Study on paleo rainfall records clearly shows existence of MWP and LIA in Southern Hemisphere

This study from the University of Pittsburgh and SUNY-Albany set out to illustrate how rainfall patterns changes with global temperature in South America. They found the link they were looking for. At the same time, they validated the existence of the Medeival Warm Period and the Little Ice Age effects in the Southern hemisphere, which is interesting since many claim the effects were regional, not global. See the image at left and press release below.

Delta-O-18 levels from Pumacocha correlate with geological temperature records, including solar radiation levels, titanium concentration at Cariaco Basin, and annual temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere and North Atlantic. Click to magnify the image

Pitt-led Team Unearths 2,300-Year Climate Record Suggesting Severe Tropical Droughts as Northern Temperatures Rise

A sediment core from a South American lake revealed a steady, sharp drop in crucial monsoon rainfall since 1900, leading to the driest conditions in 1,000 years as of 2007 and threatening tropical populations with water shortages, a team from Pitt, Union College, and SUNY-Albany reports in PNAS

PITTSBURGHA 2,300-year climate record University of Pittsburgh researchers recovered from an Andes Mountains lake reveals that as temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere rise, the planet’s densely populated tropical regions will most likely experience severe water shortages as the crucial summer monsoons become drier. The Pitt team found that equatorial regions of South America already are receiving less rainfall than at any point in the past millennium.Laguna Pumacocha in the Peruvian Andes.

The researchers report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) that a nearly 6-foot-long sediment core from Laguna Pumacocha in Peru contains the most detailed geochemical record of tropical climate fluctuations yet uncovered. The core shows pronounced dry and wet phases of the South American summer monsoons and corresponds with existing geological data of precipitation changes in the surrounding regions.

Paired with these sources, the sediment record illustrated that rainfall during the South American summer monsoon has dropped sharply since 1900—exhibiting the greatest shift in precipitation since around 300 BCE—while the Northern Hemisphere has experienced warmer temperatures.

Study coauthor Mark Abbott, a professor of geology and planetary science in Pitt’s School of Arts and Sciences who also codesigned the project, said that he and his colleagues did not anticipate the rapid decrease in 20th-century rainfall that they observed. Abbott worked with lead author and recent Pitt graduate Broxton Bird; Don Rodbell, study codesigner and a geology professor at Union College in Schenectady, N.Y.; recent Pitt graduate Nathan Stansell; Pitt professor of geology and planetary science Mike Rosenmeier; and Mathias Vuille, a professor of atmospheric and environmental science at the State University of New York at Albany. Both Bird and Stansell received their PhD degrees in geology from Pitt in 2009.

“This model suggests that tropical regions are dry to a point we would not have predicted,” Abbott said. “If the monsoons that are so critical to the water supply in tropical areas continue to diminish at this pace, it will have devastating implications for the water resources of a huge swath of the planet.”

The study compared the record in the Pumacocha sediment core (PC) to various geological records from South America—Cascayunga Cave (CC), the Quelccaya ice Cap (QIC), and the Cariaco Basin (CB)—as well as the annual position of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ).

The study compared the record in the Pumacocha sediment core (PC) to various geological records from South America—Cascayunga Cave (CC), the Quelccaya ice Cap (QIC), and the Cariaco Basin (CB)—as well as the annual position of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ).

The sediment core shows regular fluctuations in rainfall from 300 BCE to 900 CE, with notably heavy precipitation around 550. Beginning in 900, however, a severe drought set in for the next three centuries, with the driest period falling between 1000 and 1040. This period correlates with the well-known demise of regional Native American populations, Abbott explained, including the Tiwanaku and Wari that inhabited present-day Boliva, Chile, and Peru.

After 1300, monsoons increasingly drenched the South American tropics. The wettest period of the past 2,300 years lasted from roughly 1500 to the 1750s during the time span known as the Little Ice Age, a period of cooler global temperatures. Around 1820, a dry cycle crept in briefly, but quickly gave way to a wet phase before the rain began waning again in 1900. By July 2007, when the sediment core was collected, there had been a steep, steady increase in dry conditions to a high point not surpassed since 1000.

To create a climate record from the sediment core, the team analyzed the ratio of the oxygen isotope delta-O-18 in each annual layer of lake-bed mud. This ratio has a negative relationship with rainfall: Levels of delta-O-18 are low during the wetter seasons and high when monsoon rain is light. The team found that the rainfall history suggested by the lake core matched that established by delta-O-18 analyses from Cascayunga Cave in the Peruvian lowlands and the Quelccaya Ice Cap located high in the Andes. The Pumacocha core followed the climatological narrative of these sources between the years 980 and 2006, but provided much more detail, Abbott said.

