The Icy Nenana River

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

The last time I was in Alaska, I had the good fortune to stop by the town of Nenana, home of the Nenana River Ice Classic. Nenana sits at the junction of the Tanana and Nenana Rivers. The dates of the ice breakup at Nenana form one of the longest-term modern temperature proxies in the area, extending back unbroken to 1917. Figure 1 shows my photo of the tripod which is set out on the ice to determine the exact tim of the breakup.

nenana ice classicFigure 1. The tower and the tripod. The tripod is placed out on the ice before the breakup. When the ice breaks up, the tripod falls, tripping the clock. These days the tripod is actually a quadripod, or perhaps a quadruped.

Every year people pay money to bet on the exact time of the breakup, with the winner taking the pot. At present, the pot is $318,500 …

There’s a recent WUWT post by Psalmon about the Ice Classic here. Although I’d written about it previously, there were a couple of things I didn’t understand about Nenana until I’d visited the place.The first was the reason the ice breakup was so important. It was critical because both then and now, the river is navigable, and becomes a main highway for people and supplies during the summer. Until the breakup, little villages and cabins and camps along the river can’t get their supplies or travel by water. Although this is less important now with the advent of highways, there still are many places along the river that can only be reached by traveling along the river. That made the breakup a huge event in the old days.

The second thing I didn’t understand was the reason why the breakup was so sudden and complete. The map shows the Tanana River and surroundings:

ge nenana ice classicFigure 2. The Tanana River and its tributaries flow north to the Yukon River. The Yukon flows from the top center to the upper left of the figure, with a portion appearing dark blue.

The reason the breakup comes suddenly is that unlike most US rivers, the rivers around Nenana are flowing north. As a result, the more southerly upriver parts of the drainage would tend to melt earlier. At some point this increasing upstream meltwater will put pressure on the downriver ice, and as the ice at Nenana rots and melts, the whole thing will break and collapse at once.

Now, you’d think that the river breakup dates would be a perfect temperature proxy. After all, urban warming surely won’t be an issue. However, nature always sides with the hidden flaw, so of course there is a confounding factor—rain. Rain can hasten the breakup significantly by melting the ice from the top. In addition to starting out warmer than the ice, rainwater pools have less albedo than ice, so they warm more for a given amount of sunlight. Rain also increases the volume of water flowing in the river, so it puts additional pressure on the ice. As a result, the breakup dates form the usual imperfect proxy for temperature.

Given all of that, here are the inverse dates of ice breakup since the Classic was first run in 1917.

ice breakup dates at nenanaFigure 3. Nenana ice breakup dates since 1917. The result for 2013 will be equal to or greater than today, May 15th. Blue dots show the standard error of the Gaussian average at the endpoint in 2013.

For me, it is clear that what we are seeing are the effects of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. This is a slow, decades long cycle in the heat distribution in the Pacific Ocean. In about 1945 the PDO shifted to the cool phase, then went back to the warm phase in about 1975, and has recently switched again to the cool phase.

Overall? I’d say there’s not a whole lot to see in the ice records. Temperatures went up a bit, down a bit, up a bit, and appear to be on their way back down again … be still, my beating heart, it’s all too exciting.

I leave you with the current photo from the Nenana Icecam, at 8:47 Alaska Daylight Time May 15, still no breakup, but goodness, it’s a lovely spring day in Alaska … makes my heart leap just to look at it.

ice cam 945 am pdt

Regards to all,

w.

DATA: the historical breakup days are available here.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

172 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Phager
May 15, 2013 10:20 am

Wow, looking at the breakup dates, Two distribution humps. Suggests an oscillatory system is at work there. It is odd that the later hump has a dip in the middle. Possibly a 3 state system?

D.J. Hawkins
May 15, 2013 10:24 am

Who’s the poor SOB who has to go and retrieve the tripod?

John Tillman
May 15, 2013 10:26 am

To appreciate the infantile state of climate science, consider that the PDO wasn’t discovered until 1997, by a Pacific NW fisheries researcher.

May 15, 2013 10:38 am

if the measurement of the day in the year of break-up is exact,
there cannot be a standard error.
What error do you want to bring in? For 2013 we are already on 135
and counting.
Looks to me, on the black, we are exactly on course
2013-88
= 1925
what did I tell you
http://blogs.24.com/henryp/2013/04/29/the-climate-is-changing/

Don B
May 15, 2013 10:41 am

My comment earlier today on the previous Nenana post…
“The early ice breakup date in 1998 was the last hurrah for the warm phase of the PDO. Since then the trend has been towards later breakups, at the rate of 0.4 day per year. (The Excel linear calculation assumes this year’s breakup is today, May 15, which is not my prediction, but an assumption to use in the calculation.)”

Robert M
May 15, 2013 10:45 am

It was snowing at my house when I left for work this morning. Cooler then normal weather is expected until at least next week. There is a pretty good Chance that Anchorage, Alaska’s largest city, will have measurable snowfall Friday night into Saturday. Which if it happens will be the third (I think…) latest on record…
In about 4 hours, 2013 will move into the top three latest breakups ever. (As measured by the Nenana Ice Clasic) The latest is 20 May.
If CO2 was truly a strong climate driver, I would expect so see it’s fingerprints all over your graph Willis, but you are correct, all I see is a noisy PDO signal.
One other thing, you mentioned rain as one of the confounding variables for using this as a temperature proxy. Last year was one of the earliest breakups, and I think what made it early was the absolutely enormous amount of snow that fell last year. The area broke snowfall records early and often. I had around 17 feet at my house, and nearby Anchorage had it’s snowiest year ever. I think the additional insulation from the snow kept the ice from getting very thick. If you look at last years thickness measurements, the ice was not very thick at all, even though that winter was one of the coldest we have had.

