Voyager tells us we live in a "fluffy" interstellar cloud

December 23, 2009: The solar system is passing through an interstellar cloud that physics says should not exist. In the Dec. 24th issue of Nature, a team of scientists reveal how NASA’s Voyager spacecraft have solved the mystery.

see caption“Using data from Voyager, we have discovered a strong magnetic field just outside the solar system,” explains lead author Merav Opher, a NASA Heliophysics Guest Investigator from George Mason University. “This magnetic field holds the interstellar cloud together and solves the long-standing puzzle of how it can exist at all.”

Right: Voyager flies through the outer bounds of the heliosphere en route to interstellar space. A strong magnetic field reported by Opher et al in the Dec. 24, 2009, issue of Nature is delineated in yellow. Image copyright 2009, The American Museum of Natural History. [larger image]

The discovery has implications for the future when the solar system will eventually bump into other, similar clouds in our arm of the Milky Way galaxy.

Astronomers call the cloud we’re running into now the Local Interstellar Cloud or “Local Fluff” for short. It’s about 30 light years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms at a temperature of 6000 C. The existential mystery of the Fluff has to do with its surroundings. About 10 million years ago, a cluster of supernovas exploded nearby, creating a giant bubble of million-degree gas. The Fluff is completely surrounded by this high-pressure supernova exhaust and should be crushed or dispersed by it.

“The observed temperature and density of the local cloud do not provide enough pressure to resist the ‘crushing action’ of the hot gas around it,” says Opher.

So how does the Fluff survive? The Voyagers have found an answer.

“Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*,” says Opher. “This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure required to resist destruction.”

see caption

Above: An artist’s concept of the Local Interstellar Cloud, also known as the “Local Fluff.” Credit: Linda Huff (American Scientist) and Priscilla Frisch (University of Chicago) [more]

NASA’s two Voyager probes have been racing out of the solar system for more than 30 years. They are now beyond the orbit of Pluto and on the verge of entering interstellar space—but they are not there yet.

“The Voyagers are not actually inside the Local Fluff,” says Opher. “But they are getting close and can sense what the cloud is like as they approach it.”

The Fluff is held at bay just beyond the edge of the solar system by the sun’s magnetic field, which is inflated by solar wind into a magnetic bubble more than 10 billion km wide. Called the “heliosphere,” this bubble acts as a shield that helps protect the inner solar system from galactic cosmic rays and interstellar clouds. The two Voyagers are located in the outermost layer of the heliosphere, or “heliosheath,” where the solar wind is slowed by the pressure of interstellar gas.

Voyager 1 entered the heliosheath in Dec. 2004; Voyager 2 followed almost 3 years later in Aug. 2007. These crossings were key to Opher et al‘s discovery.

see captionRight: The anatomy of the heliosphere. Since this illustration was made, Voyager 2 has joined Voyager 1 inside the heliosheath, a thick outer layer where the solar wind is slowed by the pressure of interstellar gas. Credit: NASA/Walt Feimer. [larger image]

The size of the heliosphere is determined by a balance of forces: Solar wind inflates the bubble from the inside while the Local Fluff compresses it from the outside. Voyager’s crossings into the heliosheath revealed the approximate size of the heliosphere and, thus, how much pressure the Local Fluff exerts. A portion of that pressure is magnetic and corresponds to the ~5 microgauss Opher’s team has reported in Nature.

The fact that the Fluff is strongly magnetized means that other clouds in the galactic neighborhood could be, too. Eventually, the solar system will run into some of them, and their strong magnetic fields could compress the heliosphere even more than it is compressed now. Additional compression could allow more cosmic rays to reach the inner solar system, possibly affecting terrestrial climate and the ability of astronauts to travel safely through space. On the other hand, astronauts wouldn’t have to travel so far because interstellar space would be closer than ever. These events would play out on time scales of tens to hundreds of thousands of years, which is how long it takes for the solar system to move from one cloud to the next.

