New telescope brings the power of Hubble down to Earth

From the University of Arizona

UA astronomers take sharpest photos ever of the night sky

MAGAO_telescope
The Magellan Telescope with MagAO’s Adaptive Secondary Mirror (ASM) is mounted at the top looking down some 30 feet onto the 21-foot diameter primary mirror, which is encased inside the blue mirror cell. Credit: Yuri Beletsky, Las Campanas Observatory

Using a new camera and a telescope mirror that vibrates a thousand times each second to counteract atmospheric flickering, astronomers have achieved image resolution capabilities that could see a baseball diamond on the moon

Astronomers at the University of Arizona, the Arcetri Observatory near Florence, Italy and the Carnegie Observatory have developed a new type of camera that allows scientists to take sharper images of the night sky than ever before.

The team has been developing this technology for more than 20 years at observatories in Arizona, most recently at the Large Binocular Telescope, or LBT, and has now deployed the latest version of these cameras in the high desert of Chile at the Magellan 6.5-meter telescope.

“It was very exciting to see this new camera make the night sky look sharper than has ever before been possible,” said UA astronomy professor Laird Close, the project’s principal scientist. “We can, for the first time, make long-exposure images that resolve objects just 0.02 arcseconds across – the equivalent of a dime viewed from more than a hundred miles away. At that resolution, you could see a baseball diamond on the moon.”

The twofold improvement over past efforts rests on the fact that for the first time, a telescope with a large diameter primary mirror is being used for digital photography at its theoretical resolution limit in visible wavelengths – light that the human eye can see.

“As we move towards shorter wavelengths, image sharpness improves,” said Jared Males, a NASA Sagan Fellow at the UA’s department of astronomy. “Until now, large telescopes could make the theoretically sharpest photos only in infrared – or long wavelength – light, but our new camera can take photos that are twice as sharp in the visible light spectrum.”

Equipped with the newly developed MagAO adaptive optics system, the Magellan Telescope revealed details about the Orion nebula. The background image, taken with the Hubble Space Telescope, shows the Trapezium cluster of young stars (pink) still in the process of forming. The middle inset photo reveals the binary nature of the Theta Ori C star pair. The bottom insert shows a different binary young star pair shaped by the stellar wind from Theta 1 Ori C. Credit: Laird Close and Ya-Lin Wu; NASA, C.R. O’Dell and S.K. Wong

 

These images are also at least twice as sharp as what the Hubble Space Telescope can make, because with its 21-foot diameter mirror, the Magellan telescope is much larger than Hubble with its 8-foot mirror. Until now, Hubble always produced the best visible light images, since even large ground-based telescope with complex adaptive optics imaging cameras could only make blurry images in visible light.

To overcome atmospheric turbulence, which plagues earth-based telescopes by causing the image to blur, Close’s team developed a very powerful adaptive optics system that floats a thin (1/16th of an inch) curved glass mirror (2.8 feet across) on a magnetic field 30 feet above the telescope’s primary mirror.

This so-called Adaptive Secondary Mirror (ASM) can change its shape at 585 points on its surface 1,000 times each second, counteracting the blurring effects of the atmosphere.

“As a result, we can see the visible sky more clearly than ever before,” Close said. “It’s almost like having a telescope with a 21-foot mirror in space.”

The new adaptive optics system, called MagAO for “Magellan Adaptive Optics,” has already made some important scientific discoveries, published today in three scientific papers in the Astrophysical Journal. As the system was being tested and received what astronomers call “first light,” the team pointed it to a famous and well-studied massive star that gives the Great Orion Nebula (Object M42) most of its UV light. The Orion Nebula, located just below Orion’s Belt visible as smudge of light even with regular binoculars.

Considered young at about 1 million years old, this star, called Theta 1 Ori C, has been previously known to be in fact a binary star pair made up of two stars called C1 and C2. However, the separation between the two is so small – about the average distance between Earth and Uranus – that astronomers had never been able to resolve the famous pair in a direct telescope photo.

Once MagAO and its visible science camera called VisAO were pointed towards Theta Ori 1 C, the results were immediate.

“I have been imaging Theta 1 Ori C for more than 20 years and never could directly see that it was in fact two stars,” Close said. “But as soon as we turned on the MagAO system it was beautifully split into two stars.”

In another result, MagAO has shed light on another mystery: How do how planets form from disks of dust and gas affected by the strong ionizing light called stellar wind coming from a massive star like Theta 1 Ori C, which has about 44 times the mass of the sun?

The team used MagAO and VisAO to look for red light from ionized hydrogen gas to trace out how the strong UV radiation and stellar wind from Theta 1 Ori C affects the disks around its neighboring stars.

