks, George! I`d love such an a-kicking bird myself. Can`t blame `em for coming for the Sauvignon Blanc, btw.
Phil. (21:04:39) :
Sam the Skeptic (13:11:06) :
Nasif Nahle (11:25:05)
There is at least one warmist who is convinced of the toxicity of CO2.
I’ve lost the link unfortunately but his reply to someone who said that CO2 was not a pollutant was to suggest that he shut himself in a garage with has car engine running!
IF that’s the standard of science of the eco-fascists I think we probably have more to worry about than previously thought.
You have a problem with that?
REPLY: I sure do Phil. I find it abhorrent that you think such comments are OK. Explain yourself – Anthony
[REPLY – Then perhaps explain the difference between carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide . . . ~ Evan]
Way to stay classy Phil.
But the commenter that Nasif mentioned wasn’t as off base as you other guys assumed. With the improvements in auto exhaust standards carbon monoxide is unlikely the to be the lethal agent in modern suicide by asphyxiation by automotive exhaust and CO2 probably plays more of a part than CO although the actual smoking gun is probably O2 depletion. http://journals.lww.com/amjforensicmedicine/Abstract/2002/06000/Asphyxial_Deaths_Caused_by_Automobile_Exhaust.2.aspx
Dave Wendt (10:06:02) :
Way to stay classy Phil.
But the commenter that Nasif mentioned wasn’t as off base as you other guys assumed. With the improvements in auto exhaust standards carbon monoxide is unlikely the to be the lethal agent in modern suicide by asphyxiation by automotive exhaust and CO2 probably plays more of a part than CO although the actual smoking gun is probably O2 depletion. http://journals.lww.com/amjforensicmedicine/Abstract/2002/06000/Asphyxial_Deaths_Caused_by_Automobile_Exhaust.2.aspx
Correction: it was not me who made the commentary but Sam the Skeptic.
Nonetheless, I stand on Sam the Skeptic’s, Anthony’s and Evan’s assertions because if the authors at AM Journal of Forensic Medicine attribute the deaths to high concentrations of carbon dioxide and depletion of oxygen they would be talking about asphyxiation, not intoxication, and the carbon dioxide remains as a non-hazardous product. The same happens with liquid water and water vapor; water, sand, carbon dioxide and other non toxic products suffocate, do not intoxicate.
Some Wikipedia authors have forced the definition and classification of toxic substances for making carbon dioxide and water appear as toxic substances. However, they do not change the chemistry of the body neither set off apoptosis nor stop or transmute metabolic processes, as toxic substances do; they simply asphyxiate, that is, do not permit the oxygen to act as an acceptor of electrons. It is a 101-biophysics matter.
Hyponantremia, a condition of high dilution of sodium in biological tissues for taking too much water, is not a result of toxicity of water, but an osmotic misbalance. The terminology has been corrupted at the extreme. You are toxic, I am toxic, air is toxic, water is toxic, pinto beans are toxic, and the whole Universe is toxic… This is stupid. As I have mentioned above these lines, the real and original concept of toxicity is about substances which change the chemistry of the body, induces apoptosis, and stop or alter the metabolic processes.
Nasif Nahle (13:09:58) :
Sorry for the misattribution, I agree with the rest of your comment about the nontoxicity of CO2 entirely and had planned to add something very similar to my own comment, but I had to go take care of a problem, so I just posted what I had finished. I had also intended to add something to the effect, that if we took a tiny fraction of the money they’re about to squander trying to suppress carbon and invested it in subsidizing the transfer of well developed American technologies for cleaning non CO2 pollutants from smokestacks and autos to developing countries like China and India, we would see real and profound improvements in not only the world environment, but the American economy as well. Of course, improving the American economy seems to be exactly opposite to the goals our politicians are striving to achieve.
Comparing the above unreferenced graph
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/mwp-hockey-warming_graph.gif
to the now read the referenced document
http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/5/771/2009/cpd-5-771-2009.pdf
One concludes that they do not refer to the same climate:
Intro:A multi-proxy, high-resolution 1200-year lake sediment record was analysed at Marcacocha, 12 km north of Ollantaytambo, in the heartland of the Inca Empire. This record reveals a period of sustained aridity that began from AD 880, 10 followed by increased warming from AD 1100 that lasted beyond the arrival of the Spanish in AD 1532.
5.4 AD 1400–1540
This interval, which coincides with a period of rapid Inca expansion outside of the Cuzco heartland, appears to have been relatively stable from a climatic point of view.
Temperatures seemed to have remained warm, with precipitation (and corresponding lake-levels) being low. Despite this climatic stability, significant land-use changes occurred in the basin.
Whereas the graph shows no such stability in MWP warmth in fact it dives into minus 0.5C
George E. Smith (14:38:02) : You can make the degree sign (and most other characters) by using the Alt-key & your numeric keypad to type the ASCII equivalent. E.g., “£,” “º,” “½,” “α,” “Ω,””√,” “♣,” “♫,”☺” are all possible.
BTW, “º” is Alt-167. Hold down the Alt key and type the number, then let go!