
Our last story was about crabs, so is this one. I’m sure we’ll figure out a way to work in lobsters soon too. From the Stanford Linear ACcellerator Lab (SLAC):
Fermi’s Large Area Telescope Sees Surprising Flares in Crab Nebula
Menlo Park, Calif.—The Crab Nebula, one of our best-known and most stable neighbors in the winter sky, is shocking scientists with its propensity for fireworks—gamma-ray flares set off by the most energetic particles ever traced to a specific astronomical object. The discovery, reported today by scientists working with two orbiting telescopes, is leading researchers to rethink their ideas of how cosmic particles are accelerated.
“We were dumbfounded,” said Roger Blandford, who directs the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, jointly located at the Department of Energy’s SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Stanford University. “It’s an emblematic object,” he said. The Crab Nebula, also known as M1, was the first astronomical object catalogued in 1771 by Charles Messier. “It’s a big deal historically,” Blandford continued, “and we’re making an amazing discovery about it.”
Blandford was part of a KIPAC team led by scientists Rolf Buehler and Stefan Funk that used observations from the Large Area Telescope, one of two primary instruments aboard NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, to confirm one flare and discover another. Their report was posted online today in Science Express alongside a report from the Italian orbiting telescope Astro-rivelatore Gamma a Immagini LEggero, or AGILE, which also detected gamma-ray flares in the Crab Nebula.
The Crab Nebula, and the rapidly spinning neutron star that powers it, are the remnants of a supernova explosion documented by Chinese and Middle Eastern astronomers in 1054. After shedding much of its outer gases and dust, the dying star collapsed into a pulsar, a super-dense, rapidly spinning ball of neutrons. The Crab Nebula’s pulsar emits a pulse of radiation every 33 milliseconds, like clockwork.
Though it’s only 10 miles across, the amount of energy the pulsar releases is enormous, lighting up the Crab Nebula until it shines 75,000 times more brightly than the sun. Most of this energy is contained in a particle wind of energetic electrons and positrons traveling close to the speed of light. These electrons and positrons interact with magnetic fields and low-energy photons to produce the famous glowing tendrils of dust and gas Messier mistook for a comet over 200 years ago.
The particles are even forceful enough to produce the gamma rays the LAT normally observes during its regular surveys of the sky. But those particles did not cause the dramatic flares.
Each of the two flares the LAT observed lasted a few days before the Crab Nebula’s gamma-ray output returned to more normal levels. According to Funk, the short duration of the flares points to synchrotron radiation, or radiation emitted by electrons accelerating in the magnetic field of the nebula, as the cause. And not just any accelerated electrons: the flares were caused by super-charged electrons of up to 1015 electron volts, or 10 quadrillion electron volts, approximately 1,000 times more energetic than the protons accelerated by the Large Hadron Collider in Europe, the world’s most powerful man-made particle accelerator, and more than 15 orders of magnitude greater than photons of visible light.
“The strength of the gamma-ray flares shows us they were emitted by the highest-energy particles we can associate with any discrete astrophysical object,” Funk said.
Not only are the electrons surprisingly energetic, added Buehler, but, “the fact that the intensity is varying so rapidly means the acceleration has to happen extremely fast.” This challenges current theories about the way cosmic particles are accelerated. These theories cannot easily account for the extreme energies of the electrons or the speed with which they’re accelerated.
The discovery of the Crab Nebula’s gamma-ray flares raises one obvious question: how can the nebula do that? Obvious question, but no obvious answers. The KIPAC scientists all agree they need a closer look at higher resolutions and in a variety of wavelengths before they can make any definitive statements. The next time the Crab Nebula flares, the Fermi LAT team will not be the only team gathering data. They’ll need all the help they can get to decipher the mysteries of the Crab Nebula
“We thought we knew the essential ingredients of the Crab Nebula,” Funk said, “but that’s no longer true. It’s still surprising us.”
The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope was constructed through an astrophysics and particle physics partnership developed by NASA in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, along with important contributions from academic institutions and partners in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Sweden, and the United States. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory managed construction of the LAT and now plays the central role in science operations, data processing and making scientific data available to collaborators for analysis.
SLAC is a multi-program laboratory exploring frontier questions in photon science, astrophysics, particle physics and accelerator research. Located in Menlo Park, California, SLAC is operated by Stanford University for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science.
-30-
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I so enjoy the unexpected discoveries in science. It does cross my mind that an increase in cosmic rays could cause increased cloudiness, especially since the sun is being quiet.
Way out on a limb with no support… if the light from the star blowing reached the Earth in 1054, then there should have been an extended period of increased cosmic rays. Interesting that the Earth did start cooling right arround that period.
