Bees and Sunspots

Here is some interesting reading linking solar magnetic activity to Bees. Bees use the sun to navigate, so it is not a surprise that they’d be in tune with the sun. But there are also other issues such as immune systems and ag chemicals,
Vanishing Bee Colonies, Doomsday Scenarios and Sunspots

Vanishing Bee Colonies, Doomsday Scenarios, and Sunspots

By Aidan Maconachy

Published: 6/8/2007 at http://www.buzzle.com/

Albert Einstein once said : “If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left. No more bees, no more pollination, no more plants, no more animals, no more man.”

Apocalyptic for sure. We haven’t reached that point yet, but some worrisome indicators suggest dramatic drops in the bee population of the US are likely to impact crop production. This is not a small agricultural sector that is being impacted either. In the US bees pollinate more than $14 billion worth of seeds and crops each year.

The disappearing bee phenomena isn’t restricted to the US. In Europe countries are experiencing varying degrees of what investigators describe as “colony collapse disorder” (or CCD). Countries effected include Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece. However the most serious losses have occurred in the US. On the West Coast keepers have seen bee population losses in the 30 to 60 percent range. On the East Coast and Texas it gets as high as 70%. These are catastrophic drops for an industry that considers around a 20% population decline to be an off-season norm.

There are a number of different theories about why this is happening. After looking at a cross-section of scientific opinion I tend toward the view that the decline in the bee population is being triggered by a variety of factors, rather than a single overriding cause.

There is evidence that the immune system of bees has been adversely effected by modern agricultural practices. These range from use of insecticides to the controlled raising of bees in order to have an army of pollinators ready to service crops on schedule. Some researchers take the view that genetically modified crops are a contributing factor in bee population decline. Stress figures into it too, given that increased pressure is being placed on colonies as their habitat is squeezed each year due to urban development. Parasites are also an issue. The varroa mite introduced from Asia has proved to be problematic.

The decline in the health of the colonies can be demonstrated by research data. You know the problem has reached crisis levels when a guy like Dennis van Englesdorp with the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture uses an Aids analogy in an attempt to underscore the seriousness of the threat to bee populations.

Researchers have discovered multiple infections co-existing in some colonies, many of which were also infected with fungi, an indicator that the bees’ immune systems were seriously compromised. This compromised immune function may be related to genetically modified crops and scientists are currently working to try to determine any possible links. When you look at the stats though, on the surface there does seem to be a generalized cause and effect pattern. In the US, which has experienced the most severe bee losses, 40% of the corn is now a GM insect-resistant strain. By contrast in Germany we are only talking about 0.06%, mostly grown in the Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and Brandenburg regions.

A number of earlier studies investigated whether or not GM crops were having a negative impact on bees. One such study took place at the University of Jenna from 2001 to 2004. The researchers used a GM maize variant named “BT corn” that includes a gene from a soil bacterium in order to make it insect-proof. At first the study seemed entirely positive. No discernible negative effects were detected in the bees from the BT corn. Then researchers discovered that when the bees were attacked by a parasite, the portion of the colony exposed to the BT corn had a much lower ability to fight off infection and showed much more rapid levels of decline.

There is a second set of factors though that raises concerns about quantum-mechanical effects related to magnetic fields and electromagnetic waves. The majority of losses have been occurring as a result of bees being unable to navigate back to their hives. Bees have been expiring singly, in a seemingly disoriented state far from the hive and this can’t simply be attributed to immune system issues.

There are two possible causes. One being our high-tech gadgetry, particularly mobile phone technology. The other cause odd though it may seem, relates to so-called “sunspots” – the effect of solar activity.

At first glance it seems a bit far-fetched to make a connection between the life of bees and mobile phones. However research suggests there may indeed be something to this theory. German research has determined that bees showed a marked change of behavior when in the vicinity of power lines, and a study conducted at Landau University found that bees avoided returning to the hive when mobile phones were placed nearby.

A study by the mathematician Barbara Shipman, provides one of the more fascinating … one might even say ‘esoteric’ theories. A critical aspect of bee activity hinges obviously upon finding pollen sources and returning to the hive. According to Ms Shipman this routine is facilitated by the dance the bees perform. She indicates that the dance is influenced by factors such as the polarization of the light of the sun and variations in the earth’s magnetic field.

She goes further though and suggests bees are capable of identifying quarks. I think it’s a leap to suggest that bees can ‘perceive’ the quantum field or even use it as a type of frame of reference. My hunch is that their activity is pretty much instinctual, based upon their highly specialized circuitry. Questions about whether or not they can perceive quarks seems almost a moot point, especially since there is no way of proving it.

Where the sunspot theory does hold up is that bees appear to be very sensitive to energy fluctuations. One study exposed a colony to bursts from a high-intensity magnetic field and concluded that the bees’ reactions revealed a high sensitivity to nuclear magnetic resonance, or NMR. This occurs when an electromagnetic wave alters the orientation of the nuclei of atoms.

