Who Is Your Favorite Cardiologist?

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

Well, it’s been a most unusual week on my planet. On Tuesday, I went to my doctor about some recurring chest pain I’d been having. He gave me an EKG and a complete physical. He told me that there had been some changes since my last EKG (in 1985), and then asked me something I greatly hope that not one of you ever gets asked. He asked me, who was my favorite cardiologist?

Pills

I allowed as how I didn’t know one cardiologist, and I’d never given the question a moment’s thought.

So I said that my father-in-law, who is 85, had a cardiologist I’d never met. I’d take his. My doc said go. That was Tuesday

Early Wednesday morning, I found myself in the cardiologist’s office. He turned out to be like my doctor, warm and informative. His assistant hooked me up to another more complex EKG machine. Then they gave me an “echocardiogram”, that was fascinating. I could see my heart beating, and watch the valves open and close … astounding.

However, when the cardiologist read the EKG and echocardiogram charts, he told me that I’d suffered a heart attack. He said it was an inferior myocardial infarction. Inferior? Really? I have a heart attack, and it’s second-rate?

He made an appointment with the surgeons for the next morning. He said said they would thread a tube through my veins into my heart, release some dye, and take pictures to see exactly what was going on. 

But there was more. He said they did the whole thing in one go—after the dye test, if the plumbing was clogged, they’d likely put in a stent.

stent insertion

Diagram Source

He also said that if it was really bad, they’d cut me open right there and and do bypass surgery … dangalang, that’s not the kind of thing a man wants to hear, and certainly not before 10 AM. He gave me some nitroglycerine pills to take home with me … that was Wednesday.

Thursday I checked in to the cardio unit at the local hospital, accompanied as usual by my gorgeous ex-fiancee, who is a Family Nurse Practitioner and my main medical squeeze. First thing, they shucked me out of my clothes and had me put on one of those hospital gowns, the kind I call “fundamentally drafty” because the draft is on … anyhow, the nurse was asking me all these questions and came to “Are you taking any medications on a regular basis?” I said no … she said “Really? We hardly ever see anyone in here who isn’t taking some regular medication”. 

“Not me,” sez I, “not even aspirin.”

She looked at me with a wry smile and said matter-of-factly “Well … that’s over.” 

Dang.

The surgeon came in, again a warm and encouraging man. He said if they could put the catheter in through my arm and I had to get a stent, I could go home that day. But if they went in through the groin, I’d have to stay overnight.

“OK,” I said, I was only a pawn in the game at that point.

So they took me away to the Operating Room, and I woke up with a stent in my heart. They put it in through the arm, so that same day I came home. That was Thursday.

The whole crazy sequence of events has been relatively painless, except for my arm where they put in the catheter. That still aches, but that’s minor. And I’m enjoined from pounding nails or lifing anything heavy or doing anything strenuous for a week.

So no condolences or the like are necessary. I count myself among the most fortunate of men. Heck, since I can’t work at house building, I’m free to do more research and writing, what’s not to like? …

What do I take from all of this?

Well, it sure was great to wake up after going under. And it is always good to be reminded of my mortality. It let me know that I need to keep the pedal pressed firmly to the floorboard, and that I need to produce during my days, for the night is assuredly headed my way, wherein no man can produce …

Finally, it is very strange to think that I have a piece of metal mesh in my heart … first step to being a cyborg?

I go back to see my new favorite cardiologist on Friday.

My best to everyone,

w.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

220 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hoser
November 10, 2013 9:17 pm

Good thing you could get it done before Obamacare kicked in. No doubt someone already said that. As for me, I’ll just let nature take its course. When it’s my time, then fine. I’d rather have that than the controlling and expensive Obamacrap that will wind up refusing “care” anyway. They can take their BS healthcare and put it where a proctologist might find it with an endoscope.

tobias
November 10, 2013 9:27 pm

Mario,(Nov 10 8.37 pm) “I need a checkup every three years due to my age”, “I was born in1965,”,
That is a frightening environment to work in You are barely , into your 50’s ?
What is a “competition” license? Can you explain? Is a like a permit to practice? Thanks, Tobias.
Oh and BTW get better soon Anthony.

