Flooding And Planning: We Don't Need To Live Near Rivers Anymore

Guest Opinion: Dr. Tim Ball

Petula Clark sang, “Don’t sleep in the subway, darling. Don’t stand in the pouring rain.” More helpful advice would urge, “Don’t live in the floodplain, darling. Don’t you know it’s pouring rain?” It’s called a floodplain for a reason. The dangers of flooding mostly involve people living in dangerous places. Why are people allowed to live in these regions without being forced to accept full responsibility for their actions? They are encouraged by governments and insurance that enable bad practices, questionable, and unnecessary behavior.

There was a time when living near a river was important for transport, water supply, waste removal, and even food supply. We don’t need to live close to rivers or at least within the area identified as the floodplain. If you live there, flooding is inevitable, even if flooding protection is in place. In fact, the protection creates a false sense of security. Inevitably the protection will fail through neglect, accident, or water levels that exceed the design capacity.

Engineers design flood control structures based on the frequency of events. Usually, it is for the one in 100-year event. Most think this means if you have such an event then another one will not occur for another 100 years. It is known be a few names the return period, recurrence interval, repeat interval, or expected frequency. It is defined by

 

flood-return-perion-equation1

Where n = number of years: m = number of occurrences of flood events

There are several problems with this approach, many now producing headlines about global warming and climate change.

The first involves the changing patterns of precipitation. There are very few records of precipitation, and most are less than 100 years long. The greatest range of variation of precipitation occurs in the middle latitudes in association with the changes in the latitude and amplitude in Rossby Waves along the Polar Front. Much longer time periods of precipitation are now occurring. These are not because of man-made climate change but the natural mechanism. The IPCC don’t consider these because of the restrictions of the definition of climate change to only human causes.

Second are the ongoing changes to the river as flows vary with changing precipitation. These are superimposed on the natural changes in a river as it evolves from youth to maturity to old age.

Third are man-made changes in the river basin that alter the pattern of runoff spatially and temporally.

All these issues confronted the Assiniboine River Management Advisory Board I was appointed to Chair. We were charged with creating a total basin management strategy. (Figure 1)

clip_image002

Figure 1

The first challenge was to come to grips with the great range of flow. Like most Great Plain’s rivers, it varied considerably. Fortunately, what triggered the demand for a management strategy was a swing in 6 years from the lowest to the highest flow in the then 94-year record. Figure 3 only covers from 1906 to 1973 but illustrates the range of maximum and minimum flows. Sedimentary evidence indicates much longer and larger scale wetter cycles. For example, Figure 2a, 2b, and 2c are cross-sections through a dune located half way along the current Assiniboine River near Brandon. They show three distinct well-formed paleosols formed through prolonged wetter spells.

clip_image004

Figure 2a (Source: Author).

clip_image006

Figure 2b Top of Dune – Two paleosols visible

clip_image008

Figure 2 c Middle dune paleosol.

clip_image010Figure 3

The flow rate was important along the river, but also because the Assiniboine is the major tributary of the Red River of the North. The Red consistently causes urban flooding problems at Minot, Fargo in North Dakota, and Winnipeg. The City of Winnipeg built a massive diversion channel called the floodway that takes water out of the River south of the city and returns it north of the city (Figure 4). It effectively doubles the river capacity over the length of the diversion channel. It was built based on the modern record of flooding. The recurrence frequency considered a one-in-100-year flood including the 1950 event that triggered demand for flood control.

In fact, precipitation pattern changes much more frequently and widely than any 100-year record could accommodate. They ignored the historical evidence of the 1826 flood that was three times larger and reports of an even bigger flood in 1776, which coincides with the Little Ice Age. The 1826 flood was approximately a one-in-400-year event. Another flood of this magnitude occurred in 1996, and the floodway was inadequate, and though it alleviated to some extent, it forced them to expand the floodway.

clip_image011

Figure 4

There is a reason government provide flood insurance in the US. Private insurance companies won’t get involved because living in flood prone areas is asking for trouble, a self-inflicted wound, and governments often create or aggravate the problems by such actions as changing the surface.

In climate, most are aware of the urban heat island effect (UHIE), but that tends to focus on the temperature. An important cause of the temperature change is the changed surface and altered rates of runoff and evaporation.

The greatest surface changes are in the city center: an area called the Central Business District (CBD) with almost 100% impervious surface. Even the suburbs are at least 50 percent impervious surface. Figure 5 shows an average suburban lot and impervious surfaces.

clip_image013

Figure 5: Average suburban lot and impervious surfaces

Extensive drainage systems are designed to carry water away quickly. The water stays around in the countryside and evaporates slowly or is used by plants and transpired slowly, both processes creating cooling.

clip_image015

Figure 6. Rates of Runoff Urban/Rural

Figure 6 shows how these changes alter the peak at which the water reaches the river channel. The channel develops to accommodate a certain runoff rate so when water arrives too quickly flooding potential is increased.

