Statement by The Heartland Institute on Gleick Confession

(Received via email direct from Heartland president Bast in advance of their website posting, see Gleick’s statement/confession here – Anthony)

FEBRUARY 20, 2012: Earlier this evening, Peter Gleick, a prominent figure in the global warming movement, confessed to stealing electronic documents from The Heartland Institute in an attempt to discredit and embarrass a group that disagrees with his views.

Gleick’s crime was a serious one. The documents he admits stealing contained personal information about Heartland staff members, donors, and allies, the release of which has violated their privacy and endangered their personal safety.

An additional document Gleick represented as coming from The Heartland Institute, a forged memo purporting to set out our strategies on global warming, has been extensively cited by newspapers and in news releases and articles posted on Web sites and blogs around the world. It has caused major and permanent damage to the reputations of The Heartland Institute and many of the scientists,  policy experts, and organizations we work with.

A mere apology is not enough to undo the damage.

In his statement, Gleick claims he committed this crime because he believed The Heartland Institute was preventing a “rational debate” from taking place over global warming. This is unbelievable. Heartland has repeatedly asked for real debate on this important topic. Gleick himself was specifically invited to attend a Heartland event to debate global warming just days before he stole the documents. He turned down the invitation.

Gleick also claims he did not write the forged memo, but only stole the documents to confirm the content of the memo he received from an anonymous source. This too is unbelievable. Many independent commentators already have concluded the memo was most likely written by Gleick.

We hope Gleick will make a more complete confession in the next few days.

We are consulting with legal counsel to determine our next steps and plan to release a  more complete statement about the situation tomorrow. In the meantime, we ask again that publishers, bloggers, and Web site hosts take the stolen and fraudulent documents off their sites, remove defamatory commentary based on them, and issue retractions.

# # #

For more information, contact Jim Lakely, communications director of The Heartland Institute, at 312/377-4000 or jlakely@heartland.org.

Joseph Bast

President

The Heartland Institute

One South Wacker Drive #2740

Chicago, IL 60606

Phone 312/377-4000

Email jbast “at”heartland.org

Web site http://www.heartland.org

Support The Heartland Institute today!

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

285 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ron McDonald
February 20, 2012 8:27 pm

The hysterical-warmist crowd would do well to remember the words of Seneca: “Revenge is a confession of pain”.

February 20, 2012 8:27 pm

Another nail in fanatical AGW coffin.

February 20, 2012 8:27 pm

I have been reading WUWT for a while, but have not commented. Until now. HI needs to drag every piece of filth who had a role in stealing these documents, or transmitting them on the web, into court, if nothing else but to force depositions from those creeps.
Great work, Mr. Watts. Keep fighting the good fight.
And to those who played a role in this crime: karma is a beast. Remember that.

kim2ooo
February 20, 2012 8:28 pm

The preacher of ethics …with his pants down.
Why he’s the guy who preaches science ethics
A brief lesson in the integrity of science
Climate Change and the Integrity of Science, Again
AGU’s new task force on scientific integrity and ethics begins
Threats to the integrity of science: congressional testimony
http://judithcurry.com/2012/02/20/breaking-news/

Paul Westhaver
February 20, 2012 8:30 pm

I bet Gleik, has got some sticky ick, running down his criminal legs all over his green liar sandals.
I hope the Heartland Institute sues the sticky ick out of the LA times and every single person and organization who repeated the lie.

Bill Sticker
February 20, 2012 8:30 pm

Now where’d I put my popcorn maker?
This isn’t just going to break, I think ‘shatter’ is a more apposite term.

dalyplanet
February 20, 2012 8:30 pm

A bit surprising, perhaps, is that Peter Gleick is the just announced American Geophysical Union expert to lead the AGU task force on scientific ethics and integrity.
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2011/2011EO470009.shtml
NOV 2011

Jenn Oates
February 20, 2012 8:31 pm

It ain’t over ’til the fat lady sings.

Bill Jamison
February 20, 2012 8:32 pm

California Penal Code Section 528.5 make it a crime to create an email account in someone else’s name with intent to defraud. Seems like that applies here. Maybe Federal charges too. This is serious stuff.
It seems like the goal was to create a skeptic climategate and instead we have something that makes alarmists look bad and that rational people should be ashamed of.

dean burgher
February 20, 2012 8:32 pm

Oh the humanity!

Jeff
February 20, 2012 8:33 pm

Repeatedly asking that the documents be taken down is a waste of breathe. The internet has them. They aren’t going away.

dp
February 20, 2012 8:34 pm

It looks like Gleick has earned some time on the Group W bench. While the request to remove the alleged stolen documents from the Internet is at first glance heavy handed, if they are used as evidence against this self-confessed boob they will become part of the public record. I’m ok with the request.
I trust he’s written his last missive as a representative of the Brotherhood of Climate Alarmists.

