Previously, we had 29 excuses for “the pause” now we have 30.
When a paper is published by multiple authors, the universities of those authors often produce separate press releases to highlight the paper. Today, two separate press releases about the same paper showed up right next to each other in Eurekalert, as seen in the screen cap. Problem is though, one paper PR (from the University of New South Wales) places blame squarely on global warming, the other (from the University of Hawaii), only gives it a contributory mention. UNSW also expects a “sudden acceleration of global average surface temperatures”, but there’s no mention of that in the UH press release. Looking at the differences, it isn’t hard to spot the bias towards alarmism at UNSW.
Both press releases are presented in entirety below. Commentary follows.
From the University of New South Wales
Atlantic warming turbocharges Pacific trade winds
Record breaking trade winds may have led to hiatus in global surface average temperatures
New research has found rapid warming of the Atlantic Ocean, likely caused by global warming, has turbocharged Pacific Equatorial trade winds. Currently the winds are at a level never before seen on observed records, which extend back to the 1860s.
The increase in these winds has caused eastern tropical Pacific cooling, amplified the Californian drought, accelerated sea level rise three times faster than the global average in the Western Pacific and has slowed the rise of global average surface temperatures since 2001.
It may even be responsible for making El Nino events less common over the past decade due to its cooling impact on ocean surface temperatures in the eastern Pacific.
“We were surprised to find the main cause of the Pacific climate trends of the past 20 years had its origin in the Atlantic Ocean,” said co-lead author Dr Shayne McGregor from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (ARCCSS) at the University of New South Wales.
“It highlights how changes in the climate in one part of the world can have extensive impacts around the globe.”
The record-breaking increase in Pacific Equatorial trade winds over the past 20 years had, until now, baffled researchers.
Originally, this trade wind intensification was considered to be a response to Pacific decadal variability. However, the strength of the winds was much more powerful than expected due to the changes in Pacific sea surface temperature.
Another riddle was that previous research indicated that under global warming scenarios Pacific Equatorial Trade winds would slow down over the coming century.
The solution was found in the rapid warming of the Atlantic Ocean basin, which has created unexpected pressure differences between the Atlantic and Pacific. This has produced wind anomalies that have given Pacific Equatorial trade winds an additional big push.
“The rapid warming of the Atlantic Ocean created high pressure zones in the upper atmosphere over that basin and low pressure zones close to the surface of the ocean,” said Prof Axel Timmermann co-lead and corresponding author from the University of Hawaii.
“The rising air parcels, over the Atlantic eventually sink over the eastern tropical Pacific, thus creating higher surface pressure there. The enormous pressure see-saw with high pressure in the Pacific and low pressure in the Atlantic gave the Pacific trade winds an extra kick, amplifying their strength. It’s like giving a playground roundabout an extra push as it spins past.”
Many climate models appear to have underestimated the magnitude of the coupling between the two ocean basins, which may explain why they struggled to produce the recent increase in Pacific Equatorial trade wind trends.
While active, the stronger Equatorial trade winds have caused far greater overturning of ocean water in the West Pacific, pushing more atmospheric heat into the ocean, as shown by co-author and ARCCSS Chief Investigator Prof Matthew England earlier this year. This increased overturning appears to explain much of the recent slowdown in the rise of global average surface temperatures.
Importantly, the researchers don’t expect the current pressure difference between the two ocean basins to last. When it does end, they expect to see some rapid changes, including a sudden acceleration of global average surface temperatures.
“It will be difficult to predict when the Pacific cooling trend and its contribution to the global hiatus in surface temperatures will come to an end,” Prof England said.
“However, a large El Niño event is one candidate that has the potential to drive the system back to a more synchronized Atlantic/Pacific warming situation.”
================================================================
Now from the University of Hawaii. Who says the Atlantic warming is “induced partly by greenhouse gasses”.
