When Did Global Warming Begin?

Image Credit: Marathon NationSoft Pixel

By WUWT regular “Just The Facts”

There have been a number of statements made recently about “Global Warming Deniers”, e.g. “White House: Global Warming Deniers Wrong to Reference Polar Vortex” US News, “Watch The Daily Show mock Trump and other global warming deniers” The Week and “Global warming denier Jim Inhofe: ‘Fewer and fewer’ senators believe in climate change ‘hoax’”. The Raw Story

Given the apparent prevalence of “Global Warming Deniers”, it seems prudent to take a look at the data so that everyone is clear when Global Warming began and what is undeniable. As such, from the following EPICA Dome C Ice Core record from Vostok, Antarctica, over the last 450,000 years Earth has experienced numerous Glacials, commonly referred to as Ice Ages, and Interglacials,  like the Holocene Interglacial we are experiencing today:

EssayWeb.net – Click the pic to view at source

“The Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) refers to a period in the Earth’s climate history when ice sheets were at their maximum extension, between 26,500 and 19,000–20,000 years ago, marking the peak of the last glacial period.” As such, one could argue that Global Warming began about “19,000–20,000 years ago”.

However, there was “the Late Glacial Maximum (ca. 13,000-10,000 years ago), or Tardiglacial (“Late Glacial”)” which was “defined primarily by climates in the northern hemisphere warming substantially, causing a process of accelerated deglaciation following the Last Glacial Maximum (ca. 25,000-13,000 years ago)”. “As such, one could also argue that Global Warming began about “13,000-10,000 years ago”.

Now looking at the GISP2 Ice Core record from Greenland, over the last 10,700 years, you can see the rapid warming that occurred at the end of last Glacial and that the current Holocene Interglacial reached it’s maximum peak between 8000 – 7500 years ago:

climate4you.com – Ole Humlum – Professor, University of Oslo Department of Geosciences – Click the pic to view at source

Since the peak of the Holocene Intreglacial, Earth has experienced several additional descending peaks, including the Minoan Warm Period between 3500 – 3000 years ago, the Roman Warm Period between 2250 – 1500 years ago and the Medieval Warm Period between 1250 – 750 years ago. The Medieval Warm Period and subsequent Little Ice Age can be seen clearly on the following temperature reconstruction based upon Alexandre, 1987 and Lamb, 1988, found Page 250, Figure 7.1 of IPCC Assessment Report 1:

JoNova – IPCC AR1 – Click the pic to view at source

The Little Ice Age “has been conventionally defined as a period extending from the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries, or alternatively, from about 1350 to about 1850, though climatologists and historians working with local records no longer expect to agree on either the start or end dates of this period, which varied according to local conditions. NASA defines the term as a cold period between AD 1550 and 1850 and notes three particularly cold intervals: one beginning about 1650, another about 1770, and the last in 1850, each separated by intervals of slight warming.” As such, one could argue that Global Warming began in “about 1850”.

However, generally when referring to “Global Warming Deniers” there is an implication that the “Global Warming” that’s being denied is caused by anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions. Anthropogenic CO2 emissions were de minimis in 1850. In fact, anthropogenic CO2 Emissions from Fossil-Fuels did not become potentially consequential until approximately 1950:

Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center – Click the pic to view at source

This is why the IPCC only claims to be;

“95% certain that humans are the “dominant cause” of global warming since the 1950sBBC

As such, one could argue the Global Warming began in “the 1950s”.

However, if you look at the Met Office – Hadley Center  HadCRUT4 Global Surface Temperature record for the last 163 years you can see that temperatures didn’t warm during the 1950s, nor the 60s:

Met Office – Hadley Center – Click the pic to view at source

In fact it was not until approximately 1975 that temperatures began to rise. As such, one could argue that Global Warming began in approximately 1975.

