The Medieval Warm Period linked to the success of Machu Picchu, Inca Empire

According to Wikipedia,  the Medieval Warm Period was a time of warm weather around AD 800-1300 during the European Medieval period. Initial research on the MWP and the following Little Ice Age (LIA) was largely done in Europe, where the phenomenon was most obvious and clearly documented. It was initially believed that the temperature changes were global. However, this view has been questioned; the 2001 IPCC report summarises this research, saying

“…current evidence does not support globally synchronous periods of anomalous cold or warmth over this time frame, and the conventional terms of ‘Little Ice Age’ and ‘Medieval Warm Period’ appear to have limited utility in describing trends in hemispheric or global mean temperature changes in past centuries”.

Of course, there’s many researchers, such as Michael Mann and his thoroughly discredited “hockey stick”  that  try mightily to make the MWP disappear.

MWP-hockey-warming_graph

News flash to IPCC.  Now a scientist has linked the MWP to success of the Inca civilization in the southern hemisphere. It is not going away any time soon, it is spreading.

The new study is called “Putting the Rise of the Inca within a Climatic and Land Management Context” and was prepared by Alex Chepstow-Lusty, an English paleo-biologist working for the French Institute of Andean Studies, in Lima. Link to paper (PDF) is here (h/t to WUWT reader Corey)

Here is the abstract:

The rapid expansion of the Inca from the Cuzco area of highland Peru produced the largest empire in the New World between ca. AD 1400–1532. Although this meteoric rise may in part be due to the adoption of innovative societal strategies, supported by a large labour  force and standing army, we argue that this would not have been possible without increased crop productivity, which was linked to more favourable climatic conditions. A multi-proxy, high-resolution 1200-year lake sediment record was analysed at Marcacocha, 12 km north of Ollantaytambo, in the heartland of the Inca Empire. This record reveals a period of sustained aridity that began from AD 880,  followed by increased warming from AD 1100 that lasted beyond the arrival of the Spanish in AD 1532. These increasingly warmer conditions allowed the Inca and their predecessors the opportunity to exploit higher altitudes from AD 1150, by constructing agricultural terraces that employed glacial-fed irrigation, in combination with deliberate agroforestry techniques. There may be some important lessons to be learnt today from these strategies for sustainable rural development in the Andes in the light of future climate uncertainty.

Here is a news article about it that talks of the findings. (h/t to WUWT reader “cotwome”) – Anthony

Huayna Picchu towers above the ruins of Machu Picchu

Opportunity knocks, again, in the Andes

by Nicholas Asheshov
The last time global warming came to the Andes it produced the Inca Empire.  A team of English and U.S. scientists has analyzed pollen, seeds and isotopes in core samples taken from the deep mud of a small lake not far from Machu Picchu and their report says that “the success of the Inca was underpinned by a period of warming that lasted more than four centuries.”

The four centuries coincided directly with the rise of this startling, hyper-productive culture that at its zenith was bigger than the Ming Dynasty China and the Ottoman Emachu_picchu_globempire, the two most powerful contemporaries of the Inca.

“This period of increased temperatures,” the scientists say, “allowed the Inca and their predecessors to expand, from AD 1150 onwards, their agricultural zones by moving up the mountains to build a massive system of terraces fed frequently by glacial water, as well as planting trees to reduce erosion and increase soil fertility.

“They re-created the landscape and produced the huge surpluses of maize, potatoes, quinua and other crops that freed a rapidly growing population to build roads, scores of palaces like Machu Picchu and in particular the development of a large standing army.”

No World Bank, no NGOs.

The new study is called “Putting the Rise of the Inca within a Climatic and Land Management Context” and was prepared by Alex Chepstow-Lusty, an English paleo-biologist working for the French Institute of Andean Studies, in Lima.  Alex led a team that includes Brian Bauer, of the University of Illinois, one of today’s top Inca-ologists. The study is being published in Climate of the Past, an online academic journal.

Alex spends a lot of time in Cuzco and he told me the other day that the report “raises the question of whether today’s global warming may be another opportunity for the Andes.”

The core samples from the sediment of the little lake, Marcacocha, in the Patakancha valley above Ollantaytambo, show that there was a major cold drought in the southern Andes beginning in 880 AD lasting for a devastating century-plus through into 1000AD.  This cold snap finished off both the Wari and the Tiahuanaco cultures which had between them dominated the southern Andes for more than a millenium.

