Climate scientists officially declare ‘climate emergency’ at an end

Press release by the Climate Intelligence Group (CLINTEL)

The Chamber of Deputies in session

Climate scientists have issued a shock declaration that the “climate emergency” is over.

A two-day climate conference in Prague, organised by the Czech division of the international Climate Intelligence Group (Clintel), which took place on November 12-13 in the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic in Prague, “declares and affirms that the imagined and imaginary ‘climate emergency’ is at an end”.

The communiqué, drafted by the eminent scientists and researchers who spoke at the conference, makes clear that for several decades climate scientists have  systematically exaggerated the influence of CO2 on global temperature.

The high-level scientific conference also declared:

“The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which excludes participants and published papers disagreeing with its narrative, fails to comply with its own error-reporting protocol and draws conclusions some of which are dishonest, should be forthwith dismantled.”

The declaration supports the conclusions of the major Clintel report The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC [presented to the Conference by Marcel Crok, Clintel’s co-founder].

Moreover, the scientists at the conference declared that even if all nations moved straight to net zero emissions, by the 2050 target date the world would be only about 0.1 C cooler than with no emissions reduction.

So far, the attempts to mitigate climate change by international agreements such as the Paris Agreement have made no difference to our influence on climate, since nations such as Russia and China, India and Pakistan continue greatly to expand their combustion of coal, oil and gas.

The cost of achieving that 0.1 C reduction in global warming would be $2 quadrillion, equivalent to 20 years’ worldwide gross domestic product.

Finally, the conference “calls upon the entire scientific community to cease and desist from its persecution of scientists and researchers who disagree with the current official narrative on climate change and instead to encourage once again the long and noble tradition of free, open and uncensored scientific research, investigation, publication and discussion”.

The full text of the communiqué follows:

The International Scientific Conference of the Climate Intelligence Group (Clintel), in the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic in Prague assembled on the Twelfth and Thirteenth Days of November 2024, has resolved and now declares as follows, that is to say –

  1. The modest increase in the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide that has taken place since the end of the Little Ice Age has been net-beneficial to humanity.
  2. Foreseeable future increases in greenhouse gases in the air will probably also prove net-beneficial.
  3. The rate and amplitude of global warming have been and will continue to be appreciably less than climate scientists have long predicted.
  4. The Sun, and not greenhouse gases, has contributed and will continue to contribute the overwhelming majority of global temperature.
  5. Geological evidence compellingly suggests that the rate and amplitude of global warming during the industrial era are neither unprecedented nor unusual.
  6. Climate models are inherently incapable of telling us anything about how much global warming there will be or about whether or to what extent the warming has a natural or anthropogenic cause.
  7. Global warming will likely continue to be slow, small, harmless and net-beneficial.
  8. There is broad agreement among the scientific community that extreme weather events have not increased in frequency, intensity or duration and are in future unlikely to do so.
  9. Though global population has increased fourfold over the past century, annually averaged deaths attributable to any climate-related or weather-related event have declined by 99%.
  10. Global climate-related financial losses, expressed as a percentage of global annual gross domestic product, have declined and continue to decline notwithstanding the increase in built infrastructure in harm’s way.
  11. Despite trillions of dollars spent chiefly in Western countries on emissions abatement, global temperature has continued to rise since 1990.
  12. Even if all nations, rather than chiefly western nations, were to move directly and together from the current trajectory to net zero emissions by the official target year of 2050, the global warming prevented by that year would be no more than 0.05 to 0.1 Celsius.
  13. If the Czech Republic, the host of this conference, were to move directly to net zero emissions by 2050, it would prevent only 1/4000 of a degree of warming by that target date.
  14. Based pro rata on the estimate by the UK national grid authority that preparing the grid for net zero would cost $3.8 trillion (the only such estimate that is properly-costed), and on the fact that the grid accounts for 25% of UK emissions, and that UK emissions account for 0.8% of global emissions, the global cost of attaining net zero would approach $2 quadrillion, equivalent to 20 years’ global annual GDP.
  15. On any grid where the installed nameplate capacity of wind and solar power exceeds the mean demand on that grid, adding any further wind or solar power will barely reduce grid CO2 emissions but will greatly increase the cost of electricity and yet will reduce the revenues earned by both new and existing wind and solar generators.
  16. The resources of techno-metals required to achieve global net zero emissions are entirely insufficient even for one 15-year generation of net zero infrastructure, so that net zero is in practice unattainable.
  17. Since wind and solar power are costly, intermittent and more environmentally destructive per TWh generated than any other energy source, governments should cease to subsidize or to prioritize them, and should instead expand coal, gas and, above, all nuclear generation.
  18. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which excludes participants and published papers disagreeing with its narrative, fails to comply with its own error-reporting protocol and draws conclusions some of which are dishonest, should be forthwith dismantled.

