Evidence of a Significant Solar Imprint in Annual Globally Averaged Temperature Trends – Part 2

NEW An update to this has been made here:

evidence of a lunisolar influence on decadal and bidecadal oscillations in globally averaged temperature trends

Part II

By Basil Copeland and Anthony Watts

In Part I, we presented evidence of a noticeable periodicity in globally averaged temperatures when filtered with Hodrick-Prescott smoothing. Using a default value of lambda of 100, we saw a bidecadal pattern in the rate of change in the smoothed temperature series that appears closely related to 22 year Hale solar cycles. There was also evidence of a longer climate cycle of ~66 years, or three Hale solar cycles, corresponding to slightly higher peaks of cycles 11 to 17 and 17 to 23 shown in Figure 4B. But how much of this is attributable to value of lambda (λ). Here is where lambda (λ) is used in the Hodrick-Prescott filter equation:

hp_filter_equation.png

The first term of the equation is the sum of the squared deviations dt = yt − τt which penalizes the cyclical component. The second term is a multiple λ of the sum of the squares of the trend component’s second differences. This second term penalizes variations in the growth rate of the trend component. The larger the value of λ, the higher is the penalty.

For the layman reader, this equation is much like a tunable bandpass filter used in radio communications, where lambda (λ) is the tuning knob used to determine the what band of frequencies are passed and which are excluded. The low frequency component of the HadCRUT surface data (the multidecadal trend) looks almost like a DC signal with a complex AC wave superimposed on it. Tuning the waves with a period we wish to see is the basis for use of this filter in this excercise.

Given an appropriately chosen, positive value of λ, the low frequency trend component will minimize. This can be seen in Figure 2 presented in part I, where the value of lambda was set to 100.

essifigure2

Figure 2 – click for a larger image

A lower value of lambda would result in much less smoothing. To test the sensitivity of the findings reported in Part I, we refiltered with a lambda of 7. The results are shown in Figures 3 and 4.

essifigure3

Figure 3 – click for a larger image

As expected, the smoothed trend line, represented by the blue line in the upper panel of Figure 3, is no longer as smooth as the trend in the upper panel of Figure 1 from Part I. And when we look at the first differences of the less smoothed trend line, shown in Figure 4, they too are no longer as smooth as in Figure 2 from Part I. Nevertheless, in Figure 4, the correlation to the 22 year Hale cycle peaks is still there, and we can now see the 11 year Schwabe cycle as well.

essifigure4

Figure 4 – click for a larger image

The strong degree of correspondence between the solar cycle peaks and the peak rate of change in the smoothed temperature trend from HadCRUT surface temperature data is seen in Figure 5.

essifigure5

Figure 5 – click for a larger image

The pattern in Figure 4, while not as eye-catching, perhaps, as the pattern in Figure 2 is still quite revealing. There is a notable tendency for amplitude of the peak rate of change to alternate between even and odd numbered solar cycles, being higher with the odd numbered solar cycles, and lower in even numbered cycles. This is consistent with a known feature of the Hale cycle in which the 22 year cycle is composed of alternating 11 year phases, referred to as parallel and antiparallel phases, with transitions occurring near solar peaks.

Even cycles lead to an open heliosphere where GCR reaches the earth more easily. Mavromichalaki, et. al. (1997), and Orgutsov, et al. (2003) contend that during solar cycles with positive polarity, the GCR flux is doubled. This strongly implicates Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) flux in modulating global temperature trends. The lower peak amplitudes for even solar cycles and the higher peak amplitudes for odd solar cycles shown in Figure 4 appears to directly confirm the kind of influence on terrestrial climate postulated by Svensmark in Influence of Cosmic Rays on Earth’s Climate (1998)From the pattern indicated in Figure 4, the implication is that the “warming” of the late 20th century was not so much warming as it was less cooling than in each preceding solar cycle, perhaps relating to the rise in geomagnetic activity.

It is thus notable that at the end of the chart, the rate of change after the peak associated with solar cycle 23 is already in the negative range, and is below the troughs of the preceding two solar cycles. Again, it is purely speculative at this point, but the implication is that the underlying rate of change in globally averaged temperature trends is moderating, and that the core rate of change has turned negative.It is important to understand that the smoothed series, and the implied rates of change from the first differences, in figures 2 and 4, even if they could be projected, are not indications of what the global temperature trend will be.

There is a cyclical component to the change in global temperature that will impose itself over the underlying trend. The cyclical component is probably dominated by terrestrial dynamics, while the smoothed series seems to be evidence of a solar connection. So it is possible for the underlying trend to be declining, or even negative, while actual global temperature increases because of positive cyclical factors. But by design, there is no trend in the cyclical component, so that over time, if the trends indicated in Figures 2 and 4 hold, global warming will moderate, and we may be entering a phase of global cooling.