However, in 2010 Phil Jones was asked by the BBC, “Do you agree that according to the global temperature record used by the IPCC, the rates of global warming from 1860-1880, 1910-1940 and 1975-1998 were identical?” Phil Jones responded that,”Temperature data for the period 1860-1880 are more uncertain, because of sparser coverage, than for later periods in the 20th Century. The 1860-1880 period is also only 21 years in length. As for the two periods 1910-40 and 1975-1998 the warming rates are not statistically significantly different. I have also included the trend over the period 1975 to 2009, which has a very similar trend to the period 1975-1998. So, in answer to the question, the warming rates for all 4 periods are similar and not statistically significantly different from each other.”

The warming during the periods of “1860-1880” and “1910-1940”, before anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions became potentially consequential, is “not statistically significantly different” from the warming during the periods “1975-1998” and “1975 to 2009”. Thus there is no indication that the warming between “1975-1998” and “1975 to 2009” is unnatural, unusual and/or caused by anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions. Global Warming may have started in 1975, but there is no observable evidence [of] anthropogenic CO2 emission based Global Warming began in 1975. As such, one could argue that anthropogenic CO2 emission based Global Warming began sometime [after] 1975.

However, if you look at following UAH Satellite Lower Atmosphere graph for the last 34 years;

University of Alabama – Huntsville (UAH) – Dr. Roy Spencer – Click the pic to view at source

and this NASA GISS Mean Monthly Surface Temperature Anomaly graph for the last 17 years;

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) – Click the pic to view at source

you can see that Global Warming stopped in the late 1990s or early 2000s, which has been referred to as “The Pause” in Earth’s temperature. In fact, looking at the Werner Brozek’s recent article, the Pause in each major temperature data set is as follows:

For GISS, the slope is flat since July 2001 or 12 years, 6 months.

For Hadcrut3, the slope is flat since July 1997 or 16 years, 6 months.

For Hadcrut4, the slope is flat since December 2000 or 13 years, 1 month.

For Hadsst3, the slope is flat since December 2000 or 13 years, 1 month.

For UAH, the slope is flat since October 2004 or 9 years, 3 months. (goes to December using version 5.5)

For RSS, the slope is flat since September 1996 or 17 years, 4 months.”

Shown graphically, that looks like this:

WoodForTrees.org – Paul Clark – Click the pic to view at source

As such, one could argue that for the last 17 – 9 years Global Warming hasn’t been occurring, and thus Global Warming began in 1975 and ended between 1996 and 2004.

However, this would not  resolve the question of when the “Global Warming” that’s being caused by anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide emissions began. If you look at Global CO2 Emissions from Fossil-Fuels and;

EPA – Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy – Click the pic to view at source

and Cumulative Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions from Fossil-Fuels, you can see that emissions have been growing rapidly in the last few decades:

Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center – Click the pic to view at source

In fact the Economist noted in 2013 that “The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO₂ put there by humanity since 1750. And yet, as James Hansen, the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, observes, ‘the five-year mean global temperature has been flat for a decade.'”

Thus, while anthropogenic CO2 emissions are the highest they’ve ever been, and growing rapidly, Earth’s temperature has been in a 9 – 17 year Pause. And the only period of warming that anthropogenic CO2 emissions could have had a significant influence on, 1975 – 1998, is “similar and not statistically significantly different from” the periods of 1860-1880 and 1910-1940 when there is no evidence of anthropogenic CO2 emission influence. As such one could argue that “Global Warming” due to anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide emissions may not have begun, that Earth’s sensitivity to CO2 may be low, that natural processes may be large enough to outweigh the effects of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and/or that preparing for a period of rapid and catastrophic Global Warming, when there is no observational evidence that it is in fact occurring, may be a historic folly.

Anyway, what do you think, when did Global Warming begin?

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

139 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hoser
January 26, 2014 9:11 pm

I think I missed a verb. I hate it when I do that. I guess I just excited.