February 20, 2012 8:34 pm

Why do I keep hearing the opening theme music to Jaws playing in my head when I read this?
Somebody is in deep — hope they have a big legal liability policy.
Larry

February 20, 2012 8:35 pm

Didn’t see Revkin’sapology…nor Romms. We will wait. What is the temperature in Hell right now?

bk
February 20, 2012 8:35 pm

The CAGW narrative is unravelling everywhere.
On another front – good letter in WSJ
http://junkscience.com/2012/02/20/wsj-concerned-scientists-reply-on-global-warming/

Bill H
February 20, 2012 8:35 pm

i hope that they rake them over the coals…
very publicly i might add…

Editor
February 20, 2012 8:36 pm

From Eos … seems like the noble scientists forgot the ancient Roman question—Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

AGU’s new task force on scientific ethics and integrity begins work
Peter Gleick
Pacific Institute, Oakland, Calif., USA
Randy Townsend
American Geophysical Union, Washington, D. C., USA
In support of the new strategic plan, AGU has established a new task force to review, evaluate, and update the Union’s policies on scientific misconduct and the process for investigating and responding to allegations of possible misconduct by AGU members. As noted by AGU president Michael McPhaden, “AGU can only realize its vision of ‘collaboratively advancing and communicating science and its power to ensure a sustainable future’ if we have the trust of the public and policy makers. That trust is earned by maintaining the highest standards of scientific integrity in all that we do. The work of the Task Force on Scientific Ethics is essential for defining norms of professional conduct that all our members can aspire to and that demonstrate AGU’s unwavering commitment to excellence in Earth and space science.”

And they wonder why we don’t trust them, even when they set up special task forces to encourage us to trust them …
w.

Copner
February 20, 2012 8:37 pm

dalyplanet
> A bit surprising, perhaps, is that Peter Gleick is the just announced American Geophysical Union expert to lead the AGU task force on scientific ethics and integrity.
Not just expert, Chair!
http://www.agu.org/about/governance/committees_boards/scientific_ethics.shtml

kbray in california
February 20, 2012 8:38 pm

“In the meantime, we ask again that publishers, bloggers, and Web site hosts take the stolen and fraudulent documents off their sites, remove defamatory commentary based on them, and issue retractions.”
I can understand the desire to limit dissemination of the offending documents at “unfriendly locations”, however open discussion of the documents at selective locations i.e. WUWT is useful and productive. After all, Mosh figured it out by reading them, eh?

February 20, 2012 8:40 pm

The well funded CAGW scientist has been driven to confessing about lying, stealing, and forgery because there is a single small non profit funding a private professional weather company to build an independent analysts of public government released weather results.
I hope the letter of the law is thrown at the guilty party.

DirkH
February 20, 2012 8:43 pm

Edward von Bear (@Edward_von_Bear) says:
February 20, 2012 at 8:27 pm
“And to those who played a role in this crime: karma is a beast. Remember that.”
Karma is an angry beast and we are poking at it with sticks.
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/cas_angry_beast.jpg
or (h/t Zefal)
http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii317/zefalafez/al_gore_fire_angry_beast.jpg

J. Knight
February 20, 2012 8:45 pm

Hopefully this douchebag will be convicted of criminal fraud and sent to jail. It’s way past time these “people” pay for there criminal actions. I also hope there are civil penalties in the millions of dollars as well. HI, please…please…don’t have any mercy on Gleick. Stick it to the creep.

JJ
February 20, 2012 8:45 pm

Add another name to the list of prominent crimate scientists.

G. Karst
February 20, 2012 8:46 pm

Seems to me – that should be the end of Peter Gleick, professionally and ethically. Good riddance to bad rubbish. And the best thing is… he did it to himself. GK

Russ R.
February 20, 2012 8:49 pm

Predictions:
1. Desmog and other alarmist outfits will rush to support Gleick, accepting his story uncritically, and offering up plausible defenses, contorting the evidence and timeline to explain how things could have transpired. They will also continue to act as if the strategy document were authentic. They will portray him simultaneously as a hero (David standing up to Goliath), and a victim (an innocent whistleblower being harassed by evil deniers and their lawyers).
2. It will become apparent that Gleick was in contact with Desmog prior to sending them the document cache. They knew he was the source, and they probably knew that he falsified the strategy document. They also likely received the documents ahead of the other 14 recipients, which is the only way they could have had a blog post up with all the documents AND a summary hyping up their talking points within hours of receiving them.
3. This will take months, or possibly years to fully resolve.

1 2 3 12