On the Vikings and Greenland

Discussions on the Viking settlements on Greenland are seen from time to time on WUWT, and its is often in the context of the Medieval Warm Period. While this article from the University of Alberta is a few years old, I thought I’d provide it for our readers interest.

The Viking farm under the sand in Greenland

by Terese Brasen

in Greenlandin Greenland


April 23, 2001 – In 1991, two caribou hunters stumbled over a log on a snowy Greenland riverbank, an unusual event because Greenland is above the tree line. Closer investigation uncovered rock-hard sheep droppings. The hunters had stumbled on a 500-year-old Viking farm that lay hidden beneath the sand, gift-wrapped and preserved by nature for future archaeologists.

Gården under Sandet or GUS, Danish for ‘the farm under the sand,’ would become the first major Viking find in Greenland since the 1920s.

“GUS is beautifully preserved because, once it was buried, it was frozen,” explained University of Alberta anthropologist Dr. Charles Schweger. “Things that are perishable and normally disappear are found at GUS.”

A specialist in Arctic paleo-ecology and geo-archeology, Schweger joined the international archaeological team that would spend the next seven years sifting through sand at GUS.

The famous Viking, Eric the Red, probably didn’t know where he was headed when, adrift on the North Atlantic in AD 981, he bumped into the southern coast of Greenland. Eric returned to Iceland three years later and enticed about 500 fellow Vikings to follow him and settle the new country.

“The Norse arrived in Greenland 1,000 years ago and became very well established,” said Schweger, describing the Viking farms and settlements that crowded the southeast and southwest coasts of Greenland for almost 400 years.

“The Greenland settlements were the most distant of all European medieval sites in the world,” said Schweger. “Then the Norse disappear, and the question has always been: what happened?”

Time was not on the archaeological team’s side. Earlier digs had explored the southern tip of Greenland, the most settled area of the country where Eric the Red first landed. These early digs merely scratched the surface because the archaeologists were interested in the buildings and architecture, not what lay beneath. The GUS site was up the West Coast, deep inside a fjord. The river was advancing, swallowing the site, so it was important to act quickly.

The University of Alberta, Greenland and the Danish government combined resources and pushed ahead on the first Greenland excavation since the 1930s. The team would excavate the complete site, looking at the entire history and development of the farm, not just the surface buildings.

Schweger recalls vividly the day the team uncovered GUS. Smells frozen in permafrost for 500 years exploded into the air. “It stunk to high heavens,” said Schweger. “There was no question about this being a farm.”

The Viking ships that had brought Icelandic adventurers to Greenland may have been mini versions of Noah’s Ark with sheep, goats, horses and Vikings sharing the crowded space. The Greenland Vikings raised sheep and fabricated woollen garments. The centre of the farm was a typical Viking longhouse, the communal building where Vikings gathered around the fire. The settlement flourished. In the North Atlantic, walrus, seal and whale were abundant and the Greenlanders made rope from walrus hide and controlled the European walrus tusk market.

Every summer, the team raced against the river. In 1998, when researchers finally abandoned GUS to the river, 90 per cent of the site had been excavated. Artifacts packaged and taken to the lab include pieces of cloth and sheep combs used to remove wool without shearing the animal. The site gave up metal hinges, locks, keys and wooden barrels. The Vikings appear to have traded their northern wares for metal and wooden products unavailable in Greenland. For them, a trip to Iceland or Norway was like a shopping spree at Home Hardware.

We know about Eric the Red and the Greenland settlement because years after the Vikings had given up their pagan ways, Snorri Sturluson collected Viking stories and penned the Icelandic sagas. “The Icelanders wrote everything down,” said Schweger, puzzled that the literature says nothing about what happened to the Norse in Greenland.

What did happen? Theories abound. In his 1963 book, Early Voyages and Northern Approaches, Tryggvi Oleson proposed a theory that still has some credibility. He believed the Vikings and northern aboriginal people intermarried to produce the unique Thule people, ancestors of the modern Eskimo.

