Pigs have been flying at AGU, apparently. All hope is lost for this organization. Get out while you can.
Grab an air sickness bag, then see this press release:
AGU Board adds new members with expertise in science policy and communication
AGU Release No. 10–39
15 November 2010
For Immediate Release
WASHINGTON—The American Geophysical Union’s board of directors has approved two new members who will bring expertise in science policy and communication: policy advisor Floyd DesChamps and author Chris Mooney. Their selection reflects AGU’s commitment to applying the results of scientific research to challenges faced by the global community, many of which are based in the geosciences.
Floyd DesChamps served as senior advisor on climate change to the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee from 1997 to 2009, and was a co-author of the landmark climate bill, the Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act (also called the McCain-Lieberman Climate Change Bill). He is currently a senior vice-president for the Alliance to Save Energy, where he develops the Alliance’s policy initiatives.
DesChamps has degrees in mechanical engineering and engineering management, and previously worked for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the U.S. Department of Energy.
Chris Mooney is a journalist and author of Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future (co-authored by Sheril Kirshenbaum) and “Do Scientists Understand the Public?” a report of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He co-writes a blog with Kirshenbaum called “The Intersection” at Discover magazine which covers science’s interactions with politics and other realms.
Mooney was a Knight Science Journalism Fellow at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology from 2009-2010 and a Templeton-Cambridge Fellow in Science and Religion in 2010.
AGU bylaws authorize appointment of up to two members of the Board in addition to those elected by the membership. President Michael J. McPhaden exercised that option in bringing DesChamps and Mooney to the Board for approval.
“Floyd and Chris will provide expert advice on how to effectively communicate the importance and relevance of Earth and space science to the public and policy makers,” said McPhaden. “We’re really excited about their involvement and what it means for new opportunities to advance AGU’s outreach efforts.”
AGU is a not-for-profit, professional, scientific organization with more than 58,000 members in over 135 countries. The organization advances the Earth and space sciences through its scholarly publications, conferences, and outreach programs. AGU is accessible on the Web.
===============================================================
Ok well here’s a few tidbits. Mr. Mooney is neither a scientist nor engineer, but an English major. He’s also just a kid who doesn’t seem to fit in well with this photo line up. In fact, they had to decolorize this photo to make it fit in even slightly.
He’s also an angry activist kid, with a mouthpiece, several actually.
Roger Pielke Jr. says this:
Last week my friend and colleague Dan Sarewitz tossed some red meat out on the table in the form of an essay in Slate on the apparent paucity of Republicans among the US scientific establishment. Sarewitz suggests that it is in the interests f the scientific community both to understand this situation and to seek greater diversity in its ranks, explaining that “the issue here is legitimacy, not literacy.”
Sarewitz’s essay has been followed by predictable responses (1,243 of them at Slate alone). Writing at MIT’s science journalism tracker Paul Raeburn offers this suggestively sinister critique:
And what is Sarewitz’s political affiliation, I wonder?
Since everyone else knows the answer to this, you’d think a journalist might have ways of figuring it out. Similarly sophomoric, Chris Mooney, in his characteristic us vs. them fashion, asks if Sarewitz will be joining the forces of evil:
Would Sarewitz himself like to become a Republican?
…
AGU recently appointed Chris Mooney to its Board. I am sure that Chris is a fine fellow, but appointing an English major who has written divisively about the “Republican War on Science” to help AGU oversee “science communication” is more than a little ironic, and unlikely to attract many Republican scientists to the institution, perhaps even having the opposite effect.
Yah, ya think?
This comment over on Phil Plait’s blog pretty well sums it up
semi Says:
Phil,
There is the Ophelia Benson case:
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2009/waist-deep-in-the-moral-slime/
The lockdown and moderation of comments on Mooney’s blog (which had the effect of preventing comments critical of Mooney’s handling of the “Tom Johnson” affair from being posted.)
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2010/07/08/housecleaning-note/
The sordid “Tom Johnson” affair in which Mooney ran with a sock puppet’s post as evidence for discrimination and general nastiness of scientists toward the religious (all fabricated) Mooney claimed he had “checked” the source out and was legitimate :
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/07/tom_johnson_fini.php
(You can wade through the comments if you want evidence of post moderation)
My feelings about Mooney is that based on the evidence I have seen, the negatives outweigh the positives in the “helping science” category. I have no ill-feelings about Mooney personally, and he might be a great guy. But as far as supporting science? Not so much. Ditto with the journalistic ethics.
Here’s the AGU fall meeting, maybe some people that run the outfit will come to their senses there. One can hope. I stopped getting Discover Magazine also as it has gone the way of NatGeo and SciAm. There’s just nothing in these magazines anymore that seems to be free of science politicization.
In fact, my family doesn’t get any magazines anymore, the recycling issue becomes much simpler when you have less glossy waste.
Gotta love AGU’s commitment to warmist science though, they have a rooftop weather station:
Only one problem:
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Read the titles of his books under the “Activist Kid” link and that’s enough to convince me that Mooney is more political partisan than anything else.
Dr. Mary Anne Carroll, one of the directors on the AGU board, was my first undergraduate research opportunity “mentors”. She is a wonderfully dedicated and well-respected atmospheric scientist from the University of Michigan. Mooney is perhaps qualified to get Dr. Carroll her coffee in the morning.
[At an AGU meeting, I enjoyed a beer and appetizer with Steve McIntyre. San Fran is a great place to congregate in December, weather is beautiful.]
Nice putsch.
We need a major legitimate breakaway science organisation that only deals with facts. THe Factual Sciences & Engineering Worldwide Body.