JohnB
November 10, 2013 9:32 pm

Glad it went well.
It’s a bugger to rattle like a pill bottle, but better than not moving. 😉

November 10, 2013 9:42 pm

He asked me, who was my favorite cardiologist?
—————————————————-
If you like your cardiologist, you can keep your cardiologist.
…but seriously, best of luck Sir!

TomE
November 10, 2013 9:42 pm

Willis:
Continue in good health. Your writing has taken us many places and looks like you just added another one which is very close to home for all of us.

ldd
November 10, 2013 9:42 pm

Very happy for your outcome Willis. My late father in law, lost a kidney at 50, heart attack at 70ish and passed when he was 86, peacefully in his sleep. He was a pilot who use to fly to the DEW line, after being one in WW ll. He was still shoveling his own driveway on his own insistence, that very week.

vigilantfish
November 10, 2013 9:46 pm

Weird to read this so soon after your post about your stress test! My grandma had five heart attacks, starting in her fifties. After her third heart attack, the strangest piece order she got from her doctor – a young immigrant – was that she had to stop eating watermelons. Nothing else distressed her so much. Then during our annual visit my mom went along with her to see the doctor, and it turned out he had no idea what watermelons were, and had to reverse his order. Grandma was so relieved as this was her favourite fruit. She made it to 86, and died of old age.
Several people have mentioned bucket lists, which makes me wonder what yours could possibly be like, Willis, after all you’ve done? I’m sending you best wishes for many more years of glorious experiences, accompanied by your splendid accounts to share with us.

J. Fujita
November 10, 2013 9:49 pm

Willis, two years ago tomorrow I had quadruple-bypass surgery – it was the smartest decision I’ve made in my life. The second smartest decision was to incorporate the lessons taught on a blog I found – marksdailyapple.com. The short description of it is primal living. You seem to be far from being sedentary but if your diet was part of the problem, the change to a primal diet can bring about relatively rapid change – it has changed my life. There’s still a lot of educating for you to pass on to us. I wish you the best.

November 10, 2013 9:51 pm

If we all lived each day as if it were our last….
a lot less would get built.
Re: rgbatduke Oct 18, 2013 at 2:54 pm
The [enchanted] frog croaks out “One door leads to freedom; the other door leads to certain death. You may ask me one question, but I always lie!”
[But the logic of it is] All doors lead to certain death.
Some perhaps sooner than others…;-)

I am glad to read that for you, Willis, the better door opened for you.