The power of visible light adaptive optics: On the left is a “normal” photo of the theta 1 Ori C binary star in red light. The middle image shows the same object, but with MagAO’s adaptive optics system turned on. Eliminating the atmospheric blurring, the resulting photo becomes about 17 times sharper, turning a blob into a crisp image of a binary star pair. These are the highest resolution photos taken by a telescope. Credit: Laird Close/UA

“Close to Theta 1 Ori C, there are two very young stars surrounded by disks of gas and dust,” said Ya-Lin Wu, a graduate student and lead author on one of the publications. “Theta 1 Ori C pummels those disks with stellar wind and UV light. It looks like they are being bent backwards by a strong wind.”

MagAO’s photo revealed that the two stars and their protoplanetary disks are heavily distorted into teardrop shapes as the strong UV light and wind create shock fronts and drag gas downwind of the pair.

The distribution of gas and dust in young planetary systems is another unsolved problem in planet formation. The team used VisAO’s simultaneous/spectral differential imager, or SDI, to estimate the mass of another intriguing object in the Orion Nebula: one of a few stars in Orion sporting a rare “silhouette disk.” The SDI camera allowed the light from the star to be removed at a very high level—offering, for the first time, a clear look at the inner regions of the silhouette.

“The disk lies in front of the bright Orion nebula, so we see the dark shadow cast as the dust in the disk absorbs background light from the nebula,” said Kate Follette, a graduate student and lead author of one of the three papers published in the Astrophysical Journal. “Picture a moth flying across a bright movie screen: Its body will appear opaque, while the wings will be partially transparent. Our SDI instrument allows us to peer into the silhouette and trace how much dust is at each location in the disk based on how transparent or opaque it is.”

“We were surprised to find that the amount of attenuated light from the nebula never reached an opaque point,” she said. “It seems as though the outer parts of this disk have less dust than we would have expected.”

“It is important to understand how dust is laid out in these objects because that dust and gas is what nature uses to build planets,” Close explained. “Our new imaging capabilities revealed there is very little dust and gas in the outer part of the disk.”

According to Close, the silhouette disk might have been close to the massive star Theta 1 Ori C at some point, which might have blown away its outer dust and gas.

“This tells us something about planet-forming disks in these dense, stellar nurseries,” Close said. “There appears to be a limit to the formation of massive planets very far away from their parent stars. One possible explanation might be the presence of a massive star like Theta 1 Ori C stripping away the outer gas and dust.”

###

The MagAO system was developed with support of the National Science Foundation MRI, TSIP and ATI grant programs. The Adaptive Secondary Mirror itself was produced by Microgate and ADS of Italy, with the UA’s Steward Observatory Mirror Lab. The MagAO pyramid wavefront sensor was developed at the Arcetri Observatory, Italy. The Magellan telescopes are operated by a partnership between the Carnegie institute, the UA Harvard University, MIT and the University of Michigan. The work of NASA Sagan Fellows Jared Males and Katie Morzinski was performed in part under contract with the California Institute of Technology and was funded by NASA through the Sagan Fellowship Program executed by the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute. The work of Kate Follette was funded in part by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship program.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

77 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Adam Gallon
August 24, 2013 8:37 am

Real science being done by NASA.
Defund GISS by 90% & spend that on this sort of thing!

Pamela Gray
August 24, 2013 8:39 am

I have Cannon stabilizer binoculars that do the same thing. Great pair of binoculars. I wonder if stabilizers on binoculars and movie cameras came before or after this technology as applied to telescopes?

ferdberple
August 24, 2013 8:48 am

As soon as NASA turned its equipment inwards for “mission earth” it stopped doing its job. Since when did anyone need a Space Agency to study the planet earth? Washington might be on a different planet, but the rest of us are still here on good old planet earth. The job of the Space Agency should be to explore space. Earth is not a candidate for that work, which is why NASA went so badly off the rails.

beng
August 24, 2013 8:59 am

Impressive. Astronomy is one of my passions. Can close binary stars have stable planetary systems?

Patrick
August 24, 2013 9:01 am

There are many ground based devices that do this anyway, so nothing new other than recognising the fact. So they adjust for “Atmospheric Scintillation”? No kidding…

John West
August 24, 2013 9:13 am

Adam Gallon says:
“Defund GISS by 90% & spend that on this sort of thing!”
Why fund 10% of current GISS inanity? Drop it like it’s Pluto!

Steve from Rockwood
August 24, 2013 9:36 am

If we can “see” further into space will the Universe get older?