One reigning expert on Norse extinction in Greenland is Dr. Thomas McGovern from City University of New York. McGovern is also chair of the North Atlantic Biocultural Organization, an international research association interested in the relationship between changing climate and people in the North Atlantic. He believes the Norse did not adapt completely to Greenland because they never adopted Inuit ring-seal hunting techniques. The Inuit used buoys or floats and hunted ring seal from kayaks or through the ice. These techniques do not appear in Norse culture. McGovern and other paleo-ecologists also believe the Norse were poor farmers.

But Schweger says the evidence comes from the southern or eastern settlement where the excavations only looked at the surface. “There is a lot of sediment thrown around, and it suggests to these researchers that the Norse were poor farmers. The theory is poor agricultural practices caused the sod to break up, and the winds eroded this and blew sand all over the landscape.”

While Danish and Greenland researchers look at GUS buildings and artifacts, the U of A’s role is to study organic material. Cross-sections of the GUS soil contain evidence that challenge McGovern’s theories and offer brand-new understanding of the Vikings in Greenland.

“The ring seal is only one species of seal. The Norse hunted everything else–walrus, whales, harbour seals,” Schweger said, moving quickly to part two of his McGovern challenge. The argument that the Vikings were poor farmers doesn’t make sense upon close examination of the GUS organic material. “There is no evidence that they were destroying their fields. Quite the opposite. They were improving upon them.”

It is not surprising that the Greenland Vikings chose to farm at the mouth of a fjord. The Vikings who settled Iceland and later moved to Greenland were originally from Norway, where farming technology grew up around fjords. The centre of a fjord farm is a meadow where animals graze during winter months.

Cross-sections of the GUS soil show the Vikings began their settlement by burning off birch brush to form a meadow. Over the next 300 to 400 years, the meadow soil steadily improved its nutritional qualities, showing that the Greenland Vikings weren’t poor farmers, as McGovern and others have suggested. “At GUS, the amount of organic matter and the quality of soil increased and sustained farming for 400 years,” said Schweger. “If they were poor farmers, then virtually all the farming in North America is poor farming.”

Schweger believes the sand that packaged and preserved GUS also ruined the site, polluting the river the Vikings relied on for fresh water. The soil was healthy and nutritious. Then, suddenly, farming stopped and the soil was encapsulated in sand.

A massive ice sheet covers about 85 per cent of Greenland, about 2,600,000 cubic kilometres of ice–enough to raise sea levels by 6.4 metres if it were to melt. Sheets of ice sliding down the mountain toward GUS may have pushed sand over the eastern coast of Greenland, burying the Viking settlements. The sand slide was probably a major catastrophic event, comparable to an earthquake.

The Danish Antiquity Society will publish the GUS findings once the international lab results have been tabulated and debated. The team that sifted through sand summer after summer may tell the world new stories about the Vikings who farmed and traded in the North Atlantic then suddenly, and inexplicably, disappeared.

Related story:

Related link – internal

Address of this ExpressNews article:

http://www.expressnews.ualberta.ca/article.cfm?id=776

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

71 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 26, 2009 9:42 am

Here is a 200 page thesis, 1997. A detailed archeology paper from U of Alberta
University of Alberta Paleoethnobotanical Investigation of Garden Under Sandet, a Waterlogged Norse Farm Site. Western Set~lement. Greenland
http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp04/mq22551.pdf
Page 51(of the pdf) discusses climate.

jlc
October 26, 2009 9:43 am

Thank you, Terese – what a fantastic story!

James H
October 26, 2009 9:50 am

Could there be a hint early in the story, where it says that hunters stumbled over a log, which was strange because Greenland is above the treeline? Wouldn’t the same changes that put Greenland above the treeline make it difficult to farm? After mentioning this, the story departs in other directions, missing the simplest explanation.

October 26, 2009 9:58 am

It’s easy to lose sight of how long the Vikings were on Greenland. To put the Viking presence on Greenland into perspective, their tenure there was about the same length as Anglo-Saxon settlement in North America from Jamestown to the present.

