Icebreaker at the North Pole

From the Alfred Wegener Institute news that a ship that reached the real geographic North Pole, unlike the hapless group of Whisky sponsored rowers (Row to the Pole) who are pointlessly attempting to reach the location of 1996 magnetic pole, which doesn’t even exist there anymore.

Research Vessel Polarstern at North Pole

Bremerhaven/North Pole, 22 August 2011. You can’t get any “higher”: on 22 August 2011 at exactly 9.42 a.m. the research icebreaker Polarstern of the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in the Helmholtz Association reaches the North Pole. The aim of he current expedition is to document changes in the far north. Thus, the researchers on board are conducting an extensive investigation programme in the water, ice and air at the northernmost point on the Earth. The little sea ice cover makes the route via the pole to the investigation area in the Canadian Arctic possible.

Sea ice not only plays a role in the selection of the route, but is above all a major research focal point. How thick is the ice and how old? To what extent has it been deformed by pressure – is there snow or puddles of melting water on it? Satellite measurements, too, supply ice information, but measurements are still required on site to be able to interpret these data correctly. Light energy causes the ice to melt and heats up the water in the summer months. The warming of the Arctic and the related changes in heat and gas exchange processes between the ocean, sea ice and atmosphere are the paramount focus of the investigations. The oceanic currents that exchange water masses with the Atlantic and the Pacific are also undergoing change. Redistribution of the freshwater input from rivers into the Arctic Ocean is one of the factors that influence these oceanic currents.

Light is the source of energy for tiny algae that live in and under the ice and form the basis of the food web in the Arctic Ocean. Biologists classify species and determine the number of algae as well as the small and larger animals that feed on them. The researchers follow the path taken by the organisms from the water surface to the seafloor, where the remains end up as organic substance at a depth of thousands of metres after the organisms die.

These deposits on the seafloor permit conclusions to be drawn on how living conditions were in the course of the Earth’s history. After all, the sediments and the animal and plant remains they contain are up to several million years old. Following the expedition, sediment cores will be analysed in the laboratory. To improve the models of the Earth’s climate history, chemists, physicists and oceanographers additionally examine the environmental conditions in the present-day oceans. They draw conclusions on how fast organic substance is transformed and relocated as a result of altered current conditions.

All 55 scientists and technicians from six countries on board the Polarstern have a common goal: studying the changes in the Arctic. This is also reflected in the name of the expedition “TransArc – Trans-Arctic survey of the Arctic Ocean in transition”. The researchers have been investigating their questions jointly with the 43 crew members since the Polarstern left the port of Tromsø (Norway) on 5 August. The first ice floes appeared on 8 August. Since 9 August the Polarstern has been sailing through dense pack ice on the route along 60° East in temperatures of around 0° C. At first it was predominantly one-year-old sea ice, now older and consequently thicker ice floes appear.

“From a scientific point of view the North Pole is not more interesting than other places in the Arctic,” reports Prof. Ursula Schauer from on board the Polarstern. The oceanographer at the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in the Helmholtz Association is the chief scientist of the expedition. “The expected changes are rather minor here. However, the northern part of the Canadian sector of the Arctic still numbers among the least researched regions on the globe because of the dense pack ice.” Schauer was in the central Arctic the last time in 2007 and is now experiencing a similarly small ice cover as the year that went down in the annals as the one with the lowest extent of sea ice since the beginning of satellite measurements in 1979. Initial measurements of the ice thickness confirm this: in 2011 as well as in 2007 the most frequently occurring ice thickness was 0.9 metres. As a comparison, the most frequently measured ice thickness in 2001 was around 2 metres. In that year the extent of the ice cover at the end of the melting period corresponded roughly to the long-term mean.

The Polarstern is at the North Pole for the third time in its history. On 7 September 1991 it was one of the first two conventionally driven ships to sail there, along with the Swedish research icebreaker Oden. Almost exactly ten years later, on 6 September 2001, it carried out a joint expedition at the North Pole together with the American research icebreaker Healy.

