Two separate examples show 2007 NRC review panel was stacked, except for a "token" skeptic and worked to supress dissenting science

This is pretty ugly. In 2007 the NRC was setup to review the state of climate science. The usual players were involved. Today we have two separate examples of inappropriate behavior designed to squash any scientific dissent. First from Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. in this essay: An E-Mail Communication Between Phil Jones and Ben Santer…

Advertisements