Starting on March 22, a series of major eruptions have taken place from Mt. Redoubt in Alaska. The biggest exceeded 65,000 feet in height. More than a dozen eruptions as high as 60,000 have followed the first week alone. Activity may continue for weeks or months based on the volcano’s history.


Mt. Redoubt March 26, 2009
Climatologists may disagree on how much the recent global warming is natural or manmade but there is general agreement that volcanism constitutes a wildcard in climate, producing significant global scale cooling for at least a few years following a major eruption. However, there are some interesting seasonal and regional variations of the effects.
Oman et al (2005) and others have shown that though major volcanic eruptions seem to have their greatest cooling effect in the summer months, the location of the volcano determines whether the winters are colder or warmer over large parts of North America and Eurasia.
According to their modeling, tropical region volcanoes like El Chichon and Pinatubo actually produce a warming in winter due to a tendency for a more positive North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and Arctic Oscillation (AO). In the positive phase of these large scale pressure oscillations, low pressure and cold air is trapped in high latitudes and the resulting more westerly jet stream winds drives milder maritime air into the continents.

Oman found high latitude volcanoes like Katmai (Alaska in 1912) instead favored the negative phase of the Arctic and North Atlantic Oscillations and cold winters. In the negative phase, the jet stream winds buckled and forced cold air south from Canada into the eastern United States and west from Siberia into Europe. They also favored a cooling of middle and higher latitudes the year round of that atmosphere and a weakening of the summer monsoon in India and Africa.
Here is the abstract of that paper:
“Strong volcanic eruptions can inject large amounts of SO2 into the lower stratosphere, which over time, are converted into sulfate aerosols and have the potential to impact climate. Aerosols from tropical volcanic eruptions like the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption spread over the entire globe, whereas high-latitude eruptions typically have aerosols which remain in the hemisphere in which they where injected. This causes their largest radiative forcing to be extratropical, and the climate response should be different from that of tropical eruptions.
We conducted a 20-member ensemble simulation of the climate response to the Katmai eruption (58N) of 6 June 1912 using the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE climate model. We also produced an additional 20-member ensemble for a 3 times Katmai (3x Katmai) eruption to see the impact the strength of the eruption has on the radiative as well as the dynamical responses.
The results of these simulations do not show a positive Arctic Oscillation response like past simulations of tropical volcanic eruptions, but we did find significant cooling over southern Asia during the boreal winter.
The first winter following Katmai and the second winter following 3x Katmai showed strong similarities in lower stratospheric geopotential height anomalies and sea level pressure anomalies, which occurred when the two cases had similar optical depth perturbations. These simulations show that the radiative impact of a high-latitude volcanic eruption was much larger than the dynamical impact at high latitudes. In the
boreal summer, however, strong cooling over the Northern Hemisphere landmasses caused a decrease in the Asian monsoon circulation with significant decreases of up to 10% in cloud cover and warming over northern India. Thus the main dynamical impact of high latitude eruptions is in the summer over Asia.”
Lets look at volcanic activity in Alaska, Iceland and Kamchatka in eastern Russia.
ALASKA AND KAMCHATKA VOLCANO MAP

Intreractive map here. Red over Alaska is Redoubt, yellow on Aleutians is Mt Cleveland.
MT. REDOUBT
Mount Redoubt has erupted five times since 1900: in 1902, 1922, 1966, 1989 and 2009. The eruption in 1989 spewed volcanic ash to a height of 14,000 m (45,000 ft) and managed to catch KLM Royal Dutch Airlines flight 867, a Boeing 747 aircraft, in its plume (the flight landed safely at Anchorage).
The 1989 eruption is also notable for being the first ever volcanic eruption to be successfully predictedby the method of long-period seismic events developed by Swiss/American volcanologist Bernard Chouet.

An aerial view of Redoubt Volcano looking north on December 18, 1989 showing a low-level eruption of steam and ash. Photograph by W. White, U.S. Geological Survey

Mt. Redoubt April 21, 1990. Photograph by R. Clucas.
MT. CLEVELAND
On Monday, February 19, 2001, Cleveland volcano in the east central Aleutians erupted explosively sending ash to 35,000 feet. The explosive event lasted less than one day.