EO Peter
November 10, 2013 10:00 pm

@Lou (November 10, 2013 at 7:16 pm)
“Low fat, high carbs diet is very dangerous!” Spot-on… I’m no fan of taking my info from book with “canned” solution & try to get the info by myself & understand how “the machinery” work, but the more I learn from human cellular metabolic process, the more I’m conviced too of the toxicity of the carbohydrates & mystified about the drive to demonize the saturated fats.
As said before me, I’m now very doubtfull of what the “modern” medical practice & the parallel with climate science is excellent. It is not the science that is not right, it is the “human” side of the practice that make me sick (politics, patented medication, marketting machination…). I sadly now consider most doctors simply as puppets controlled by marketting arm of big pharma (usefull educated idiots). They have no clues that they are being “managed” from the very start of their education, throught their entire career. It is a constant astonisment to see how human seem to excel at shooting themself in the foot at long term…
Not long ago, I began studying the multiples metabolic pathway present in human, and began very suspicious when learned that many medical “authorities” were convinced that no human can survive w/t a prolonged diet of ZERO carbohydrates, that w/o glucose the brain cannot work… Again very similar to climate science: lots of theory & model but ZERO practical knowledge and discrediting any realworld exemple as being false.
For those that does not believe we can survive w/o carb. explain to me how the Inuits of northern Canada (of the past) have managed to stay alive for so long? But no problem NOW, we have managed to “convert” them to our “healty” way of live, so there is no proof left. But I began to pay lot more attention about these legends that before their “conversions”, that the incidence of cancer & cardiovascular disease were practically zero, and that numerous medical expeditions were made to try to find their “secret”.
The more I understand about the subject, the more I am inclined to believe that it is quite possible that taking our energy from ingestion of carb. may NOT be the primary & most efficient pathway, but instead is a secondary mechanism. The main one may possibly be the lipid one (Ketogenic diet). Again explain to me why epileptic that do not respond to any med or treatment respond well to the Ketogenic diet? Also why this diet seem neuroprotective? My belief is that this pathway is lot less “stressfull” on the mitochondria, especially when they are already fragile due to disease. Also, it is well established fact that lipid store more energy per weigth unit than carb. It seem logical that natural biological process tend to go to most efficient way at first, then use alternative less optimal method as a backup when primary way is unavailable.
And for the cancer thing, AFAIK the mitochodria is central to the apoptosis mecanism & it seem lots of cancer simply deactivate the mitocondria to gain immortality. It is interresting to learn that most cancer produce energy by anaerobic glycolysis that does NOT depend on mitocondria (the Warburg effect). It is also interresting to know that ketogenic diet seem to require functionnal mitocondria to provide energy to the cell, the “inconvenient” it provide to cell that depend on anaerobic glycolysis may starve them enough to let immune defence and/or chemotherapy chance to do the work. But we talk here of ZERO carb intake and ZERO glycogen store left, and that is tricky… Diabetic are especially problematic for the transition to ketogenic mode due to uncontrolled acidosis that can lead to death.
For the coconut oil, that this is medium chain triglyceride saturated fat. Not all saturated fat are equal. Long chain saturated fat may still be bad, I don’t know, but MCT fat are different & use a different mecanism of absorbtion (lot easier), are highly ketogenic, and source of lauric acid, a powerfull anti-fungal & antimicrobial agent normally present in human milk. But be wary of fractionned coconut oil, this is the leftover stuff after the cosmetic industry et al. have removed lauric acid & possibly other good stuff, this is the reason why peoples recommend using only virgin oil or even insist on extracting it by themself.
Next time you have problem w/t fungus, especially the mighty & powerfull Candida genus, try to apply coconut oil topically just to see if it work…

Adrian O
November 10, 2013 10:02 pm

Be Well,
Adrian

JEM
November 10, 2013 10:13 pm

Good to hear everything went smoothly for you.
Here’s another one of those conversations.
“I’d like you to go see …”
“Okay. What’s this about? What kind of do is he?”
“… is an oncologist.”
Every ounce of your being hits the pit of your stomach and goes straight to your feet.

Janice Moore
November 10, 2013 10:17 pm

I hope you are doing okay, JEM. How many years, now? You will be prayed for (by me).
Take care.
Janice