Some are probably wondering which view of the historical correspondence between globally averaged temperatures and solar cycles is the “correct” one: Figure 2 or 4?

Such a question misconstrues the role of lambda in filtering the data. Here lambda is somewhat like the magnification factor “X” in a telescope or microscope. A low lambda (less smoothing) allows us to “focus in” on the data, and see something we might miss with a high lambda (more smoothing). A high lambda, precisely because it filters out more, is like a macroscopic view which by filtering out lower level patterns in the data, reveals larger, longer lived processes more clearly. Both approaches yield valuable insights. In Figure 2, we don’t see the influence of the Schwabe cycle, just the Hale cycle. In Figure 4, were it not for what we see in Figure 2, we’d probably miss some similarities between solar cycles 15, 16, and 17 and solar cycles 21, 22, and 23.In either case, we are seeing strong evidence of a solar imprint in the globally averaged temperature trend, when filtered to remove short term periodicities, and then differenced to reveal secular trends in the rate of change in the underlying long term tend in globally averaged temperatures.

At one level we see clear evidence of bidecadal oscillations associated with the Hale cycle, and which appear to corroborate the role of GCR’s in modulating terrestrial climate. At the other, in figure 4B, we see a longer periodicity on the order of 60 to 70 years, correspondingly closely to three bidecadal oscillations. If this longer pattern holds, we have just come out of the peak of the longer cycle, and can expect globally average temperature trends to moderate, and increased likelihood of a cooling phase similar that experienced during the mid 20th century.

In Lockwood and Fröhlich 2007 they state: “Our results show that the observed rapid rise in global mean temperatures seen after 1985 cannot be ascribed to solar variability, whichever of the mechanisms is invoked and no matter how much the solar variation is amplified.” . Yet, as Figure 5 demonstrates, there is a strong correlation between the solar cycle peaks and the peak rate of change in the smoothed surface temperature trend.

The periodicity revealed in the data, along with the strong correlation of solar cycles to HadCRUT surface data, suggests that the rapid increase in globally averaged temperatures in the second half of 20th century was not unusual, but part of a ~66 year climate cycle that has a long history of influencing terrestrial climate. While the longer cycle itself may be strongly influenced by long term oceanic oscillations, it is ultimately related to bidecadal oscillations that have an origin in impact of solar activity on terrestrial climate.

UPDATE: We have had about half a dozen people replicate from HadCRUT data the signal shown in figure 4 using FFT and traditional filters, and we thank everyone for doing that. We are currently working on a new approach to the correlations shown in figure 5, which can yield different results using alternate statistical methods. A central issue is how to correctly identify the peak of the solar cycle, and we are looking at that more closely. As it stands now, while the Hodrick-Prescott filtering works well and those results in figures 2,3, and 4 have been replicated by others, but the correlation shown in figure 5 is in question when a Rayleigh method is applied, and thus figure 5 is likely incorrect since it does not hold up under that and other statistical tests. There is also an error in the data point for cycle 11. I thank Tamino for pointing these issues out to us.

We are continuing to look at different methods of demonstrating a correlation. Please watch for future posts on the subject.

NEW An update to this has been made here:

evidence of a lunisolar influence on decadal and bidecadal oscillations in globally averaged temperature trends

References:

Demetrescu, C., and V. Dobrica (2008), Signature of Hale and Gleissberg solar cycles in the geomagnetic activity, Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, A02103, doi:10.1029/2007JA012570.

Hadley Climate Research Unit Temperature (HadCRUT) monthly averaged global temperature data set (description of columns here)

J. Javaraiah, Indian Institute of Astrophysics, 22 Year Periodicity in the Solar Differential Rotation, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy. (2000) 21, 167-170

Katsakina, et al., On periodicities in long term climatic variations near 68° N, 30° E, Advances in Geoscience, August 7, 2007

Kim, Hyeongwoo, Auburn University, “Hodrick-Prescott Filter” March 12, 2004

M. Lockwood and C. Fröhlich, Recent oppositely directed trends in solar climate forcings and the global mean surface air temperature, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Astronomy doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1880; 2007, 10th July

Mavromichalaki, et. al. 1997 Simulated effects at neutron monitor energies: evidence for a 22-year cosmic-ray variation, Astronomy and Astrophysics. 330, 764-772 (1998)

Mavromichalaki H, Belehaki A, Rafios X, et al. Hale-cycle effects in cosmic-ray intensity during the last four cycles ASTROPHYS SPACE SCI 246 (1): 7-14 1997.
Nivaor Rodolfo Rigozo, Solar and climate signal records in tree ring width

from Chile (AD 1587–1994), Planetary and Space Science 55 (2007) 158–164

Ogurtsov, et al., ON THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE SOLAR CYCLE LENGTH AND TERRESTRIAL CLIMATE, Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 5, 03762, 2003
Royal Observatory Of Belgium, Solar Influences Data Analysis Center, monthly and monthly smoothed sunspot number. (Description of data here)

