Guest post by Alan Caruba
Full disclosure: Years ago I received a small stipend from The Heartland Institute to help cover the costs of writing articles regarding the global warming hoax, well before it was exposed in 2009 when emails between its perpetrators—the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change—revealed the total lack of real science involved. I have continued to expose the hoax without any support from Heartland or any other entity.
A total of six conferences on climate change have been sponsored by The Heartland Institute. I attended the first conference in New York City in 2008 and my initial observation was that virtually no one from the press was there and the meager coverage it received disparaged it.
This week, a major smear campaign against the Institute erupted as the result of an act of deception and thievery that may well result in criminal charges against its as yet unknown perpetrator.
The President of the Institute, Joe Bast, immediately informed its supporters, directors, donors and friends that someone pretending to be a board member had sent Heartland an email claiming to be a director and asking that documents regarding a January board meeting be re-sent.
A clever ruse, but the result was that elements of the confidential documents were then posted on a number of so-called climate blogs and from there to various members of the media who, with the exception of The Guardian, took no steps whatever to verify the authenticity of the documents, some of which Heartland says were either a concoction of lies or altered to convey inaccurate information.
The leading disseminator of the global warming hoax, The New York Times, published its version on Wednesday, February 15th, titled “Leak Offers Glimpse of Campaign Against Climate Science.”
Suffice to say, the “climate science” served up by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been a pack of lies from the day it first convened. Its “science” was based on computer models rigged by co-conspirators that include Michael Mann of Penn State University and Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia.
The original leak of their emails in November 2009 instantly revealed the extent of their efforts to spread the hoax and to suppress any expression of doubt regarding it. A second release in 2011 confirmed what anyone paying any attention already knew.
The “warmists”, a name applied to global warming hoaxers, launched into a paroxysm of denial that has not stopped to this day. Their respective universities have since engaged in every possible way to hide the documentation they claimed supported their claims. Suffice to say, the global warming hoax was the golden goose for everyone who received literally billions in public and private funding.
We have reached the point where the warmists have been claiming that global warming causes global cooling! Along the way the bogus warming has been blamed for thousands of utterly absurd events and trends. What really worried the perpetrators was the fact that the planet had entered a cooling cycle in 1998.
At the heart of the hoax was the claim that carbon dioxide (CO2) was causing the Earth to heat and that CO2 emissions must be reduced to save the Earth. Next to oxygen, CO2 is vital to all life on Earth as it sustains all vegetation which in turn sustains every creature that depends on it as a source of food. It represents a mere 0.033% of the Earth’s atmosphere and is referred to by warmists as a “greenhouse gas.” It is, as any meteorologist or climatologist will tell you, the atmosphere that protects the Earth from becoming a dissociated planet like Mars.
The New York Times article is a case study in bad journalism and bias on a scale for which this failing newspaper is renowned. The Times reported that “Leaked documents suggest that an organization known for attacking climate science is planning a new push to undermine the teaching of global warming in public schools, the latest indication that climate change is becoming part of the nation’s culture wars.”
Wrong, so wrong. Polls have demonstrated that global warming is last on a list of concerns by the public. It barely registers because the public has concluded that it is either a hoax or just not happening. Teaching global warming in the nation’s schools constitutes a crime against the truth and the students.
The Times article makes much of the amounts some donors to Heartland have contributed, but in each cited case, with one exception, the donations had nothing to do with its rebuttal of global warming science.
“It is in fact not a scientific controversy”, said the Times article. “The majority of climate scientists say that emissions generated by human beings are changing the climate and putting the planet at long-term risk, although they are uncertain about the exact magnitude of that risk.”
The exact magnitude is zero. Thousands of scientists have signed petitions denouncing global warming as a hoax. The Times lies.
A post at The Daily Bayonet on February 14th said it well, “What the Heartland documents show is how badly warmists have been beaten by those with a fraction of the resources they’ve enjoyed. Al Gore spent $300 million advertising the global warming hoax. Greenpeace, the WWF (World Wildlife Fund), the Sierra Club, the National Resources Defense Council, NASA, NOAA, the UN and nation states have collectively poured billions into climate research, alternative energies, and propaganda, supported along the way by most of the broadcast and print media.
The Times will continue to publish lies about global warming, as will others like Time and Newsweek magazines. The attacks on Heartland and the many scientists and others like myself who debunk this fraud will continue, but their efforts are just the dying gasp of the greatest hoax of the modern era.