Most rivers flood. The channels they create are for average natural flow, but if precipitation increases the channel will fill. The first stage is “bank full” when water reaches the top of the banks. Once water flows over the bank, it is in “first flood stage” and covers an area called the first flood plain. (Figure 7)

clip_image017

Figure 7: Thalweg is deepest part of a channel. Levees form from silt deposited during flooding.

Nobody should be allowed to build in that floodplain. Dikes to contain the river should not be allowed either because when breached catastrophic flooding occurs. Also, they prolong the flood because they prevent water returning to the river.

It is an event that occurs naturally in the old age stage of river development as a broad flat floodplain develops. Once the first flood stage occurs, water flowing along the edges of the river is slowed, and sediment is deposited creating levees. They deflect small tributaries from entering the river, so they flow parallel in a distinctive pattern known as a yazoo stream (Figure 8).

clip_image019

Figure 8

The precipitation patterns over long periods change much more than anything measured in the modern instrumental record. There is no need to build in the areas flooded shown in the following pictures of Calgary (9) and High River (10) Alberta, and Tewkesbury (11), UK.

clip_image021

Figure 9

clip_image023

Figure 10

clip_image025

Figure 11

Figure 11 shows the church builders knew long ago where the dry, as well as the moral high ground was located. Now with our faith in engineering, we are more arrogant and think we can ignore the long term patterns of nature. So, we need a new song, “Don’t live in the floodplain darling”.

Convert those floodplain areas within all cities, especially in the centers. They need more parks to give people access to nature, ameliorate the impact of the UHIE, and save the costs of dealing with the loss of lives and damage to property that floods inevitably bring. It doesn’t matter if the record is inadequate or if you only built for a 100-year flood to save money. When the 100-year event aggravated by changes to the urban area or the inevitable 400-year event occurs, it overwhelms and traps people who don’t understand recurrence frequencies. You can use the floodplain, but only with the ability to let nature use it for its designed purpose when she chooses.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
117 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Darkinbad the Brighdayler
January 26, 2016 6:36 am

The 1/100 event planning does not mean that there will be only 1 such event every 100 years or that such events will be 100 years apart.
It was an estimate based presumably on data thought to be pertinent at the time.
The Victorian London sewers were designed to cope with .5″ rainfall in 24hrs. A generous overestimate at the time.
Urban growth and a penchant for paving over driveways and gardens have scotched that, even within the core area.
As for the 1/100…………..lol

Tom
January 26, 2016 6:51 am

My house lies in a designated flood plane, so this article is of some interest to me. There are several important points to make. First, the Red River of the North and its tributaries flow north. They flow from where it’s warmest, to Hudson Bay, where it’s a lot colder. This causes spring ice jams, making flooding more frequent than in most of the US where rivers flow from cold to warm. Second, I choose to live where I live. I enjoy being close to the water. I accept the risk. I made my basement floor a bit higher than the last large flood. It was in 1954, before several flood control dams were built. (I note that flood control dams don’t prevent floods – they create them. Hopefully they move the floods to more suitable locations. I’m in such a ‘suitable’ location, though the dam would be overflowing long before I would get my feet wet.) I constructed the lowest wooden parts of the house to be 8 feet above the designated hundred year flood level. I don’t keep anything in the basement that I can’t afford to lose. I don’t waste my money on flood insurance. Finally, in order to build the house, I needed permits from FEMA, Corps of Engineers, the state DNR, County, and Township officials. it took more time to get the permits than it took to build the house. I don’t need more people than that telling me where I can, and can’t live. I should also note that in the winter I live along the Guadalupe, in what some call the most flood prone area in the US. Last spring, a nearby location went from a normal river level of 5 feet, to a flooded level of 34 feet, all between 10:00 PM and midnight. I chose to be some 370 feet above that.

Reply to  Tom
January 26, 2016 10:16 am

You must be part of the 0.1%. People with brains that use them.

PRD
January 26, 2016 6:55 am

As a wee lad sitting at my great uncle’s knee during a visit to his Central Texas ranch I learned some important lessons. (Summarized and edited for clarity and a “G” rating)
1) Build high. It doesn’t take a Ph.D. to determine the extent of the worst flood the soil and flora indicate.
2) Build the house and the barn on the sorriest, least productive soil on the property rather than the best view. That leaves the rest for producing your food and fiber. Further explanation provided was that this same soil is probably eroded of the topsoil, well draining, and well oxidized (stable), but may be corrosive to steel.
3) Dig to the rock (if present) before pouring the slab, then it really won’t crack. (nice metaphorical reference too).
4) Don’t buy/build where there is not good water available via a drilled well or surface supplied by springs which may be stabilized/protected or perrennial streams.
Wisdom from the poorly educated, but supremely intelligent.
Many years later sitting in “Soils”, “Forest Soils”, “Range Management”, etc. the simple lessons of my uncle remain the most basic and applicable. The undergrad and grad level classes just gives the why and how the obvious to the observant is.