Svensmark, Henrik, Danish Metorological Institute, Influence of Cosmic Rays on Earth’s Climate, Physical Review Letters 15th Oct. 98

Wikipedia, Hodrick-Prescott Filter January 20, 2008

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

176 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TCO
March 31, 2008 1:09 pm

In your figure 5, regression, you ignore peaks at halfway between 15-16 and 16-17 from the temp record, that are not on a solar cycle.
Also my intuition is that the sort of plot that you show here in figure 5 is not proper use of X-Y regressions.

Paul Clark
March 31, 2008 1:17 pm

One more, and then I’ll shut up and code the interactive version so you can all play. This is a band-pass from harmonic 2 through 5. We’re in the deep sub-bass now:
http://www.woodfortrees.org/graphs/hadcrut3.fourier-bp-2-5.png
66 year cycles, anyone? And feel the volume: 0.3K+ peak-to-peak. God is clearly a drum-n-bass fan.

Jim Arndt
March 31, 2008 1:26 pm

Basil/Anthony,
If you look at the RSS and the magnetic field map of the world you will see that the anomalies almost match the field lines. Why is this important. Because the suns magnetic field and CME’s effect the Earths magnetic field. They also change the atmosphere and may inhibit cloud production. This is also seen in the LOD variations that maybe cause by jerks in the geomagnetism. This may correlate with your solar cycle variations. Don’t want to go too much into it but it is very interesting. Very nice work on part II.
http://www.remss.com/msu/msu_data_monthly.html?channel=tmt
http://geomag.usgs.gov/charts/ig00f.pdf
http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/istp/nicky/cme-chase.html
LOD comparision to temperature.
http://sait.oat.ts.astro.it/MSAIt760405/PDF/2005MmSAI..76..957D.pdf
The Geomagnetic jerk in 2003 maybe the signal that the cooling has started.
http://spacecenter.dk/~nio/papers/SV_SHA.pdf

March 31, 2008 1:40 pm

Interesting.
I did something similar: Using an Accurate Global Temperature Index to Diagnose Global Climate Change.
REPLY: To all readers here, this some sort of early April fools joke as he labels it “humor”.

Willem
March 31, 2008 1:53 pm

Wonderful piece of work and I look forward to seeing it in journal form. I am particularly interested in the 66 year cycle it highlights due to the importance that the 60-70y Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation (or Pacific Decadal Oscillation for those in the Northern Hemisphere) has on weather and oceanic processes for us in the Southwest Pacific Ocean.
Your results are essentially the same as I get with Wavelet analysis, but a whole lot easier for my students to understand.

someknowledge
March 31, 2008 2:12 pm

What is needed is to correlate the total solar flux with the temperature. Why is it such a stretch for scientists to realize that the sun heats the earth? Anyone who’s ever gone out on a sunny day can realize this. The energy output of the sun varies over time. Almost all stars have some luminosity variations. As was pointed out in another comment, sunspot cycles do not necessarily correlate with luminosity. With all the solar observatories in orbit, you’d think somebody was keeping track of solar luminosity. Get the data and plot a graph. It should be just obvious.

SteveSadlov
March 31, 2008 2:34 pm

Nigel et al … witness the current situation with world rice supplies.
Highly disturbing and attributable to this winter and spring’s abnormal cold, especially in the eastern half of Asia. Although having written that, I report that this AM in Northern California there were freezing conditions, especially inland. Especially in areas of the Sacramento Valley where short grain hinode is grown.

Erik
March 31, 2008 2:44 pm

Here is a question for you astrophysicists:
If this graph is indicates a GCR – temperature link, could we predict a hemisphere specific signal?
Ie, the earth is tilted so that one hemisphere has greater average exposure to the galactic core. If that is seeding clouds and changing the temperature, would we expect to see one hemisphere change temperature more than the other?

Jim Arndt
March 31, 2008 3:24 pm

Hi Eric,
GCR’s come from all directions. Only changes if you get Super Nova’s and hope one of them isn’t real close and pointing at you. Gamma Ray Burst (GRB).

Jim Arndt
March 31, 2008 3:25 pm

Hi
Oooops Erik. Sorry

March 31, 2008 4:27 pm

Great work, guys, and the cleanest, most collegial comment thread I think I’ve ever seen. My tiny brain can’t figure the math, but I get the gist. And I have a couple of old communications receivers…
We need a label for watts goin’ on here (Puns again? (Ed). Sorry, mate…)
Open Source Science?
REPLY: “the cleanest, most collegial comment thread I think I’ve ever seen.” Thanks for that complement. On some other blogs, particularly with the ones run by phantom operators, vitriol, taunting, and general boorish behaviours is a way of life. I’ve never understood it, except to think that “anonymity breeds contempt”, because there is no repercussion for such behaviour. – Anthony

erikv
March 31, 2008 5:10 pm

Thanks Jim.

