NASA finds proof that amino acid components in meteorites originate in space.
This is exciting news. NASA-funded researchers have evidence that some building blocks of DNA, the molecule that carries the genetic instructions for life, found in meteorites were likely created in space. The research gives support to the theory that a “kit” of ready-made parts created in space and delivered to Earth by meteorite and comet impacts assisted the origin of life. We may all be immigrants on Earth.
By Bill Steigerwald
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.

NASA-funded researchers have evidence that some building blocks of DNA, the molecule that carries the genetic instructions for life, found in meteorites were likely created in space. The research gives support to the theory that a “kit” of ready-made parts created in space and delivered to Earth by meteorite and comet impacts assisted the origin of life.
“People have been discovering components of DNA in meteorites since the 1960’s, but researchers were unsure whether they were really created in space or if instead they came from contamination by terrestrial life,” said Dr. Michael Callahan of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. “For the first time, we have three lines of evidence that together give us confidence these DNA building blocks actually were created in space.” Callahan is lead author of a paper on the discovery appearing in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
The discovery adds to a growing body of evidence that the chemistry inside asteroids and comets is capable of making building blocks of essential biological molecules.
For example, previously, these scientists at the Goddard Astrobiology Analytical Laboratory have found amino acids in samples of comet Wild 2 from NASA’s Stardust mission, and in various carbon-rich meteorites. Amino acids are used to make proteins, the workhorse molecules of life, used in everything from structures like hair to enzymes, the catalysts that speed up or regulate chemical reactions.
In the new work, the Goddard team ground up samples of twelve carbon-rich meteorites, nine of which were recovered from Antarctica. They extracted each sample with a solution of formic acid and ran them through a liquid chromatograph, an instrument that separates a mixture of compounds. They further analyzed the samples with a mass spectrometer, which helps determine the chemical structure of compounds.
The team found adenine and guanine, which are components of DNA called nucleobases, as well as hypoxanthine and xanthine. DNA resembles a spiral ladder; adenine and guanine connect with two other nucleobases to form the rungs of the ladder. They are part of the code that tells the cellular machinery which proteins to make. Hypoxanthine and xanthine are not found in DNA, but are used in other biological processes.
Also, in two of the meteorites, the team discovered for the first time trace amounts of three molecules related to nucleobases: purine, 2,6-diaminopurine, and 6,8-diaminopurine; the latter two almost never used in biology. These compounds have the same core molecule as nucleobases but with a structure added or removed.
It’s these nucleobase-related molecules, called nucleobase analogs, which provide the first piece of evidence that the compounds in the meteorites came from space and not terrestrial contamination. “You would not expect to see these nucleobase analogs if contamination from terrestrial life was the source, because they’re not used in biology, aside from one report of 2,6-diaminopurine occurring in a virus (cyanophage S-2L),” said Callahan. “However, if asteroids are behaving like chemical ‘factories’ cranking out prebiotic material, you would expect them to produce many variants of nucleobases, not just the biological ones, due to the wide variety of ingredients and conditions in each asteroid.”
The second piece of evidence involved research to further rule out the possibility of terrestrial contamination as a source of these molecules. The team also analyzed an eight-kilogram (17.64-pound) sample of ice from Antarctica, where most of the meteorites in the study were found, with the same methods used on the meteorites. The amounts of the two nucleobases, plus hypoxanthine and xanthine, found in the ice were much lower — parts per trillion — than in the meteorites, where they were generally present at several parts per billion. More significantly, none of the nucleobase analogs were detected in the ice sample. One of the meteorites with nucleobase analog molecules fell in Australia, and the team also analyzed a soil sample collected near the fall site. As with the ice sample, the soil sample had none of the nucleobase analog molecules present in the meteorite.
Thirdly, the team found these nucleobases — both the biological and non-biological ones — were produced in a completely non-biological reaction. “In the lab, an identical suite of nucleobases and nucleobase analogs were generated in non-biological chemical reactions containing hydrogen cyanide, ammonia, and water. This provides a plausible mechanism for their synthesis in the asteroid parent bodies, and supports the notion that they are extraterrestrial,” says Callahan.
“In fact, there seems to be a ‘goldilocks’ class of meteorite, the so-called CM2 meteorites, where conditions are just right to make more of these molecules,” adds Callahan.
The team includes Callahan and Drs. Jennifer C. Stern, Daniel P. Glavin, and Jason P. Dworkin of NASA Goddard’s Astrobiology Analytical Laboratory; Ms. Karen E. Smith and Dr. Christopher H. House of Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa.; Dr. H. James Cleaves II of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC; and Dr. Josef Ruzicka of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Somerset, N.J. The research was funded by the NASA Astrobiology Institute, the Goddard Center for Astrobiology, the NASA Astrobiology: Exobiology and Evolutionary Biology Program, and the NASA Postdoctoral Program.
