Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
Due to good fortune and the WUWT readership, we got the chance to not only see the Falkirk Wheel, but to take a ride on it … what a marvelous piece of Scottish engineering. No wonder the engineer on the Starship Enterprise was “Scotty” … here’s the wheel, on a lovely day of rain and sun, but mostly rain. Or what is known as “un-made whisky”, as I’m told rain is called locally:
The wheel rotates to move boats up and down, in lieu of a system of locks, to overcome the difference in height between two canals above and below. When you’ve been moved up from the bottom to the top, you are looking out along an elevated waterway that you can see below:
We didn’t go far on the canal, just through the tunnel and back. The gorgeous ex-fiancée and I take care of her father, who is 85 and legally blind. We’re always looking for things that he can do, and so we were graciously given a very short ride on a boat that is used to carry disabled people along the canals, so that they can be safely out and moving in the fresh air. It would be perfect for the old man, he loves the water but has trouble on the ocean, so we’ll see if we can find something equivalent back in the States.
The boat is one of ten that is operated by a charity called the “Seagull Trust Cruises”. I have been amazed by the amount and extent of work that is done by various charities in the UK. Many things that are done (poorly) by the government in the US are done, and done well, by the charities in the UK. For example, the Seagull Trust Cruises operates totally on public donations, and is staffed entirely by volunteers … and they’ve given free rides to over a million disabled people to date. What a wonderful gift for someone cooped up in a nursing home, or homebound for some chronic medical problem, to be able to take a canal cruise.
So I put £20 into the charity right there on the spot, and if anyone else is so inclined, their website is here, it’s a good cause. They’re set up to take people on wheelchairs, and every penny of the money goes to the actual operating expenses—no one, from the highest to the lowest, takes any money at all for their time.
The engineering on the Falkirk Wheel is so well-balanced that it only takes about the amount of energy needed to toast three slices of toast to rotate the wheel by a half turn, boats, water and all … it’s all computer controlled, and if the water levels in the two chambers are different by more than 75 mm (3″), the whole thing stops. Here’s a view from the top of the wheel, just prior to starting back down:
And here are the gears that make it all go round …
From there, an old sea-dog who reads WUWT took us on a tour of the “kirk”, or church, for which Falkirk is named. First, though, we stopped at the Antonine wall. It served the same purpose as the better-known Hadrians wall, regulating commerce. Unlike Hadrian’s Wall, however, it was built of turf, and has since disappeared. All that is left are the trench that was excavated to provide the turf for the wall and increase its height, and the heap of earth on the left that is where the wall once stood:
I was irresistibly reminded of Matsuo Basho’s haiku, written on a battlefield that was already ancient in the 1600’s …
Summer grass
Of stalwart warriors’ spendid dreams
The aftermath …
We were then taken on a guided tour of the Falkirk church. “Falkirk” means “spotted church”, because the original church (built in 36,000BC or some such date) was built with stones of different colors. The church feed lunch every day to the homeless, and the cost of that is recovered by selling the same meals to anyone who comes in … so we started out with lunch at the church. Like the Seagull Trust, the restaurant is completely staffed by volunteers.
Inside, the church is very unusual, because it’s rounded. Unlike most churches, it felt well-worn and well-loved. The best part of the tour, though, was we went up into the belfry.

I’ve never been up in an actual belfry before, in the US churches generally have loudspeakers … the old sea-dog said bells were a gift from the Dollar family of San Francisco … “The owners of the Dollar Steamship Lines?” I asked, because that name is very familiar on the West Coast. Yes, I was told, the family came from Falkirk, and they had the bells made in the US and shipped back to the old country after they’d made their fortune.
And wonder of wonders, I was invited to play the bells! Rather than subject the entire city to a novice, I just played a few notes … I’ve never, ever played an acoustic instrument of that power, it was astonishing. The only thing I can compare it to, which some may understand, is driving a D10 Caterpillar dozer … raw unbridled strength at my fingertips.
Parts of the church are made of sandstone … and it is so old that the very stones themselves have been worn away, not by people or by traffic, but by the rain … where I grew up, that only happens to mountains. The folks of Falkirk appear to be harder than their sandstone, however, if this plaque near the church is accurate …
The old sea-dog had graciously invited us to spend the night at his home, and on the way there we stopped at the Carron Iron Works … or more accurately, a monument to the former Carron works, cheaper ironwork from the Japanese drove them out of business. There I learned that a “carronade”, which is a small cannon which I’d read about in many histories of the period, was named after the Carron works. It’s a lethal affair designed to shoot “grape-shot” at infantry, basically a shotgun on steroids.
