Dr. Peter Gleick recently resurfaced at another water conference acting as if nothing had or is about to happen just 17 days after admitting he apparently engaged in wire fraud. One wonders if he’ll be seen at this big event or if he has been asked to quietly sit this one out.- Anthony
=============================================================
Experts: Integrate global water, food and energy policies to divert future conflict
Current and future solutions to the conflicts over the use of water resources discussed by public and private sector experts
This press release is available in French.
MARSEILLES, FRANCE March 11th — As food and energy production intensify around the world, their demands on dwindling water resources have prompted the search for an innovative and collaborative solution. On Friday, March 16, a High Level Panel convened by the EDF Group and the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) will gather in Marseilles at the Sixth World Water Forum (WWF6) to share experiences and results.
The panel will discuss how to embrace a “nexus” approach to water management, in which projects that tap water resources are planned and executed with input from stakeholders in the food, water and energy sectors. A key goal of the panel is to insert this approach into the agenda of the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development that will be held in June 2012.
“We live in a world today where all too often development policies seem almost perfectly designed to produce conflict between multiple sectors, particularly energy and agriculture, over water resources,” said Alain Vidal, Director of CPWF, which is part of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).
Uschi Eid, Vice Chair of the United Nations Secretary General’s Advisory Board on Water and Sanitation, will open the panel. Other participants include:
- Alain Vidal, Director of CPWF;
- Gérard Wolf, Senior Executive Vice President, International Development, EDF Group, one of the world’s largest electricity companies with 640 dams worldwide;
- Yasar Yakis, Turkey’s former Minister of Foreign Affairs;
- Ogunlade Davidson, Sierra Leone’s Foreign Minister of Energy and Water Resources;
- Jane Madgwick, CEO of Wetlands International;
- Gustavo Francisco Petro Urrego, Mayor of Bogota, Colombia; and
- Anil B .Jain, Managing Director (CEO) of Jain Irrigation Systems, based in India.
The EDF – CPWF High Level Panel’s work is driven by the problems and tensions that emerge when officials in both the public and private sectors fail to consider how water management decisions simultaneously affect energy, drinking water and food production.
These complementary, but often clashing areas of interest were the subject of last year’s Bonn2011 Nexus Conference and are expected to be prominent at the 2012 World Water Week in Stockholm this fall. The concern among many water experts is that the nexus approach to water management is rarely applied today, and that increases the likelihood of water-related conflicts, particularly as economic development accelerates in rapidly changing areas of Asia, Africa and Latin America.
Vidal noted that with 1.1 billion poor people lacking access to safe water, 1 billion undernourished and 1.5 billion lacking electricity, demand for water resources for multiple uses will rise dramatically over the next decades.
“The world is now a very different place because addressing insecurities related to food, energy and water –particularly in the world’s least developed countries–is now at the forefront of development strategies around the globe,” Vidal said. “We know that in the next decade hundreds of dams are going to be built and the question is, how can we ensure that before the projects begin all of the potential beneficiaries sit down together and discuss the purpose of the dam and the pros and cons of various approaches?”
Laos, for example, is facing criticism that without a nexus perspective, efforts by the energy sector to build dams in the Mekong basin to become the “battery of Asia” could damage fish-dependent communities in the region and exacerbate the existing problem of saltwater intruding into farmlands in Vietnam.
The severity of last year’s floods in Thailand and elsewhere in Southeast Asia has raised fresh concern about the way water flows are controlled in the region. There are questions about whether water management decisions in the region’s network of dams intensified the flooding of agriculture lands—though there are also policies in Thailand for compensating farmers who lose their crops to flooding that could inform the broader nexus discussion.
The Panel will also examine India’s effort to expand drip irrigation projects as it confronts the daunting disparity between available water resources and future food, energy, clean water and economic development needs. A 2005 World Bank report warned that by 2050, absent a more focused and coordinated water management strategy, India’s various water demands will exceed “all sources of supply.”
Vidal said there is evidence that recognizing the multiple demands on water resources can lead to innovative efforts aimed at cooperation. For example, at the World Water Forum, the High Level Panel will examine a case study of the Andean region where numerous clashes between various sectors vying for the water resources in the Machángara River Basin prompted the creation of the Machángara River Basin Council, (the Consejo de la Cuenca del río Machángara or CCRM).
The council’s membership includes the regional water and sewerage authority, the irrigation management agency, the main electric power utility, the national water secretariat, the Ministry of Environment (which protects the forests that cover much of the basin) and small-scale farmers from the area. They are working together to facilitate cooperation among all of the water users in the basin for sustainable development that increases the water, food and energy productivity while also protecting the ecosystem’s services.
The CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) was launched in 2002 as a reform initiative of the CGIAR. The CPWF aims to increase the resilience of social and ecological systems through better water management for food production (crops, fisheries and livestock). The CPWF does this through an innovative research and development approach that brings together a broad range of scientists, development specialists, policymakers and communities to address the challenges of food security, poverty and water scarcity. The CPWF is currently working in six river basins globally: Andes, Ganges, Limpopo, Mekong, Nile and Volta (www.waterandfood.org).