TheLastDemocrat
January 26, 2014 10:53 pm

All so un-original. Copying Revelation…
“The first angel sounded his trumpet, and there came hail and fire mixed with blood, and it was hurled down on the earth. A third of the earth was burned up, a third of the trees were burned up, and all the green grass was burned up.”
Earthquakes, fish kills, scorched earth, plagues, and on and on. The only calamity not parallel with the Bible is the supposed flood that will be here any minute….

Dr. Strangelove
January 26, 2014 11:58 pm

When did global warming begin? Since climate is always changing, it depends on the timescale. On multidecadal scale, global warming started 1977 with the “Great Climate Shift.” Since the latest warming 1977-98 is only 21 years long, there is not enough empirical evidence to claim AGW has started at all. Natural variability can be 30-year cycles or longer. Hence it cannot be ruled out.
On centennial scale, global warming started ca. 1700 coming out of the LIA. On millennial scale, earth has been cooling since the Interglacial Maximum 6,000 years ago. On longer timescale, earth is still in an ice age since 2.58 million years ago. Temperature today is one of the coldest in 540 million years of earth history.

Gkell1
January 27, 2014 12:00 am

Jaffa wrote –
“Global warming starts in the morning and ends mid-afternoon (local time) every day. I think the warming causes the sun to come up – no science just gut instinct.”
You are close to the truth here but putting a face on this truth can be such an adventure through history and the technical details.
The first instance of modeling by artificial means was when accurate watches appeared in the late 17th century and the first conclusion they lunged at using a watch was that the daily return of a star to any foreground reference such as a chimney or a tree was due to the rotation of the Earth. Up to this point the actual foreground reference was the central Sun and the first appearance of Sirius after a number of months lost in the glare of the Sun fixed the Earth’s position in space and more importantly,the number of rotations it took to return the Earth to this same position,in this case 1461 full rotations for 4 orbital circuits .

http://danmary.org/tiki/show_image.php?id=30
What they did was assert that the daily return of a star to foreground position in 23 hours 56 minutes was due to the daily rotation of the Earth and built on that foundation even though the overall qualifiers expose the cracks in that conclusion as a star returns in 23 hours 56 minutes of an average 24 hour day within the 365/366 day calendar framework. The point is that appreciation of the true foreground reference of the central Sun was lost and the annual astronomical event which uses Sirius as a marker for the Earth’s orbital position in space.
Modeling by artificial means is on trial here whether it was modeling planetary dynamics using watches and timekeeping averages or climate using computers. When they tried to model planetary dynamics using watches 250 years ago they lost the basic correlation between cause and effect as they still assert an imbalance between the temperature fluctuations within a 24 hour day and one rotation and that is a low point in human reasoning as a productive and creative endeavor.
What began in astronomy has now spread to terrestrial sciences and the words of Galileo should strike people in this respect –
“The same thing has struck me even more forcibly than you. I have heard such things put forth as I should blush to repeat–not so much to avoid discrediting their authors (whose names could always be withheld) as to refrain from detracting so greatly from the honor of the human race. In the long run my observations have convinced me that some men, reasoning preposterously, first establish some conclusion In their minds which, either because of its being their own or because of their having received it from some person who has their entire confidence, impresses them so deeply that one finds it impossible ever to get it out of their heads. Such arguments in support of their fixed idea as they hit upon themselves or hear set forth by others, no matter how simple and stupid these may be, gain their instant acceptance and applause. On the other hand whatever is brought forward against it, however ingenious and conclusive, they receive with disdain or with hot rage–if indeed it does not make them ill ” Galileo
To even allow yourselves to be called ‘skeptics’ is an admission of defeat and submission.