There’s a reason the theme of Heartland’s sixth conference in 2011 was “Restoring the Scientific Method.” Real science does not depend on declaring “a consensus” before the hypothesis has been thoroughly tested, a process that often involves years of effort. Meanwhile, the planet continues to cool.

Could Romm and McKibben please reveal all and any monies they might have received, including free trips or expenses?
We have the details on Gore, Suzuki and their foundations. We know Hansen made a fortune – though he blithely says it goes to his grandchildren and the American economy and tax department, as if none of this impacts him in any positive, please-do-it-to-me-again, way. What about Revkin? What about Monbiot?
Who paid for all those wankers going to South Africa for the last boondoggle? Bet it wasn’t them.
Let’s have it out on the table, old-school style, and do some measuring. And then publish the results in the NYT.
Exactly what I wrote. Very nice.
I found some other inconsistencies in the “DeSmogBlogGate” memo.
The fake one is completely different in style than the other memos.
http://www.minnesotansforglobalwarming.com/m4gw/2012/02/desmogbloggate.html
Right on point, Alan!
If only the educational institutions would teach real earth science (geology, glaciology, earth history) and meterology – – – – rather than ecology, climate studies, and politicized geography – – – the baseless claims of “unprecedented” by the GW-alarmists would be self-evident and laughable.
Life on Earth would not have survived billion of years if climatological “tipping points” (persistent positive feedback processes) really existed.
Cross-posted Comment – Google “Yellow Dots of Mystery” – I am speculating that the fraudulent PDF document contains non-obvious forensic tracking features that law enforcement agencies mandated be automatically ‘printed’ on each scanned page of a document. You might be able to ‘see’ those features in the PDF if you know where to look and what to look for. This is NOT the File – Properties – Metadata stuff (too obvious). The Electronic Frontier Foundation has a bunch of webpages describing this for printers. There are also YouTube videos out there describing how you can find these forensic tracking features printed on printer hard-copy output
Richard Black of the BBC has knee-jerked into publication in condemnation of the Heartlands based upon these spurious documents, in complete contrast to the restraint and diligence he used over the CRU “climate-gate” leaks.
However, the comments on his blog give him a well deserved kicking for his blatantly biased double standard. Something which would not matter at a newpaper, such as the Guardian, whose views and biases are well known. But to use the once respected BBC as a platform for his personal agenda is beyond the pale.
Tiny quibble – carbon dioxide is more important than oxygen, without it oxygen wouldn’t exist. And, sometimes you’ll hear that plants produce oxygen as a “waste product” of photosynthesis, that’s not at all what they’re doing because they themselves breathe in oxgen and breathe out carbon dioxide when they’re not photosynthesising. They’re perfect self-sufficient food and atmosphere producing entities for their own needs, for spreading they’ve created the animal kingdom..
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/02/14/microbes-and-their-impact-within-climate-models/#comment-894308
Public confidence in science also needs to be restored, especially with certain ‘scientists’ appearing not to practice the Scientific Method.
WUWT would do well to distance itself from this kind of empty bluster. It adds nothing to the body of science.
Its not about science. Its not about climate. Its not about the environment. It is all about the destruction of capitalism and the enslavement of mankind. They are not wrong, they are evil.
It never ever was about saving the planet, it was always about control, thought control, control of our actions, control of resources, to be doled out by a Global Government, unelected, undemocratic, unaccountable, & unsackable! It’s all very simple, the neo-socilaists & the neo fuedalists want control for thei own misguided aims, some not so misguided though! Thankfully I know one teacher of science here in the UK who always insists that her pupils/students check & verify all their sources of information & not just cut & paste from Wikipedia & the like! That’s why she is a fine teacher.
It seems there is too much money in play as to try anything to “save the business”. BTW What is it the real value of a “carbon share”?….It seems it decreases exponentially relative to real temperatures. Bad luck guys, sustainability in unsustainable.
Great post Alan, thank you. It could be passed on as an instant primer to those folk who understand that there is a ‘war’ going on between those who believe in anthropogenic global warming and the skeptics who point to the data (and the political agenda of the warmists) yet have not yet grasped the size and implications.
It has just one flaw in it. The New York Times, risible though this once great newspaper has become, is NOT the leading disseminator of the hoax (although it may be in the United States). The undoubted global media leader in spreading grotesquely unbalanced coverage is the BBC.