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Another meeting of the great and good from where ?? EDF have been pushing their green initiative for some time mainly, I think, to sell nuclear power stations.
There is another of the greenie beenies advertising a program for CNBC with the classic “be afraid” phrase “what do we do when we run out of water”. I’ve the answer : Put the plug back in.
Sure, why shouldn’t he appear?
He has only been involved in illegal activity against SKEPTICS. It is not as if he has done anything wrong..
..
/sarc
Coincidentally today it was also announced somewhat hysterically that there are to be hosepipe bans in the south east of the UK to combat an ‘unprecedented’ drought. Probably nothing, but the professional sceptic in me is just wondering why all this talk of water right now, and how it will translate into someone getting richer 😉
“The panel will discuss how to embrace a “nexus” approach to water management…”
Is this different from the “fuxus” approach that the Obama Administration has take towards energy management?
I have been thinking for a long time that the next fake crisis to replace global warming/climate change would be a water crisis. Already I’ve seen CBS news do a report about the coming potable water crisis. Do you think the UN and these so-called scientists will give up their easy money and power? I don’t. I personally believe they will find about crisis to invent.
It’s Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Drying. Its new and its heading our way – hide your wallets.
A new impetus for integrating global water policies could guide the energy and agriculture to the exit from the impasse
Experts from public and private sectors discuss the current and future solutions to conflicts on the use of water resources
Translation of the French title.
March 12, 2012 at 2:11 pm | quidsapio says:
Coincidentally today it was also announced somewhat hysterically that there are to be hosepipe bans in the south east of the UK to combat an ‘unprecedented’ drought. Probably nothing, but the professional sceptic in me is just wondering why all this talk of water right now, and how it will translate into someone getting richer 😉
====================================
During our drought in Queensland, Australia, our State Government banned watering gardens and ‘rationed’ water. It also re-organised how water resources were managed taking ownership of water distribution and retailing away from Local Authorities and creating a number of quangos. As a consequence, consumption dropped remarkably which then created a problem for its water revenues, so it increased the cost of water to users. We now have our dams full and overflowing, we still have restrictions in place, and we have some of the most expensive water in the world.
It occurred to me that if the State Government were now to sell-off the Water businesses that it created in the artificially created market, there would be a pretty penny in it for them at the expense of the consumer. Having sold off most of every other income producing asset, it would not surprise me if this were the motive of the State Government in the first instance.
Just saying 😉
That’s naughty, jorge. Funny, but naughty.
This article:
Global WaterIntelligence
Market Leading Analysis of the international Water Industry:
“The tender process for the contract to run water services for the Lagos State Water Corporation (LSWC) is starting to trigger interest in the Nigerian water sector as a whole. A federal bill permitting widespread private involvement in the sector is completing its passage through the legislature and a series of other contracts may follow the Lagos concession. However, any foreign private companies interested in Nigeria will face a multitude of challenges as well as opportunities….” http://www.globalwaterintel.com/archive/3/6/general/challenging-times-ahead-in-nigeria.html
I had seen an article several years ago that Water Authorities here in the USA were being sold to foreign investors and was looking for a link when I stumbled on to this site which has far wider implications.
It is interesting to observe the intellectual conflict that modern socialists have with dams. On the one hand, dams, especially really big ones, fit the old socialist paradigm, while environmentalists see dams as the epitomy of human arrogance and evil. Discussion of the subject tends to break open many watermelons.
I notice the British politicos and journos are pushing the threat of a drought (as they often do at this time of year). Of course they are forgetting that we still have most of March, the whole of April and May before summer.
Therefore we can be sure they have now cursed us with unending wet whilst I’m doing an extension and loft conversion.
Friends:
Several of the above posts rightly observe that we need to be vigilant to prevent the next false scare now AGW is in its death throes. That is very true, but we also need to avoid turning scepticism into cynicism.
At this stage we need to observe the intended Conference with great interest in its details before deciding appropriate response. Knee-jerk reaction prior to such observation could result in ‘shooting our own feet’.
The article says about the purpose of the Conference;
“The panel will discuss how to embrace a “nexus” approach to water management, in which projects that tap water resources are planned and executed with input from stakeholders in the food, water and energy sectors. A key goal of the panel is to insert this approach into the agenda of the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development that will be held in June 2012.
“We live in a world today where all too often development policies seem almost perfectly designed to produce conflict between multiple sectors, particularly energy and agriculture, over water resources,” said Alain Vidal, Director of CPWF, which is part of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).”
OK. If that is true then the stated purpose is to usurp the dangerous UN Sustainable Development and thus to obtain developments beneficial to energy producers, farmers and water users.
And if that stated purpose is the real purpose then we need to support this Conference against the attacks it will receive from ‘greenies’.
But we need to oppose the Conference if we discern that the stated purpose is a fraud and this is merely another front for ‘greenie’ attacks on energy supplies, on farmers and on the poor.