Stephen
October 26, 2009 10:10 am

If farm smells appered after thawing, wouldn’t it imply that the area was quickly frozen?

October 26, 2009 10:31 am

Very informative

austin
October 26, 2009 10:32 am

It does not have to be quickly frozen, just never unfroze one winter or was buried in winter…

October 26, 2009 10:44 am

Here a link to most important historical events of the vikings in greenland:
http://www.greenland-guide.gl/leif2000/history.htm

October 26, 2009 10:50 am

“Cross-sections of the GUS soil show the Vikings began their settlement by burning off birch brush to form a meadow.”
Birch no longer grows in Greenland. None. Zip zero. However it even grew in East Greenland (where Vikings didn’t settle, that we know of,) during the MWP, and recent melting of glaciers in East Greenland has revealed crushed birches.
It was the talk of the current warming in Greenland being “unprecedented” that originally woke me from my slumber, and made me doubt the “science” of some Alarmists.
What irked me most was that the hard work of a lot of archeologists was just plain thrown under the bus, because it got in the way of the attempt to make the MWP disappear.
I can’t help chuckle when politicians go up to Greenland and look about with round eyes. What dunces! However it is good for the local economy. Guiding politicians about sure beats freezing your toes off, hunting caribou. Unfortunately the caribou herds are now not culled enough, and overpopulation and winter-starvation is a problem.

Philip_B
October 26, 2009 10:53 am

‘Covered in sand’ sounds like glacial outwash/terminal moraine material.
If so, its likely the site was abandoned well before the sand was deposited, and the scenario would have been climate cools and too cold for farming, glacier advances over an extended period (centuries?), site covered in sand when the glacier advances close to site.
Also, the preservation indicates very rapid cooling and the area becoming permafrost within a single or a few years. Farming on permafrost land wouldn’t be possible. When permafrost melts on the surface it becomes a bog.
The views of a glaciologist who has seen the site would be interesting.

Alan the Brit
October 26, 2009 11:24 am

Very interesting! Well done.

Philip T. Downman
October 26, 2009 11:26 am

Remember when the settlement dissappeared. Some time around 1350. What happened then?
Many settlements became devasted at that time due to bubonic plague – The Black Death.
Maybe the settlers all died. Noone might have survived to tell their story.
This site is about climate so it is easy to forget microbiology but Black Death may have a connection to that after all. It originated in China after crop failure due to bad climate after volcanism in the area.

SandyInDerby
October 26, 2009 11:35 am

Thank you Anthony and Therese I’ll use this in my next dicussion with my Warmist colleagues.

SandyInDerby
October 26, 2009 11:35 am

Sorry should have been Anthony and Terese

John Galt
October 26, 2009 11:54 am

Obviously Greenland was much farther south a few centuries ago. No other explanation is possible, a least none that I can imagine.

Don B
October 26, 2009 11:59 am

Here is a 2007 article about Charles Schweger and GUS. The Little Ice Age caused abandonment, combined with failure to adapt.
http://www.uaf.edu/sunstar/archives/20070227/vikings.html
On page 51 of the pdf referred to by Nofreewind, above, the assertion is made that settlement occurred while Greenland temperatures were 1-3 degrees C higher than today. The paleoHockeySticks must have had crooked shafts. 🙂

Don B
October 26, 2009 12:01 pm

Oops. 1- 4 degrees higher than currently (not 1-3).

George Tobin
October 26, 2009 12:04 pm

Hostile natives, bubonic plague, political dissension, catastrophic landslides from climate change and slander concerning their farming skills. It must have sucked to be a Viking in Greenland.
If only they knew about cap and trade and cultivated a higher shared awareness…

Chris
October 26, 2009 12:11 pm

In the new AP story (seth borenstein again) regarding global temp trends, he quotes someone regarding the present period being hotter than anytime in the past THOUSANDS of years. The vikings in greenland was the first thought that came to mind.