November 10, 2013 10:21 pm

The correct answer to “Who is your favorite cardiologist?” is the cardiologist you never have to go to see.
Lou and Jere above are definitely steering you right (except the Wheat Belly author is Dr. William Davis, not Mike Davis). Heart disease is not caused by a buildup of LDL in the arteries (people think it’s like sediment buildup in a water pipe), the actual cause is inflammation due to chronic high blood sugar eventually causing a breech of the endothelium (the single layer thick interior lining of an artery); LDL and white blood cells rush to the site of the breech and attempt a repair. But because the cause (high blood sugar) has not been addressed, the breech becomes a chronic situation and the LDL and WBC’s become trapped under a scab-like cap where they oxidize. Wash, rinse and repeat over years and eventually you have blockage that doctors say can only be fixed by with a stent or a CABG. Blaming LDL for arterial blockage is like blaming a fireman for a fire.
It was in 2009 that both CAGW and health/nutrition became topics that interested me. I quickly realized just how similar the two disciplines are. Both are dominated by awful science, conventional wisdom, cognitive dissonance, financial interests and incredibly misguided government policy. I consider Ancel Keys, the father of the lipid hypothesis, to be the Michael Mann of nutritional science. It was because of his 7 Country Study, that is as flawed as Mann’s Hockey Stick, that we are mired in the misguided notion that saturated fat is bad for you and a low fat/high carb diet is excellent for heart health. If you have an open mind (and as skeptics of climate science I would hope all of us here do) it’s trivial to discover that mainstream medicine is 180 degrees wrong about the cause of heart disease. My level of trust in medical doctors is nil in terms of being able to cure the diseases of our day that kill in the millions and are most likely due to high blood sugar.
Your body works very hard to maintain your blood sugar in a very narrow range – roughly 75 to 90 ng/dl. This is why glucose is metabolized by the body before fat, your body views it as toxic at any level over 100 ng/dl. All carbohydrates are converted to glucose in your body and depending upon your insulin sensitivity the resulting blood sugar spike can raise your blood sugar well over 100 ng/dl for several hours. If you eat as the government, doctors and nutritionists advise (“healthy whole grains” being the base of 6 small meals per day) you are spiking your blood sugar well above the toxic level for all of your waking hours (and then some).
I know this sounds nutty if you’ve bought into the conventional wisdom but I urge you to do some research into this topic (which I know you enjoy anyhow). Dr. Davis’s “Track Your Plaque” and “Wheat Belly” blogs are excellent as are Tom Naughton’s “Fat Head” blog, Dr. Peter Attia’s “The Eating Academy”, Dr. Malcolm Kendrick’s blog (as well as his book – The Great Cholesterol Con) and Dr. Michael Eades’s blog “Protein Power”.
And for god’s sake, don’t take a statin! I would hope that trying to reduce a substance that is so important that every cell in your body can manufacture it makes so little sense I can’t believe we ever bought into it.
Hopefully I’ve piqued your interest with my comment so far and before I go let me leave you with a single chart that I hope will make your eyes pop out of your head. This chart shows the LDL-C level of over 136,000 patients who were admitted to the hospital for heart issues. As you can see there is no correlation between LDL and heart disease, in fact I would say there is actually a reverse correlation. Medical advice today is unfortunately as bass-ackwards as the conventional wisdom of CAGW. Do your own research before you let your doctors permanently put you on a bunch of drugs that won’t be of any benefit and will probably do a lot of harm.
http://s81.photobucket.com/user/bobbyj0708/media/LDLandheartattacks.png.html?o=35
Warm regards,
Bob Johnston

F. Ross
November 10, 2013 10:33 pm

Having survived the CABG routine several years ago, but still needing the occasional nitro tab, I asked my cardiologist about taking citrus bioflavonoids. He said they probably wouldn’t do any harm.
Tried ’em and after about two weeks I have not needed any nitrostat tabs at all and am still able to do my usual exercises.
So, Willis, if you are still having some chest pains you might ask your doctor about taking a supplement like flavonoids.
In the meantime best wishes and a speedy recovery to you.

Kerry McCauley
November 10, 2013 10:54 pm

Willis, Please, please, please check out http://www.DrFuhrman.com and his track record (He is the consulting doctor featured in Australian Joe Cross’ documentary of his recovery, available on YouTube or NetFlix, titled FAT SICK AND NEARLY DEAD). Dr. Fuhrman’s home page has a boxed click to archived “Nutritional Wisdom” radio programs … the drop-down menu shows many subject titles of interest. Dr. Joel Fuhrman was featured PBS special on my local (Naples, FL) tv in June,2013 and I began his program then. It has been transformational for me … SO, I beg you and your beautiful medical squeeze, at least take a peek…and his book EAT TO LIVE. Long may you live and thrive. Best regards.

November 10, 2013 10:59 pm

Willis, I hope you recover and continue your adventures for many years. I have enjoyed your writing so much and I hope you get to keep at it as much as you like. Having passed my own “expiration” date at age 50, I am glad we live in a time when medicine can extend those “expirations” and allow us to be thankful for every day.
Sincerest regards,
slohr

November 10, 2013 11:07 pm

All the best from over here.