================================================================
From the University of Hawaii ‑ SOEST
Atlantic origin of recent Pacific trade wind, sea level and temperature trends
An Australian–US team of climate researchers has solved a puzzle that has challenged scientists for over a decade. Climate models predict that the equatorial Pacific trades should weaken with increasing greenhouse gases. Yet, since the early 1990s, satellites and climate stations reveal a rapid and unprecedented strengthening of the Pacific trade winds, accelerating sea level rise in the western Pacific and impacting both Pacific and global climate.
“The answer to the puzzle is that recent rapid Atlantic Ocean warming has affected climate in the Pacific,” say the scientists. Their findings from observations and modeling experiments are published in the August 3, 2014, online issue of Nature Climate Change.
“We were surprised to find that the main cause of the Pacific wind, temperature, and sea level trends over the past 20 years lies in the Atlantic Ocean,” says Shayne McGregor at the University of New South Wales and lead author of the study. “We saw that the rapid Atlantic surface warming observed since the early 1990s, induced partly by greenhouse gasses, has generated unusually low sea level pressure over the tropical Atlantic. This, in turn, produces an upward motion of the overlying air parcels. These parcels move westward aloft and then sink again in the eastern equatorial Pacific, where their sinking creates a high pressure system. The resulting Atlantic–Pacific pressure difference strengthens the Pacific trade winds.”
“Stronger trade winds in the equatorial Pacific also increase the upwelling of cold waters to the surface. The resulting near-surface cooling in the eastern Pacific amplifies the Atlantic–Pacific pressure seesaw, thus further intensifying the trade winds,” says Axel Timmermann, corresponding author of the study at the University of Hawaii International Pacific Research Center. He comments further, “It turns out that the current generation of climate models underestimates the extent of the Atlantic–Pacific coupling, which means that they cannot properly capture the observed eastern Pacific cooling, which has contributed significantly to the leveling off, or the hiatus, in global warming.”
In contrast to previous studies that explain the eastern Pacific cooling as resulting solely from natural climate variability, the international climate research team points to a climate feedback that has been overlooked, namely, that the recent Atlantic warming affects the atmospheric circulation over the Pacific, leading to an increased persistence of cold ocean conditions there.
“It will be difficult to predict when the Pacific cooling trend and its contribution to the global warming hiatus will come to an end. The natural variability of the Pacific, associated for instance with the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, is one candidate that could drive the system back to a more even Atlantic–Pacific warming situation,” says co-author Matthew England from the University of New South Wales.
“Our study documents that some of the largest tropical and subtropical climate trends of the past 20 years are all linked: Strengthening of the Pacific trade winds, acceleration of sea level rise in the western Pacific, eastern Pacific surface cooling, the global warming hiatus, and even the massive droughts in California,” explains co-author Malte Stuecker from the University of Hawaii Meteorology Department.
“We are just starting to grasp the scope of the impacts of this global atmospheric reorganization and of the out-of phase temperature trends in the Atlantic and Pacific regions,” adds Fei-Fei Jin, climate scientist also at the University of Hawaii Meteorology Department.
Citation
Shayne McGregor, Axel Timmermann, Malte F. Stuecker, Matthew H. England, Mark Merrifield, Fei-Fei Jin, and Yoshimitsu Chikamoto: Recent Walker Circulation strengthening and Pacific cooling amplified by Atlantic warming.Nature Climate Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2330.
Funding
Australian Research Council (ARC), including the ARC Centre of Excellence in Climate System Science. A.T. was supported through NSF grant No. 1049219. M.F.S. and F-F.J. were supported by US NSF grant ATM1034798, US Department of Energy grant DESC005110 and US NOAA grant NA10OAR4310200.
==============================================================
The only problem is, how would they explain similar but larger peaks in Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature, that have occurred before being “induced partly by greenhouse gasses”?

The The Atlantic multidecadal oscillation (AMO) was identified by Schlesinger and Ramankutty in 1994 in “An oscillation in the global climate system of period 65-70 years“.