To be a BBC reporter, editor or commentator involved in covering AGW involves a shamefaced under-the-counter juggling of storylines, inviting trusted ‘safe pairs of hands’ into the studio, ignoring even highly-gifted communicators if they happen to ‘bat for the other side’ (Christopher Monckton is avoided like the plague) and a determination to eschew journalistic enquiry.
As a former UK journalist myself – I used to work alongside good, honest, BBC reporters – I have never known the corporation’s journalistic star to fall so low. It distributes these cancerous journalistic cells, of course, to all corners of the globe, using a wide variety of media.
Unhappily – much in the way that dishonest climate scientists have tainted the image of all pro-AGW scientists (yes, even those who still genuinely believe that CO2 may be the decisive element in climate change) – so have these journalists damaged the reputation of all of the BBC’s news programmes.
Although most of the BBC’s news output is probably factual and accurate, millions of people around the world now take its news coverage with a huge pinch of salt.
Global warming has irretrievably (I believe) damaged the reputation of the BBC. More damage to more reputations is on the way.
Maybe it’s time to set up a string of Honey Pots to train the media shills to be more skeptical. I suspect that in a few weeks their guard will be down and they can be stimulated to give their typical Pavlovian response again and again.
GeologyJim says:
“If only the educational institutions would teach real earth science (geology, glaciology, earth history) and meterology – – – – rather than ecology … ”
What is wrong with teaching ecology (if it is done right)??? Ecological principles are extremely important in forestry, fisheries, wildlife management etc. etc.
The planet continues to cool, but Hearts and Minds, are clearly being controlled. Here in Britain a new Climate Changer takes up the challenge….
http://fenbeagleblog.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/the-green-treens/
Why is it that many of the Warmist crowd come across as all weaselly and unpleasant? Their blogs tend to be unpleasant, hateful places were dissent is crushed and open debate controlled by censorship or pseudo-intellectual rantings by a small arrogant clique.
At least you, Anthony, have provided a site which is open to the science. Where newcomers are made to feel welome and where education and enlightenment are core concerns.
You have a lot of support out here.
Heartland should consider approaching Google about cleaning their search results from links to the faked document a couple weeks down the line. It constitutes well poisoning as far as the search for Heartland is concerned – which may be one of the purposes of the whole affair.
Anthony
You are hero to many, you took fight to their doorstep.
Now the end of big struggle is near, with the failure and a total demise of the AGW hypothesis.
The Great European Freeze of 2012 has done the job in Europe, reminiscent of the 1812’s Napoleons fatal march on Moscow,
http://www.napoleon-series.org/images/military/organization/Dutch/1812/
even if some deny the similarity.
Ignorance of history is of course fatal both to rational skepticism and to scientific progress.
That is why it is important to know — and to verify for oneself — that the origins of the “global warming hoax” go back to an expose in the June 1955 issue of Fortune, in the form of a much-read article by the eminent scientist John von Neumann, titled Can We Survive Technology?
The widespread impression that that climate-change warnings, from the world’s most eminent mathematicians and scientists, are any kind of modern innovation, is of course entirely mistaken.
[snip. More sock puppetry from Gneiss, RW, Alan Statham, J. Fischer, BA, Stevo, Harry Lebowski, KevinJ, Jennifer, Luke, Jackson, etc. All the same troll. ~dbs, mod.]
Sorry link got truncated
http://www.napoleon-series.org/images/military/organization/Dutch/1812/Textiles/Dutchtextiles6b.jpg
Contains profanity.
The hypocrisy of the warmistas, and the left in general, is profoundly staggering and utterly absolute. Climategate Emails are a crime and should be prosecuted fully! Hacking Heartland, swallowing the the fake Bush Air National Guard documents whole, having all kinds of fun with Sarah Palin’s emails… that’s all cool you know, becuase it’s for the greater good.
I also noticed the old meme “possibly fake BUT consistant with fact” that they used with the Bush ANG documents. Honestly I can’t even discuss anything of any intellectual or politcal heft with people of the far left because they are either liars, callow stooges, or just plain stupid. When you in your teens and twenties you can be fogiven for the “idealis” of youth, but by your 30s you need to smarten up. I think it was Churchill who said a young conservative has no heart and an old liberal has no brain (or something to that effect).
Does anyone have any other scaned pdf’s from ‘suspects’ websites that could be used as a comparison ?