Reality Forces Reason into Power Choices

Guest essay by Gordon J. Fulks

At a time when campaigning politicians defy reality with extravagant promises, recent developments suggest reason may be returning to the electric power sector – even as the Biden administration frantically tries to spend billions on so-called ‘renewable energy.’

Much of this drama plays out in my Pacific Northwest, where policymakers favor faddish, ideological approaches to energy needs over practical technologies relying on fossil fuels, nuclear, or hydro. One result has been the intrusion of expensive, unreliable, and environmentally damaging wind turbines on the beauty that makes the Northwest special.

Among those saving us from ourselves are native people, for whom the land is sacred. They recently forced the federal government and Oregon Governor Tina Kotek to cancel the sale of large offshore tracts for wind development.

Also playing a role were market realities: Only a single, inexperienced company bid on the project. Other competitors dropped out because offshore wind is financially risky, involving high costs and the hazards of a corrosive and stormy marine environment. Besides, who wants intermittent power that costs more than it is worth?  No one.

Another ally in the fight for sanity is Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, sometimes known for harebrained schemes such as blocking out the Sun to cool the planet. Sweden nixed that.

Nevertheless, Gates rightly has championed nuclear power, much maligned despite obvious advantages. In 2006, he founded TerraPower to develop an advanced breeder reactor that will power a plant in Kemmerer, Wyoming. With one billion dollars from Gates, TerraPower broke ground in June. The plant is designed to run 50 years without refueling.

In Pennsylvania, Microsoft, which Gates continues to advise, signed a 1.6-billion-dollar agreement to power data centers with 800 megawatts of nuclear power from Three Mile Island.  With the generating capacity of thousands of large wind turbines, TMI’s Unit 1 will provide power far more reliably than wind and solar.

TMI’s reopening would have been unthinkable just a few years ago.  People now seem to have forgotten the partial meltdown of Unit 2 in 1979. Or they have come to understand that the risks of nuclear power can be managed — just like the hazards (real or imagined) of other modern technologies.

Then there is Amazon, a company better known for its delivery of consumer goods than for its profitable data centers. Residents of eastern Oregon are familiar with Amazon’s large, dreary concrete buildings that have elaborate cooling equipment and large backup generators should utility power fail. These hint at enormous power consumption.

Lured by Oregon’s generous tax breaks, Amazon and other web service providers like Google and Facebook built data centers to take advantage of the state’s cheap hydroelectric power.

However, the newcomers did not realize that public officials were inadequately planning for the increased power that new data centers would require. This came at a time when politicians were also forcing electric utilities like Portland General Electric to switch to wind and solar while promoting an all-electric economy.

Data centers had to find reliable power and meet the ideological requirements of Oregon politicians.  It did not work. The centers now need more electricity than the Oregon grid can supply.  Blackouts are a distinct possibility.

Although ideologically aligned with Oregon politicians, Amazon executives realized their very profitable data centers would fail if they kept posturing with renewable energy.

So, they took a bold step on October 16, announcing that they will work with X-Energy to build small modular nuclear reactors to provide the power they need. These will be set up, not in Oregon where nuclear power is essentially banned, but across the Columbia River in Washington State, near an existing nuclear plant. Power can be easily shipped to Oregon.

Amazon announced that it is working with Energy Northwest, a consortium of 29 Washington State utilities on this nuclear project.  This suggests that many Northwest utilities are finally acknowledging that the region will need great amounts of new and reliable power.

Thank you, Amazon, for promoting a solution to the looming Pacific Northwest power shortage. This may not save us from the massive rate increases that are beginning to hit consumers due to the renewable debacle. But it may keep the lights on.

This commentary was first published at Newsmax on December 4, 2024.


Gordon J. Fulks has a Ph.D. in physics from the Laboratory for Astrophysics and Space Research at the University of Chicago. He is a director of the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, Virginia.

5 11 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Wojick
December 6, 2024 2:13 am

But see my
https://www.cfact.org/2024/10/21/will-wind-and-solar-hammer-hydro-in-washington-state/#

Where huge amounts of wind and solar are in process. No sign of reason.