It could be worse. He could have majored in Environmental Studies.
Looks like they are clearly embarking in a new direction of agitprop. I’ll dump any society that would use my membership this way.
Mooney is getting a good gig and I hope he enjoys it while it lasts.
The AGW is in effect putting lipstick on a pig and I think will find out what it is like to try and housebreak the same.
Do all ‘professional organizations’ end being highjacked by leftist activisits?
Take a look at WORLDWIDE COLA temp maps and solar cycle 24 flux and SSN. Its becoming very apparent from last year as well that we are probably entering a solar minima with serious implications for the earth that is if it continues and enter a real ice age. The AGW crowd may need to be arrested. LOL!
I get the impression that the purpose of UrbaNet is to gather data to gain an understanding of urban micro-climate phenomena. In which case, one would want to know the temperature 10 meters above a roof. They have a purpose., just like airport weather stations that are for determining the weather at the runway so that aircraft can land and take-off safely. Why is anyone using this data in ways it was not intended, such as determining average global temperature? I used to yell at my son whenever he would grab the wrong tool to do something.
Mooney and DesChamps aren’t the only folks in the board that stand to benefit financially from AGW views… That page is a monument to money biasing science…
The AGU is plumbing new depths of being Stuck on Stupid . . . . really, really stupid.
A True Believer English Major . . . . how appropriate.
NASA’s newly appointed chief scientist is a AWG propagandist with a PhD. All of our institutions have been subverted for the cause. I canceled my subscription to IEEE Spectrum a few years back because I could not stand the spin.
All propaganda all the time. Just what Obama promised when he said restore science to it’s rightful position … As a propaganda arm of the AGW hoax.
Sheesh, do they think that everybody with a brain has died already?
Who is next to be invited on this board with a similar intellectual capacity as Mr Mooney?
Maybe Peter Sinclair of Climate Denial Crock of the Week fame, maybe George Monbiot of the Guardian or maybe Andy Revkin of NYT could complement Mr. Mooney.
The corruption of these scientific organizations is amazing and has reached astronomical levels. Members should revolt.
See Floyd at http://ase.org/efficiencynews/floyd-deschamps-joins-alliance-new-senior-vice-president-policy-and-research – Since he doesn’t have anyone to influence in Congress any more, now he gets to steer the AGU in its dealing with Congress!
> Grab an air sickness bag, ….
I didn’t think it could be that bad, but it’s worse than I thought. Sigh.
… Or liberal art…. Although Journalism and English are almost the same thing (I know because my Telecommunications degree isn’t that far off).
Went over to Mooney’s blog and found this on NY State’s moratorium on fracking, which is done to extract shale oil. Here is what he said:
“Meanwhile, right wingers are hurling the phrase “junk science” to attack the fracking moratorium (see this comments thread). But of course, being cautious in the face of uncertainty is hardly junk science. Unless “junk science” is code for “reasonableness,” which is often the impression I’m left with.”
Being cautious in the face of uncertainty is hardly junk science. That’s quite a statement considering Mooney’s complete faith in AGW computer modeling and his disparaging comments about those who don’t share his certainty.
Who knew the AGU was so easily impressed with silly hypocrisy.
A roof-top weather station!
I like how you saved the best, for last.
Reason enough to drop AGU and join a more promising group.
Oh…, Anthony!
Don’t lose heart with this ‘Van Jones wanna be’ coming into that arena of Science!!! (But,
Wowie Zowie!!! I admit it’s time to re-think membership!) But, now EVERYONE is gonna see what ‘they’ are putting up as Scientists!!!
Isn’t that GLORIOUS!!!!!!!!!! I mean, can you IMAGINE, this guy standing and taking questions from……….ANYONE?????? All someone would have to do is ask him where he got and WHAT he got his degree/s in!!!
hahaha………BIG GUNS they’re pulling out, indeed!!! hahaha!!! Now, Anthony….could YOU bring ‘anyone you know’ to a forum and NOT BE EMBARRASSED by their credentials?????? huh???????? Jus’ THINK ABOUT WHO YOU KNOW and then put them up against ‘this BLOKE’. hahaha………. this is simply further proof that ‘they’ drink their own fluoridated kool-aid…….ohhhhhh hahaha….wait till Sir C of M here’s of this……… hahaha…..
Shall we expect Joe Romm and George Monbiot to be elected next time? Or maybe tender aged Chris Colose or John Cook?
Exactly, Darren! GREAT THOUGHT. Is someone else doing that???
Why don’t you guys put together a REALLY KICK ASS organization???
I promise I wouldn’t even TRY to join it. I’d just cheer lead for you all.
C.L. Thorpe
C’mon now, give them a break.
Every scientific organization needs experienced propagandists on their board.
In my experience, scientists lean left and engineers lean right.
What surprised me most when I first began working at an engineering and research organization is what a consensus process science was (at least where I worked). I thought original research was all observation and math, but most of it seemed to be passing data sheets down the hall, office by office, to see if your fellow scientists agree (especially the guys controlling funding).
Engineers, on the other hand, actually have to build things that don’t kill people.
Hmmm, loading up with apparatchiks. Lysenko would smile.
I would have thought Geophysicists would have made good candidates. Buyt, hey, what do I know, I’m not a climate scientist.
Well, every good “agency” and every good “organization” will need a Politbureau member at the board meetings to assure that everything goes as planned…
So having someone “gifted” at such “comunications” issues all makes sense.
BTW, I no longer buy SciAm, nor Nat Geo, nor Discover. Same reason as above. Too many times the BS-o-Meter clanging about bias presented as information…