Therefore, this conference hereby declares and affirms that the imagined and imaginary “climate emergency” is at an end.

This conference calls upon the entire scientific community to cease and desist from its persecution of scientists and researchers who disagree with the current official narrative on climate change and instead to encourage once again the long and noble tradition of free, open and uncensored scientific research, investigation, publication and discussion.

Given under our signs manual this Thirteenth Day of November in the Year of our Lord Two Thousand and Twenty-Four.

Pavel Kalenda, Czech Republic [Conference Chairman]

Guus Berkhout, The Netherlands [Co-founder, Clintel]

Marcel Crok, The Netherlands [Co-founder, Clintel]

Lord Monckton, United Kingdom

Valentina Zharkova, United Kingdom

Milan Šálek, Czech Republic

Václav Procházka, Czech Republic

Gregory Wrightstone, United States

Jan Pokorný, Czech Republic

Szarka László, Hungary

James Croll, United Kingdom

Tomas Furst, Czech Republic

Gerald Ratzer, Canada

Douglas Pollock, Chile

Henri Masson, Belgium

Miroslav Žáček, Czech Republic

Jan-Erik Solheim, Norway

4.9 69 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

100 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
D Sandberg
November 20, 2024 9:57 am

What’s going on here at WUWT? I just finished reading though 62 comments and only found one liner personal attacks and no substantive discussion of the issues. I would like to see quantitative comments on these two points:(Item 15 &16):.

On any grid where the installed nameplate capacity of wind and solar power exceeds the mean demand on that grid, adding any further wind or solar power will barely reduce grid CO2 emissions but will greatly increase the cost of electricity and yet will reduce the revenues earned by both new and existing wind and solar generators.

The resources of techno-metals required to achieve global net zero emissions are entirely insufficient even for one 15-year generation of net zero infrastructure, so that net zero is in practice unattainable…

Robert Cutler
Reply to  D Sandberg
November 20, 2024 11:56 am

Perhaps you didn’t see the link to the list of presentations I posted. A quick search shows that Pollock was the likely source of your first point. I haven’t read this, but a second quick search turns up his posting: Why wind and solar won’t save the planet: A U.S. case history

D Sandberg
Reply to  Robert Cutler
November 20, 2024 6:36 pm

Robert. Thank you for the link. Hopefully you or someone can help me understand two lines in the article. Everything else makes sense:

copy
in the US, not only natural gas in combined-cycle plants but also simple-cycle gas turbines, as well as oil and even coal, have been used to back up the grid. Therefore, emissions are much less than that produced by combined-cycle gas backup alone since CO2-output emission rates for the other forms of thermal backup are significantly higher than those of natural gas in combined-cycle plants. Table 2 shows the actual outcome:

Comment

Shouldn’t this statement be “emission reductions are much less?

copy

in Table 3, one must consider renewable generation as a percentage of oil and gas generation (row 2) rather than that of total generation (row 1). On that basis, the US almost reached the limit on generation by unreliables in 2022. It is very likely that that limit was exceeded in 2023. The US, like Europe, may as well have joined the grid-killing unreliables’ club.

Comment
Line 1 is fine as is Line 3 but line 2  as written is beyond my comprehension and seems fundamental to the entire Pollack Limit concept. HELP!.

The Table didn’t copy: see link or below:

Line2: % of US oil and gas generation contributed by renewables 2019 18.5% 2022 25%.  I get the numbers but where did they come from? Onthat basis yes, in 2022 we were within 0.8% of breaking the “Pollack Limit”.

Bob
November 20, 2024 12:53 pm

Very nice, I approve.

damp
November 20, 2024 2:00 pm

I miss Roseanne Rosannadanna right now.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  damp
November 21, 2024 9:01 am

Can you picture Chevy Chase chastising Jane Curtain for her “Climate Crisis” report?

bwahahahaha

David S
November 20, 2024 2:27 pm

So what will happen now? Will Joe Biden and all the climate change alarmist politicians say: OOPs looks like screwed up? And will they rescind all their policies? I think not.

Edward Katz
November 20, 2024 2:35 pm

It’s nice to see that some influential climate scientists have awakened and seen the light. Now if many politicians would be willing to follow suit, governments would stop wasting money and picking taxpayers’ pockets, while consumers’ living costs would be alleviated, and living standards would rise.

Old.George
November 20, 2024 7:25 pm

All the millions wasted on the stuff we never needed in the first place.
All of it because of good intentions. Save the World! Oh, wait! Look at all the destroyed countryside. Those windmills and solar panels need to be disposed of.
Just another ordinary day.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Old.George
November 21, 2024 9:02 am

Good intentions?

TBeholder
November 21, 2024 9:57 am

“Uncorrected Evidence 39” was more brütal. Yet did it lead to anything?

Verified by MonsterInsights