In that paper abstract, they claim the AMO has “obscured” the global warming signal:
In addition to the well-known warming of ~0.5 °C since the middle of the nineteenth century, global-mean surface temperature records1-4display substantial variability on timescales of a century or less. Accurate prediction of future temperature change requires an understanding of the causes of this variability; possibilities include external factors, such as increasing greenhouse-gas concentrations5-7 and anthropogenic sulphate aerosols8-10, and internal factors, both predictable (such as El Niño11) and unpredictable (noise12,13). Here we apply singular spectrum analysis14-20 to four global-mean temperature records1-4, and identify a temperature oscillation with a period of 65-70 years. Singular spectrum analysis of the surface temperature records for 11 geographical regions shows that the 65-70-year oscillation is the statistical result of 50-88-year oscillations for the North Atlantic Ocean and its bounding Northern Hemisphere continents. These oscillations have obscured the greenhouse warming signal in the North Atlantic and North America. Comparison with previous observations and model simulations suggests that the oscillation arises from predictable internal variability of the ocean-atmosphere system.
Personally, I don’t think any of these climate scientists have a clue as to what they are talking about, much less what drives the climate in cycles.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
damn…we have another ocean?..and it’s called Atlantic??
..and the Pacific have been controlling hurricanes in it?
is there nothing it can’t do?….
The increase in these winds has caused eastern tropical Pacific cooling, amplified the Californian drought, accelerated sea level rise three times faster than the global average in the Western Pacific and has slowed the rise of global average surface temperatures since 2001.
But.. I thought the science was settled?
Even Trenberth is “very, very skeptical” about this new excuse
http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/08/03/new-study-sees-atlantic-warming-behind-a-host-of-recent-climate-shifts/?_php=true&_type=blogs&module=BlogPost-Title&version=Blog%20Main&contentCollection=Climate%20Change&action=Click&pgtype=Blogs®ion=Body&_r=0
“Personally, I don’t think any of these climate scientists have a clue as to what they are talking about, much less what drives the climate in cycles.”
Doesn’t Chris Turney work at the UNSW?
Now there is a clueless wonder!
So global warming caused the Atlantic trade winds to increase, which has cooled the Pacific, made El Ninos less common, and the “pause” in global temperature? (No warming since Sept 97′.)
‘The only problem is, how would they explain similar but larger peaks in Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature, that have occurred before being “induced partly by greenhouse gasses”?’
This is but a minor problem. They will just have to “adjust” the past high points away like they did to the warm period in the 30s and 40s in the US — or like they disappeared the Medieval Warming Period.
It is all in the “adjustments”.
Priceless – this mob remind me of a certain christian sect who were categorically predicting the arrival of the big “A” so far their score is nil from many re-interpretations of the “facts” they shoulda been using computer models….
The science is turning like art under the Catholic Church in the 13-16 century to something bizarre and political? Climate is 100 % driven by 3% antroproghenic CO2?
30 excuses to date? Shouldn’t it be 50 by now? I’m blaming global warming for the paucity of excuses. Is there ANYTHING it can’t do??
We just need to see what all the other universities put in their press releases and we can see how good the consensus is.
Or is it how much they need the funding?
James Bull
The fact that there are now 30 guesses means they are dazed and confused. The models failed to see the standstill because they are primed to react violently to co2.
When will they just admit the AMO and PDO are significant climate drivers – more so than CO2?
Somebody should tally the number of excuses that have been claimed just by England or the University of New South Wales. It’s clearly more than one. I guess that’s why he’s been called “say-anything Matthew England”.
So now the climate alarmists have a list of 30 possible reasons that they are uncovering to explain the warming hiatus. Which tells me that they openly admit that there is plenty about the Earth’s climate that they don’t understand and are still learning. When leads me to a logical fallacy they are creating regarding the human CO2-induced climate change theory: if they are still learning all these things about the Earth’s climate, how can they ascribe the 20th century warming to human CO2 emissions in the first place? Why aren’t any and all of these factors included in their precious models?
