Last June, WIRED magazine wrote an in depth article that asked:
Can a Million Tons of Sulfur Dioxide Combat Climate Change?
The question arose from research from research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory near San Francisco, by Lowell Wood, a protégé of the brilliant and controversial hydrogen bomb inventor Edward Teller. The idea was simple: Inject sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere to reflect a portion of the sun’s rays back into space, thus cooling the planet. It also seemed to be within the realm of possibility to some.
Here is how it works:
Graphic and text below adapted from Wired magazine article
1. Make sulfur dioxide
A million tons of sulfur dioxide would be needed to begin the cooling process. Luckily SO2, a byproduct of coal-burning power plants, is a common industrial chemical.
2. Inject it into the stratosphere
Load the sulfur dioxide into aircraft — converted 747s, military fighters, or even large balloons — and carry it up to the stratosphere. This will cost about $1 billion a year.
3. Wait for the chemical reaction
In a series of reactions, sulfur dioxide combines with other molecules in the atmosphere, ultimately forming sulfuric acid. This H2SO4 binds to water to form aerosol droplets that absorb and reflect back into space 1 to 3 percent of the sun’s rays. (The particles also contribute to the depletion of the ozone layer, but scientists are researching alternate chemicals.)
4. Let the planet cool
Results will be quick, especially over the Arctic.
And just a few days ago, over a million tons of sulfur dioxide (SO2) was in fact injected into the atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean, here is a satellite sounder derived image of the cloud that has been released:
Source: AVO
The Terra/MODIS satellite snapped a nice image of the release, notice the obvious brown trail as the plume becomes airborne over the Pacific ocean:
Source: NASA
Here is a photo of where the experiment took place:

The Kasatochi volcano as seen from space, and location map below:

Thanks to a posting on another wordpress blog called “eruptions” we have this insight from Dr. Simon Carn from the University of Maryland in Baltimore:
“The August 7-8 eruption of Kasatochi volcano (Aleutian Islands)produced a very large stratospheric SO2 cloud – possibly the largest since the August 1991 eruption of Hudson (Chile). Preliminary SO2 mass calculations using Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) data suggest a total SO2 burden of ~1.5 Tg. This figure will be revised in the coming weeks but is more likely to go up than down. The SO2 cloud has drifted over a large area of North America and is now (August 14) reaching Europe.“
With the released SO2 at ~ 1.5 Tg (Teragrams, a unit of mass approximately equal to one megaton) this is actually 50% more than mass in the experiment proposed by Wood and Teller.
For those wishing to follow the plume, NOAA offers a website that tracks SO2 in the atmosphere here. You can also keep tabs on the eruption and plume at the Alaska Volcano Observatory.
With this eruption coming on the heels of a short term global cooling trend that we’ve seen in the last 18 months, it will be interesting to see if this real-world experiment being performed by nature will add to the trend we’ve already seen.
Click for a larger image
Reference: UAH lower troposphere data
This type of “experiment” has already been seen before in recent times, as the Wired article mentions:
Pinatubo’s eruption didn’t just unleash huge mud slides and lava flows; it also fired an ash stream 22 miles into the air, injecting 20 million tons of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere. Over the following months, a massive haze gradually dispersed across the globe. Meanwhile, the sulfur dioxide component underwent chemical reactions to form a particulate known as sulfate aerosol (in essence, droplets of water and sulfuric acid), which absorbs sunlight and reflects some of it back into space.
The climatic effect of this volcanic eruption was rapid, dramatic, and planetary in scale. In a year, the global average temperature declined by half a degree Celsius, and researchers observed less summer melt atop the Greenland ice sheet.
An interesting passage in the article on SO2 injection suggests:
Until large-scale experiments are funded, the only way to explore the potential consequences is through computer simulations. By turning down the virtual sun or cranking up the digital carbon, we can create any planetary future we want.
It looks like nature has stepped up and eliminated that need for computer simulation.
Based on Carn’s estimate, when the data is all in on Kasatochi, it will likely be about 10 times less than Pinatubo in total mass of SO2 ejected. But we’ll watch, measure, and see what this smaller event does for our global climate. Unfortunately, most any global cooling we see in the next couple of years, no matter what the true cause of it is, will probably be labeled as “volcanically induced” due to this event.
h/t to Philip_B for comments that lead to this article’s creation
UPDATE: 8/19/08 10:20 AM PST There has some been some questions in comments as to whether or not the plume reached stratospheric levels. This press release from USGS notes that the plume has reached more than 35,000 feet altitude, which would put the plume into the lower stratosphere.



