My friend, Joe D’Aleo who runs ICECAP, had the opportunity this year to write an article for the 2009 Old Farmer’s Almanac. While I’m normally “skeptical” of the long term forecasts printed in the OFA, I’m not of this piece written by D’Aleo, who is a Fellow of the American Meteorological Society and a Certified Consulting meteorologist.
With 3.3 million copies printed, his article, Is Global Warming on the Wane? , will get wide distribution in many venues. The subtitle “Some scientists believe that an extreme cooling episode, potentially a mini-ice age, is imminent. Others think that it may already be under way.” will probably raise a few eyebrows.
In this blog I often cite historical perspectives on how people and the press have perceived and written about climate in the past, such as this article from the New York Times that says “the Arctic will soon be an open sea” or this one from the 1933 Monthly Weather Review “IS OUR CLIMATE CHANGING? A STUDY OF LONG-TIME TEMPERATURE TRENDS.”, or this one from 1922 “Arctic Ocean Getting Warm; Seals Vanish and Icebergs Melt.”
The editors of OFA took a similar view for the beginning of D’Aleo’s article with this timeline of similar events:
Click for the full size image and article
D’Aleo relies heavily on UAH, HadCRUT, and Mauna Loa CO2 data to make his point, which is that climate change is mostly about cycles, oceans, and solar activity. Here is one of the graphs from the article that we’ve seen many times before:

D’Aleo’s also cites the work of David Hathaway, whom we often mention here, and his predictions of solar cycle 25 being weak, along with mentions of the PDO shift
Doug Hathaway, a solar physicist at NASA, believes that solar activity has diminished and will continue to do so for decades. In 2006, he predicted, based on observations of the slowing of the plasma flow on the Sun, that cycle 25 could be the quietest—thus, the coolest—in centuries. Also in that year, Khabibullo Abdusamatov, head of research for the Russian Academy of Sciences, issued an imminent mini-ice age warning based on expectations of a quieter Sun over the next 50 years. Our long-range forecasts also point toward cooling conditions.
These factors—the cooling Pacific, the yet-to-cool Atlantic, and the historical reduction in recent solar activity—suggest that a staggered cooling period could continue. Absent from most headlines about global warming is a discussion of measures suggesting that the warming has ceased and a cooling may have begun. For example, deep-ocean heat content has not increased during the past five years. Looking at just one year, from January 2007 to January 2008, we find that satellite-derived atmospheric temperatures indicate that Earth was about one degree Fahrenheit cooler at the beginning of 2008 than it was at the beginning of 2007. The United Kingdom’s Hadley Centre ocean and land temperature records show cooling in the last seven to ten years.
During the past 100 years, while temperatures have risen and fallen and risen yet again, carbon dioxide has been on a steady climb (see graph)—and, for that, mankind does bear some responsibility. However, we would be wise to also consider the cycles and synchronicity of the Sun and oceans in any discussion of the causes of climate change.
While I’m sure that many people whom are firmly entrenched in the CO2 based AGW theory will simply dismiss this out of hand, the simple fact remains that the Old Farmer’s Almanac is read by many, many people. This easy to understand article by Joe D’Aleo will reach many people whom have been “saturation bombed” with mainstream media stories that say otherwise.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


This may have been discussed before, but looking at the CO2 to temperature trend, I realized that the right hand side has a scale measured in parts per million (PPM) and the delta between high and low is about 23PPM. As a percentage of full scale, 23PPM is 0.0023%. This is equvilent to a difference of less than 1 1/2 inches in a mile. This may be stupid, but do we have instruments that are capable resolving 23PPM accurately and repeatably using diffrent instruments at different locations over time?
sod- you say “sorry, but people who use the 1998 till today graph, can NOT be taken seriously.”
You mean like taking a temperature trend from 1970 to 1998 as an indication of catastrophic, unprecedented global warming?
John Miller: your interpretation of ppm is a little scewed. The total amount of CO2 is currently about 350ppm. So 23ppm is acctualy about a 6.5% change. That is fairly significant. And yes, ppm are easely measured. They can measure ppb (parts per billion).
Jeff – “And yes, ppm are easely measured. They can measure ppb (parts per billion).” Okay then – give me a manufacturer and a model number.
Also, show me the standardized ISO9000/9001 level of quality control on these measurements that have been applied at all labs and at all times.
And no, 23ppm is the merely delta on the CO2 component, but CO2 is still being measured as a component of the whole and you are resolving against that whole.
I read this a couple weeks ago. He’s definitely putting himself out there with this bold prediction.
I think some of us are hoping that He’s right so the agw bandwagon will go away. Problem is, they probably won’t.
Only time will tell.
Nice post, the UN organization IPCC is driving the climate hype through a corrupt government system. They were formed with the purpose of identifying and combating man made climate change before there was any real evidence.
They would have no purpose for existence if they didn’t find climate change so after only 2 years they had identified global warming and CO2 as a serious threat and began recommending formation of more organizations and committees which did the same.
Today billions of dollars are spent around the world by government organizations who’s entire survival depends on man made global warming being true. This had the necessary effect of corrupting the science beyond believability.
For more information you can go here.
http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/environment/anthropogenic-global-warming/
I’m buying 10 copies and giving them to some pro AGW friends.
RE: Steven Hill (19:12:25) :
We may indeed be facing a planetary emergency, however, if so, it’s probably not the one that non scientist Al Gore has in mind. It’s far worse. Far, far worse.
I cannot think of a worse way to witness the end of Civilization than sitting cold and starving in a war torn world of death.
old construction worker (16:48:36) :
I’m buying 10 copies and giving them to some pro AGW friends.
Good! In addition to that, if they’re members of an enviromental group like the Sierra Club or Greenpeace, have them read Lucy Skywalker’s article at http://www.greenworldtrust.org.uk/Science/Curious.htm . If they are interested in the use and abuse of science in AGW, have them read my http://wermenh.com/climate/science.html .
Lucy’s article may be best read on the web as she has a lot of links going to sources that support her journey back from the hot side.