“There could be interesting times ahead!” says Opher.

To read the original research, look in the Dec. 24, 2009, issue of Nature for Opher et al’s article, “A strong, highly-tilted interstellar magnetic field near the Solar System.”

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

224 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
December 26, 2009 10:04 am

The magnetization is worse than we thought.
I believe I will set up a market in Fe2O3 Credits and become a billionaire.

Allan M
December 26, 2009 10:06 am

“There could be interesting times ahead!” says Opher.
Good!
(But not as in the Chinese proverb, I hope)

John
December 26, 2009 10:09 am

Interesting, but how does this have any bearing on our climate and ice age cycle?
REPLY: Why does it have to? Science for its own sake is enough don’t you think? – A

December 26, 2009 10:14 am

Very interesting!

December 26, 2009 10:18 am

REPLY: Why does it have to? Science for its own sake is enough don’t you think? – A
Couldn’t agree more!
This is very interesting indeed – one wonders what will happen to the stalwart Voyagers when they enter this Fluff.
It is in any case utterly amazing that after 3 decades these small objects of human ingenuity are still sending back data, leading to these astonishing discoveries.
They’re a credit to their makers – and one also wonders if anything built today would stand the test of time as these two voyagers have don.

geo
December 26, 2009 10:19 am

John (10:09:06):
Try reading that top thingy that no doubt your eyes pass over without seeing every time you come here:
“Commentary on puzzling things in life, nature, science, weather, climate change, technology, and recent news by Anthony Watts”
That WUWT is most famous for its Climate Change pieces does not mean that is all it is meant to report on.

December 26, 2009 10:20 am

So we are just detecting the “REAL Climate drivers” with the study of these interactions, and the rest of the heliopauses around other stars in the neighborhood. We should get a better forecast of the long term changes, in our local climate as the Earth gets to absorb the buffeting action, of the sun’s heliopause pushing against the local galactic wind turbulence, and clouds.

noaaprogrammer
December 26, 2009 10:22 am

Would this magnetic field have anything to do with calming down our sun?

Bruce
December 26, 2009 10:24 am

Since the heliosphere is compressable, it does not have to be the same size all the time. Therefore there is probably periods when it is bigger and smaller. Therefore cosmic ray intensity can get bigger or smaller.
That can affect climate.

anna v
December 26, 2009 10:26 am

Interesting. Leif has been explaining how the plasma carries the magnetic field, so it seems one more case of this.

December 26, 2009 10:28 am

Eventually, the solar system will run into some of them, and their strong magnetic fields could compress the heliosphere even more than it is compressed now. Additional compression could allow more cosmic rays to reach the inner solar system, possibly affecting terrestrial climate
I don’t think this is correct. Cosmic rays are scattered away from the inner solar system by compression regions in the solar wind including the big one at the edge of the heliosphere, so I think that a more compressed heliosphere would mean less cosmic rays. Also, think of the opposite scenario: slowly take away the solar wind until in the end there is no heliosphere. That would IMHO lead to an increase in cosmic rays.

Richard deSousa
December 26, 2009 10:28 am

We sure got our moneys worth with those two Voyager satellites. They don’t make them any more like that!

December 26, 2009 10:31 am

How long until we travel interstellar space, humans that is? I would love to travel on a huge ship as a tourist/photographer. It’s a dream, but reality says we way behind on the technology needed to conduct/survive such travel, we only live 80+ yrs if we’re healthy. Oh well maybe when my baby boy has grandkids.

DeNihilist
December 26, 2009 10:32 am

Thanx Anthony. Love this stuff, especially the “hundreds of thousands years…”
details. Really helps to expand the mind!

Doug in Seattle
December 26, 2009 10:41 am

At 6000 degrees I certainly hope our sun’s magnetic field is able to push it aside or otherwise deflect it’s effects. Or perhaps it already is?