[…] may not have heard about it on the news, but it’s happening again. A couple weeks back, the Kasatochi volcano in the Aleutian islands let […]
@Bob Tisdale,
The ocean heat content data are from Levitus e.a., “Warming of the world ocean, 1955–2003”:
ftp://ftp.nodc.noaa.gov/pub/data.nodc/woa/PUBLICATIONS/grlheat05.pdf
The SI contains the main increase of the heat content of the different oceans for the two hemispheres and combined.
Detailed heat content data are available as yearly and pentad files at:
http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/indprod.html or directly at:
ftp://ftp.nodc.noaa.gov/pub/data.nodc/woa/DATA_ANALYSIS/DATA/temp/heat/
I can’t remember where I found the area’s for the different hemispheric oceans, but here is the ratio for the total of all oceans: 43/57 NH/SH
I have plotted the difference in ocean heat content per hemisphere (as surrogate for volume) here:
http://www.ferdinand-engelbeen.be/klimaat/oceans_heat.html
There are a few remarkable points: The largest increase in ocean heat content is at the subtropics. This coincidences with the decrease in cloudiness in the (sub)tropics found by Chen e.a. for the period 1980-2003 ( http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2002/2002_Chen_etal_2.pdf ) and differs from the GHG “fingerprint”, which should be more evenly spread over the latitudes. See Fig. 2 and S4 in Levitus e.a.
Moreover, as GHGs are near equal in the NH and SH, while 90% of the anthro SO2 emissions are in the NH, the NH oceans should warm less fast than the SH oceans…
You should watch what you wish for, because the excess sulfates have a dark side to their presence, beyond the desired short-term moderation of regional-global climate (not that it’s needed presently, with the effects of couple cold-phase PDO and ENSO).
Prepare for Pandora’s Box to open.
Jack Simmons claims that the US is “one of the cleanest, if not the cleanest, nation on Earth”, with respect to pollution.
Excuse me, what planet are you from, again?
According to the most recent USGS survey of rivers and streams in the US, the situation has not improved much over the last several decades. Not only are groundwater levels dropping nationwide as subsurface supply is withdrawn, it’s more polluted than ever before, at depth.
Our cities are NOT much less than polluted/polluting, because incremental decreases in source pollutant loading are met and exceeded by mass increase in the number of sources. For example, the average vehicle on the road is larger and emits more pollutants than a decade ago, and the number of vehicles and miles driven continues to climb each year. Our older power plants were to meet new EPA guidelines for retrofitting – until the present Administration got those regulations thrown out, along with attempts to control carbon emissions by instituting greenhouse gas controls.
But even if we weren’t continually adding to our air and water contaminant signature of global pollutants, we recipient to a massive long distance loading from SE Asia.
And, we’ve been sending our pollution hello’s to NW Europe for decades – it’s been tracked through wet deposition monitoring, particulate traps and air chemistry sampling and in ice cores.
Tell the Europeans the US is a ‘clean, nonpolluting country’, and they’ll laugh in your face.
[…] SO2 update: aerosols may have cooling effect on the NH this year 13 09 2008 In August, I reported that the Kasitochi volcano in the Aleutian Island erupted over a million tons of sulfur dioxide […]
Fresgh news…press conf. tomorrow!!!
SO2: “Primary Cause of Global Warming Discovered, According to Dr. Peter L. Ward of Teton Tectonics”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29086842/
Hmmmm… as Rosanne Rosannadanna use to say ” if it’s not one thing, it’s another.”
[…] vulcanike mondiali a livello di micro e macro clima… anke se ora odi si mettera a strillare… Thanks to Nature, a Large Atmospheric Sulfur Dioxide Experiment is Now Underway in the Pacific Watts… la natura è il miglior banco di prova in questi frangenti… […]