Related Link
› Related videos from NASA Goddard’s Scientific Visualization Studio
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
All we are, is dust in the [solar] wind…
I can’t wait to see what Amino Acids in Meteorites has to say about this 🙂
“NASA-funded researchers have evidence that some building blocks of DNA, the molecule that carries the genetic instructions for life, found in meteorites were likely created in space.”
But have not found any DNA.
I think what this study proves, is that Chemistry (like Physics) is universal, nothing else.
I thought Fred Hoyle had written about this 40 years ago.
So… well, NASA’s fighting for funds so they need to make it sound great.
Yes it’s nice to have yet another piece to the puzzle but I don’t see anything really new in this research, just more accurate confirmation of already existing hypotheses based on data known for tens of years.
And DNA was very probably not the very first building block of life.
Why assume we’re all immigrants? That attitude seems to imply that Earth couldn’t possibly be the source of its own life. Makes no more sense than the attitude that Earth must be the only place where life originated.
More likely, life arose on lots of planets.
I can think of a certain poster who will be very interested in this 😉
Left or right handed acids?
“… have been discovering components of DNA in meteorites since the 1960′s, but [unsure] they came from contamination by terrestrial life…”
Enter the Murchinson Meteorite (1969),
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murchison_meteorite
Already in 1997 ET-amino-acids were more or less confirmed.
Well now, this news gives pause to put “god” back on the scientific menu, at the very least “humility”.
Huh, where else would stuff originate from on a planet that originated from the same space and stuff itself? :p
“twelve carbon-rich meteorites”
So these meteorites brought not only life but death; the evil, evil carbon that has doomed us all.
Was this the first recorded carbon exchange?
We are all the stuff of stars as I think a songwriter put it way back when …
That life, as we know it, exists at all seems, to me, to pretty miraculous, given that the random combinations of all the various nuceotides, DNA strands and so on that are necessary for a fairly simple organism, number in the billions. Roughly the equivalent of throwing a boxfull of car parts randomly into the air and getting a fully assembled Rolls-Royce …
I remember Carl Sagan going through a formula to work out if there was alien life in the universe. At the end he said If there was alien life where are they? They should be here now! I shouted at the TV “It’s us!” but you know scientists, they don’t listen to us mere mortals.
We might all me immigrants but I’m sure I come from the rare Stony-Iron meteorite and not the common Stone meteorite like most of you do.
Kelvin, if the scientist in the TV ignores you when you shout at him, this may be because TV tends to be a uni-directional information transfer system.
I don’t think the significance is that life came to Earth, rather that the basics of life can develop everywhere. Next question is if single cell organisms develop elsewhere.
Fred Hoyle’s “panspermia” hypothesis wasn’t ridiculed or discarded per se, but was considered an unnecessary entity in the explanation of origins, given that the same building blocks could have been produced here, and can be reproduced in experiments.
On the other hand, this research with multiple efforts at corroboration looks pretty solid, in contrast with the extra-terrestrial offerings from NASA in the recent past. The article is also well written, and not laden with ambiguities. Good stuff.
“…the way whereby one can learn the pure truth concerning the plurality of worlds is by aerial navigation.” –P.Borel (1657 CE)
Ah.. proof perhaps of a primary cause or prime mover? Perhaps science and religion will end up at the same result despite their pretenses.
Is there any possibility that some asteroids with DNA components may have originated from Earth having been ejected into space by meteorite or comet impacts?
It’s a nice fantasy, but more likely, all the building blocks were already here. All that was needed were the right conditions. When it comes to life, scientists as a whole are somewhat dim.
I’m sure some pro agw commenter/blog/alarmist said the other day that ‘agw deniers were in the same league as creationists, flat earthers and those that believed life came to earth on a comet….’ or similar. Anyone remember so I can shove this back at him! 😉
The Gray Monk: “We are all the stuff of stars as I think a songwriter put it way back when”
Perhaps you’re thinking of Joni Mitchell? “We are stardust, we are golden, we are billion year old carbon”
[ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBqodL2OJ1A ]
There is nothing magic about DNA, it is just a long term information store. It is pretty damned likely that RNA was the prior storage medium. Before RNA, who knows.
An analogy here, in the stone age we had the same mineral resources available as we do now, but our ancestors didn’t use sand to make glass-clad ferro-concrete sky scrapers.