It was at this same time that the Classic Maya disappeared in Yucatan. It was also a time, on the other side of the Pacific when major migrations from East Asia took place into Polynesia, an indication of a major Niño event; a Niño sees western Pacific currents switch to flow from West to East.

Core samples from glaciers and from the mud beneath lakes in the Andes, the Amazon and elsewhere have built up a history of the world’s climate and the message is crystal clear. It is that changes have taken place in the past, during the six or seven thousand years of our agriculture-based civilizations, that are just as big as the ones we are facing from today’s CO2 warming.

The message may be, too, that climate change is especially forceful in the Andes. Here we are, sandwiched thinly between the world’s biggest ocean and the world’s biggest jungle. The peaks are so high that they have had until just a few years ago deep ice on or near the Equator.

The valleys and surrounding hills have formed the roof of the human world for at least three millennia, according to Alex Chepstow-Lusty’s core samples. Nowhere else do millions of people live at or even near 4,000ms above sea level where it is cold, but getting warmer.

Today’s warming is also following on a colder spell that started, the core samples say, not long after the arrival of the Spaniards in the 16th century.

For instance, the pollen in the cores says that there was maize being grown under the Incas around the lake at 3,300ms a.s.l. Until recently the upper level for maize around the Urubamba valley was 3,000-3,100ms. In the past few years the maize level has moved up and today there is maize being grown again above Marcacocha.

Alex’s records show that hundreds of terraces were being built around the lake between 1100 and 1150 AD -“lots of mud followed by the heavy pollen of maize.”

Enrique Mayer, at Yale, tells me that “the question of the expansion of maize together with the Inca state is now a proven archeological fact, notably in the Mantaro Valley (Tim Earle).

“The question of why terraces are not worked now as intensively as they could has been worked on (Bill Devevan) in the Colca Valley where the terraces are actually in franco retroceso.

“Also, you have John Treacy’s book on Coporaque which is probably the most technically accessible to the argument that terraces are, like flower pots, expensive to maintain.”

There is also, of course, the work of John Earls on the terracing at Moray.

Today there are thousands upon thousands of fine flights of Inca terraces all over the upper ends of the valleys of Central and Southern Peru but few of them are used on a regular basis.

Efforts have been made, among them by Ann Kendall, the English archaeologist, to rescusitate the old irrigation channels and the use of the terraces in the valleys above Machu Picchu. But most have been re-abandoned.

In the same vein the great forests of polylepis, the world’s highest tree, which capture and conserve moisture, have mostly been cut down for firewood.

As they say, you only have to look in the mirror to see where the problem is.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 1 vote
Article Rating
120 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
July 8, 2009 10:09 am

Near as I can tell, warmer weather is beneficial to life, plants and animals as well as humans.
Do we need any more proof that liberals are gripped with and motivated by cultural, societal and planetary suicide?
All life on earth is carbon based, viewing carbon as a “pollutant” and demanding its reduction and/or removal is nothing more than calling for extermination of all life. That is the end result of their programs and we need to see it for what it is.
It is time for a culture of life to assume control of the debate and the decisions.
Best regards,
Gail S
http://backyardfence.wordpress.com

Vincent
July 8, 2009 10:13 am

What’s wrong with these scientists? Don’t they know the MWP does not exist?
It’s all lies!

bill
July 8, 2009 10:24 am

What is amazing is that no-one will trust temperatures measured with instruments. Yet the headline graph shows temperatures to within 0.5degC back to times when temperatures were measured by hot, cold and ok!!
It is interesting to note that this temperature plot from an earlier blog entry
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/kirkby_slide_siberianclimate.jpg
shows Siberian temperatures being 1degC below 20Century normals
And this plot of grape harvest date shows no shortened harvest times (compared to 2000+) Times (and so temperatures) are similar to those in 1650 to 1700
The LIA is missing from the grape dates as well – the plot at top shows LIA 1550 to 1700 but this period is similar to 1790 1900 in dates and therefore temperatures.
Life is so full of incosistencies!

SteveSadlov
July 8, 2009 10:38 am

No doubt the MWP was a world wide golden age for the emergence of mountain cultures. Alpenvolk, Tibettans, Mustangians, Nepalese, and the ones already mentioned. Then, when things got cold, they became scattered remnants. Their cultural oddities derive from that pattern of early development followed by a deep retreat and fall off in population.