October 26, 2009 12:16 pm

What did happen? Theories abound. In his 1963 book, Early Voyages and Northern Approaches, Tryggvi Oleson proposed a theory that still has some credibility. He believed the Vikings and northern aboriginal people intermarried to produce the unique Thule people, ancestors of the modern Eskimo.
Not very likely, the mitochondrial and Y chromosome haplotypes that I’ve seen from the modern greenland eskimo show N American ancestry not European.
http://www.scs.uiuc.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogroupsMaps.pdf

Stephen Skinner
October 26, 2009 12:22 pm

Terese Brasen
In his 1963 book, Early Voyages and Northern Approaches, Tryggvi Oleson proposed a theory that still has some credibility. He believed the Vikings and northern aboriginal people intermarried to produce the unique Thule people, ancestors of the modern Eskimo.
I understood the Thule to have come from the East during the same warm period that the Vikings established themselves on Greenland. The Wiki excerpt below of the Dorset culture, which the Thule replaced, is of interest.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorset_culture
Dorset culture and history is broken up into four periods, the Early (which began around 500 BC), Middle, Late (starting around AD 800), and Terminal (AD 1000 to 1500) phases. The Terminal phase was already in progress occurred when the Thule were entering the Canadian Arctic as they migrated east from Alaska, and is most probably closely related to the onset of the medieval warm period, which started to warm the Arctic considerably around AD 800. With the warmer climates, the sea ice became less predictable and was isolated from the High Arctic. Since the Dorset were highly adapted to living in a very cold climate, and much of their food came from hunting sea mammals through holes in the ice, the massive decline in sea-ice which the Medieval Warm Period produced would have had a devastating impact upon their way of life, and they seem to have great difficulty adapting to this change. They apparently followed the ice north, and concentrated their settlements in the High Arctic during the Late and Terminal periods.[citation needed] As mentioned below, an isolated remnant of the Dorset may have survived on a few small Hudson Bay islands until 1902, but by 1500 they had essentially disappeared.

L
October 26, 2009 12:22 pm

Back in the ’60’s when I studied Scandinavian literature, the whole first semester was spent on Icelandic sagas, not just Snorri Sturluson’s masterful “Njal’s Saga,” but on others like the sagas of “Eric the Red” and “Leif the Lucky.” It is in these that we find Vikings visiting North America proper and meeting with a hostile reception from the “Skraelings,” surely Amerinds. These are great ‘reads.’
Lest anyone think these are mere myths, recall that in the year 1000, Iceland was, by far, the most literate and democratic country in the world, hardly fertile ground for growing fairy tales. The Icelandic “Althing” (935?) is the oldest parliament on Earth.
Anyway, back then there was no question about the loss of Greenland. Very simply, climate change. As the colder climate crept southward, agriculture had to be abandoned. At the same time, increased sea ice cut off contact with Iceland and the project was finished. Whether most of the Greenlanders
fled back to Iceland in time is an open question, but those who didn’t were thought to have been overwhelmed by Inuit, also fleeing the advancing cold.
Some of the Norse may have been absorbed by the incoming natives, some simply massacred. Back in the ’60’s the end was thought to have come in the late 15th Century, ironically just about the time Europeans were ‘discovering’ the Americas for what, they thought, was the first time.
What’s of value is that the entire Greenland saga illustrates the undeniable fact of natural climate change of a major amplitude well within historic times and well before CO2 had even been invented. Nothing new under the Sun.

crosspatch
October 26, 2009 12:26 pm

“Remember when the settlement dissappeared. Some time around 1350. What happened then?”
Oh, around that time Europe was having horrible weather (not in the 1350’s but certainly in the 1320’s). There were major volcanic eruptions in the Philippines and New Zealand around that time too.

Stephen Skinner
October 26, 2009 12:28 pm

In contrast to the MWP, during the Little Ice Age it seems there is evidence of Eskimos turning up in Scotland and Ireland.

Yarmy
October 26, 2009 12:39 pm

Pfff, forget these historians and their anecdotes. I’ve got a tree here that tells me Greenland was frozen then.

1 2 3