More permafrost fears

From the University of Georgia, where apparently they didn’t read this paper before publishing their own and this press release.

Warming climate may release vast amounts of carbon from long-frozen Arctic soils

A bank of permafrost thaws near the Kolyma River in Siberia. Credit Skidaway Institute of Oceanography
A bank of permafrost thaws near the Kolyma River in Siberia.
Credit: Skidaway Institute of Oceanography

Savannah, Ga. – While climatologists are carefully watching carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, another group of scientists is exploring a massive storehouse of carbon that has the potential to significantly affect the climate change picture.

University of Georgia Skidaway Institute of Oceanography researcher Aron Stubbins is part of a team investigating how ancient carbon, locked away in Arctic permafrost for thousands of years, is now being transformed into carbon dioxide and released into the atmosphere. The results of the study were published in Geophysical Research Letters.

The Arctic contains a massive amount of carbon in the form of frozen soil–the remnants of plants and animals that died more than 20,000 years ago. Because this organic material was permanently frozen year-round, it did not undergo decomposition by bacteria the way organic material does in a warmer climate. Just like food in a home freezer, it has been locked away from the bacteria that would otherwise cause it to decay and be converted to carbon dioxide.

“However, if you allow your food to defrost, eventually bacteria will eat away at it, causing it to decompose and release carbon dioxide,” Stubbins said. “The same thing happens to permafrost when it thaws.”

Scientists estimate there is more than 10 times the amount of carbon in the Arctic soil than has been put into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels since the start of the Industrial Revolution. To look at it another way, scientists estimate there is two and a half times more carbon locked away in the Arctic deep freezer than there is in the atmosphere today. Now, with a warming climate, that deep freezer is beginning to thaw and that long-frozen carbon is beginning to be released into the environment.

“The study we did was to look at what happens to that organic carbon when it is released,” Stubbins said. “Does it get converted to carbon dioxide or is it still going to be preserved in some other form?”

Stubbins and his colleagues conducted their fieldwork at Duvanni Yar in Siberia. There, the Kolyma River carves into a bank of permafrost, exposing the frozen organic material. This worked well for the scientists, as they were able to find streams that consisted of 100 percent thawed permafrost. The researchers measured the carbon concentration, how old the carbon was and what forms of carbon were present in the water. They bottled it with a sample of the local microbes. After two weeks, they measured the changes in the carbon concentration and composition and the amount of carbon dioxide that had been produced.

“We found that decomposition converted 60 percent of the carbon in the thawed permafrost to carbon dioxide in two weeks,” Stubbins said. “This shows the permafrost carbon is definitely in a form that can be used by the microbes.”

Lead author Robert Spencer of Florida State University added, “Interestingly, we also found that the unique composition of thawed permafrost carbon is what makes the material so attractive to microbes.”

The study also confirmed what the scientists had suspected: The carbon being used by the bacteria is at least 20,000 years old. This is significant because it means that carbon has not been a part of the global carbon cycle in the recent past.

“If you cut down a tree and burn it, you are simply returning the carbon in that tree to the atmosphere where the tree originally got it,” Stubbins said. “However, this is carbon that has been locked away in a deep-freeze storage for a long time.

“This is carbon that has been out of the active, natural system for tens of thousands of years. To reintroduce it into the contemporary system will have an effect.”

The carbon release has the potential to create what scientists call a positive feedback loop. This means as more carbon is released into the atmosphere, it would amplify climate warming. That, in turn, would cause more permafrost to thaw and release more carbon, causing the cycle to continue.

“Currently, this is not a process that shows up in future (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) climate projections; in fact, permafrost is not even accounted for,” Spencer said.

“Moving forward, we need to find out how consistent our findings are and to work with a broader range of scientists to better predict how fast this process will happen,” Stubbins said.

###

In addition to Stubbins and Spencer, the research team included Paul Mann from Northumbria University, United Kingdom; Thorsten Dittmar from the University of Oldenburg, Germany; Timothy Eglinton and Cameron McIntyre from the Geological Institute, Zurich, Switzerland; Max Holmes from Woods Hole Research Center; and Nikita Zimov from the Far-Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Science.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
168 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andrew N
April 27, 2015 5:28 pm

Under how much ice did this moss and other plant material grow 20,000 years ago? Magic Moss? We should bag it an sell it in Colorado.

taxed
April 27, 2015 7:02 pm

There was little in the way of ice sheets over NE Russia. Climate science suggests the reason for this was because it was to dry. l think it was more of a case that NE Russia was just too warm during the ice age for the ice sheets to form. lt seems it was warm enough for this moss and plant material to grow during the ice age. Because what looks to have happened during the ice age was that cold Arctic air got pushed down across North America. Which drove the Atlantic side of the NH into major climate cooling. But with all the Arctic air been pushed south it would have to been replaced by warmer air coming up from the south somewhere else. l believe it was in and around the northern Pacific area where this warm air was moving moving into he Arctic.