Richard Heg
July 8, 2009 10:39 am

I linked to this article in a previous comment. This article is in the current national geographic about the city of ankor in cambodia. The city was at its hight around the 12th century at the hight of the warm period and fell due to lack of rain during the little ice age.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2009/07/angkor/stone-text

SteveSadlov
July 8, 2009 10:39 am

Argh … MWP.
REPLY: Fixed pre-argh, Anthony

Don S.
July 8, 2009 10:39 am

noaaprogrammer
Not sure who the Anastasi were. Google might ask “did you mean Anasazi?”
Sam the Sceptic
‘The Mayor of Casterbridge’ is a fine literary exposition on the effect of climate on wheat prices. Because of the way farm products were marketed in England, knowledge of weather precursors were avidly sought and drove the futures sales of grains. Still do. Want to know what the weather will be in East Anglia next fall? Ask a farmer. He’s betting his personal wealth on it.

Corey
July 8, 2009 10:40 am

Here is the study:
Putting the rise of the Inca Empire within a climatic and land management context
Received: 30 January 2009 – Accepted: 2 February 2009 – Published: 4 March 2009
Abstract
The rapid expansion of the Inca from the Cuzco area of highland Peru produced the largest empire in the New World between ca. AD 1400–1532. Although this meteoric rise may in part be due to the adoption of innovative societal strategies, supported by a large labour force and standing army, we argue that this would not have been possible without increased crop productivity, which was linked to more favourable climatic conditions. A multi-proxy, high-resolution 1200-year lake sediment record was analysed at Marcacocha, 12 km north of Ollantaytambo, in the heartland of the Inca Empire. This record reveals a period of sustained aridity that began from AD 880, followed by increased warming from AD 1100 that lasted beyond the arrival of the Spanish in AD 1532. These increasingly warmer conditions allowed the Inca and their predecessors the opportunity to exploit higher altitudes from AD 1150, by constructing agricultural terraces that employed glacial-fed irrigation, in combination with deliberate agroforestry techniques. There may be some important lessons to be learnt today from these strategies for sustainable rural development in the Andes in the light of future climate uncertainty.
http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/5/771/2009/cpd-5-771-2009.pdf
REPLY: Thank you sincerely for finding that, I spent time looking but was unable to. – Anthony

Corey
July 8, 2009 10:58 am

REPLY: Thank you sincerely for finding that, I spent time looking but was unable to. – Anthony
You’re welcome! Keep up the good work.

July 8, 2009 11:25 am

Gail S (10:09:58) :
Near as I can tell, warmer weather is beneficial to life, plants and animals as well as humans.
And biologists are sure of it. I do not understand why some colleagues adhere to the fallacy on the “toxicity of the carbon dioxide pollutant”. They do know for sure that life is not possible without carbon dioxide. In the begining of life, living beings were chemosmotic-anoxibiotic organisms. Life prospered in environments with more than 8000 ppmV of CO2 (proterozoic era).
In the middle proterozoic chemoautotrophic organisms appeared and by the late proterozoic the composition of the atmosphere started changing. The proportion of Oxigen increased due to the release of this gas from H2O through photosynthesis. The superwarm Earth during the proterozoic era is evidence against the role of carbon dioxide like an important “greehouse” gas.

George Tobin
July 8, 2009 11:30 am

I think the Incas suddenly realized it really could not really be that warm and pleasant because the Medieval Warming Period (if it existed all all) was limited to northern Europe–and their economy collapsed as a result of that realization.
It may also be the case that when believers in Inti (the sun god) starting to perceive that the god Illapa’s extreme weather events were actually a form of positive rather than negative feedback that the religious culture was fatally undermined as well.
Also, there is no truth to the silly rumor that Pizarro ordered Atahuallpa, last of the Incan rulers to be executed with a hockey stick.

Conservative&denialist
July 8, 2009 11:36 am

Thanks to Mr.Nasif Nahle (11:25:05) : we can guess that perhaps some
chemosmotic-anoxibiotic organisms are the ones after the “global warming” issue. 🙂

Barry Foster
July 8, 2009 11:45 am

Can someone guide me in the right directions? In this month’s BBC Focus magazine (here in the UK) they say that the Medieval Warm Period wasn’t global. But is the current warming global? Are there many places which show no warming, or even cooling since 1979? I know the lower troposphere shows no warming now, and neither does the Antarctic, but are there any other places? Thanks.