Historical eruptions at Mt. Cleveland have been characterized by short-lived explosive bursts of ash, at times accompanied by lava fountaining, lava flows, and debris flows down the flanks. On May 25, 1994 sent a short-lived ash plume to about 10.5 km (35,000 ft) altitude (photo above and below).

MT. SPURR

Crater Peak, the active vent of Mount Spurr, Alaska, on 26 September 1992 erupted in June, August, and September 1992. Ash from the August eruption closed Anchorage International Airport. Photo is from June 27, 1992.
Mt. Spurr is a stratovolcanoin Alaska. It is composed mostly of andesite. The Spurr volcanic complexwas built on the remains of an older volcano. The present Mt. Spurr grew in the center of the old caldera. The original volcano was an andesitic stratovolcano. It is about 12 miles (19 km) around. Snow and ice cover the north side. The caldera is breached to the south. It contains an ice field which feeds glaciers in all directions.
A dome grew in the center of the old volcano’s caldera to form the present Spurr. This volcano is mostly covered with ice. The exposed ground around the volcano has fumaroleswhich are near the boiling point. A small summit crater sometimes melts some of the ice on the volcano. Fumarole activity from this crater was the only activity before 1953. A second cone called Crater Peak grew in the breach of the older volcano. This was the sight of a major ash eruption on July 9, 1953. The most recent eruption of Spurr was in 1992.

MT AUGUSTINE
Historic eruptions were recorded in 1812, 1883, 1935, 1963-64, 1976, and 1986. Augustine’s eruptions tend to be highly explosive and tend to spread ash across the Cook Inlet region.

KATMAI/NOVARUPTA
The largest eruption in the world last century (VEI=6) occurred in 1912 at Novarupta on the Alaska Peninsula. An estimated 15 to 30 cubic kilometers of magma was explosively erupted during 60 hours beginning on June 6 — about 30 to 60 times the volume erupted by Mount St. Helens in 1980! The expulsion of such a large volume of magma excavated a funnel-shaped vent 2 kilometers wide and triggered the collapse of Mount Katmai volcano. Katmai was once a cluster of 3 or 4 small volcanoes. Pyroclastic flows traveled as far as 15 miles (23 km) and filled a valley adjacent to the volcano to produce the Valley of Ten Thousand Smokes. The withdrawal of magma from beneath the cluster of small volcanoes at Katmai caused the area to collapse and produce a caldera. A lake has filled part of the caldera.

“The magnitude of the eruption can perhaps be best realized if one could imagine a similar outburst centered in New York City. All of Greater New York would be buried under from ten to fifteen feet of ash; Philadelphia would be covered by a foot of gray ash and would be in total darkness for sixty hours; Washington and Buffalo would receive a quarter of an inch of ash, with a shorter period of darkness. The sound of the explosion would be heard in Atlanta and St. Louis, and the fumes noticed as far away as Denver, San Antonio, and Jamaica.” (Robert F. Griggs, National Geographic Magazine, 1917, v. 81 no. 1, p. 50)

Katmai from the summit of Griggs. Katmai is in the middle and to the right. Photo by Jay Robinson, National Park Service.

Novarupta is a pumice-filled depression that was the vent for the 1912 eruption. A rhyolitedome extruded into the vent after the eruption. The dome is 1,300 feet ( 400 m) in diameter and about 210 feet (65 m) high. Photo by Jay Robinson, National Park Service.
MT. VENIAMINOF