“We thought we knew the essential ingredients of the Crab Nebula,” Funk said, “but that’s no longer true. It’s still surprising us.”
Well durr, you know only 0,01% of the universe.
Problem ofcourse is timescale. No matter what we capture has no real meaning because it doesn’t exist anymore for a long long time. Our models based on it are therefore quite arbitrary. For all we know the universe ceased to exist long time ago and the background noise that reaches us still will dissipate in a few hundred billion years more.
All we have to show for it is a mess of interdependent calculations that by sheer coincidence seem to work because they ‘confirm’ what we see. But since what we see isn’t sure what is happening the calculations are bound to be right as long as they work out.
The chances they reflect ‘reality’ are infinitesimally small. Not that it matters since the chances we’ll be around another million years are zero.
Big fun to play with huge machines though.
Oh my god, the astronomers are dumbfounded yet again.
It can only happen if their models fail to predict what they see
Could it be that their models are wrong as well?
Since you mentioned lobsters, I searched the Internet for effect of AGW on lobsters. Some older hits show that AGW is causing both huge lobsters and killing lobsters. Once again, any and all observations can be attributed to AGW.
“Though it’s only 10 miles across, the amount of energy the pulsar releases is enormous, lighting up the Crab Nebula until it shines 75,000 times more brightly than the sun. ”
This puts things into perspective.
‘ These electrons and positrons interact with magnetic fields and low-energy photons to produce the famous glowing tendrils of dust and gas Messier mistook for a comet over 200 years ago.’
Messier did not mistake the ‘Crab Nebula’ for a comet, he created the Messier list so that in future, he and others would not mistake these ‘fixed’ misty patches for comets and waste time tracking them night to night to see if they moved against the background stars.
“The discovery of the Crab Nebula’s gamma-ray flares raises one obvious question: how can the nebula do that? Obvious question, but no obvious answers.”
One obvious answer is maybe it always does that!
Maybe at times when our suns activity falls to such a low state (like it has been recently) that it allows more cosmic rays to reach the Earth, therefor more phenomena like this can be easily detected & observed from Earth.
Someone Give S.E.T.I a ring!
10 miles across, how many manhattans is that?
It depends on how tall the glasses are. 😉
Ah well, the thousand-year war out there is heating up as the Prador deploy their gamma-ray weapons.
Maybe alittle infalling matter made it to the surface to cause the flares. Would most of the energy output of the neutron star travel outward along the magnetic poles & form jets? Seems I’ve seen time-elapse films (Hubble?) of small “jets” extending out each end of the star.
“We were dumbfounded,” said Roger Blandford…
Ever heard that from a climate “scientist”?
For those so inclined here is a link to a picture of the Lobster Nebula: http://cosmicphotos.com/gallery/image.php?fld_image_id=155&fld_album_id=11
The X-ray photo of the Crab Nebula is spectacular, and you can see just where the pulsar is from it:
http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2002/0052/0052_xray_widefield.jpg
The search for knowledge is part of our innate need to explore our surroundings. The cognitive bias that develops once we “believe” in a paradigm or a dogmatic interpretation is our greatest impediment to understanding.
btw I trust that the search for earth-impacting objects (and not just particles) continues as I see those asteroids and comets as a much greater threat to our civilization than any amount of climate change.
Messier cataloged his list of objects to avoid misidentifying and waste time investigating these as comets.
Party time for EU theory!!
Just wondering how many consensus were tipped over by this discovery…
Very Interesting. What was the source for the electrons? And another dumb question, if it is permitted, if neutrons from our sun are so difficult to detect from failing to interact with what ever is employed to detect them, how are they able to concentrate and turn so fast?
the_Butcher: You don’t have anywhere near enough zeroes after that decimal point.
Dude, it’s probably a mini black hole, sucking things in with irresistible gravity. Isn’t that the usual explanation for masses of high-energy being emitted from somewhere in space?
“The discovery of the Crab Nebula’s gamma-ray flares raises one obvious question: how can the nebula do that? Obvious question, but no obvious answers.”
How about: dark matter + dark energy = electromagetism
John Kehr says:
January 8, 2011 at 12:56 am
Way out on a limb with no support… if the light from the star blowing reached the Earth in 1054, then there should have been an extended period of increased cosmic rays. Interesting that the Earth did start cooling right arround that period.
======================================================
A long limb John!
If cosmic rays are assumed to travel at the speed of light then they would have left the Crab Nebula 6296 light years (check the WolframAlpha site) before the Crab was observed in 1054 !!
Could it be that “heavy” elements like iron and nickle are in the core of the neutron star? As they are in the core of the Earth — and the Sun, according to certain astrophysicists.