Michael D Smith
July 8, 2009 11:49 am

Thanks for the link… The comment about CO2 warming is not in the linked paper.

Edward
July 8, 2009 11:52 am

I marvel at people who still deny that there was a medeival warm period. There’s ample evidence of earlier warmer periods when people traversed Alpine mountain passes that are now covered by glaciers. The Romans did so as did the “Iceman” Otzi about 5300 years ago. Perhaps our climate is just now returning to a more normal warmer time period. Please find link below.
Thanks
Ed
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7580294.stm

tj
July 8, 2009 12:04 pm

Gail S., In answer to your question all “liberals” are not “…gripped with and motivated by cultural, societal and planetary suicide…” Liberals have been misinformed by the people they trust. The masses of them would change their minds immediately if they weren’t filled with total malarkey by their leadership and the media, which is almost totally owned and controlled by very wealthy “conservatives”. Don’t you smell the ruse? The people at the top, the ones who have orchestrated this issue , are neither liberal in the sense the average “left leaning” individual thinks or conservative in the way the average “right leaning” individual thinks. In fact those two groups, sans the misinformation, would think like honest Americans which both groups consider themselves to be. We agree on most things with slight differences in degree and which propaganda sources we believe. We are,however, intentionally fooled to believe we are enemies. The scam wouldn’t work without the divide and conquer technique used in many issues, not just this one.

Jim Papsdorf
July 8, 2009 12:05 pm

I know it is only “weather” but things are getting a little colder in the SH these days:
Deadly Cold Wave Brings Misery to Southern Peru
08 Jul 2009 14:31:00 GMT
An intense cold front has brought heavy snow, hail, strong winds and unusually low temperatures to southern Peru where the deaths of more than 150 children have been blamed on the cold. The situation prompted the Peruvian government to declare a state of emergency in 21 regions of the country, said the Adventist Development and Relief Agency (ADRA).
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/fromthefield/219487/124706360614.htm

sylvain
July 8, 2009 12:17 pm

Now What, the MWP was limited to europe and the Inca empire but miraculously skipped the rest of the world.

Scott B
July 8, 2009 12:28 pm

On the bottom graph, how is the line around 9.2C the 20th Century average temperature when the majority of the 20th century is above the average? Also, the positive temperature anomalies appear to be greater than the negative.

Jakers
July 8, 2009 12:28 pm

The problem I have with this study is the time-line they have created. I’ve taken cores and worked up their stratigraphy, and taken C14 dates, and one has to be very careful about conclusions drawn from them. They don’t discuss how they determined the time periods much. “The chronology for the sequence was derived from six radiocarbon dates and seven 210Pb dates (Table 1).” OK – they got dates at AD280, AD630, and AD1360, and others outside that range, then they interpolated in between even though there was not a uniform deposition rate, to get 880, 1000, 1100, 1150, etc. In fact, looking at the site picture, deposition could easily have been pulsed from up slope erosion events.

Miles
July 8, 2009 12:33 pm

Seems Al Gore has more than the Third Reich to battle.

July 8, 2009 12:40 pm

Conservative&denialist (11:36:38) :
Thanks to Mr.Nasif Nahle (11:25:05) : we can guess that perhaps some
chemosmotic-anoxibiotic organisms are the ones after the “global warming” issue. 🙂

Heh! By the way, it should have said “oxygen”, not “oxigen”… Sorry. 🙂

KLA
July 8, 2009 12:40 pm

Well, limestone caves exist all over the world.
This study:
http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2006/11/15/stalagmite-story/
Shows a temperature record derived from isotopic data preserved in limestone stalagmites from such caves for Europe. It seems to me that all one has to do is to correlate similar data from caves all over the world to settle the question wether the MVP or roman warm period were local or global.

Jim L
July 8, 2009 12:41 pm

Frost warning for Eastern Canada. It’s July 8th for cryin’ out loud:
http://www.theweathernetwork.com/index.php?product=alerts&placecode=canf0253&region=wwcanl0027

Bruce Cobb
July 8, 2009 12:51 pm

Hmmm… The Medieval Maximum, a time of high solar activity occurred then. Must be just coincidence, though. Then again, C02 levels historically have followed temperature rises by approximately 800 years, which is about how long ago the MWP was. So, the fact that today, some 800 years after a significant warming we have a rise in C02 must be just another coincidence. Because, nothing beats the power of manmade C02! Sarc/off.