The Medieval Warm Period linked to the success of Machu Picchu, Inca Empire

According to Wikipedia,  the Medieval Warm Period was a time of warm weather around AD 800-1300 during the European Medieval period. Initial research on the MWP and the following Little Ice Age (LIA) was largely done in Europe, where the phenomenon was most obvious and clearly documented. It was initially believed that the temperature changes were global. However, this view has been questioned; the 2001 IPCC report summarises this research, saying

“…current evidence does not support globally synchronous periods of anomalous cold or warmth over this time frame, and the conventional terms of ‘Little Ice Age’ and ‘Medieval Warm Period’ appear to have limited utility in describing trends in hemispheric or global mean temperature changes in past centuries”.

Of course, there’s many researchers, such as Michael Mann and his thoroughly discredited “hockey stick”  that  try mightily to make the MWP disappear.

MWP-hockey-warming_graph

News flash to IPCC.  Now a scientist has linked the MWP to success of the Inca civilization in the southern hemisphere. It is not going away any time soon, it is spreading.

The new study is called “Putting the Rise of the Inca within a Climatic and Land Management Context” and was prepared by Alex Chepstow-Lusty, an English paleo-biologist working for the French Institute of Andean Studies, in Lima. Link to paper (PDF) is here (h/t to WUWT reader Corey)

Here is the abstract:

The rapid expansion of the Inca from the Cuzco area of highland Peru produced the largest empire in the New World between ca. AD 1400–1532. Although this meteoric rise may in part be due to the adoption of innovative societal strategies, supported by a large labour  force and standing army, we argue that this would not have been possible without increased crop productivity, which was linked to more favourable climatic conditions. A multi-proxy, high-resolution 1200-year lake sediment record was analysed at Marcacocha, 12 km north of Ollantaytambo, in the heartland of the Inca Empire. This record reveals a period of sustained aridity that began from AD 880,  followed by increased warming from AD 1100 that lasted beyond the arrival of the Spanish in AD 1532. These increasingly warmer conditions allowed the Inca and their predecessors the opportunity to exploit higher altitudes from AD 1150, by constructing agricultural terraces that employed glacial-fed irrigation, in combination with deliberate agroforestry techniques. There may be some important lessons to be learnt today from these strategies for sustainable rural development in the Andes in the light of future climate uncertainty.

Here is a news article about it that talks of the findings. (h/t to WUWT reader “cotwome”) – Anthony

Huayna Picchu towers above the ruins of Machu Picchu

Opportunity knocks, again, in the Andes

by Nicholas Asheshov
The last time global warming came to the Andes it produced the Inca Empire.  A team of English and U.S. scientists has analyzed pollen, seeds and isotopes in core samples taken from the deep mud of a small lake not far from Machu Picchu and their report says that “the success of the Inca was underpinned by a period of warming that lasted more than four centuries.”

The four centuries coincided directly with the rise of this startling, hyper-productive culture that at its zenith was bigger than the Ming Dynasty China and the Ottoman Emachu_picchu_globempire, the two most powerful contemporaries of the Inca.

“This period of increased temperatures,” the scientists say, “allowed the Inca and their predecessors to expand, from AD 1150 onwards, their agricultural zones by moving up the mountains to build a massive system of terraces fed frequently by glacial water, as well as planting trees to reduce erosion and increase soil fertility.

“They re-created the landscape and produced the huge surpluses of maize, potatoes, quinua and other crops that freed a rapidly growing population to build roads, scores of palaces like Machu Picchu and in particular the development of a large standing army.”

No World Bank, no NGOs.

The new study is called “Putting the Rise of the Inca within a Climatic and Land Management Context” and was prepared by Alex Chepstow-Lusty, an English paleo-biologist working for the French Institute of Andean Studies, in Lima.  Alex led a team that includes Brian Bauer, of the University of Illinois, one of today’s top Inca-ologists. The study is being published in Climate of the Past, an online academic journal.

Alex spends a lot of time in Cuzco and he told me the other day that the report “raises the question of whether today’s global warming may be another opportunity for the Andes.”