After the investigations at the North Pole and subsequently in the Canadian Basin the vessel will head for the Siberian Sea. The researchers want to study the oceanic circulation from the deep sea to the shallow shelf seas and habitats from the ice edge to the ice-free ocean. The Polarstern is expected to return to its homeport of Bremerhaven on 7 October. For all those who would like to follow the events on board until that time: the members of the expedition report regularly in the blog of the magazine GEO at (German language only) www.geo.de/blog/geo/polarstern-blog.

###

The Alfred Wegener Institute conducts research in the Arctic, Antarctic and oceans of the high and middle latitudes. It coordinates polar research in Germany and provides major infrastructure to the international scientific community, such as the research icebreaker Polarstern and stations in the Arctic and Antarctica. The Alfred Wegener Institute is one of the seventeen research centres of the Helmholtz Association, the largest scientific organisation in Germany.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

84 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Corey S.
August 23, 2011 10:54 am

OT – But an earthquake just hit Virginia. Not sure how big.

Ken Hall
August 23, 2011 11:00 am

So the ice wasn’t melting fast enough so they thought that they will give it a helping hand by breaking it up? Unbelieveable!

August 23, 2011 11:02 am

It’s so easy to translate that German polarstern-blog …..
Just do this instead … ( Google Webpage Translator )
http://preview.tinyurl.com/3jtdd7f

D. Robinson
August 23, 2011 11:03 am

Felt it in in NJ too, very slight here.

August 23, 2011 11:07 am

Hopefully they’ll study how much research activity and shipping is effecting the ice cap.

the_Butcher
August 23, 2011 11:12 am

How long does it takes for the wind to push away patches of ice that have been slit through from the icebreakers?

August 23, 2011 11:13 am

Corey S. says:
August 23, 2011 at 10:54 am
I felt it here in Cary, NC. It shook slightly for about 3 seconds.

Bill Yarber
August 23, 2011 11:20 am

I wonder if the crew of the Nautilus measured the thickness of the ice they broke through in 1959. Vaguely remember seeing open waters near the sub while surfaced at the North Pole. Anyone have acces to those photos?
Bill

Ken Hall
August 23, 2011 11:26 am

I can imagine those researchers stood at the stern of the research vessel looking backwards and proclaiming, without a hint of irony,
“Oh look, the ice is breaking up and melting faster than we ever imagined, How terrible, it’s worse than we thought! Mankind must be to blame!”
Yeah, mankind is to blame. It’s the kind of man who is PILOTING YOUR BLOODY BOAT!!!

RACookPE1978
Editor
August 23, 2011 11:32 am

Note very, very carefully that this is the icebreaker’s THIRD trip to the north pole, each trip accompanied by other surface ships, and (apparently) that several nuclear icebreakers (all Russian) made the trip before ….
Though, I most certainly suspect that the CAGW – obsessed ABCNNBCBS media will not mention that fact very loudly, since it detracts from the overriding message that the Arctic melting “now” and “it’s worse than we thought” ….
So polar ice has been in this condition before, and will be in today’s conditions in the future.

Gary
August 23, 2011 11:41 am

Arctic ocean sediment cores (not just one at the North Pole) could tell a very revealing story about climatic cycles if enough were taken over the whole ocean, especially at sensitive points such a band that includes the summer melt ice extent edge. Cores taken in the 1960s and 70s throughout the other ocean basins were quite useful in proving the Milankovich cycles control much of the glacial/interglacial timing.

August 23, 2011 12:01 pm

Bill Yarber asked
Vaguely remember seeing open waters near the sub while surfaced at the North Pole. Anyone have acces to those photos?
Here are some
http://radio4scienceboards.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=witter&action=display&thread=599

Nuke
August 23, 2011 12:01 pm

The aim of the current expedition is to document changes in the far north.

Is there a baseline to compare against or are they creating the baseline? It’s implied there’s been little research there, so there is currently no baseline to use for comparison.