Veniaminof is a large stratovolcanothat suffered a huge caldera-forming eruption about 3,700 years ago. The caldera is almost 6 miles (10 km) across and filled with ice and snow. All the recent eruptions have taken place from a cinder conethat pokes up through the ice in the caldera. Both the 1983-84 and June 1993 eruption have consisted of fountaining at this cinder cone. Additionally, lava flowsflow down the sides of the cone and onto the ice surface where they then melt their way down through to the bottom of the caldera and then a lake forms. This photo shows active lava flows on January 23, 1984. Flows from November 1983 are covered with snow. Photo courtesy of U.S. Geological Survey.
There are very few people who live nearby so the danger to humans is pretty small. One of the things they worry about is called a jokulhlaup. This is an unpronounceable Icelandic word. A jokulhlaup happens when an eruption occurs under a thick ice sheet. The eruption will often melt the bottom of the glacier. If the eruption keeps on long enough pretty soon the glacier will float up on its own melted water (ice floats). As soon as this happens all that melted water can escape out from under the glacier and you get a big flood. This happens pretty often in Iceland, and it is a possibility at Veniaminof.

Eruption of Veniaminof on January 23, 1984. From front cover of USGS in Alaska:

ICELAND VOLCANOS
LAKI
Laki, volcano, 2,684 ft (818 m) high, S Iceland, at SW edge of the Vatnajökull glacier. Its eruption in 1783 was one of the more devastating on record, leading to the deaths of a quarter of Iceland’s inhabitants (mainly due to a famine that resulted from the eruption’s effects). Haze from the eruption spread over parts of Europe, where some experts believe it affected the inhabitants’ health. Surrounding the crater are the Lakagígar series of 100 volcanic rifts.


Map of the Laki fissures and lava flows. The Eldgja fissures and flows are also shown. Map simplified from Thordarson and others.
Lakagigar (also called Skaftar) was the vent for the 1783-1784 eruption of Grimsvotn caldera. It was the second largest basaltic fissure eruption in historic time (after the ~935 eruption of nearby Eldgja) and caused notable atmospheric cooling and effects.Additional vents of Grimsvotn were active from May 1783 to May 1785.
The eruption began on June 8, 1783 and lasted eight months. Ten fissures make up the vent complex. The fissures are arranged in an en echelon pattern that extends for a length of 27 km. Each fissure is covered by a continuous row of scoria cones, spatter cones, and tuff cones. The cones range in heights from 40m to 70 m.

Only 2.6% of the material erupted was tephra but ash fall extended all the way to mainland Europe. Map from Thordarson and Self (1993).
Laki is also known for its atmospheric effects. The convective eruption column of Laki carried gases to altitudes of 15 km (10 miles). These gases formed aerosols that caused cooling in the Northern Hemisphere, possibly by as much as 1 degree C. This cooling is the largest such volcanic-induced event in historic time. In Iceland, the haze lead to the loss of most of the islands livestock (by eating fluorine contaminated grass), crop failure (by acid rain) and the death of 9,000 people, one-quarter of the human residents (by famine).
This event is rated as VEI6 on the Volcanic Explosivity Index, but the eight month emission of sulfuric aerosols resulted in one of the most important climatic and socially repercussive events of the last millennium.
In Great Britain, the summer of 1783 was known as the “sand-summer” due to ash fallout. The eruption continued until 7 February 1784. Grímsvötn volcano, from which the Laki fissure extends, was also erupting at the time from 1783 until 1785. The outpouring of gases, including an estimated 8 million tons of fluorineand estimated 120 million tons of sulfur dioxide gave rise to what has since become known as the “Laki haze” across Europe. This was the equivalent of three times the total annual European industrial output in 2006, and also equivalent to a Mount Pinatubo-1991 eruption every three days. This outpouring of sulfur dioxide during unusual weather conditions caused a thick haze to spread across western Europe, resulting in many thousands of deaths throughout 1783 and the winter of 1784.
The poisonous cloud drifted to Bergenin Norway, then spread to Praguein the Province of Bohemiaby 17 June, Berlinby 18 June, Parisby 20 June, Le Havreby 22 June, and to Great Britainby 23 June. The fog was so thick that boats stayed in port, unable to navigate, and the sun was described as “blood coloured”
This disruption then led to a most severe winter in 1784, where an estimated to have caused 8,000 additional deaths in the UK. In the spring thaw, Germany and Central Europe then reported severe flood damage.
In North America, the winter of 1784 was the longest and one of the coldest on record. It was the longest period of below-zero temperatures in New England, the largest accumulation of snow in New Jersey, and the longest freezing over of Chesapeake Bay. There was ice skating in Charleston Harbor, a huge snowstorm hit the south, the Mississippi Riverfroze at New Orleans, and there was ice in the Gulf of Mexico.
GRÍMSVÖTN
Grímsvötn is a central volcanoin the Grímsvötn volcanic system of Iceland. This system is about 62 miles (100 km) long and ~9 miles (15 km) wide. It is mostly covered with ice named Vatnajokull. The total volume of lava erupted from the Grimsvotn system is about 50-55 cubic km. Only about 19 cubic km of this lava is not covered by the ice. The system rises to the northeast from about 1000 ft (300 m) above sea level in the southwest. It reaches its tallest point at Grímsvötn volcano. This volcano has a 35 sq km caldera. A high temperature hydrothermal area is located in this caldera. Grímsvötn has erupted 45 times. The last major eruption of the volcano was in 1996 (shown in photo below).

