CA Academy of Science AGW display apparently not very popular

What are we teaching our children?

Guest post by Russ Steele, NCwatch

Ellen and I spent the day at the new California Academy of Science building yesterday and really enjoyed the experience, except for the crowds. I break out in crowds. With spring break in full force, there were hordes of children, the lines to the tropical rain forest sphere, the aquarium, bugs in 3D, and the planetarium were long. One display that did not receive much attention was the global warming, save the planet from global warming display. Or, as it was properly labeled the Ocean Warming display.

Academy of Science04

The interactive display to save the polar bear cub, by creating more ice by reducing greenhouse gases was empty the three times I passed by the booth. [A carbon] “hockey stick” was is full view.

Academy of Science01

There was a clever device to demonstrate the value of carbon credits to off set the family carbon foot print stood unused except for one young man and his dad. There was no pushing and shoving to observe these displays or use the interactive tools.

Academy of Science03

Academy of Science02

For the most part these displays were ignored, except for a few casual observers seeking refuge from the long lines at the real science displays.  This lack of interest and participation seems to reflect the recent Gallup Polls indicating people are not really concerned about global warming, or ocean warming either. It could be our children have caught on to the scam, or they have reached global warming overload for the school lessons,  and want some real science for change of pace.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
77 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Editor
March 30, 2009 6:56 pm

walshamatic (13:43:12) :
> PASPORT Carbon Dioxide Gas Sensor $259
> http://store.pasco.com/pascostore/showdetl.cfm?&DID=9&PartNumber=PS-2110&groupID=192&Detail=1
Accuracy:
* 0 ppm to 10,000 ppm: 100 ppm or 10% of value, whichever is greater
* 10,000 ppm to 50,000 ppm: 20% of value
* Over 50,000 ppm: qualitative only.

Editor
March 30, 2009 6:58 pm

DaveE (18:51:53) :
> You state the cheapest CO2 monitors have an accuracy of +/-50ppm.
> What is their precision?
> ie are they consistently out by that + or – 50ppm?
> If they are consistent, they are still useful.
If the display increment is 100 ppm, they aren’t very useful.