The team then established a connection between rainfall and Northern Hemisphere temperatures by comparing their core to the movement of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), a balmy strip of thunderstorms near the equator where winds from the Northern and Southern Hemispheres meet. Abbott and his colleagues concluded that warm Northern temperatures such as those currently recorded lure the ITCZ—the main source of monsoons—north and ultimately reduce the rainfall on which tropical areas rely.

The historical presence of the ITCZ has been gauged by measuring the titanium concentrations of sea sediment, according to the PNAS report. High levels of titanium in the Cariaco Basin north of Venezuela show that the ITCZ lingered in the upper climes at the same time the South American monsoon was at its driest, between 900 and 1100. On the other hand, the wettest period at Pumacocha—between 1400 and 1820, which coincided with the Little Ice Age—correlates with the ITCZ’s sojourn to far south of the equator as Northern Hemisphere temperatures cooled.

###

Levels of the oxygen isotope delta-O-18 from Pumacocha overlaid with corresponding levels from Cascayunga Cave (red) and Quelccaya Ice Cap (blue).h/t to reader Dennis via email
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

84 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pingo
May 23, 2011 5:09 am

It was clearly regional to south America and north-west Europe, move along nothing to see here.
Meanwhile a single Calfornian tree can decipher global climate for hudnreds of years.

Mike Bromley
May 23, 2011 5:20 am

I read it twice….no reference to any link to CAGW?? Are my eyes happily deceiving me?
In keeping with just how complex all of this is, just imagine a different continental confiuguration.

Joe Lalonde
May 23, 2011 5:25 am

Anthony,
I love the way conclusions are made for little evidence support in a time frame that is extremely minor the time frame of the whole planet.
Evidence of the past suggest there was a GREAT deal more ocean water but current theories lump movements of huge rocks with Ice Ages considering snow and ice don’t actually move.
Upland movements do NOT calculate out with the current science when brought back to the time frame of billions of years ago by many hundreds of thousands of meters.

RayG
May 23, 2011 5:36 am

What happens if you overlay these results on the dendro plots of NH temp, MM’s in particular? Do these results represent yet another falsification of treemometers?

Luther Wu
May 23, 2011 5:37 am

What’s this? They didn’t throw in so much as a paragraph, or even a sentence warning that it’s all our fault?
Perhaps that all comes later, when the rhetoricians turn this report on it’s ear to show that ‘yes, there was no Little Ice Age’.

henrythethird
May 23, 2011 5:41 am

“…A 2,300-year climate record University of Pittsburgh researchers recovered from an Andes Mountains lake reveals that as temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere rise, the planet’s densely populated tropical regions will most likely experience severe water shortages as the crucial summer monsoons become drier. The Pitt team found that equatorial regions of South America already are receiving less rainfall than at any point in the past millennium…”
Seems their main objective wasn’t to confirm the existance of the LIA, but to give us another “it’s gonna get worse” scenario, and blame the Northern Hemisphere as well.
Unfortunately for them, it shows the GLOBAL impact of the LIA.

Gary
May 23, 2011 5:48 am

They claim a correlation with NH temperatures, but I don’t see a mechanism for the linkage proposed in the paper, just some references to other studies. They also state that decadal variation in rainfall is quite variable. Interesting, but needs more work to pin down the causes.

P Gosselin
May 23, 2011 5:49 am

This further confirms that Mann’s HS was a fraud throughout. The lion’s share of the climate science can be discarded onto the scrap heap.

May 23, 2011 5:51 am

According to 971 scientists from 562 research institutions the MWP is a fact of history. This research covers 43 different countries, Northern and Southern hemispheres.
So the above report, important though it is, is not the first and doubtless not the last.
IPCC please note.

Scottish Sceptic
May 23, 2011 6:01 am

“since many claim the effects were regional, not global.”
Gotcha Mann!
Now tell us that the medieval warm period was just a small regional effect.

Rick Bradford
May 23, 2011 6:18 am

It won’t make any difference to the faithful, who are still waiting for the Climate Rapture (aka ‘tipping point’) which will instantly plunge us into planetary catastrophe.
Making trillion-dollar economic decisions on the basis of the climate religion is the real apocalypse.

tallbloke
May 23, 2011 6:18 am

The graph shows pretty small temperature changes between the MWP -LIA and NOW
Could easily be fully accounted for by solar, GCR and instrumental/interpretational/calculation errors.
CO2 along for the ride methinks.

tallbloke
May 23, 2011 6:23 am

Gary says:
May 23, 2011 at 5:48 am
Interesting, but needs more work to pin down the causes.