HEKLA

Hekla is the most active volcano in Iceland with eruption events numbering from as low as 15 major eruptions to the huge number of 167 since 1104, the most recent being in 1991.
On 26 February, 2000 Iceland’s most famous volcano, Mt. Hekla, began erupting at 1819 GMT. A 6-7 km long fissure appeared and a steam column rose nearly 15 km (45,000 feet) into the sky. A discontinuous curtain of fire emanated from the entire fissure. The lava flowed down the slopes of Hekla and covered a large part of the Hekla ridge. Most of the ash fell in uninhabited areas in the interior of Iceland. The eruption reached its peak intensity in the first hour of the activity. Icelanders in the Middle Ages called the volcano the “Gateway to Hell.”
KAMCHATKA VOLCANOS
BEZYMIANNY

A steaming lava dome fills much of the large horseshoe-shaped crater cutting the ESE side of Bezymianny volcano in this late-1980’s view from the SE. The crater was formed during a dramatic eruption in 1955-56, which was similar to that of Mount St. Helens in 1980. Prior to this eruption, Bezymianny volcano had been considered extinct. Subsequent episodic but ongoing lava-dome growth, accompanied by intermittent explosive activity and pyroclastic flows, has largely filled the 1956 crater.
SUMMER AND WINTER
Taking all the years of high latitude eruptions listed and composting them leads to a slightly cooler than normal summer in much of the lower 48 and a winter with cold in Canada and western United States with more variability and net warmth in the east. The winter pattern has the look of another La Nina.