John Hultquist
Reply to  David Wojick
December 6, 2024 8:47 am

Jay “no-sign-of-reason” Inslee. This ClimateCult™ member has been governor since January 2013. He tried a run for president in March, 2019 and quit in August six months later. His focus on combating climate change was then fully directed within Washington State.
Current Attorney General Bob Ferguson {also has the ClimateCult virus} will replace Inslee on January 15, 2025, and is “poised to build upon Washington’s nation-leading climate policies.”

strativarius
December 6, 2024 2:31 am

“”when campaigning politicians defy reality””

Our Parliament does this on a daily basis. And then some. I suppose this could be a story tip, however, I’m still cleaning up the spluttered coffee from screen and keyboard, and reaching for my little book of calm…

“”Sadiq Khan ‘to be knighted’ in New Year Honours as Reform ask ‘what for?’

Khan is reportedly set to receive a knighthood in the New Year Honours list, according to Whitehall sources.

Reform Assembly Member Alex Wilson questioned the decision, describing it as a “kick in the teeth” to Londoners.

Now, we learn that Keir Starmer intends to honour Sadiq with a knighthood.

“Londoners will be asking themselves, what for? His abject failure on knife crime? His failure to build affordable homes? His failure to keep our streets safe? His failure to protect working people?”
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1985190/sadiq-khan-knighted-new-year-honours-reform-party

And so this most egregious excuse for an human being gets a gong and in reality that gong is for his efforts to diminish London’s nightlife, theatres, bars, clubs and hospitality, its ability to move freely around and in relative safety.

Reality Forces Reason into Power Choices, but not in Britain.

oeman50
December 6, 2024 4:58 am

“..TMI’s reopening would have been unthinkable just a few years ago.”

Let’s not forget that TMI 1 operated successfully after the TMI 2 accident until 2019 when it was closed due to economic (NOT safety) reasons.

Reply to  oeman50
December 6, 2024 8:24 pm

Wasnt it also the costly certification renewal as the old one expired ?

strativarius
December 6, 2024 5:53 am

Story tip – not going to plan

[Chris] Stark has instead been busy publicly defending the watering down of Labour’s manifesto pledge to reach “clean power by 2030.” Labour explicity pledged 100% by the end of the decade…

Miliband’s climate head of Mission Control caught out in pro Labour outburst
https://order-order.com/2024/12/06/milibands-climate-head-of-mission-control-caught-out-in-pro-labour-outburst/

KevinM
Reply to  strativarius
December 6, 2024 10:44 am

I remember from long ago, about 90% of energy was either fission, hydro or “burning stuff to boil water” and 10% was other stuff. Is that still the same? If other ways to get power can get to 50% I don’t see how anyone could say power had not changed.

December 6, 2024 7:39 am

Seems we will try every hair brained wrong solution and pour tens of billions of taxpayer funds down the sewer before we eventually and reluctantly use the tools we know work to build our energy systems. This is what a lack of critical thinking and a devotion to superstitious nonsense brings us.

Reply to  Andy Pattullo
December 6, 2024 7:51 am

Eventually those who believe homeopathy will cure their toothache will go to a dentist…

D Sandberg
Reply to  Andy Pattullo
December 6, 2024 9:26 am

And the Donald is the dentist.

Bob
December 6, 2024 11:00 am

Very nice. It is past time to get these very wealthy very large energy users involved in financing nuclear power to fulfill their huge needs and also for us.

Thomas Hunt
December 6, 2024 11:46 am

The Pacific Northwest is about 10 days into an omega block of high pressure and no wind. Our own DunkelFloute as many of the PNW valleys are fogged in, days are short, and sun angles are low.

It’s been a while since this Bonneville Power Authority Balancing report has been posted. Note the wind is the green straight line across the bottom. At full power it would be at 2.7 GWatts. The steady magenta line at 1.1 GWatts is the mentioned nuclear power plant at Richland WA.

Anyone want to do the math of replacing 2.7 GWatts of power for 10 days (and counting) with batteries?

https://transmission.bpa.gov/Business/Operations/Wind/baltwg.aspx

Beta Blocker
Reply to  Thomas Hunt
December 6, 2024 4:30 pm

Thomas Hunt, as you have noted, since November 27th, we here in the US Northwest have been experiencing a period of cloudy days with temperatures in the mid 30’s F, and with little or no wind for eight straight days.  

I’ve combined the BPA’s daily graph for the last eight days into a composite graph as follows:

comment image

These periods of ‘Dunkelflaute Days’ are not unusual in the US Northwest. In past years, some of these periods have lasted as long as twenty days before the sun came out and the wind started blowing again.

The BPA’s area of load balancing authority includes approximately 2800 MW of wind & solar generation nameplate capacity. Most of that is wind.