The core samples from the sediment of the little lake, Marcacocha, in the Patakancha valley above Ollantaytambo, show that there was a major cold drought in the southern Andes beginning in 880 AD lasting for a devastating century-plus through into 1000AD.  This cold snap finished off both the Wari and the Tiahuanaco cultures which had between them dominated the southern Andes for more than a millenium.

It was at this same time that the Classic Maya disappeared in Yucatan. It was also a time, on the other side of the Pacific when major migrations from East Asia took place into Polynesia, an indication of a major Niño event; a Niño sees western Pacific currents switch to flow from West to East.

Core samples from glaciers and from the mud beneath lakes in the Andes, the Amazon and elsewhere have built up a history of the world’s climate and the message is crystal clear. It is that changes have taken place in the past, during the six or seven thousand years of our agriculture-based civilizations, that are just as big as the ones we are facing from today’s CO2 warming.

The message may be, too, that climate change is especially forceful in the Andes. Here we are, sandwiched thinly between the world’s biggest ocean and the world’s biggest jungle. The peaks are so high that they have had until just a few years ago deep ice on or near the Equator.

The valleys and surrounding hills have formed the roof of the human world for at least three millennia, according to Alex Chepstow-Lusty’s core samples. Nowhere else do millions of people live at or even near 4,000ms above sea level where it is cold, but getting warmer.

Today’s warming is also following on a colder spell that started, the core samples say, not long after the arrival of the Spaniards in the 16th century.

For instance, the pollen in the cores says that there was maize being grown under the Incas around the lake at 3,300ms a.s.l. Until recently the upper level for maize around the Urubamba valley was 3,000-3,100ms. In the past few years the maize level has moved up and today there is maize being grown again above Marcacocha.

Alex’s records show that hundreds of terraces were being built around the lake between 1100 and 1150 AD -“lots of mud followed by the heavy pollen of maize.”

Enrique Mayer, at Yale, tells me that “the question of the expansion of maize together with the Inca state is now a proven archeological fact, notably in the Mantaro Valley (Tim Earle).

“The question of why terraces are not worked now as intensively as they could has been worked on (Bill Devevan) in the Colca Valley where the terraces are actually in franco retroceso.

“Also, you have John Treacy’s book on Coporaque which is probably the most technically accessible to the argument that terraces are, like flower pots, expensive to maintain.”

There is also, of course, the work of John Earls on the terracing at Moray.

Today there are thousands upon thousands of fine flights of Inca terraces all over the upper ends of the valleys of Central and Southern Peru but few of them are used on a regular basis.

Efforts have been made, among them by Ann Kendall, the English archaeologist, to rescusitate the old irrigation channels and the use of the terraces in the valleys above Machu Picchu. But most have been re-abandoned.

In the same vein the great forests of polylepis, the world’s highest tree, which capture and conserve moisture, have mostly been cut down for firewood.

As they say, you only have to look in the mirror to see where the problem is.

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

120 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MikeN
July 8, 2009 12:57 pm

So did he establish that temperatures were warmer than now?
Jeff Id at The Air Vent has been working with Mann’s hockey stick algorithm, and he has shown how it could shrink a historic warming to be less than it really was.

July 8, 2009 1:11 pm

Nasif Nahle (11:25:05)
There is at least one warmist who is convinced of the toxicity of CO2.
I’ve lost the link unfortunately but his reply to someone who said that CO2 was not a pollutant was to suggest that he shut himself in a garage with has car engine running!
IF that’s the standard of science of the eco-fascists I think we probably have more to worry about than previously thought.

Jon Jewett
July 8, 2009 1:11 pm

This is Proof Positive that Halliburton and Dick Chaney have been plundering the Earth for oil longer than anyone has imagined!
I feel guilty ridiculing the AGWers. It’s like kicking a cripple.
Steamboat Jack

tty
July 8, 2009 1:13 pm

A minor quibble. Ollantaytambo is not near Machu Picchu. I know that Machu Picchu is more photogenic (though Ollantaytambo isn’t bad), but it is not really relevant in this context since it is at much lower altitude and has always had tropical climate, even during the LIA.

Conservative&denialist
July 8, 2009 1:21 pm

tty (13:13:16) : Ollantaytambo is not near Machu Picchu
You are right, but the authors are making a reference to Macchu Picchu as it is the most known icon of the Inca culture.