Curiousgeorge
December 26, 2009 10:42 am

smallz79 (10:31:09) :
“How long until we travel interstellar space, humans that is?”
We already are. Can you imagine a more efficient and effective interstellar “spacecraft” than our solar system? 🙂

L. Gardy LaRoche
December 26, 2009 10:42 am

From a theoretical point of view where Electricity and plasma would be the dominant shaping forces in Space ( instead of Gravity), this observation is completely understandable.
Some suggested reading on the a Plasma Universe by Donald Scott:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Electric-Sky-ebook/dp/B002NGO5MI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1260152677&sr=1-1
http://members.cox.net/dascott3/index.htm
http://www.mcssl.com/SecureCart/ViewCart.aspx?sctoken=cf4a408e6ccf4e99b83873ab8db7f3fd&mid=576CF27A-22F6-404A-A498-4FB6FC46C951&bhcp=1

anna v
December 26, 2009 10:49 am

noaaprogrammer (10:22:14) :
Would this magnetic field have anything to do with calming down our sun?
No, the short answer. Reason: not enough energy in this “fluff”, and the magnetic field it carries . Everything boils down to energy.

Bart
December 26, 2009 10:50 am

noaaprogrammer (10:22:14)
I don’t know, but my first impression is that microGauss is a pretty small unit.
Viv Evans (10:18:13) :
“…one also wonders if anything built today would stand the test of time as these two voyagers have don.”
It is a, literally, stellar achievement. If I could work on such a project and see it succeed so spectacularly, I would die fulfilled.
The stuff built today is generally more capable, but that added capability can also be a liability. Older discrete components tend to hold up better in a high radiation environment. There is little doubt we have the ability to build more capable spacecraft which will last just as long or longer. It is just a question of the funds that would be allocated to do it right.

James F. Evans
December 26, 2009 10:54 am

“This magnetic field holds the interstellar cloud together and solves the long-standing puzzle of how it can exist at all.” — Merav Opher, a NASA Heliophysics Guest Investigator from George Mason University
Fine.
But more important is what causes the magnetic field in the first place and what determines its strength?
There was no mention of plasma, charged particles, free electrons and ions or the results when plasma flows from one region to another.
Without discussion of plasma and its properties and characteristics, the article is incomplete.
Science knows what causes magnetic fields in plasma based on laboratory experiments.
Why doesn’t the article touch on these known and established principles?

JonesII
December 26, 2009 10:55 am

L. Gardy LaRoche (10:42:11) : The next is the “astrophisics-gate”. Russian hackers are already working on it to reveal all secrets of western “Hollywood science”. Gotta buy some extra pop-corn!

Clive
December 26, 2009 10:56 am

Pretty cool information. We don’t know a lot do we? Lots to learn and a lot of it will never affect us … like we could actually do something about it, eh? Just interesting stuff.
I remember over fifty years ago, sleeping outside in the mountains and looking up at the stars and … well, just wondering like where the heck are we? You all now what I mean. And today when we are camping in remote places the stars are spectacular and I look up at the cosmos and … well .. I am still wondering. ☺
Makes me misty thinking about this stuff.
Thanks for the article.

Mark Fawcett
December 26, 2009 10:57 am

REPLY: Why does it have to? Science for its own sake is enough don’t you think? – A
Hear, hear! The Voyager programme was one of the reasons I became fascinated by cosmology, space and science in general. This subsequently led me on to obtain a BSc in Astrophysics and, as an amateur astronomer, to keep a life-long interest in the subject.
Cheers
Mark

Matt O
December 26, 2009 10:59 am

“We sure got our moneys worth with those two Voyager satellites. They don’t make them any more like that!”
The remnants of a free society which beleived investing in the future was better of use of resources than chasing an elusive utopia.

Dev
December 26, 2009 11:00 am

I’d love to hear Svensmark comment on this. These revelations may add much to the climate changes predicted by his innovative cosmic ray theory…

1 2 3 9