Here you go:
http://tallbloke.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/shumidity-ssn96.png

Amino Acids in Meteorites
May 23, 2011 6:29 am

More data showing that climate always changes. It also shows we are living in a relatively mild time in climate. There are no unprecedented weather events happening now. Things have been worse in the past.

richard verney
May 23, 2011 6:33 am

I understand that there is little evidence in the various Southern Hemisphere proxy records suggesting that the MWP was not seen in the Southern Heisphere but rather due to a sparcity of proxy records, there was insufficient evidence to confirm that the MWP also extended into the Southern Hemisphere. In otherwords, the AGW proponents, in quite typical stance, used the sparcity of evidence as ‘proof’ that the MWP was not global.
It is not known with any certainty as to precisely when Machu Picchu was built but it is thought to be around or shortly before 1450 and was inhabitated for about 100 or so years. Many archaeologists consider that crops were grown there and the site was abandoned when agriculture was no longer possible due to climate change.
Obviously, such a theory is only a theory but if correct, it would suggest that Peru was considerably warmer in the mid 1400s than it is today and this therefore leads some historical support to the MWP being a global event (although the precise dates for the MWP may vary from hemisphere to hemisphere).

Steve Keohane
May 23, 2011 6:33 am

John Marshall says: May 23, 2011 at 5:51 am
According to 971 scientists from 562 research institutions the MWP is a fact of history. This research covers 43 different countries, Northern and Southern hemispheres.

John, it would help your argument if you linked to the source:
http://www.co2science.org/data/mwp/mwpp.php

May 23, 2011 6:53 am

“The Pitt team found that equatorial regions of South America already are receiving less rainfall than at any point in the past millennium”
The only problem with this proposition is that it’s not true. We have monthly average Heights of the Rio Negro river at Manaus from January 1903 to December 1992 in metres, relative to an arbitrary reference point for example.
It has a rising trend of 9.23 mm/annum.

Don B
May 23, 2011 7:03 am

In Jasper Kirkby’s “Cosmic Rays and Climate,” on page 3 is a graph of Venezuelan Andes glacier growth and shrinkage for eleven hundred years.
http://aps.arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0804/0804.1938v1.pdf
The MWP and the LIA are obvious, as is the correlation with cosmic rays.

Alan the Brit
May 23, 2011 7:06 am

“By July 2007, when the sediment core was collected, there had been a steep, steady increase in dry conditions to a high point not surpassed since 1000.”
I’m sorry, are they saying this has happened before? Now there’s a surprise!

Kevin Schurig
May 23, 2011 7:06 am

Great, the drier period will be blamed on us in an attempt to weasel even more money out of us to give to those we have “screwed” through our causing AGW. As many have stated this report shows the world wide effect the MWP and LIA had, but that will be ignored in order to blame the industrialized nations for all the ills of the rest of the world. Fine, bring it on.

Mike
May 23, 2011 7:08 am

From the abstract: “Continued Northern Hemisphere and North Atlantic warming may therefore help perpetuate the recent reductions in SASM precipitation that characterize the last 100 years, which would negatively impact Andean water resources. ”
The article is clearly a wake up call that continued AGW will damage the region.
“Minimum δ18O values occurred during the Little Ice Age (LIA) between A.D. 1400 and 1820, reflecting a prolonged intensification of the SASM that was regionally synchronous. After the LIA, δ18O increased rapidly, particularly during the current warm period (CWP; A.D. 1900 to present), indicating a return to reduced SASM precipitation that was more abrupt and sustained than the onset of the MCA.” [MCA = medieval climate anomaly]

Gary Pearse
May 23, 2011 7:10 am

Interesting paper but no surprise to thinking scientists. The ludicrous position is that the LIA and MWP were “local” – this is a null hypothesis of a higher probability inference that such long-lasting and significnt events are global. Its a bit like sea ice in the Arctic being local until we make the surprising find that it also is to be found in the Antarctic (of course such a find then probably has them speculating there must be polar bears there too). Yet the CAGW types have no problem in pronouncing that that the future hell-on-earth with a 2C rise will be global. Yes, I’m happy they appear to have located the MWP and LIA in South America but I already predicted that myself.

Olen
May 23, 2011 7:15 am

I prefer BC rather than the new and not necessary BCE.

KnR
May 23, 2011 7:28 am

Of course the claim was that MWP was regional , but you notice no one side how big the region was just it was one . So as long as you can’t prove that the MWP existed in ever square cm of the planet , its ‘regional’ no matter how big the region . Climate science 101.

Tom T
May 23, 2011 7:56 am

Don’t count me as one who is happy to see no direct reference to AGW. Everything about this article implies that humans in the Northern Hemisphere are responsible for drought and probably every other bad thing that happens in the Southern Hemisphere.

1 2 3 4
Verified by MonsterInsights