Philip_B
July 8, 2009 1:23 pm

On a related topic, the Roman Empire was based on agricultural trade. There is substantial archeological evidence that large areas of upland Britain were used for grain (wheat) production. These areas are currently too cold for any crop based agriculture despite development of more cold tolerant varieties.
It used to be generally accepted that Britain during the Roman era was several degrees warmer than currently. I recall reading in a book written in the 70s that Britain in the Roman era had the same climate as the south of France had currently.
It is also believed by some that the otherwise unexplained reason why the Romans left Britain was because a colder climate prevented crops growing and destroyed the agricultural economy. There is evidence that the human population of Britain collapsed around this time. A sobering thought for those who would have us believe a warmer world is bad.
Here is one of many texts on the subject.
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=spyCIqTzJu0C&pg=RA2-PA446&lpg=RA2-PA446&dq=roman+britain+grain&source=bl&ots=d8aalT8uQ2&sig=QDRI5TmwkuNggKkWnPjAal-ZGxY&hl=en&ei=IfpUSuLGD6ja6gPylejODw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1
Note copyright material that prevents me cutting and pasting.

noaaprogrammer
July 8, 2009 1:30 pm

Edward: wrote: “There’s ample evidence of earlier warmer periods when people traversed Alpine mountain passes that are now covered by glaciers. The Romans did so as did the “Iceman” Otzi about 5300 years ago.”
If one believes the chroniclers of ancient Israel: Samson killed a lion, David killed a bear, (approx. 3,000 years ago.) If true, there had to be a totally different ecosystem in Palestine at that time in order to support a food chain for such large animals. Also, radar reveals dried river beds and ancient roads underneath the Sahara sand dunes.

Dave Wendt
July 8, 2009 1:36 pm

The ardent fervor the alarmists have invested in consigning the MWP and other past periods of warm climate to the memory hole derives from their realization that the entire edifice of their program of massive governmental intrusiveness and control rests on a foundational assumption that any warming that occurs will necessarily be catastrophic for humanity and the planetary environment. No information that suggests that a warmer climate may be on the whole beneficial can be allowed to freely circulate or their entire enterprise is in grave danger of collapsing like the house of cards that it is. Of course, even without the evidence of the benevolent nature of past warm periods, their presumption of catastrophic consequences is still largely unsupportable based the evidence provided by more current observations. That they willingly choose to disregard this is prima facie evidence that their fundamental concern is in driving the expansion of governmental control rather than in expanding environmental well being.

JimInIndy
July 8, 2009 1:36 pm

Edward (11:52:27)
Thanks for the Alpine/Otzi ref. I’ve seen several stories that link him to the tail-end of Bronze Age (or Minoan) Warming. He was killed on the run, fell against a snow-bank, was covered by a fresh fall, then wasn’t seen until summer melt in 1991. To me, this meant an extensive (non-SUV) glacial retreat 5000 years ago, and abrupt reversal. The BBC story reveals evidence of Bronze and Roman Warming, but also shows the lockstep thought of AGW true believers. Quoting:
— For Martin Grosjean( a climatologist at Berne University), the leather items found on the Schnidejoch, dated at over 5,000 years old, are proof, if any more were needed, that the Earth is now warming up. “The leather is the jewel among the finds,” he says. “If leather is exposed to the weather, to sun, wind and rain, it disintegrates almost immediately.
“The fact that we still find these 5,000-year-old pieces of leather tells us they were protected by the ice all this time, and that the glaciers have never been smaller than in the year 2003 and the years following.” –
The glacier was obviously smaller during the Bronze and Roman Warming, or the varied artifacts could not have been buried, and the probability, based on the evidence in front of Mr. Grosjean, is that the Bronze was warmer than Roman.
Those who do not believe in Earth’s natural climate cycles are the true deniers.

Steve Keohane
July 8, 2009 1:48 pm

Sam the Skeptic (10:00:17) From what I’ve read and heard from talks on the Anasazi cliffdwellers, drought was their demise, about the time of the LIA. They had trade routes into Central if not South America as they had feathers and stones from the far south. IIRC, they did not die in situ, rather, apparently moved on, though to parts unknown.