References:
Oman, L., A. Robock, G. Stenchikov, G. A. Schmidt, and R. Ruedy (2005), Climatic response to high-latitude volcanic eruptions, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D13103, doi:10.1029/2004JD005487
Smithsonian Institution USGS Global Volcanism Program: http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/usgs/
Volcano World Oregon State University http://volcano.oregonstate.edu/
NASA GISS AOT: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/strataer/
Hmmm, that doesn’t seem right to me either…
crosspatch (07:50:13) :
“According to my reading so far, the eruptive activity at Redoubt hasn”t been large enough to cause any concern of measurable change in climate. Not to say that can’t change tomorrow (or 10 minutes from now) but to date, it just hasn’t been a large enough eruption to make a significant difference.
The volcano that concerns me the most is Nyiragongo and general vicinity. Apparently there is a young mantle plume. The magma from Nyiragongo looks to have come directly from the deep mantle. The plume appears rather large and there is roughly a circle of volcanoes in the region. Nearby Nyamuragira shows magma that is a mixture of the plume material and melted crust and so is likely to be at the edge of the plume. BOTH of these volcanoes are currently showing unrest”.
crosspatch,
I am not too worried about those volcano’s.
Further research has to be undertaken to confirm the suspected presence of a mantle plume and the most important question if this volcano system has the potential to influence climate has to be answered with “NO”.
The lava is extremely thin which robs this volcano of potential stratosphere penetrating capacities.
For the local people however this volcano system is extremely dangerous.
Nasa needs to back cap and trade
Robinson (13:03:49) :
In other news, NASA scientists are alarmed:
Of course they are! it’s in the job description 😉
Anyone notice? Sea Ice in the Arctic reduces, the oceans cool due to increased energy loss from the exposed ocean, sea ice increases.
DaveE.
The dark ash issue raised above is patently obvious, but don’t forget that (i) it can snow on top of it, (ii) the ash deposition issue is more regional than stratospheric dust, and, more importantly, (iii) that when ejected into the stratosphere, it reduces the amount of radiation that gets into the troposphere in the first place. Incidentally, near the volcano itself, if the layer is deep enough, it can actually insulate the snow and make it last even longer, but this is not of global significance (only locally could it be deep enough for this), and the black at the top is more relevant to surface temperature in the short term in the affected area.
The bottom line is that this is a relatively small volcano at high latitude. I do not have the answer, but on the basis of past studies of volcanic impacts, any effect is probably very, very small, with the net effect most likely a negligible negative impact (ie., impacts are usually negative for volcanoes and this is a small one; negative because the radiation balance is strongly positive in the north at this time of year with respect to equilibrium temperature).
Another point/question: All in all, is the atmospheric transmissivity not still relatively low at the moment due to a long period of relative inactivity? Can someone point me to the answer to this question (ie., what is the atmospheric transmissivity in 2009, how does it compare with a ‘normal’ year and how much impact does a small volcano have on it)?
lulo (07:46:47) :
“The argument that tropical volcanoes have a greater effect on climate makes sense (more solar radiation to reflect, higher starting surface temperature, lower surface albedo). However, it has occurred to me that nowhere are surface airtemperatures further below their equilibrium temperature (based on radiation balance) than at high latitudes in spring. Blocking radiation at these latitudes may, therefore, cause some cooling even though there is less radiation overall, and even though the surface has a lower albedo. So, whether or not Redoubt has a significant negative effect on climate will be determined by the size of the eruption (about 1/100 to 1/50 that of Pinatubo once all eruptions are accounted for) and whether the stratosphere of high latitudes can sustain and spread the ash well enough for the effect to be significant (stratospheric ash is apparently spread more effectively in the tropics). If an series of eruptions were to occur in the north and have a negative effect on global temperature, I can’t imagine a better time of year for it to occur than March and April. The surface air temperature is well below its radiative equilibrium and solar heating is crucial in raising the temperature over the next few months. The main problem is that this is not a large volcano”.
Lulo,
I don’t not agree with your conclusion.
Redoubt is a huge volcano and it’s explosive eruption characteristics, comparable with Mount Pinatubo and Mount Vesuvius make me conclude that this volcano represents a huge threat.