August 24, 2013 9:36 am

Wow, that’s impressive

Greg
August 24, 2013 9:46 am

ferdberple says:
As soon as NASA turned its equipment inwards for “mission earth” it stopped doing its job. Since when did anyone need a Space Agency to study the planet earth? Washington might be on a different planet, but the rest of us are still here on good old planet earth. The job of the Space Agency should be to explore space. Earth is not a candidate for that work, which is why NASA went so badly off the rails.
==
Yeah , we’ve all had enough of GISS climate propaganda but let’s stick to the facts.
It’s NASA , not SA. Checkout what it stands for.
Also satellites are “spacecraft” , so no contradiction there. They need rockets to get them up there, Seems like classic jobs for a space agency.
NASA’s motto is not “to boldly go ….” you seem to be confusing things a little.
Why Hansen’s little corner of NASA was allowed to go off the rails and remain that way for so long and why he was allowed to have income from outside sources is a question that needs answering.
I should also point out that satellite data are a useful asset to those trying to objectively assess climate. That cuts both ways.
There is a danger that as evidence mounts against AGW they may well defund satellites to prevent us having a record of it NOT warming.
Be careful what you call for.

Greg
August 24, 2013 9:47 am

BTW those images are impressive.

geran
August 24, 2013 9:50 am

Steve from Rockwood says:
August 24, 2013 at 9:36 am
If we can “see” further into space will the Universe get older?
>>>>>
No, we get younger! 🙂

Jeff Mitchell
August 24, 2013 9:52 am

Does anyone how much degradation occurs from natural light pollution from airglow (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airglow). Does the new level of clarity allow us to take pictures that take 11 day equivalent exposures from earth or does the airglow make that impossible? It would really be fun if we could get this stuff into space.

Greg
August 24, 2013 9:55 am

“At that resolution, you could see a baseball diamond on the moon.”
Great, so they should turn it to look at the moon. Then we can see all the mysterious objects that they photoshopped out of all the other lunar surface photos we already have, before releasing them.
That would probably be far more interesting than just being able to resolve a binary star. Pretty as it.

Greg
August 24, 2013 9:56 am

…is.

Jay
August 24, 2013 10:01 am

Always impressive, but perspective is the tool of the illusionist.. We can never be sure just what we are seeing unless we can make observations from different angles.. Ive seen gravity defied with a ball rolling uphill or two structures that look identical, all false and due to perspective..
Better than nothing and still very cool, but penning in the laws of the universe with your rear end nailed to the chair leaves room for major errors.

OldWeirdHarold
August 24, 2013 10:02 am

Now we can find out for once and for all if the Apollo astronauts really did play baseball on Mars.

Martin
August 24, 2013 10:22 am

Wow ! this is awesome

August 24, 2013 10:55 am

Want!
*checks ebay*
Can’t have.
*sobs*

RockyRoad
August 24, 2013 10:58 am
george e. smith
August 24, 2013 11:37 am

“”””””…….Pamela Gray says:
August 24, 2013 at 8:39 am
I have Cannon stabilizer binoculars that do the same thing. Great pair of binoculars. I wonder if stabilizers on binoculars and movie cameras came before or after this technology as applied to telescopes?……..””””””””
Sorry Pamela but your Canon binoculars do not do this.
They do stabilize the image somewhat so that it compensates for your hand movement, but if you put your binoculars on a tripod, so they didn’t move, the image wouldn’t be any sharper; just not moving.
This new gizmo, behaves as if the front lens of your binos, was broken up into a thousand different pieces, and each one could automatically move in and out to keep the light through it in focus. Of course you have to know whether each piece is in focus or not. That is, your binos have to know that, so they can automatically refocus, their piece of the puzzle.
In principle, you could do the same thing with the rippled clear glass sliding door on your shower, so each facet could move separately, and then one could have a nice sharp look at that butterfly on your left shoulder.
PS most top brand digital cameras, (Canon, Nikon etc all have optical image stabilization built into them or their lenses. None of them have adaptive optical image sharpening built into them.

RACookPE1978
Editor
August 24, 2013 11:56 am

…you could do the same thing with the rippled clear glass sliding door on your shower, so each facet could move separately, and then one could have a nice sharp look at that butterfly on your left shoulder.

Right shoulder. The butterfly on her left side is, uhm, “elsewhere” …. 8<)

Jack Simmons
August 24, 2013 12:45 pm

Greg says:
August 24, 2013 at 9:55 am

Great, so they should turn it to look at the moon. Then we can see all the mysterious objects that they photoshopped out of all the other lunar surface photos we already have, before releasing them.

Greg,
References please.

tgmccoy
August 24, 2013 1:02 pm

Now we might have a good chance of seeing who or what is in the general neighborhood…
Like an earth-like planet?

graphicconception
August 24, 2013 1:18 pm

Excellent, this is just the technology we need to help us in our search for the “missing heat”.

Mike Fayette
August 24, 2013 1:22 pm

Great post. Off topic a bit, but one that I will share with others. Keep these rare, but keep them coming….

1 2 3 4
Verified by MonsterInsights