Andyj
January 27, 2014 2:28 am

Real Septics are those who avoid the facts. That’s is why there is one called “Skeptical (of) Science”.
I know my response will be under a pile of other replies but for those who are reading and want to know what came first, the chicken or the egg. I’ll offer a dinosaur.
In the picture below are three simple lines. Two are CO2. One is detrended and raised above Hadcrut3. It is also magnified by a factor of 6.
Doesn’t this graph prove:
a. Heat comes before a CO2 surge, therefore is the cause – not the result of.
b. CO2 appears to stymy warming here.
c. Temperature and CO2 rates show poor compatibility.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1997/offset:-0.5/mean:12/plot/esrl-co2/from:1997/normalise/mean:12/detrend:0.81/offset:0.45/scale:6/plot/esrl-co2/from:1997/normalise/mean:12
May I add caution to this human output CO2 graph displayed.
(http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/images/ghgemissions/TrendsGlobalEmissions.png)
The very page shows a second pie chart. with forestry and crop growing as a form of CO2 emissions instead of absorption. Are they pulling the leg of a snail? Plant mass is derived wholly from water and CO2 !!!!
http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/images/ghgemissions/GlobalGHGEmissionsBySource.png

JP
January 27, 2014 7:26 am

Global temperatures began to slowly recover after the coldest decades of the LIA (1630-1690). However, after 1878 (the Great Climate Shift), this recovering process began to accelerate. For the next 110 years global temperatures rose on average at a steeper rate than they did the previous 200. However, since 1990 the rate that global temperatures increased began to Plateau and then stop later in the 1990s.

Jimbo
January 27, 2014 10:50 am

This graph is great! It puts the IPCCs increasing confidence against their projections and observations.
http://www.energyadvocate.com/gc1.jpg

Greytide
January 27, 2014 11:28 am

jaffa says:
January 26, 2014 at 4:45 pm
Global warming starts in the morning and ends mid-afternoon (local time) every day. I think the warming causes the sun to come up – no science just gut instinct.
That is just so beautifully put. Made my day.

January 27, 2014 11:38 am

From my Meteorology textbook: “The Atmosphere” by Lutgens/Tarbuck 1979
… (I)f the estimated increases (in atmospheric CO2)come to pass, calculations show that we can probably expect global temperatures to increase by nearly 1 degree C by the year 2000 and by about 2 degrees C by 2040.
Alarming in 1979, already.
Interestingly this also: …(T)here is presently no deterministic predictive model of the Earth’s climate
So the GCMs all came after 1979.

Abbie Normal
January 27, 2014 1:06 pm

Some years back, perhaps 20-30 years ago, before the current “climate change” silliness took off, I recall reading an observation from an astronomer that the earth’s temperature swings were also reflected in proportional temperature swings on Venus and Mars. The point being made at the time was that the sun’s moods had a equal affect on all the planets.
Perhaps someone ought to correlate the temperature deviations of all the planets and see if the charts correlate to what’s happening on Earth.

James at 48
January 27, 2014 1:55 pm

Big picture, it began about 12K YBP. But it is complicated. That trend seems to have reveresed about 3 – 4K YBP and from there it was a bit down hill. But more recently, the past 150 years, back up a bit but not as high as that past high point.

SIG INT Ex
January 27, 2014 3:42 pm

Perhaps a distinction need to be made about ‘which’ global warming:
1) Modern Political-Religeous Global Warming: Hansen’s global warming ca 1988
2) Global (inverted) warming, i.e. the Global Cooling, theorized in the 1960-’70s
3) Pre-Modern academic era: Fourier, Arrhenius, Agassiz et al., late-1800s.
4) Geologic Global Change (temperature as one of many parameters thereof), soon after 4.8 billion years ago.
I would suggest that categories 1) through 3) are insignificant (though lively at times) and only 4) needs serious consideration.
Furthermore,I would posit that 1) through 3) are vestiges of the Ptolemaic Model (Geocentric) universe were the faithful of today now place Humanity at the center of their Earth supplying heat for all manner of physical processes.
😉

January 28, 2014 3:24 am


January 25, 2014 at 10:23 pm
Thanks Very Much! for your compilation.
Go on!
Thank You! justthefactswuwt.
Thank You! Anthony…
Go on!
(Sorry for my english…)
Joxanjel from Basque Country

1 4 5 6