If this volcano, which is still in a dome building phase, explodes big time, it has the potential to cause a global impact like a volcanic winter or another “Year without a summer”.
I just don’t get it. Can NASA and others just say anything they wish? Where I come from, these are called LIES!
http://www.catlinarcticsurvey.com/route_globe.aspx
I wondered why this route was chosen… now I know…
http://nsidc.org/images/arcticseaicenews/20090406_Figure5.png
I wonder if it’s working out like they expected… I don’t think so. Too bad they won’t man up and share the data…
Hay Alaska – down here in New Mexico we have a few extinct volcanos that are not erupting, so we are willing to sell you a lot of carbon offsets to make up for all the CO2 your volcano is putting in the air.
I’m just starting in this AlGorecon business, so I’m not to sure how much these offsets are worth.
“Too late, Gary – you’ve got me started. Solar Cycle 5, the first weak cycle of the Dalton Minimum, didn’t start until until 1798.”
Ah, but John, the cooling this time around began no later than 2003(with vulcanism absent) yet the heliomagnetic effect crashed Oct. 2005. Meantime, cycle 24 has yet to awaken.
Looking at cycle 4, the bottom fell out earlier in its period of 14 years than cycle 23, if sunspots can be relied on to translate. The interaction I’m wondering about, heliomagnetic field collapse awakening vulcanism, fits, if just.
The solar sunspot counts are not the cause but an effect as are solar flux, UV, cosmic rays, clouds, etc.
Getting the timings right will not be as easy as you clearly suppose.
Most informative and well written piece. There’s more to this climate thingy than the laughably minor role that CO2 plays.
Now, to go a bit O/T:
1 – It seems that SOHO isn’t doing so well in the NASA ‘Mission Madness’ game. It’s getting beat by a hot air balloon, of all things! http://mission-madness.nasa.gov/mm/bracket.html
2 – This AP story ( http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97D27280&show_article=1&catnum=0 ) is based on a discussion on the NSIDC website ( http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/ ). It seems to illustrative of confirmation bias. In the past the stories were all about first year ice and how fragile it is. Now, after a year in which it the sea ice recovered a bit, it seems we are being told that it’s even two-year-old ice that’s fragile. What’s next? Ice that’s less than 5 years old is in danger? Anything to keep on message about melting ice and the doomsday that awaits.
It seems to me the associated paper of Oman acknowledges the importance of rapid cooling of NH with large H2S/SO2 ejection into stratosphere and above. Metaphorically, NH is earth’s radiator fins and SO the heat sink. Long term climate effect is not under consideration.
Enhanced melt of glaciers is small potatoes–the emissivity of snow is 84 already. Dark ash emissivity might be 98 or so and accelerate summer melt but after the following winter who cares?
Just The Facts (08:59:23) wrote:
“I’ve noticed that the Arctic Sea Ice Extent as measured by NSIDC seems to maintaining its coverage as we move into Spring.”
This agrees with my eyeballing. It’s possible therefore that the March and/or April ice extent will make some sort of historic high (relative to recent years, anyway). If it does, I doubt that the NSIDC will give that fact a press release, the way it did with the ice maximum occurring on the earliest date yet recorded, Feb. 28.
All that first year ice the Catlin expedition is walking across right now must be very dangerous (even though some blocks of that first year ice are the size of a house).
Why didn’t the NSIDC talk about the thickness of the ice – they only talked about the age as in one-year, two-year or older ice.
Credit someone over at CA, it is all Baby Ice and only a little is Toddler Ice. But they are 3 and 4 metre high babies and toddlers
That would be me, thanks. I may soon have to continue the saga of the baby ice.
Is there any other data source about artic ice apart of the Global warming involved Nasa?
Ah, jeez is the Baby Daddy of the Baby Ice.
Well. She was a bit frigid, but I just thought that’s because she was …. (self snip for ethnic/nationalist joke).
Adolfo Giurfa (09:15:23) :
From the link you provided this is interesting:
“This outpouring of sulphur dioxide during unusual weather conditions caused a thick sulphurous haze to spread across western Europe, resulting in many thousands of deaths throughout 1783 and the winter of 1784.
The summer of 1783 was the hottest on record and a rare high pressure
zone over Iceland caused the winds to blow to the south west.”
Remember this if the summer is a bit hot in Iceland and western Europe this summer.
skeptic (08:49:40) :The Antarctic one hasn’t been reported yet in the MSM, but that’s probably just a conspiracy. WE KNOW ITS THERE.
[…]
These collapses can not be caused by warming seas or climate. We know this because.. OH, LOOK, A SHINY THING!