Some scientists take the view that the next solar maximum may be one of the most intense ever. Mausumi Dikpati, an astronomer with the National Center for Atmospheric Research predicts a solar maximum for 2012, a phenomena that last occurred in 1958. The sunspot generates intense magnetism that can be felt on the earth. Dikpati even believes that it is possible electronics will be effected, for example GPS and mobile phone technology. Since solar cycle 24 began in 2007 according to Mausumi’s estimate, it’s possible that the behavior of bees is already being effected to some degree.

The dramatic declines in the bee population appear to be due to a combination of factors. Insecticides, crop engineering, shrinking habitats and parasites have impacted the overall health and immune system of bees. The other factor contributing to bee decline relates most probably to side-effects of technology and solar activity.

 
Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
59 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jeff Alberts
June 10, 2008 11:03 pm

Typo: “Countries effected include Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece.”
Should be “Countries affected…”
I really don’t think if bees disappeared that it would be the end. There are other pollinators, and many types of bees. With one major competitor rapidly dwindling, something else would take the reins, I’m sure.

June 10, 2008 11:37 pm

I’m getting sick to death of doomsday scenarios based on little more than hunches.
What ever happened to inductive reasoning?
BTW: That is their title, not mine

Peter Hearnden
June 11, 2008 12:12 am

It’s a pity the picture show flies and not bees…
As to the rest it all seems rather unlikely – how do we suppose bees survived the MM? And why are ‘there two possible causes’? Does the author know everything and can rule out other explanations?

Leon Brozyna
June 11, 2008 12:22 am

Found this one a bit puzzling till I noted that it was written last year. Since then there’s been more research as noted in:
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/commentary/dissection/2008/02/dissection_0222
Still, the theory of a virus introduced from Australia has some shortcomings.
On the other hand, why would decreasing solar activity impact the health of hives? Solar activity decreases on a regular eleven year cycle; why is it just now having such an impact? As noted in that article in Wired {above}, it took Pasteur six years to solve the problem with silk worms. The problems with honey bees seem much more complicated and I suspect that any resolution will take several more years before the real cause is unearthed. And, since it will probably be something very mundane, that may be why the honey bee story rarely intrudes on the public consciousness any more. The media wants a glib answer and a sexy target and it probably won’t happen, so they’ll keep milking that other story without end – AGW.

Hard Rain
June 11, 2008 1:58 am

Down here in South Africa our bees are having no problems…

June 11, 2008 2:00 am

Bees are insects. The 24 hour day is killing off insects. It completely destroys the day – night circadian cycle where ever it exists. Nocturnal creatures are in decline. Whip-poor-wills in the USA, night jars in europe and the Masked Owl in Australia. We are told that the 24 hour day suppresses production of melatonin and exacerbates the risk of breast cancer in woman. Wahat about the 24 hour day being the “hidden” cause of things that we still do not understand? perhaps we should being thinking about simple solutions to our problems instead of looking for and not finding any “mysterious” reasons?
Try looking at http://www.lightpollution.org.uk
Maybe just turning off unnecessary lights at night will help. Not just insects decline but global warming and climate change?

Rod Gill
June 11, 2008 2:51 am

I was in a newsgroup for organic farming and I read one post that said there are thousands of organic farmers communicating thru this site, not one of them has experienced CCD on their organic farms.
I don’t know how true this is, but if it is true then the finger points to modern agricultre pesticides, herbicides, GE strains etc.

Berean
June 11, 2008 2:57 am

Just so you know, but that supposed quote from Albert Einstein is possibly an urban legend. There is no evidence that he ever actually said this about bees disappearing. Just for your info.

June 11, 2008 4:09 am

I am not sure that Einstein actually ever said those words – I believe it may be an urban myth. The story has done the rounds several times.

L Nettles
June 11, 2008 5:23 am

A story that starts with the Einstein quote on bees immediately loses me, because there is no proof that Einstein ever said it and it was not in his expertise anyway.

terry
June 11, 2008 5:47 am

arg! that Einstein quote no one can say for certain he ever said!!!! IT’S STILL AROUND!!!! grrrrrrrr!

June 11, 2008 6:06 am

I think you received the wrong buzz and got stun by this story (I had to do that!), Tony. I also think Graham fell of the cliff with his comments on 24 hours of daylight. Perhaps he should view one of the many global maps found on the Inet showing just how dark the world is at night.
Considering the many flaws: “stale dated,” flies on the flower in the picture instead of bees – or at least it appears that way, assertions over cell phone interference, etc., etc., I had to check to see whether this was published on April 1, 2007 instead of 6-8-07. I also could not access the author’s web page to check her out although buzzle.com list amongst her many interests – wine. Perhaps she had a bit too much of it when she wrote this piece!
The Heartland Institute (one of the most reliable sources of information on a variety of subjects) has been studying this mystery for several years. Their latest article clearly debunks much of what the author claims and can be found at http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=22614&CFID=3628058&CFTOKEN=31432669
Jack Koenig, Editor
The Mysterious Climate Project
http://www.climateclinic.com

June 11, 2008 6:33 am

Off Topic… sort of.
A couple of post ago you linked to an article about the growth of biodiversity due to more CO2 in the atmosphere? Well, that growth will be short lived because of…. EVIL CITIES!!!