Larry Kirk
November 10, 2013 11:18 pm

Hi Willis,
I am so glad to hear you got to the right place at the right time and had the problem fixed! You should be right as rain now.
I had no less than five stents put in myself a couple of years ago, into the internal carotid arteries in my skull, by a magician and a complete genius, after it turned out that a vehicle rollover in the bush 30 years ago had done far more damage than I originally thought, and the advancing years had completed the job. And now, two years on, you wouldn’t even know there had been a problem.
The whole fascinating thing was done in two lengthy procedures, in a theatre like the bridge deck of a spacecraft, with a slimline version of what looked like the brake cable off my old pushbike, fed in through my femoral artery and then all the way up into my skull, guided on the X-ray display of six huge LCD screens, as I lay there conscious and able to comment, and let them know if things were going awry.
An utterly painless, un-troubling and completely effective modern surgical miracle, and a very interesting experience indeed. Hooray for modern medical science!!!
I did vaguely pause to wonder afterwards how the hell you go in and out of the biggest artery in the body without getting claret all over the ceiling, and what the little thing in my groin was that held the hole shut for a month or so and then quietly melted away, and also WHAT I should now do in the case of an incoming coronal mass ejection?
I mean, here I am, with five little tubular ring circuits wrapped around inside the meaty blood vessels that pipe the precious fluid to my frontal lobes. And what happens if these find themselves moving across a huge incoming loop of solar magnetic flux (..apologies Leif)? Do they fry?? Will there suddenly be smell like the burning insulation on a dodgy three pin plug ..and then nothing?
I had a contingency plan of course. My girlfriend’s old metal garden shed. I would monitor Spaceweather.com diligently, and every time we had a big incoming, out I’d go. I’d bash the rusted padlock off the hasp, dive in there amongst the sun-damaged plastic garden toys, termite-ridden cartons of forgotten books, broken garden implements and red-back spider nests, and there I’d stay until the danger had passed.
But then I had an even better idea. Maybe I was simply being neurotic? Perhaps I was over-estimating the hazard? And there was a website of course, or at least there used to be, called “Ask an Astrophysicist”! So I asked one, and some months later was pleased to receive a slightly bemused reply (possibly from a very young astrophysicist who wasn’t even aware that he had carotid arteries), telling me that the tiny circumference of my stents – about a millimetre n fact – was incomparably small in comparison to that of the Canadian National Grid, so that I was probably worrying unnecessarily, as post-operative patients occasionally tend to do.
So there you go: Cyborgate, fully functioning, and completely out of danger. And better still, should I have the strange geological fortune to get fossilised, my stents will be good for another thirty five million years!
Best regards Willis. And here’s to the moon-wind..
LK

November 10, 2013 11:55 pm

I’m very glad to hear that it was only a ‘second-rate’ heart attack. Even if that sounds very funny, I hope that you take notice of the warning, as we want to hear from you for a long time yet. Best wishes for a full and speedy recovery.

November 11, 2013 12:21 am

Scary reading.
Have the courage to take the time for yourself, Mr Eschenbach. You are well liked.
And there is more to life than the public battles.

Colorado Wellington
November 11, 2013 12:30 am

Break it in well, Willis. It’s good they had the right aftermarket parts in the shop.
Instead of wasting money on third-rate climate science we should be spending it on ‘second-rate’ heart attack research. And non-OEM parts industries.