Look, if you’re going to Troll, could you at least make it interesting and not patent fantasy and stupid? Sheesh. This reminds me of folks in the dorms who didn’t do their homework and had to much ‘green stuff’ making haze in their rooms and brain…
Ice sheets collapse because ice sheets collapse. They are not stable persistent structures on geologic time scales. Ice extrudes out to sea until it is too extended then fractures and breaks off. They are dynamic flowing fracturing things. Nothing more.
Adolfo Giurfa,
“Is there any other data source about artic ice apart of the Global warming involved Nasa?”
Yes, there is the Army ice-buoy system recently mentioned here on WUWT, http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/03/18/arctic-ice-thickness-measured-from-buoys/
The military is a far better & more ‘professional’ source to look to in all questions Arctic (and elsewhere).
We know that submarines are under the ice, basically ‘all the time’. They (and all other ships) and (military) airplanes bristle with sensors gathering oceanic, ice cover, atmospheric and land-surface environmental data/intelligence continuously as they travel. ‘It’s what they do’, eh? The military also has the best satellites, and more of them.
With a bit of reflection, you will all realize that you already know that submarines have the capacity to determine whether they can safely force their way up through an ice layer of any given thickness … or not.
The data-gathering capacity, analysis resources and mission-committment of the military with respect to climate & weather dwarfs that of NASA.
Furthermore, Pentagon representatives sit down in direct counsel with the President daily … whereas NASA plays an incidental role.
Our military is in charge of monitoring & assessing climate issues for us, in particular the Arctic Ocean, and NASA is pretty much a side-show.
The possibility (however remote or acute we judge it) of reliable open water in the Arctic Ocean would create a major strategic challenge. NASA isn’t the lead organization tasked with informing & advising us on this topic.
The downside, of course, is that a lot of what the military does is kept secret. The public gets NASA-stuff as a consolation prize. Still, it’s a huge oversight not to realize & bear in mind, that it is the military that really carries this ball.
Yep !
Saying OH NO the leading edge of the ice shelf broke off is about as news worthy as saying OH NO there is water flowing over Niagara Falls, or sand is blowing off the sand dunes or — well you get the picture.
Calving of the ice sheets is how they accommodate new ice flowing down off the ice cap as it builds up over time. Sometimes they even “surge” briefly.
If the MSM was an honest broker they would mention how this calving event compares to other large events in the past, and the public would see it is not unusual at all.
Larry
Hi there… I cannot speak on volcanism out because I’m not a volcanologist; however, many people who know I’m a scientist (W-Mart clerk, my neighbors, etc.) are asking about two main things:
1. The reason by which we are experiencing two cold days in a row in April.
2. The coincidence of volcanic eruptions in NH and SH and an earthquake in Italy.
I’ve explained the first question with relative refinement; however, I couldn’t explain the last one.
I forgot to say that 10 °C are unusual temperatures in Monterrey Mexico in the heat of spring. Worth to mention it is that one day on the latter week of March the temperature increased up to 38 °C.
pft:
Though it is more probable that SO2 reacts with H2O to form sulphurous acid,(also in the lungs-by the way I had such an accident-) and if SO3 is present or SO2 is oxidized to SO3 then it turns into sulphuric acid, which is present in nature even in rivers, as the Magdalena river in Colombia; as its molecular weight is more than that of the air mix then inmediately falls down to surface as a heavy white cloud (if the source is near, as in the accident I was involved), but in the case of volcanoes chances would be mixed, some of the SO2 reacts with humidity, forming seeds of rain drops, which if too concentrated becomes what is called “acid rain”, and so on.
As you see nature dwarfs any human contamination; do you know why? just because we are too little and too few, believe me. Newly concocted prophets or green messiahs are wrong.
Seems like all over the earth is getting restless. Some other Volcanoes to watch;
Mt Ruapehu New Zealand
http://www.url.co.nz/resources/ruapehu.php
Quote “It is now 9 months since Ruapehu’s last eruption,but Crater Lake temperatures and gas on Mt Ruapehu continue to be higher than normal, and are now rferred to be GNS scietists as “signs of unrest”.
Australias highest mountain
http://www-new.aad.gov.au/default.asp?casid=2099
Indian – Australia plate on the move at 7cm a year
http://www.theage.com.au/national/quakes-eruption-sign-of-land-on-move-20090320-94hu.html
Previous Antarctic eruptions;
http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/hpg/envis/doc98html/globalcl1114.html
http://www.zmescience.com/first-evidence-of-under-ice-volcanic-eruption-in-antarctica
Nasif Nahle:
Sorry
earthquake ….. 6,0-6,9 (Richter) = 120 by year