Reply to  taxed
April 27, 2015 8:18 pm

That is a superb observation. So, given that, of what use is a “global average”temperature? What does it tell us about regional climate? A lot I suspect. Like why were the last mammoths located on Wrangle Island.? Same/similar reason I expect.
We really do get myopic at times, me included.
I must go look for some proxies …

geologyjim
Reply to  Wayne Delbeke
April 27, 2015 9:02 pm

The last mammoths were found at Wrangel Island because it was the last place human hunters looked. Everywhere else, humans killed and consumed the “Gentle Giants”

Reply to  Wayne Delbeke
April 27, 2015 10:21 pm

Popular “urban” myth based on many recent papers I have read. I don’t think humans fast froze the remains for us to find thousands of years later. Humans most likely contributed but there were many compounding factors. I’ll post a link when I find my computer.

Reply to  Wayne Delbeke
April 27, 2015 10:27 pm

geologyjim:
as promised here is a link to a recent paper that says the decline in mammoth population started before humans came out of Africa … and they suggest it was …. wait for it ….
“CLIMATE CHANGE”!!! What is old is new again 😉
http://www.theguardian.com/science/grrlscientist/2013/sep/11/woolly-mammoth-extinction-warming-climate

zemlik
Reply to  Wayne Delbeke
April 28, 2015 2:02 am

perhaps the tilt of the Earth relative to the orbit used to be different ?

taxed
Reply to  Wayne Delbeke
April 28, 2015 3:50 am

Yes the average global temperature is rather meaning less when it comes to climate change. The mistake been that the same thing must happen right across the globe. lt looks to me that the last ice age was to a large extent a regional climate change “at least within the NH” rather then across the whole NH. l got my first clue about this some years ago, by looking at the extent of the ice sheets during the ice age from the view point of been above the north pole. From this view point it looked like the Arctic had not been extended but had just moved somewhat over towards the Atlantic. This lead to thinking “what would of cause that”. l now believe l understand the reason why this happened.

zemlik
Reply to  John of Cloverdale, WA, Australia
April 28, 2015 2:06 am

most annoying phrase of 2014.
“Lessons have been learnt “

April 27, 2015 10:01 pm

Perm and frost …
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4093/4888904735_c345fc3b44_o.jpg
Living on a Prayer
Bon Jovi

dp
April 28, 2015 12:03 am

It is difficult for me to accept a world where the climate is in run-away heating and a new glacier is growing unfettered in the crater of Mt. St. Helens in Washington State. I think climate science is in need of a process check. Something they’re sure of is very wrong.

David
April 28, 2015 3:52 pm

There seems to be confusion in some of these comments about what permafrost is. There is no reason to suppose that organic matter in permafrost was originally ‘flash frozen’. At the present day, permafrost is usually covered with vegetation, ranging in nature from lichen to conifers. Below the vegetation is a layer of soil that is frozen in winter and thawed in summer. Below that is the permafrost. If the climate is gradually cooling, the coverage of permafrost will extend, and in some areas the vegetated surface will be succeeded by permanent ice and snow fields. Sequestration of organic matter occurs where the surface is not permanently frozen, provided the accumulation of plant matter during the growing season outstrips the processes of decay. A.cooling climate will in itself tend to slow down decay, so it is conceivable that substantial amounts may accumulate before all growth is stopped by permanent ice cover. There is an analogy with the more familiar case of peat bogs, which presumably nobody will deny can accumulate over many centuries.

sciguy54
April 28, 2015 5:04 pm

These “scientists” believe that the organic material in the soil will be rapidly consumed if it thaws. After all, just look at the organic soils in the New Orleans area… except they have survived mostly intact for thousands of years in near-tropical heat.
But surely the organic material which washes downstream will be consumed, freeing all of its C02. This is why there are no fossil fuel deposits offshore of the warm silty Mississippi and Amazon deltas, and offshore of the “permafrost” surrounding the Arctic ocean. /sarc