I have been remiss at posting reviews on several books that people have sent me. I hope to get some of them up in the next week. Dr. Spencer’s announcement below is a start, though his is the one book I don’t have. – Anthony
============
The Great Global Warming Blunder: How Mother Nature Fooled the World’s Top Climate Scientists
By Dr. Roy Spencer

Today (April 20) is the official release date of my new book entitled: “The Great Global Warming Blunder: How Mother Nature Fooled the World’s Top Climate Scientists“, published by Encounter Books.
About one-half of Blunder is a non-technical description of our new peer reviewed and soon-to-be-published research which supports the opinion that a majority of Americans already hold: that warming in recent decades is mostly due to a natural cycle in the climate system — not to an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide from fossil fuel burning.
Believe it or not, this potential natural explanation for recent warming has never been seriously researched by climate scientists. The main reason they have ignored this possibility is that they cannot think of what might have caused it.
You see, climate researchers are rather myopic. They think that the only way for global-average temperatures to change is for the climate system to be forced ‘externally’…by a change in the output of the sun, or by a large volcanic eruption. These are events which occur external to the normal, internal operation of the climate system.
But what they have ignored is the potential for the climate system to cause its own climate change. Climate change is simply what the system does, owing to its complex, dynamic, chaotic internal behavior.
As I travel around the country, I find that the public instinctively understands the possibility that there are natural climate cycles. Unfortunately, it is the climate “experts” who have difficulty grasping the concept. This is why I am taking my case to the public in this book. The climate research community long ago took the wrong fork in the road, and I am afraid that it might be too late for them to turn back.
NATURE’S SUNSHADE: CLOUDS
The most obvious way for warming to be caused naturally is for small, natural fluctuations in the circulation patterns of the atmosphere and ocean to result in a 1% or 2% decrease in global cloud cover. Clouds are the Earth’s sunshade, and if cloud cover changes for any reason, you have global warming — or global cooling.
How could the experts have missed such a simple explanation? Because they have convinced themselves that only a temperature change can cause a cloud cover change, and not the other way around. The issue is one of causation. They have not accounted for cloud changes causing temperature changes.
The experts have simply mixed up cause and effect when observing how clouds and temperature vary. The book reveals a simple way to determine the direction of causation from satellite observations of global average temperature and cloud variations. And that new tool should fundamentally change how we view the climate system.
Blunder also addresses a second major mistake that results from ignoring the effect of natural cloud variations on temperature: it results in the illusion that the climate system is very sensitive. The experts claim that, since our climate system is very sensitive, then our carbon dioxide emissions are all that is needed to explain global warming. There is no need to look for alternative explanations.
But I show that the experts have merely reasoned themselves in a circle on this subject. When properly interpreted, our satellite observations actually reveal that the system is quite IN-sensitive. And an insensitive climate system means that nature does not really care whether you travel by jet, or how many hamburgers or steaks you eat.
CARBON DIOXIDE: FRIEND OR FOE?
The supposed explanation that global warming is due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide from our burning of fossil fuels turns out to be based upon little more than circumstantial evidence. It is partly a symptom of our rather primitive understanding of how the climate system works.
And I predict that the proposed cure for global warming – reducing greenhouse gas emissions – will someday seem as outdated as using leeches to cure human illnesses.
Nevertheless, despite the fact that scientific knowledge is continually changing, it is increasingly apparent that the politicians are not going to let little things like facts get in their way. For instance, a new draft climate change report was released by the U.S. yesterday (April 19) which, in part, says: “Global warming is unequivocal and primarily human-induced … Global temperature has increased over the past 50 years. This observed increase is due primarily to human-induced emissions of heat-trapping gases.”
You see, the legislative train left the station many years ago, and no amount of new science will slow it down as it accelerates toward its final destination: forcibly reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
But in Blunder I address what other scientists should have the courage to admit: that maybe putting more CO2 in the atmosphere is a good thing. Given that it is necessary for life on Earth, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is surprisingly small. We already know that nature is gobbling up 50% of what humanity produces, no matter how fast we produce it. So, it is only logical to address the possibility that nature — that life on Earth — has actually been starved for carbon dioxide.
This should give you some idea of the major themes of my new book. I am under no illusion that the book will settle the scientific debate over global warming.
To the contrary — I am hoping the debate will finally begin.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I just finished reading Dr Roy Spencer’s book “The Great Global Warming Blunder” and I highly recommend it to warmistas and skeptics alike because it is clearly written, short and to the point. I enjoyed it and it has given me a lot to think about.
I see it is selling very well. #78 a few minutes ago.
I will buy one and send it to Michael Mann. I may have to ‘splain it to him.
So the warmers grabbed the term “Climate Change” not knowing that’s earth’s modus operandi? And these guys are being taken seriously as “scientists”?? I recommend they go back to their alma mater and ask for their tuition back.
I just finished Pat Michaels’ and Robert Balling’s Climate of Extremes and I was trying to decide what to read next… Looks like a trip to Barnes & Noble this weekend is in order.
No Kindle version as of yet. 🙁
The inability to model clouds accurately is the Achilles Heel of GCMs.
Harry Chance,
Mann might turn the book on its side and confuse the pages with tree rings.
“You see, the legislative train left the station many years ago, and no amount of new science will slow it down as it accelerates toward its final destination: forcibly reducing greenhouse gas emissions”
you could substitute “forcibly increasing taxes”.
