Paleopollen in Antarctica

Fossilized pollen reveals climate history of northern Antarctica

Analysis of direct climate record shows Antarctic tundra persisted until 12 million years ago

HOUSTON — (June 27, 2011) — A painstaking examination of the first direct and detailed climate record from the continental shelves surrounding Antarctica reveals that the last remnant of Antarctic vegetation existed in a tundra landscape on the continent’s northern peninsula about 12 million years ago. The research, which was led by researchers at Rice University and Louisiana State University, appears online this week and will be featured on the cover of the July 12 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The new study contains the most detailed reconstruction to date of the climatic history of the Antarctic Peninsula, which has warmed significantly in recent decades. The rapid decline of glaciers along the peninsula has led to widespread speculation about how the rest of the continent’s ice sheets will react to rising global temperatures.

“The best way to predict future changes in the behavior of Antarctic ice sheets and their influence on climate is to understand their past,” said Rice University marine geologist John Anderson, the study’s lead author. The study paints the most detailed picture to date of how the Antarctic Peninsula first succumbed to ice during a prolonged period of global cooling.

In the warmest period in Earth’s past 55 million years, Antarctica was ice-free and forested. The continent’s vast ice sheets, which today contain more than two-thirds of Earth’s freshwater, began forming about 38 million years ago. The Antarctic Peninsula, which juts farther north than the rest of the continent, was the last part of Antarctica to succumb to ice. It’s also the part that has experienced the most dramatic warming in recent decades; its mean annual temperatures rose as much as six times faster than mean annual temperatures worldwide.

IMAGE: Researchers ascertained the exact species of plants that existed on the Antarctic Peninsula over the past 36 million years during a three-year examination of thousands of grains of fossilized pollen,…

Click here for more information.

“There’s a longstanding debate about how rapidly glaciation progressed in Antarctica,” said Sophie Warny, a Louisiana State University geologist who specializes in palynology (the study of fossilized pollen and spores) and led the palynological reconstruction. “We found that the fossil record was unambiguous; glacial expansion in the Antarctic Peninsula was a long, gradual process that was influenced by atmospheric, tectonic and oceanographic changes.”

Warny, her students and colleague Rosemary Askin were able to ascertain the exact species of plants that existed on the peninsula over the past 36 million years after a painstaking, three-year examination of thousands of individual grains of pollen that were preserved in muddy sediments beneath the sea floor just off the coast.

“The pollen record in the sedimentary layers was beautiful, both in its richness and depth,” Warny said. “It allowed us to construct a detailed picture of the rapid decline of the forests during the late Eocene — about 35 million years ago — and the widespread glaciation that took place in the middle Miocene — about 13 million years ago.”

Obtaining the sedimentary samples wasn’t easy. The muddy treasure trove was locked away beneath almost 100 feet of dense sedimentary rock. It was also off the coast of the peninsula in shallow waters that are covered by ice most of the year and beset by icebergs the rest. Anderson, a veteran of more than 25 research expeditions to Antarctica, and colleagues spent more than a decade building a case for the funding to outfit an icebreaker with the right kind of drilling equipment to bore through the rock.

IMAGE: This is Rice University oceanographer John Anderson aboard the Nathaniel B. Palmer.

Click here for more information.

In 2002, the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded the project, which was dubbed SHALDRIL. Three years later, the NSF research vessel Nathaniel B. Palmer left on the first of two drilling cruises.

“It was the worst ice year that any of us could remember,” Anderson said. “We’d spend most of a day lowering drill string to the ocean floor only to pull it back up to get out of the way of approaching icebergs.”

The next year was little better, but the SHALDRIL team managed to obtain enough core samples to cover the past 36 million years, thanks to the logistical planning of marine geologist Julia Wellner and to the skill of the drilling crew. By end of the second season, Anderson said, the crew could drill as much as a meter every five minutes.

Reconstructing a detailed climate record from the sample was another Herculean task. In addition to the three-year palynological analysis at LSU, University of Southampton palaeoceanographer Steven Bohaty led an effort to nail down the precise age of the various sediments in each core sample. Wellner, now at the University of Houston, examined the characteristics of the sediments to determine whether they formed below an ice sheet, in open marine conditions or in a combined glacial-marine setting. Other members of the team had to count, categorize and even examine the surface texture of thousands of sand grains that were preserved in the sediments. Gradually, the team was able to piece together a history of how much of the peninsula was covered by glaciers throughout the past 36 million years.