Perry
November 11, 2013 12:52 am

Lou says:
November 10, 2013 at 5:30 pm
Absolutely correct. Wheat belly is why humans are the only chronically ill animals on Earth.
It’s been drilled into our heads that whole grains are heart-healthy and essential to a diet that keeps us slim and satisfied. But the wheat toast you opt for over a muffin or bagel in the a.m. may not be as smart of a dietary decision as once thought. In his new book “Wheat Belly,” preventative cardiologist William Davis, MD, argues that the world’s most popular grain, found in everything from lager to licorice to lunch meat, is destructive to weight loss – and overall health.
According to Davis, the compounds found in wheat are responsible for appetite stimulation, exaggerated rises in blood sugar, and the release of endorphin-like chemicals that get the brain hooked on breads, pastas and crackers, while increased wheat consumption can also be linked to higher incidences of celiac disease, diabetes, heart disease, arthritis and schizophrenia.
If you think this talk about wheat sounds like a new spin on the gluten-free fad, it’s not so simple. While wheat is the dominant source of gluten in the human diet – gluten is what gives dough the ability to be stretched, rolled and shaped into bagels, pretzels and pizza crusts and is the culprit underlying inflammatory damage to the intestinal tract in those with celiac disease – it also contains a unique carbohydrate called amylopectin-A, which sends blood sugar soaring higher than table sugar or a candy bar ever could.
This isn’t your great grandmother’s wheat – or waistline – we’re talking about. Amounts of wheat’s destructive compounds have increased over the past 50 years as the grain has been hybridized and crossbred to be resistant to drought and fungi, produce higher yields per acre, result in better baking consistency, and cost less to produce. Not surprisingly, the increase in wheat in the American diet parallels obesity rates that have nearly tripled since 1960.
We took a close look at “Wheat Belly,” chatted with Davis, and discovered eight ways that wheat could be wrecking havoc on your weight loss efforts and how going wheat-free can help you slim down.
Whole wheat is marketed as healthy
Studies performed during the 1980s show that when processed white flour foods are replaced with whole grain flour products, there is a reduction in colon cancer, heart disease and diabetes. While the science here can’t be disputed, the logic is faulty, says Davis: “If something bad for you (white flour) is replaced by something less bad (wheat flour), and there is an apparent improvement, then plenty of the less bad thing is (considered) good for you. What was not asked: What about the effects of total removal? That’s when far greater health benefits are witnessed.” Davis compares this misguided nutritional advice surrounding whole grains to substituting hydrogenated fats for saturated fats, margarine for butter, and high-fructose corn syrup for table sugar.
Many of Davis’s overweight patients report eating plenty of fruits, vegetables and whole grains and avoiding junk food, fast food, and sugary soft drinks, some adhering strictly to dietary guidelines and many exercising for an hour every day. Still, they continue to gain weight.
Until they cut out wheat, that is. Davis says he’s witnessed the wheat belly weight loss effect thousands of times, watching patients replace processed, wheat-based foods with vegetables, nuts, meat, eggs, avocados, olives and cheese, and drop 50 to 100 pounds in one year. Among 30 patients he recently placed on wheat-free diets, the average weight loss was 27 pounds over the course of 6 months.
Whether patients on wheat-free diets consume non-wheat carbohydrates, like quinoa and millet as well as non-grain carbs such as fruit depends on the individual’s carbohydrate tolerance, says Davis. “For an established diabetic looking to become a non-diabetic, for instance, I would advise complete avoidance of these blood sugar-increasing foods since diabetes, by definition, is a disease of high blood sugars,” he says. “On the other hand, a young, slender, athletic female usually can include these carbohydrate sources and do just fine.” Still, most people fall somewhere in between, doing well with portion sizes of non-wheat carbohydrates of a half-cup or less, says Davis.
Bread breeds belly fat
Where there’s glucose, there’s always insulin, the hormone that allows entry of glucose into the cells of the body, where it’s converted to fat. It works like this: When you eat wheat, your body gets a huge helping of a blood sugar-spiking carbohydrate called amylopectin-A. To move the sugars from the wheat into your cells where they can be used for energy – or stored as fat, the pancreas responds by releasing insulin. The higher your blood sugar is after eating, the more insulin that is released – and the more fat that is deposited in the abdominal area. When belly fat builds up, it floods the body with inflammatory signals that cause energy-requiring tissues, like muscle, to stop responding to a proportional amount of insulin. As a result, your pancreas churns out more and more insulin to help metabolize the carbohydrates you eat. Years of running your body through this high-blood sugar, high-insulin cycle result in the growth of visceral fat, or what Davis has deemed a wheat belly.
Carbs create cravings