And Gleick would be unwelcome whether or not the stated purpose of the Conference is true.
Richard
Is it just me, or do all of these conferences come to the same conclusion. The world will end unless we all submit to the benevolent dictats of big green brother. Seriously, if they want one world communism they should just say so. Of course the result would be their being laughed off the world stage.
I now see 1984 and newspeak every time I see the word “green” in the local paper. We had an article on a traffic accident that led with something like: The driver pulled out at the green light and was struck by a drunk driver. As I was scanning the page rather than reading, I thought it was another government attempt at stealing personal liberty. Still a tragedy that the driver is in the hospital and the drunk is now a statistic, but not what raised my blood pressure.
“The panel will discuss how to embrace a “nexus” approach to water management, in which projects that tap water resources are planned and executed with input from stakeholders in the food, water and energy sectors.”
Nowhere in their list of “stakeholders” (that left wing feel-good word that means nothing) do they mention the poor bloody retail consumer. Looks like another ruse to extract even greater amounts of wonga from us the public.
NOTE: no sarc!
– ITV News briefly just mentioned option of UK buying desal plants. (Maybe Oz has a few secondhand ones to sell) Ridiculous of course cos our water us so badly managed with lots of leaks & good water flowing out to sea in “drought areas” as farmers don’t take up their allocation… Better invest in dingies & wellies.
Can I just say I am always baffled at the way some sceptics characterise the prevailing Warmist orthodoxy as ‘Leftist’. Maybe it’s just a confusion of terms, but to me what you are calling ‘Leftist’ might be more properly termed Fascist? The AGW movement does indeed have strong developing fascist tendencies, including Irrational adherence to a fixed idea, demands of absolute conformity and the outlawing of all dissent. Maybe we should even update Jim Garrison’s prediction – fascism will arrive in America, not in the name of anti-fascism but in the name of Environmentalism.
Depressing to have to admit that for a former member of Greenpeace 🙁
I’m sure Gleick will be there if he can find someone to pay his air fare.
Did they inventory the silverware and candleholders after the event??
And right on time! As I type, the BBC’s flagship ‘Newsnight’ program is talking to climate scientists about the UK hosepipe ban. We have to prepare for more dryness, and more wetness, apparently. Words fail…..
The people of the developing world (and of the developed world, for that matter) need abundant energy and water. To answer these needs, China and India have embarked on ambitious programs to fill future energy through Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTR). A bonus of creating safe, inexpensive, and abundant energy via LFTR is that they operate at their best at full power, and that excess energy produced can be readily utilized for desalinization or purification. The US developed LFTR and operated a test reactor for years, beginning over 50 years ago.
No matter the turns natural climate change takes, abundant energy and water will always be the answer to future needs.
quidsapio says:
March 12, 2012 at 3:38 pm
Can I just say I am always baffled at the way some sceptics characterise the prevailing Warmist orthodoxy as ‘Leftist’. Maybe it’s just a confusion of terms, but to me what you are calling ‘Leftist’ might be more properly termed Fascist? ……
_________________________________________
Actually you might want to look into “The Third Way” (Anthony Giddens) the London School of Economics, Fabian Society Bill Clinton and Tony Blair. Do not miss Tony Blair’s connection to both the United Nations, JP Morgan investment bank and the middle east mess.
Richard S Courtney says:
March 12, 2012 at 3:19 pm
Friends:
Several of the above posts rightly observe that we need to be vigilant to prevent the next false scare now AGW is in its death throes. That is very true, but we also need to avoid turning scepticism into cynicism…..
____________________________________
Richard, It is hard not to be at least cautious if not down right cynical when you see an international conference composed of politicians and government bought and paid for scientists meeting about “Policies” (Shudder)
The advice: “No Man’s life liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in session”. applies doubly when it is an international group who is answerable to no one.
After what the World Trade Organization “Agreement on Agriculture” did to farmers and the world food supply, I reserve the right to be very very cynical.
see: http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/GMO/World_Trade_Order/world_trade_order.html
majormike1 says:
March 12, 2012 at 4:42 pm
The people of the developing world (and of the developed world, for that matter) need abundant energy and water. To answer these needs, China and India have embarked on ambitious programs to fill future energy through Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTR)…..
_____________________________________
Unfortunately the Japanese Fukushima mess could not have come at a worst time. The fact that No One Died From Radiation Exposure at Fukushima has not kept the Chicken Littles from running around screaming their heads off.
Hopefully this does not kill Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors in the USA, UK, Canada Australia and else where
Gail Combs:
Thankyou for your post at March 12, 2012 at 5:13 pm.
I understand and accept your point. Indeed, I think the fisheries agreement is even worse than the agricultural one.
However, I stand by the point I made in my post at March 12, 2012 at 3:19 pm; viz. observe and assess then support or oppose as appropriate. Please note that this is a tactical evaluation. My history proves that my suggestion is sincere and is not a delaying tactic from a ‘greenie’ troll.
I would welcome comments on the differing opinions stated in your and my posts.
Richard