“SHALDRIL gave us the first reliable age constraints on the timing of ice sheet advance across the northern peninsula,” Anderson said. “The rich mosaic of organic and geologic material that we found in the sedimentary record has given us a much clearer picture of the climatic history of the Antarctic Peninsula. This type of record is invaluable as we struggle to place in context the rapid changes that we see taking place in the peninsula today.”

###

The study was funded by grants from the NSF’s Office of Polar Programs to Anderson and Warny. Study co-authors include Wellner; Askin; Bohaty; Alexandra Kirshner, Tyler Smith and Fred Weaver, all of Rice; Alexander Simms and Daniel Livsey, both of the University of California, Santa Barbara; Werner Ehrmann of the University of Leipzig; Lawrence Lawver of the University of Texas at Austin; David Barbeau of the University of South Carolina; Sherwood Wise and Denise Kulhenek, both of Florida State University; and Wojciech Majewski of the Polish Academy of Sciences.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

53 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Latitude
June 29, 2011 6:37 am

The new study contains the most detailed reconstruction to date of the climatic history of the Antarctic Peninsula, which has warmed significantly in recent decades.
=================================================================
And never occurs to them that it might be the cold that’s unsustainable………
It warmed up from a period of extreme cold, and is now returning to a more normal temperature…..
….just once I’d like to see that

Ryan Welch
June 29, 2011 6:50 am

So, does it say what caused the climate to change? Was it the movement of the Antarctic continent over the south pole that caused the current interglacial period?

Bill Illis
June 29, 2011 7:05 am

The paper and supplemental are here.
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/06/20/1014885108.full.pdf+html
http://www.pnas.org/content/suppl/2011/06/21/1014885108.DCSupplemental/Appendix.pdf
This paper and the timelines are quite consistent with the best science regarding the history of the Antarctic glaciation process (or at least the history that has not been tainted by pro-AGW bias). No correlation to CO2 levels that is.

Andrew H
Editor
June 29, 2011 7:06 am

Tectonic, oceanographic and atmospheric activities were mentioned as being factors but what about precession of the Earths axis which has changed significantly over this period?

UK Marcus
June 29, 2011 7:07 am

Perhaps I missed something.
When a core sample is drilled how is it possible to identify from it such a relatively precise age as 36 million years ago?
Is it based on length of sample, and what length is that? And how is compression taken into account?
Are there tables for this sort of thing?

John Marshall
June 29, 2011 7:07 am

Antarctica was further north 55Ma ago and has moved to its present position over that time. It was part of Gondwanna, and a flood basalt exposure on the coast has been analysed as being identical to that of a basalt exposure on the SE African coast. There are also coals on the Antarctic Peninsular.

PeterW
June 29, 2011 7:08 am

“It was the worst ice year that any of us could remember,” Anderson said. “We’d spend most of a day lowering drill string to the ocean floor only to pull it back up to get out of the way of approaching icebergs.”
Sigh – must be because AGW is heating the planet to hell – all that hot, rotten ice…

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
June 29, 2011 7:14 am

Lots of organic material tens of millions of years ago, now covered over with dense sedimentary rock layers…
Heck, let’s get some constructions crews down there quick. Bring lots of explosives, and clear the rest of that worthless ice off of the Peninsula. It’s oil drilling time!

Pete H
June 29, 2011 7:24 am

Hang on a minute! Have we got anyone here who is up to speed on Plate Tectonics?
“In the warmest period in Earth’s past 55 million years, Antarctica was ice-free and forested”
Now, I know the limestone rock that forms parts of Dovedale in the U.K. is the fossilised remains of sea creatures that lived in the area during the Carboniferous period. In other words, this wonderful countryside was a good bit further south than the place that it now sits in and was a real coral reef. That was a lot longer before the 55 million years being introduced here but I would be interested to know where Antarctica was at the time being researched.
I really would love to know!

1DandyTroll
June 29, 2011 7:31 am

Where exactly is northern antarctica located?

Jared
June 29, 2011 7:38 am

All those extinct species on Antarctica due to glaciers. Horrific.

John Crane
June 29, 2011 8:18 am

In recent months, I came across an article on the Antarctic Peninsula about the receding ice there revealing vegetation from the MWP. Likewise with Baffin Island. If anyone has links to these, I would much appreciate you posting. I am not able to find them now in any search, tho’ I’m not surprised.