March 31, 2008 6:38 pm

[…] in Astronomy and Aerospace, Science, Science Education. trackback Here is an interesting analysis of solar min/max data. I can’t vouch for the kind of analysis that was performed. But it is […]

blcjr
Editor
March 31, 2008 6:51 pm

TCO,
The plot in Figure 5 is not a regression. There is a correlation coefficient shown, but we’re not doing any regressing. There may be a better way to “correlate” correspondence of the peaks, though, than to calculate a correlation coefficient between the years of the peaks. Any ideas?
The two peaks around solar cycle are certainly curious, and invite closer inspection at some point. They go away with higher order filtering.
Basil

Evan Jones
Editor
March 31, 2008 6:53 pm

Now, all that has to be done is to tie in the fluctuations in with PDO and AMO and you’ll have a gen-yu-wine Unified Theorem.
It’s all one piece. There must be some cause-and-effect . . .
Hmmm.

nanny_govt_sucks
March 31, 2008 7:30 pm

Re: Figure 5 corr = .9984…
What would be the corr of two random walk series using the same xy setup as in Figure 5?

Bill in Vigo
March 31, 2008 7:33 pm

Great post Basil and Anthony. It is a good thing I enjoy reading. I believe that there will be some real head scratching going on in some of the RC type blogs and some will just try to pass it off as crack pot work. It IS NOT.
Just as an aside Basil here in Alabama we have no problem correlating the effect of sun on temperature the theory is
1. 4:30am get flash light go out to the hickory tree in the yard read old Coke-a-cola thermomenter temp is 69.
2. Go back to bed and enter normal day.
3. 3:00pm go back out to the old hickory tree and insure the old Coke-a- cola thermomenter is in the shade and take reading. Temp is now 105.
4. Conclusion is that, “Yep the sun sure made it hot today”.
Makes one wonder what makes it so hard to under stand that the sun effects the surface temperature.
Don’t ya wish it were that simple?
Bill Derryberry

Steve H
March 31, 2008 7:33 pm

Anthony:
Once again, you were faster than me. I was going to send you that link with the butterfly diagram.
If you have advanced to this level of solar dynamics, then I no longer have any doubts about your scientific abilities.
WAY TO GO!
I have always looked at this as an exploration of our Sun, and how it is a variable star. You have done an outstanding job in presenting the data in a way that anyone can understand.

Bill Illis
March 31, 2008 7:49 pm

CO2 has increased from 0.000280 of the atmosphere to 0.000384 of the atmosphere or an increase of 0.0001.
Now when this change is compared to an increase from 1,362 watts/m2 (minimum value recorded) to 1368 w/m2 (maximum value recorded) in solar irradiance, the global warmers say this change has virtually no impact. But the change in CO2 has a huge impact.
I don’t know how a 0.4% change in solar energy (which is all the heat the Earth gets) can be less of an impact that a 0.01% change in the atmospheric composition.
Clearly it has to. And this analysis proves it in my mind.
Just think how much colder the height of the winter is compared to the maximum of the summer. My location has a swing of 50C in the average between these two numbers. While averaging over the entire planet is expected to balance out between the seasons, it is extremely clear that changes in solar energy must have a large impact on temperatures. 0.4% should have a large impact.

Evan Jones
Editor
March 31, 2008 8:00 pm

I just love a series where part 2 beats part 1 . . .
REPLY: always save the best for last.

Pamela Gray
March 31, 2008 8:36 pm

Is it just me or does the cold happen faster than the warm period? This reminds me of freezing a turkey. Takes just hours. Thawing the damned thing takes forever. Is there something about warming up from a cold state that makes it happen slower than cooling down from a warm state?
Do we have more time (as in years) to gear up for warm periods? And just months to gear up for cold?

kim
March 31, 2008 9:05 pm

Check out Tamino’s last graph in his Part 3 thread.
=================================

Carl Wolk
March 31, 2008 9:17 pm

I’ve heard Leif Svalgaard talk about the fact that TSI peaks alternate between round and sharp. Could this have something to do with the differing odd/even solar cycle contribution.

Jeff Alberts
March 31, 2008 9:39 pm

I don’t know how a 0.4% change in solar energy (which is all the heat the Earth gets) can be less of an impact that a 0.01% change in the atmospheric composition.

Well, the Earth does generate its own heat internally, molten core and all that.