While wind & solar have been operating at less than 5% capacity factor over these last eight days, nuclear has been chugging along continuously at 96% CF while fossil/biomass has been running at roughly 90% CF.

Fossil/biomass CF has been rising over the last several years, which is a reflection of growing demand for electricity in the region. 

In the face of rising demand for electricity, Washington and Oregon have targeted much, if not all, of that regional fossil generation for eventual shutdown.

Beta Blocker
December 6, 2024 5:23 pm

For those of you who live in the US Northwest, here are some links that I’ve posted here on WUWT within the past month:

Benton PUD Presentation, October 2024, Richland, Washington:

Over here in southeastern Washington State, the Benton PUD held a series of forums in late October to inform its customers that affordable reliable electricity is in jeopardy in our state. I attended one of these forums held in Richland. These topics were included:

— Northwest is Close to Blackouts – How Did We Get Here?
— Washington and Oregon Clean Energy Policies – Global & U.S. Perspectives
— Washington Energy Strategy – Challenges and Concerns
— Where Do We Go From Here? – Near and Long Term

If you have been following the numerous issues surrounding the future of reliable electricity in the Pacific Northwest, you will find that many of the topics you’ve been reading about for the last ten years are included in the following two presentations:

Benton PUD: Carbon-Free Electricity Policies Impacts and Perspectives (October 2024)

Benton PUD: Q and A Session (October 2024)

The Benton PUD’s manager, Rick Dunn, has his own blog on Substack. An extended discusion of nuclear versus wind & solar can be found in this Rick Dunn blog post: 

The Increasingly PrecariousNorthwest Utility Balancing Act (Rick Dunn, August 2024)

Discovery Institute Report:

Another useful report can be downloaded from the Discovery Institute headquarted in Seattle: 

The Crippling Costs of Electrification and Net Zero Energy Policies in the Pacific Northwest (september 2024)

Beta Blocker Analysis: A Hypothetical 3,000 MW Wind & Solar Capacity Expansion for the US Northwest:

Here in the US Northwest, the regional power planning council’s 2021 long range plan calls for the addition of 3,000 MW of intermittent wind and solar capacity plus 720 MW of firming capacity. Comparatively little backup storage is projected to be needed.

The council’s 2021 plan does not come close to accounting for currently expected increases in the US Northwest’s regional power demand.

In order to account for those expected increases, suppose we simply assume that the 3000 MW expansion of wind & solar intermittent generation must now become 3,000 MW of wind & solar baseload generation operating 24/7/365.  

In the following analysis, I estimate that in order to reliably generate 3,000 MW of electricty 24/7/365, a total of 18,000 MW of wind and solar nameplate are required backed by a nominal 3,600,000 MW-hours of battery storage.

A Hypothetical 3,000 MW Wind & Solar Capacity Expansion for the US Northwest

This hypothetical wind-solar-battery RE system would cost upwards of 600 billion dollars capital cost (probably more) to acquire and install — as compared with roughly 60 billion for construction of four 1,100 MW AP1000-size reactors as were installed at Vogtle 3 & 4.   

Rational Keith
December 6, 2024 6:12 pm

I am very skeptical of tribal groups claiming the land is sacred.

They exploited it when they wanted to, such as burning vegetation to open space to grow more food, control insects and unwanted species in those farms, and clearing trails. They were careful to burn when weather gave low risk of runaway fires but sometimes those did occur.

They harvested trees for various purposes including canoes and fences on land and in water (to guide fish into their nets).

Sometimes over-harvesting occurred.

In NW BC elected tribal officials support a natural gas pipeline because the economic activity of building and operating brings income to their residents, and construction may open up more roads for easier access to medical care. But ‘hereditary’ chiefs are opposing construction, sometimes with arson and violence – with Green Goon groups complicit..

In the past some tribes were exploiters of others – the Kitwanga colonized fishing areas of the Skeena and tributaries. The Haida and Laich-kwil-tach were thieving slavers.

Keitho
Editor
December 6, 2024 7:53 pm

Obviously nuclear power will replace all the renewables over time. What an obscene waste of money the wind turbines and glass fields are and they will pointlessly blight the landscape for decades to come. All predicted here and elsewhere.

bo
December 7, 2024 2:38 pm

Not to be picking nits, but exaggeration isn’t needed to make the point that nukes are the answer. TMI 1, at 800 MW, does NOT have “the generating capacity of thousands of large wind turbines,” unless someone is claiming a ridiculously low capacity factor.

Verified by MonsterInsights