Pamela Gray
June 29, 2011 8:52 am

Nonsense. Comparing back then to current weather pattern variations during an interglacial period is stuuuuuuooooooopid.

lowercasefred
June 29, 2011 8:56 am

That may be nice information to have, but there is no way the money would have been spent without the global warming/climate change/climate disruption scare.

A G Foster
June 29, 2011 8:58 am

Good post choice. –AGF

RobertM
June 29, 2011 9:02 am

“The Antarctic Peninsula, which juts farther north than the rest of the continent, was the last part of Antarctica to succumb to ice. It’s also the part that has experienced the most dramatic warming in recent decades; its mean annual temperatures rose as much as six times faster than mean annual temperatures worldwide.”
Really? According to whom?

Jimbo
June 29, 2011 9:12 am

I’ll keep it short.
28 June 2011 – Snow and sub-zero temperatures in S. Brazil

David L. Hagen
June 29, 2011 9:14 am

“It was the worst ice year that any of us could remember,” Anderson said. “We’d spend most of a day lowering drill string to the ocean floor only to pull it back up to get out of the way of approaching icebergs.”

That reflects the challenges of drilling in the Arctic. See:
Russia Embraces Offshore Arctic Drilling

After the BP accident in the gulf last year highlighted the consequences of a catastrophic ocean spill, American and Canadian regulators focused on the special challenges in the Arctic.
The ice pack and icebergs pose various threats to drilling rigs and crews. And if oil were spilled in the winter, cleanup would take place in the total darkness that engulfs the region during those months.

Why this great effort to drill in the Arctic?
Because jobs for the growing global population needs economic growth and the economy is tightly tied to transport fuel – yet global transport fuel stopped growing in 2005 (after 20 years of growing at 1 million barrels/day each year) See: Peak Oil – the clear and present danger
That growing gap between economic needs outstripping fuel availability caused prices to skyrocket precipitating the 2008 economic oil crisis.
Upcoming known oil additions are not growing global supply, but are likely to level off and head down in the near future. See: Crude Oil and Liquids Capacity Additions: 2011-2015
Our critical global challenge is NOT getting our feet wet with a few mm/year of sea level rise from global warming.
Our greatest challenge is keeping economies afloat and growing jobs in the face of declining LIGHT crude oil in the very near future. i.e. developing new and alternative fuels as fast as possible. See The Impending World Energy Mess

Thomas Trevor
June 29, 2011 9:45 am

I have always wondered why if nature can make it cold very quickly, as we know it can,why can’t it make it warm just as quickly.

R. Shearer
June 29, 2011 10:43 am

I like “real” science.

theBuckWheat
June 29, 2011 10:47 am

Is it only me, but isn’t there some irony that people fret about a frozen Antarctic becoming warmer at the very moment we carefully examine pollen that documents how warm that continent was in the past?

M White
June 29, 2011 10:53 am

People may like this animation, shows Antarcticas position from the Triassic through to the present
http://www.exploratorium.edu/origins/antarctica/ideas/gondwana2.html

peterhodges
June 29, 2011 10:54 am

Yeah sure.
Northern Antarctica has “experienced the most dramatic warming in recent decades; its mean annual temperatures rose as much as six times faster than mean annual temperatures worldwide.”
Meanwhile,
“It was the worst ice year that any of us could remember,” Anderson said…
“Obtaining the sedimentary samples wasn’t easy. The muddy treasure trove was …in shallow waters that are covered by ice most of the year and beset by icebergs the rest. Anderson….spent more than a decade building a case for the funding to outfit an icebreaker…”
Last I checked, Antarctica was getting colder, and Antarctic ice was on the increase.
For that matter, as their own study demonstrates, the entire planet is cooling in the long term.

don penman
June 29, 2011 11:10 am

They are probably talking about what is happening in the last hundred years and comparing it with what has happened over millions of years ,Antarctica in the past probably had small surges in temperature lasting a hundred years which were much larger than anything that might be occurring now ,but I don’t believe it is warming.

Jit
June 29, 2011 11:25 am


Antarctica got pretty cold when it found itself nearing the south pole. It suffered a double whammy when the Antarctic circumpolar current was able to start up, because it was then isolated from sources of heat from up north.
Isolating Antarctica like that made the rest of the planet warmer.
It is alleged that Antarctica is now getting warmer, at least on the peninsula. As you know, the analysis has been challenged.

1 2 3