I think we have a bestseller here, on climatology.
Imagine that.
“that life on Earth — has actually been starved for carbon dioxide.”
If the politicians looked down at the old growth wood found in their multi-thousand dollar desks and asked why the tree rings were so close together 200 hundred years ago…. alas
Read up on how “radiation fog” occurs. A fascinating example of how water vapour in the atmosphere interacts with changing surface temperature.
It seems this book covers everything that I have discovered in the past 8 months or so after I decided to see for myself what evidence there are is about CO2 causing global warming…
I wonder if Dr R Spencer could clear this is up (he may have already). Is the current high trend UHA temp data based mainly on one extreme hot spot over Canada/NH?
http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/execute.csh?amsutemps
because the rest of the world is not showing any warming at all!
See COLA. analysis of current conditions etc… climate. One would presume that if this is the case the data would be pretty useless (That is ONE very hotspot responsible for all the average world temps)
http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/global_warming.png
“the climate system to cause its own climate change. Climate change is simply what the system does”
This is the best explanation I’ve yet seen to explain everything!
Very good. At least he can be proud of the humble title of conservationist. It only took killing one tree for his proxies.
Did he pay the tree for using it in his picture?
Joe Romm also has a new book out. When I first checked, it ranked 39,499 on Amazon. If he has purchased the obligatory 2 dozen for friends and family, he may spike at a rank as high as 2,000th.
Dear Dr. Spencer, I have not read your book yet, but followed your reasoning about clouds as cause of temperature changes.
Cloud cover is the biggest problem of current models (together with the effect of aerosols) and that is what makes the wide range in output, including the non-prediction of any natural cycle between 1 and 100 years.
I will buy the book anyway!
“that life on Earth — has actually been starved for carbon dioxide.”
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/tables/elabund.html
Plenty of oxygen atoms, but so little Carbon. Humans and animals and plants use so much of it. Why Carbon? Why does life on Earth base itself around this scarce element?
Competition, I suppose, amongst the species for who controls the Carbon.
So, why the rush to bury all the Carbon, thereby extinguishing as much life on Earth as possible?
Tough questions.
Spencer says “The climate research community long ago took the wrong fork in the road, and I am afraid that it might be too late for them to turn back.”
These folks didn’t just wake up one morning and decide that (a) this approach would be fun, (b) they could shill some good research dollars, or (c) both.
These are true believers who actually buy into the end-of-the-world stuff that we lampoon, and who also see this as a great way to re-engineer society away from dreaded fossil fuels & onwards to something else, all the while instituting new government controls.
They won’t go into the night quietly, I can guarantee that much. I’m in and amongst these types in my chosen field of public health, and even a glacier plopping down on top of the Sahara would be due to “climate change.”
Check out the presentation slides from Dr. John Holdren’s talk at the Chicago Grand Challenges Summit, I can’t recommend them enough for you folks to see where the Obama administration is taking this (nowhere that you want to go, believe me):
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/04/22/ostp-director-holdren-keynotes-engineering-academy-summit
The counterpart to this myopia, is the myopic use of Lyell’s uniformitarianism… “The present is key to the past.”
It always seems to be assumed that since greenhouse gases are driving modern climate changes, they must have driven past changes. Yet, it’s plainly obvious in the geologic record that CO2 and GHG’s have never driven climate change at time during the Phanerozoic Eon… Yet it’s assumed that they did, because it “fits the narrative.”
The assumed modern GHG driver is evidence for a paleo GHG driver.
The assumed paleo GHG driver is then used as evidence for a modern GHG driver. It’s a circular calculation error.
Excellent. I will put this on my reading list.
After watching “Not evil just wrong” last night, this book will be next.
Here’s a quote from Hansen in that movie:
“I’m not going to use McIntyre’s name, I don’t think he deserves the publicity but I can make some statement … Unfortunately the public does not have the scientific background to interpret whether or not it’s important and the same thing happened recently with the fellow from Canada who found a flaw in our data record of temperature stations.”
You may have to read it twice. What it basically says is:
1. The public, me, you, all of us, except the warmists, are simply to stupid to understand.
2. Errors found have no significance at all, but the finders are nothing but confusing ordinary people, distract them from the real thread.
And then compare the other persons contributing on both sides. Great movie.
RE Ted Dooley (11:18:17) :
“If the politicians looked down at the old growth wood found in their multi-thousand dollar desks and asked why the tree rings were so close together 200 hundred years ago…. alas”
Well, that might be a problem, because they use tropical hardwoods in that furniture.
The AGW movement isn’t even about reducing C02. It’s a swirling vortex of Marxist/Communist Ideologues, Religious zealots, anti Capitalist/ Anti American /Anti Industrial Nutballs, Rent seekers and idiots. Did I forget anyone?
Bravo Dr. Spencer:
“The most obvious way for warming to be caused naturally is for small, natural fluctuations in the circulation patterns of the atmosphere and ocean to result in a 1% or 2% decrease in global cloud cover. Clouds are the Earth’s sunshade, and if cloud cover changes for any reason, you have global warming — or global cooling. […] they have convinced themselves that only a temperature change can cause a cloud cover change, and not the other way around. […] They have not accounted for cloud changes causing temperature changes. […] ignoring the effect of natural cloud variations on temperature […] results in the illusion that the climate system is very sensitive.”
I would advise them to show:
a) more respect for nature.
b) less obsession with anthropogenic computer fantasies.