Wil
August 23, 2011 12:06 pm

Hey, Anthony, sorry to be off topic here – but WUWT featured a number of stories about the Australian Carbon Tax with the Julia Gillard’s year-old government its single-seat majority forced through the Australian parliament. Here’s some news that could possibly change everything including the Gillard Government itself.
An Australian MP has been accused of using an official credit card to pay for prostitutes, sparking a political scandal that could bring down the government.
New South Wales state police said they are looking into new evidence that Craig Thomson misused a trade union credit card when he was a senior union official in 2005 and 2007.
A conviction for theft or fraud would force Mr Thomson to quit parliament and cost Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s year-old government its single-seat majority.
With opinion polls showing the government has become deeply unpopular, observers agree that the ruling Labor Party would have little hope of retaining Mr Thomson’s seat in an ensuing by-election.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2029178/Australian-MP-Craig-Thomson-used-official-credit-card-pay-prostitutes.html#ixzz1VseZ5bcK

Eric Anderson
August 23, 2011 12:23 pm

Sounds like an interesting expedition. I’m jealous — would love to visit the far North someday. One can catch a hint of a pre-determined bias in the stated purpose of the expedition, but they appear to be doing some serious work and, hopefully, collecting some worthwhile data. Definitely more valuable than the many publicity stunt expeditions we’ve seen in recent years.

JaneHM
August 23, 2011 12:39 pm

What sort of damage is ice-breaking doing to high latitude ice coverage? I thought ‘everyone agreed’ that open water generated positive feedbacks that produced more open water.

Steve from Rockwood
August 23, 2011 1:22 pm

If one ice-breaker can have a measurable effect on Arctic sea-ice extent (as measured by satellites say) then we are in big trouble. I seriously doubt it and see no reason why people should complain about such a voyage. Scientists should be in the Arctic if they want to study Arctic sea ice after all. Unless they went there just to ruin my 5.1 million sq m ice extent prediction – which isn’t looking too good right now. Dang ice-breakers.

August 23, 2011 1:24 pm

I can’t believe some of the commentry here is to be taken seriously. Does anyone really believe that an ice breaker trail through the Arctic is likely to have any significant impact on the rate of ice melt/ break up? Either get serious or admit you’re having a laugh!
I know that ther AGW case is often overcooked – please excuse the pun, but this kind of opinion makes a complete farce of skeptical opinion – if indeed it is intended seriously?

Anything is possible
August 23, 2011 1:30 pm

What possible purpose would deliberately using ice-breakers to speed up the demise of the Arctic Ice serve?
It’s not like alarmist scientists would use continuing ice loss as “proof” of AGW, or that there are literally billions of dollars worth of natural resources waiting to be exploited should weather conditions in the region moderate.
Oh. Wait………..

Kelvin Vaughan
August 23, 2011 1:38 pm

So why cant I see it on the drifting North Pole camera?

Anything is possible
August 23, 2011 1:39 pm

Ben Kellett says:
August 23, 2011 at 1:24 pm
I can’t believe some of the commentry here is to be taken seriously. Does anyone really believe that an ice breaker trail through the Arctic is likely to have any significant impact on the rate of ice melt/ break up?
___________________________________________________________________________
Do you seriously believe that the Russians would spend hundreds of millions of dollars building and operating a fleet of nuclear powered ice -breakers if they didn’t have a significant impact on the rate of ice melt/ break up?

Nuke
August 23, 2011 1:54 pm

Kellett says:
August 23, 2011 at 1:24 pm
I concur.

Nuke
August 23, 2011 1:55 pm

Kellett says:
August 23, 2011 at 1:24 pm
No doubt the work of lurking warministas out to besmirch our reputation. Just like at the Tea Party rallies!

HaroldW
August 23, 2011 1:56 pm

JaneHM, Anything is possible –
The ice coverage, even at maximum melt, is measured in millions of square kilometers. The amount of ice which is broken up by ice-breaking ships is minuscule by comparison. Not to mention that such ice is still around to be counted in the figures; it’s not melted by the ships.
The ships make progress possible locally. They can’t have a significant effect upon the metrics of Arctic ice coverage.

1 2 3 4