Norm Potter
June 11, 2008 6:40 am

I talked to a local beekeeper, and he said the secret to healthy hives is, get this, health food. There are some cheap commercially available foods for hives, but he said they are like junk food, and relies on stored pollen and last year’s honey.

austin
June 11, 2008 6:45 am

I used to have 42 colonies. The drought and varroa finished them off.
The last two years I have seen very few bees.
This Spring is a different story. Lots of bees on all the flowering plants and bees were in my feedbins when it started to warm up – they wanted the molasses on the horsefeed.

Bad
June 11, 2008 7:40 am

Almost certainly, bees will recover in any case: some will be less susceptible to whatever the problem is, and they’ll come to dominate. It just might take awhile.

beng
June 11, 2008 7:46 am

Honeybee mites:
http://www.ento.vt.edu/~fell/apiculture/mitepages/mitesindex.html
are the major reason for their decline here in the E US, not climate. There are quite a few species of native NA bee pollinators, so native vegetation is little affected — but many commercial crops aren’t native.

Gary Gulrud
June 11, 2008 7:55 am

I have some inside info that the ‘immune’ issue, specifically involving a bioengineered pesticide, is a leading contributor (in this country anyway).
An area of ongoing research, sorry for the tease.
Another possible ‘unintended consequence’ following a specious accomodation to Gaia.

Dana H.
June 11, 2008 8:03 am

I guess you can label this one “the crackpot thread,” since every crackpot theory one can imagine appears in that article. Bees perceiving quarks? Gimme a break! Do they have tiny linear accelerators in their stingers to smash the subatomic particles together and free the bound quarks?
Re: a solar maximum in 2012, this is something that comes along every 11 years, so what’s this garbage about the last one being in 1958? And anyway, the problem these days seems to be a lack of solar activity, not an overabundance of it.
Of all the bad science articles out there in the popular press, this has got to be one of the worst.
REPLY: I agree on the quarks, but also note that the write of the article expresses doubt about the quantum issue.

Steve Keohane
June 11, 2008 8:10 am

We are losing honey bees here in western CO. There is no light pollution, the nearest city is 100 mi. away. The towns around here have pop. of 2-5K. No lighting what-so-ever outside the towns. A shift in solar magnetic field is unlikely the problem as that is cyclic. Also, the bees started going during the last cycle with high solar output and they are still suffering with low solar output. We have plenty of other bees and wasps filling in as far as I can see on my flowers. I wonder why this seems to be species specific unless it is an infectious agent.

Bill P
June 11, 2008 8:14 am

“…bees avoided returning to the hive when mobile phones were placed nearby.”
I share the same bias. Especially when some loudmouth in the supermarket begins expounding into her cell phone – they have to shout to be heard at any distance, I suppose – about some private affair. Just want to avoid such places.

Texas Aggie
June 11, 2008 8:23 am

Also, there is no record whatsoever of Albert Einstein ever saying what’s in the quote attributed to him, according to Snopes.

June 11, 2008 8:32 am

Hard Rain, I used to farm organically in South Africa, and knew bee farmers: They indicated that they were also experiencing a growing shortage. The one farmer had hives in spots in Gauteng, Mpumalanga and (possibly) the NW Province.
But I do think that the shortage is possibly due to a combination of factors. True, there are other pollinators, but what will the overall impact be of the depletion of the major pollinator, and how long will it take for other pollinators to fill the gap.
Also, from a cultural-gastronomic pov, the loss of honey is a very significant event.

austin
June 11, 2008 8:35 am

Narroa Mites are very, very bad. They are to bees what ticks are to mammals and each bee can carry a lot of mites. They infest the hive and all the worker bees. They reduce the lifespan of the workers by half or more and that extra weight exhausts the bees. They make the hives susceptible to other pests like foulbrood and beetles and wasps.
If I treated the hives every month, then the hive had a 50/50 chance of making it. If I did not treat the hive, then it died.

Bill P
June 11, 2008 8:50 am

“There are quite a few species of native NA bee pollinators, so native vegetation is little affected — but many commercial crops aren’t native.”
There are around 4,000 North American “natives”. Oddly enough, this number doesn’t make up for the specialized niche filled by the honeybees. Leafcutters, mason bees, and bumblebees can help, and have been raised for commercial use, but none but the (originally) imported honeybee seems to do the job on the scale necessary for the ag industry. The collapse disorder, and any issue relating to bug pollination are a fascinating puzzle.
I’m not an entomologist, but I can see real reasons to keep an open mind about a link between solar minima / cooler, wetter weather / fungal and mite infestations. There may be other things going on with navigation we don’t know about.
Re: Colorado bees. The Western Colorado Honey Company was the biggest producer on the western slope about ten years ago, when I spoke to its owner. It was a family-run operation, and Paul Limbach told me how his father and he used to bring in many harvests of about 125 pounds from each “super”, the comb-and-honey-filled second story above each hive box. That was in the 50’s and 60’s. At the time of my interview, he said they were lucky to get 50-pound harvests from each super. Don’t know how that’s changed in the last ten years.

1 2 3