If you’ve ever noticed that eating a grain-heavy breakfast at 7 a.m. leaves you scrounging for a snack by the time you reach your desk, you’ve experienced the effects of amylopectin-A. The surge in glucose and insulin and subsequent drop in blood sugar that follow wheat consumption set you up to be hungry approximately every 2 hours, regardless of whether or not your body really needs to eat, says Davis. Davis suggests snacking on hearty portions of very low or no-carb foods, even those that are high in fat or calorically dense such as nuts and cheeses.
Wheat eaters eat more
Thanks to an appetite-revving wheat component called gliadin – and that all-day cycle of cravings for wheat and non-wheat-containing foods alike – it’s no surprise that, on average, those who consume wheat eat more overall. According to Davis, wheat eaters generally consume an extra 400 calories per day. Over the course of a year, the equivalent of 42 pounds of weight gain.
“On the other hand, (people who follow wheat-free diets) naturally consume 350 to 400 fewer calories per day because they aren’t craving food every 1.5 to 2 hours,” says Davis, adding that by picking wheat-free foods you’ll also reduce your exposure to sucrose, high-fructose corn syrup, artificial food colorings and flavorings, cornstarch and so on.
Wheat messes with estrogen
Grow yourself a wheat belly and you won’t just need a bigger belt; you may also need a man bra. In males, visceral fat spurs the production of estrogen, which results in the growth of breast tissue and leads to what scientists call gynecomastia, or what your friends probably call “man boobs.” For women, a surplus of estrogen caused by excess belly fat raises the risk for breast cancer. In a Journal of the National Cancer Institute analysis of nine breast cancer studies that included a total of more than 2,400 women, breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women with excess visceral fat was double that of slender premenopausal women who did not have excess belly fat. Other studies suggest that excess belly fat can increase a women’s risk for breast cancer as much as four-fold.
Your brain becomes addicted
When you grab a coffee or pour a glass or two of wine, you’re looking for a certain fix. But when you eat wheat, you consume it for its nutritional value – or so you think. What makes wheat the real bad guy is its addictive property, which it doesn’t share with other grains, like millet and flax, says Davis. Wheat stimulates your appetite so you want more and more of it and when you stop eating it, your body goes through withdrawal symptoms. In fact, wheat’s effect on the brain is the shared with that of opiate drugs.
Researchers at the National Institutes of Health found that polypeptides in gluten have the ability to penetrate blood-brain barriers. Once they gain entry into the brain, wheat compounds bind to the brain’s morphine receptors, the same receptors to which opiate drugs bind, producing a sense of reward or mild euphoria.
Eating wheat zaps energy
“When you take wheat out of the diet, you see incredible turnaround in health far more than you’d ever predict,” says Davis. “When someone gives up wheat, there’s a very frequent and marked increase in energy and sleep quality,” he says. While there’s not a lot of research on the topic, Davis speculates that the connection can be explained by the absence of sharp swings in blood sugar and resulting energy slumps.
Swapping processed, wheat-based foods for veggies, fruit, nuts and dairy may also be precursors to better sleep, more energy and more stable moods.
“Gluten-free” foods are not the answer
Even if you don’t have a wheat allergy, perhaps you’ve picked up gluten-free cookies, pasta or cereal because they just sound healthier. Truth is, many gluten-free foods are made by replacing wheat flour with corn starch, rice starch, potato starch, or tapioca starch, which hike up blood sugar even more than the amylopectin-A in wheat. This is especially hazardous to weight loss, since gluten-free foods, although they don’t trigger a neurological response like gluten does or stimulate your appetite like gliadin does, still trigger the glucose-insulin response that packs on pounds.
Davis suggests removing wheat from your diet and enjoying larger portions of other healthy foods, like baked chicken, green beans, scrambled eggs or salad. If you’re worried about not getting enough fiber, increase your consumption of vegetables and raw nuts and fiber intake will actually go up, says Davis. In fact, two slices of whole grain bread containing 138 calories contains about the same amount of fiber as 138 calories of nuts (about 24 almonds).
If you’re itching to try a wheat-free diet, try a gradual withdrawal from grains, suggests Davis. First, eliminate wheat from your dinner for 1 to 2 weeks, then get rid of it at lunch for a week or two. Finally, try going wheat-free at breakfast, when it’s often hardest to let go of cereal and other grain-based breakfast foods. “Or go ‘cold noodle,’ advises Davis. “You’ll be confronted with pain upfront, but you’ll emerge feeling much better.”
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/offer-listing/1623150388/ref=dp_olp_new?ie=UTF8&condition=new
The wheat of today is not the wheat of 50 years ago. Give it & live long & prosper.
Perry

Robertv
November 11, 2013 1:00 am

The moment you notes that life is short you wonder why so many want to make it even shorter and more stressful and full of misery. You also wonder how such people get in power.

Stephen Richards
November 11, 2013 1:02 am

or lifing anything heavy
A freaudian slip ? Willis. You were lucky. An aquaintance HAD here did the same as you, I think. No pills, no checkups, dropped dead in the garden 3 weeks ago. The one thing you did that he didn’t was to go see a doctor when the first signs appeared.

1 3 4 5 6 7 9