Jean Parisot
May 15, 2013 11:01 am

I wonder if climate science was funded by fisheries and agriculture instead of environmentalists, we would have had any of this carbon-AGW nonsense to begin with?

rtj1211
May 15, 2013 11:03 am

What would be interesting to know is if there are any similar records in Central Canada, Siberia and West of the Urals also?
That would give some insight as to whether temperature proxies were even by longitude, even but out of phase or closer to random.
Given that AMO is out of phase with PDO, you might expect west of the Urals to be phased, but perhaps Eastern Siberia to be similar to Alaska??
Anyone got enough data sets to answer scientifically?

JFD
May 15, 2013 11:20 am

The chart means something to me, so many thanks, Willis.
1. It clearly shows the earth’s climate is variable.
2. It shows the observed warming from the 1930s to the peak in 1940, which appears in many temperature datasets.
3. It shows the observed warming from the early 1980s to about 1997.
4. It shows the ending of the latest “global warming period” and first flattening then declining after 1997.
5. What it does not show is any influence of carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels at any juncture.

May 15, 2013 11:27 am

Henry@jfd
True. CO2 is and never was a factor. Is is just nonsense to make people feel guilty and to collect taxes. H

Frank K.
May 15, 2013 11:33 am

From the website, if the breakup date goes past Monday, it will be a new record…then we can all sing Neil Sedaka’s “Breaking Up is Hard To Do”… 🙂

manicbeancounter
May 15, 2013 11:35 am

I like to cross-check against other data. Looking at HADCRUT3, there was a huge drop in global average temperatures in the mid 1940s, that seemed out of place next to GISSTEMP. These figures are more in line with HADCRUT3.
Last year it was early at 7:39 p.m. April 23. In fact the fourth earliest on record. Does anybody know if there was heavy rainfall?
This year is already the third fourth or third latest on record.

May 15, 2013 11:44 am

Stopped in Nenana earlier this year for breakfast. I put my money on 5/12 4:30 PM. Looks like I won’t be collecting the cash prize.

Tom in Indy
May 15, 2013 11:44 am

A quick google and here are ice in/ice out dates for hungary and finland. Surely, someone has collected all the ice out dates available on the web. No?
http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/trends-in-water-temperature-of-1

Fred Harwood
May 15, 2013 11:55 am

The late John Daly referenced Fairbanks, upriver, as a possible factor in the dates. One of many power plants there consumes more than 210,000 tons of coal a year.

Bob
May 15, 2013 12:12 pm

Hey! That ice-cam is a terrific thing. I’m thinking about inviting neighbors over to watch for the ice-free moment. This is what life comes to when you retire.

Duster
May 15, 2013 12:14 pm

D.J. Hawkins says:
May 15, 2013 at 10:24 am
Who’s the poor SOB who has to go and retrieve the tripod?

Being Alaskans they cannily have attached cables to the tripod so it can be retrieved without having to go wading among the ice chunks.

Greg Goodman
May 15, 2013 12:39 pm

Interesting the tendency to alternate. I’ll have to grab the data and compare to Arctic melting season.
http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=210

Greg Goodman
May 15, 2013 12:48 pm

Also the arctic alternation comes from a complex pattern of three frequencies close to two years (an amplitude modulation triplet) that means it is not regular every two years. sometimes the pattern skips.
http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=216
The triplet resolves as amplitude modulation of a 2 year cycle by one of 12.83 years.
The 2 year is probable some internal flip-flop: more melting causes more snow , which causes less melting the next year. It tends to oscillation.
12.83 is less obvious, but just to note the alignment of Jupiter and Neptune happens every 12.78 years which is within the uncertainty of the detection of the AM triplet. Neptune is the third ranking planet in it’s inertial effect on the sun (Jupiter is first) and hence earth. But that’s tale for another day.

Greg Goodman
May 15, 2013 1:09 pm

Just dug out another version that uses both melting and freezing periods to give a second estimation of melting behaviour.
http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=226
By eye it’s a bit hard from Willis’ graph but it does not look like a close match on year to year scale. Though recent cooling is clear in both.

Greg Goodman
May 15, 2013 1:12 pm

Willis, where did you get the numbers from?
Looking at the menu of their site all the links are like : file:///E:\other files\blah….
Some ham fisted windows user messed up and used local file names.
If you have a direct URL for the data it would be good to have.
thx.

Eric Ellison
May 15, 2013 1:35 pm

Willis
You spoilsport!
We were having so much fun treating this as a temperature proxy! Until you came a along and rained on the parade of articles with math and even history!
/sarc
Next year we WUWT folks should start our own lottery on this even and use your math skills to predict the date of the breakup!
I appreciate you and anthony

jorgekafkazar
May 15, 2013 1:41 pm

Isn’t the Nanunenenunu “tripod” really a tetrapod?

iamthor
May 15, 2013 1:51 pm

As a kid living up in Northern Ontario I remember there being a pool for ice break up. Back then instead of a fancy time tripped tripod we used an old broken snow machine sitting out in the bay. It disturbs me now to think of that piece of junk sinking into pristine Northern waters or how many years they might have done that. I think they pulled them out later and reused it for the next year. That is what I choose to believe. Of course that was the seventies and we were supposed to die at any moment from Global Cooling so what did it matter anyway. LOL

1 2 3 7