PRD
January 26, 2016 6:58 am

The State of Texas is making some moves in this direction. So is my present state of residence, Louisiana. After you’ve flooded out once = no more insurance for flooding. An area may still be developed, but the developers are bidden by law (for what it’s worth) to disclose past flooding and the fact that flood insurance is unavailable for the zone.
So there are some good policies coming into play which should discourage development of flood prone areas.

Dodgy Geezer
January 26, 2016 7:24 am

…Flooding And Planning: We Don’t Need To Live Near Rivers Anymore…
Actually, we do. That’s where all the transport links have been built.

Chris D.
January 26, 2016 8:05 am

Here is a fascinating bit of research that should be of interest to anyone wanting to learn about pre-historic mega-flood events along the Mississippi River in North America. It looks like some pretty solid work, although they use the pages 2k temp reconstruction, presumably because the authors believe it’s the best available for the continent. The sediments were radiocarbon dated. I suppose one can’t compare these prehistoric flood events to modern day Mississippi River flood levels due to the fact that the entire watershed has been altered so much (levees, dredging, dams, etc) by the Army Corps of Engineers to mitigate flooding since the 1930’s.
http://www.pnas.org/content/112/20/6319.full?sid=86fd14fe-f84b-4eab-ae92-5d106148a74c

January 26, 2016 10:09 am

The Missouri River carries a lot of grain. As does the Mississippi.

n.n
January 26, 2016 10:59 am

Planning has become a euphemism with a genocidal connotation.

Ellen of Glacier
Reply to  n.n
January 26, 2016 12:13 pm

Ditto. As critical areas ordinances are expanded in our area, land use is being denied. There’s no sufficiently “safe” or “sustainable” place for humans to inhabit. FEMA and the Corps of Engineers are working hand in glove with environmental groups to “restore” our area to pre-industrial conditions, as if there is some perfect state of affairs. The local college’s environmental school teaches that “there is nothing more natural than nature,” whatever that means when it’s at home. (All human actions and impacts are unnatural. Surprise!)

Joe Crawford
January 26, 2016 11:36 am

Once the first flood stage occurs, water flowing along the edges of the river is slowed, and sediment is deposited creating levees. They deflect small tributaries from entering the river, so they flow parallel in a distinctive pattern known as a yazoo stream (Figure 8).
From several studies done by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, I would guess that the wide flat floodplains along most creeks, streams, and small rivers in most of the U.S. were originally developed by the beaver. According to the Wyoming Wetlands Society:
“Prior to European settlement, beaver were found in high densities throughout North America, but were nearly exterminated by 1900 to meet the demands of European fashion (primarily for felt hats). Populations before European settlement are estimated to have been as high as 600 million, occupying nearly every watershed in North America from northern Alaska to central Mexico.”
It’s only after we eliminated the beaver from most watersheds that sediment levees and yazoo streams had much of an impact on river flow. Eliminating the beaver has probably had more effect on local climate than deforestation.

dp
January 26, 2016 12:32 pm

Flood plain residents are as crazy as ocean cliff dwellers.

This is at Pacifica, California where the San Andreas fault meets the Pacific Ocean. That should count for two entries on the stupid list.

CapitalistRoader
January 26, 2016 3:52 pm

But the architect was right. If the ocean took my house, Uncle Sam would pay to replace it under the National Flood Insurance Program. Since private insurers weren’t dumb enough to sell cheap insurance to people who built on the edges of oceans or rivers, Congress decided the government should step in and do it. So if the ocean ate what I built, I could rebuild and rebuild again and again — there was no limit to the number of claims on the same property in the same location — up to a maximum of $250,000 per house per flood. And you taxpayers would pay for it.
John Stossel, Confessions of a Welfare Queen, Reason, March 2004

January 27, 2016 12:25 pm

And to the northeast of you, across that expensive channel, the maxim should be “Don’t live in the Delta, daryling.”
http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/story.html?id=00c485c3-108e-414c-8443-d1511ece692d&k=27525
Which is a flood plain, maps made by early ship visitors using telescopes show many small low islands where many people live and work in Richmond, YVR on the smaller Sea Island, (The Fraser River forks in the area, a main fork on the south side of Lulu Island, another on the north side – which itself forks around Sea Island.)
Mostly diked today, pumps have been beefed up since I walked on the west dike decades ago and noticed not much margin as winter winds pushed high December tides against the dike.

Rascal
January 28, 2016 11:37 pm

If an area of land is called a FLOOD PLAIN, why are people so surprised that it occasionally subject to flooding?