Purakanui
July 8, 2009 1:54 pm

KLA,
As I recall, stalactite analysis suggests a MWP in New Zealand and it was a time when the relatively recent Maori settlers flourished.
Incidentally, one of the authors of the study was Jim Salinger, recently dismissed from NIWA, our local Church of AGW.
I see Jim now has an affiliation with Victoria University, Wellington and is travelling the country (well, coming down to Dunedin a couple of times, at least). He is due to speak on ‘Ridding ourselves of our high carbon addiction’ or some such.
Cast out by the True Church, but still a devout Believer; there’s a soap opera episode there somewhere.

GoatGuy
July 8, 2009 2:03 pm

I think the attached is a keen screed (utilizing this here site’s citings) against the proverbial “mainstream thinking” that is expounded as science these days.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/07/various-ways-to-avoid-about-one-billion.html#comment-12332775
GoatGuy

D. King
July 8, 2009 2:07 pm

Boy, these guys better be careful; now they’re putting into
question the assertion that the evil Europeans killed off these
peaceful, human sacrificing, bloodthirsty, warmongering,
gentle indigenous people.

Ray
July 8, 2009 2:12 pm

More proof that the the poles are not melting…
NASA report of thinning arctic ice is deceiving
http://www.examiner.com/x-11224-Baltimore-Weather-Examiner~y2009m7d8-NASA-report-of-thinning-arctic-ice-is-deceiving

Jakers
July 8, 2009 2:13 pm

Steve Keohane (13:48:02) : Sam the Skeptic (10:00:17) From what I’ve read and heard from talks on the Anasazi cliffdwellers, drought was their demise, about the time of the LIA.
Actually, at the end of the 13th century, so in MWP.

Pompous Git
July 8, 2009 2:23 pm

From Polar Biology 2004
“Liguang Sun1, 2 Contact Information, Xiaodong Liu1, Xuebin Yin1, Renbin Zhu1, Zhouqing Xie1 and Yuhong Wang1
(1) Institute of Polar Environment, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026 Anhui, P. R. China
(2) Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xirsquoan, 710075 Shanxi, P. R. China
Received: 26 May 2003 Accepted: 12 February 2004 Published online: 24 April 2004
Abstract The historical seal populations at King George Island, Antarctica, for the past 1,500 years, have been estimated from the seal-hair abundance, bio-element concentrations, total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) in one terrestrial sediment sequence influenced by seal excrement. Prior to human interference, the seal populations exhibited dramatic fluctuations with two peaks during 750–500 and 1400–1100 years before present (yr B.P.) and two troughs during 1100–750 and 500–200 yr B.P. A tentative comparison of the seal populations and historical climates in the Antarctic Peninsula region suggests that the seal populations may be linked to climate-related factors such as sea-ice coverage and atmospheric temperature.”

D. King
July 8, 2009 2:24 pm

evanmjones (09:20:12) :
fall of cliff dwellers
I can see how that would be a problem.
Tears Evan, tears!

Conservative&denialist
July 8, 2009 2:30 pm

Dear D. King (14:07:22) : Boy, these guys better be careful; now they’re putting into question the assertion that the evil Europeans killed off these
peaceful, human sacrificing, bloodthirsty, warmongering, gentle indigenous people.
The Inca culture was an advanced culture to which you owe most of the food you ate today.