Don’t know who originally said this (Shakespeare?), but “Oh what a tangled web we weave when……..”.
And I’m not even a scientist.
“The record-breaking increase in Pacific Equatorial trade winds over the past 20 years had, until now, baffled researchers.”
The NE trades arrive unmitigated at my location with a probability of 60%, eg more than half of natural airflow. No noticeable increase in 23 years. No significant change in the data records either.
I would have thought that the Australian Research Council’s cash register would have been locked up by now.
McGregor: “We saw that the rapid Atlantic surface warming observed since the early 1990s, induced partly by greenhouse gasses, has generated unusually low sea level pressure over the tropical Atlantic. This, in turn, ….”
Timmermann: “It turns out that the current generation of climate models underestimates the extent of the Atlantic–Pacific coupling, which means that they cannot properly capture the observed eastern Pacific cooling, which has contributed significantly to the leveling off, or the hiatus, in global warming.”
So it seems that it is ‘surface warming’ ( induced partly by greenhouse gasses ) that has caused the hiatus in …. global warming.
Chalk up another victory the the mighty CO2.
A simpler way to describe this process would be “negative feedback”.
The warmists predicted a reduction in wind speed in the tropics which reduces evaporation which causes there to be less latent heat movement in the atmosphere which causes there to be less radiation loss to space in the tropics which is one of the model fudges made to create extreme AGW in the phony (fudged) theoretical general circulation (GCM) models.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/04/15/major-errors-apparent-in-climate-model-evaporation-estimates/
As would be expected when there is uneven warming in the tropics there is an increase rather than a decrease in tropical winds. (See current ocean surface temperature. Why is there suddenly so much blue in this picture? What was changed? Hint: The solar magnetic cycle change.)
http://www.ospo.noaa.gov/data/sst/anomaly/2014/anomnight.7.31.2014.gif
P.S.
The warmists adjust their models and their theory as necessary to keep the extreme AGW prediction alive (It is now on life support). The observed reduction in low level clouds was explained away with AGW. Some scallywags noted that the reduction in low level cloud in the same latitudes that experienced warming could be the explanation for the warming rather than CO2, as the CO2 theory predicted a different region to warm.
The sudden inhibiting of El Niño events (Do you remember the warmists’ prediction of future super El Niño events caused by AGW, Hansen’s loaded dice?) is due to the abrupt change to the sun, not due to a warmer Atlantic ocean.
Every new revelation is more evidence they’ve been feeding us a load of crap for at least 100 years. I long for a time when shame alone would have guided them toward greater honesty. Do they really not accept these missives are admissions of prior ignorance? They also continue to lack the courage to avoid weasel (stoat) words. That alone should clue us that the BS de jour is no different this year than all years previous.
I would love to have read in either of these releases “we find we were well off the mark when… and very wrong when we said…”.
Here in South Australia we awake to the headline-
“Adelaide is waking up to its coldest August morning for 126 years”
(please don’t ROFL at our horrendous new record of 0.9C at 6.29 am) which naturally means we’ll probably have to wait another 100+ years to match it, which ipso facto will prove CAGW beyond doubt in the intervening period due to the Pacific trade winds. The evidence is mounting up here skeptics.
If it walks like an oscillation, talks like an oscillation, smells like an oscillation, then it’s probably an oscillation…
Just to point out that large areas of Southern Australia experienced their coldest minimums since the 1880s this morning.
(Chinese and Indians, please try harder)
This just in from Hockey Schtick.
“New paper finds marine clouds cause a negative feedback cooling effect on climate ”
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/08/new-paper-finds-marine-clouds-cause.html
“If it walks like an oscillation, talks like an oscillation, smells like an oscillation, then it’s probably an oscillation”
Can we assume you’re referring to the Seance of Climatology here?
In medicine when there are 30 treatments for a given disease (as there were for post-hepetic neuralgia when I was in practice) you know that none of them work.
Thanks, Anthony, this has given me a chuckle.