George E. Smith
July 8, 2009 2:38 pm

Haven’t read any of the preceding yet; but I should offer this. Some years back, Dr “Willie” Wei-Hock Soon, and Dr Sallie Baliunas presented a paper, in which they examined a very large number of peer reviewed literature papers, from authors all over the globe, which related to studies that might show evidence of the MWP and/or the LIA.
They concluded that the evidence was clear that both MWP, and LIA were indeed GLOBAL PHENOMENA.
On the other hand, Michael Mann in his original “hockey stick” paper, as presented in the first IPCC report, clearly identifies the hockie stick as just a local anomaly; not a global phenomenon. I have here in my hot little hand; right out of my office desk draw; (for quick draw access), an actual portion (not a copy) of a Los Angeles Times Newspaper (impeccable source); page A12 from Friday, June 23 2006 on which can be found a reprint of the “hocky stick graph” claiming sources of the IPCC, and the National Academy of Sciences (impeccable sources); with a notation that references to colors in the chart have been removed from original; since the LAT section is printed in Black and white.
Not removed from the chart are the telling words; “NORTHERN HEMISPHERE” !!! ??? No not my caps; they are on the graph. So the LIA and MWP clearly were global in extent, but by Michael Mann’s own assertion, the hockey stick isn’t.
The interested researcher, can find that eventually, later copies of the chart were expurgated to remove the damning words; but too late to undo the damage that Mann did with this piece of science fiction. Incidently, the original data contains a noise level that is typically six times the amplitude of the “smoothed” faux data; which is quite typical of Gaussian Whie Noise signals; up to around 1600, and then mysteriously, the p-p noise level suddenly drops to about three times the smoothed false data, and around 1900, when the foot takes off into space, the noise level drops to around twice the smoothed output.
The chart bears only these other words: “Data from thermometers and from tree rings, corals, ice cores, and historical records.” The time frame is from 1000 AD to 2000AD, and the Y-axis says; “Departures in temperature (deg C) from the 1961 to 1990 average” I must confess that the “deg” is not a factual quote from the graph; which actually uses that little degree circle symbol which is not on my keyboard; so I admit to that editorial licence.
Just in case you wanted to know.
George
PS, I don’t recall whether the Soon/Baliunas review was a peer reviewed study, or whether it was something they posted on that Tech Central Station web site way back then. I’m sure you PhD Googlers can easily recover that paper of theirs.

George E. Smith
July 8, 2009 2:43 pm

“”” Purakanui (13:54:11) :
KLA,
As I recall, stalactite analysis suggests a MWP in New Zealand and it was a time when the relatively recent Maori settlers flourished.
Incidentally, one of the authors of the study was Jim Salinger, recently dismissed from NIWA, our local Church of AGW. “””
Tena koe, Purakanui ! I’m sure that Jim Salinger has an able ally in fellow Wellingtonian Vincent Gray; and for island balance, Chris de Freitas at the UofA (my alma mater), is a fellow traveller.
George

nofreewind
July 8, 2009 2:49 pm

get in on the climate funding as mentioned above. take a look at this from Australia. Details of grants awarded in the past five years under the ARC’s National Competitive Grants Program (NCGP) to projects
related to climate change. It is MINDBOGGLING! for teeny Australia.
http://sciencespeak.com/ClimateFunding.pdf
For climate history, check out Brian Fagan’s books.
The Little Ice Age 4.25 on http://www.amazon.com + ship – This one is better, and also covers the great warming somewhat. Also, Fagan does believe in CO2/Temp and states right away the party line. But then, in the book goes on all about the lack of sunspots in The Little Ice Age and some pretty interesting stuff about that.
The Great Warming

George E. Smith
July 8, 2009 2:54 pm

“”” noaaprogrammer (09:12:48) :
…and don’t forget the rise & fall of cliff dwellers in the Southwest – e.g. the Anastasi people. “””
These were the lost descendents of the lone survivor of the Russian Royal Family massacre; back around the Russian revolution era; They didn’t actually vanish; but later on became the East Germany Secret Police.

AlexB
July 8, 2009 2:55 pm

This is very serious. The threat of another Inca uprising in our time due to CO2 driven warming will cause havok. We might even approach a tipping point where the Inca empire is permanantly in control. I need to go do some modelling.

Tim Clark
July 8, 2009 2:57 pm

Barry Foster (11:45:16) :
Can someone guide me in the right directions? In this month’s BBC Focus magazine (here in the UK) they say that the Medieval Warm Period wasn’t global. But is the current warming global? Are there many places which show no warming, or even cooling since 1979? I know the lower troposphere shows no warming now, and neither does the Antarctic, but are there any other places? Thanks.

At the site below you can peruse graphical data from 1900-2008 for the United States. All seasonal graphs show a flat to negative trend. It’s an inconvenient truth.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/2008/us-final

Verified by MonsterInsights