All that’s left of the works now are a couple of cannons and carronades … the cannon in the background is one of two surviving cannons from the battle of Waterloo, the other is to the left of it just out of the picture.
The Carron Iron Works was also the company that made the first steam boiler for James Watt, a part of which is mounted in the wall of the monument:
“Stalwart warriors’ splendid dreams” indeed …
We had a lovely evening with the old sea-dog and his good lady, listening to stories of life at sea as recounted by he and his wife, who had accompanied him around the world, and tales of battles in Falkirk won and lost. I can’t thank them enough for their hospitality and the insights into Scotland and life in the north.
The next day we rolled on to Edinburgh, where we are now … but that’s a story for another day, we’re off to see Mary King’s Close.
My best to all, more to come,
w.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



Can anyone comment on the points that protrude on the “leading” side of the wheel? Something functional, for better balance or more for aesthetics?
“Summer grass
Of stalwart warriors’ spendid dreams
The aftermath …”
In similar vein, noted Lakota medicine man Black Elk was reported to have said several times, when telling stories of his former, but deceased companions, “He is now grass”.
George V says:
September 14, 2013 at 10:52 am
The old sea dog told us that the points were not functional, but just for beauty, and that they are modeled on old Scottish war axes. He said that after a long night’s debate on the shape, they were sketched out on a napkin or an envelope or something … and that’s what they used.
I do like the fact that they are not functional, no reason for such a thing to be ugly, particularly since the rest of it has such artistic lines.
w.
vigilantfish says:
September 14, 2013 at 10:32 am (Edit)
I think I’ve read every one of those great stories, and while I knew that a carronade was a small cannon, I had no idea of the history.
w.
Can you check your Waterloo reference or local source please?
Waterloo was, of course, an “unscheduled” or meeting land battle, over the channel several dozens of miles inland from the coast. It wasn’t a siege or setpiece battle, and the smaller English cannons fired there would have been mounted on wooden field carriages (double large wooden wheels with two large wood beams dragged behind caissons with a team of 4 to six horses). Siege cannons would be larger, heavier and probably dragged by oxen: slower but more powerful, but then again, who’s going to move the fort you’re going to besiege?
Many, not all!, of the field artillery of all armies of that era by that time actually copied the French “Napoleon” because it was so successful: a reliable and not-to-heavy bronze cannon firing about a 2-1/2 to 3 inch dia solid shot. Thje two Waterloo cannons might have been remounted on the cast iron/small iron wheel mounts they are shown with in your photo, but all of my cannon references and smoothbore muzzle-loading cannon reconstruction books of that era (Henry VIII through the sea coast forts of the 1890’s) for England show iron mounts only used on the stone works of forts.
Which makes sense, you can’t drag small iron wheel through mud and up hills,but they are better under the low arches inside a stone-walled, stone foundation fort.
Willis Eschenbach says:
September 14, 2013 at 11:07 am (replying to)
vigilantfish says:
September 14, 2013 at 10:32 am
The carronades solved many problems, and it is no surprise they quickly became popular once invented. They were lighter, needed fewer crew to fire, and were quicker to reload. (Shorter, wider barrel was easier to clean and faster to swab out, ram new powder, new wadding, new shot new wadding in to the base of the barrel.) The cannon were longer range, were heavier though, but fired a smaller shot. But, in balance with the broadside tactics of naval fighting, it made sense to use both: Load up the frigate or ship with “lighter-weight” carronades on the upper decks to blast the enemy one you got close alongside, but have the heavier but longer-range cannon on the lower deck to get as many long range shots as possible. Shore side, cannonades couldn’t control the entrance to a harbor well (remember that shorter range) but were well-shooted to serve against enemy close-in troops. They’d be used like a rapidly firing shotgun would, compared to a sniper rifle of today.
Willis,
Boat lifts galore.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boat_lift
Here is a map to trace all the canals.
http://ukwrs.co.uk/gecm/?page_id=7
Cordially,
Perry
Ironically, “Scotty” was played by James Doohan, who was the son of Irish immigrants…
Sure is nice to stop and smell the roses once in a while.
Thanks Willis.
Steve says: September 14, 2013 at 11:55 am
Ironically, “Scotty” was played by James Doohan, who was the son of Irish immigrants…
_______________________________
Aye, laddie.
But you would be a-knowing that it was Ireland that was called Scotland and Hibernia, long before we were a-giving our name to that other Scotland.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotia
We’ll be a-taking that factor of 5 for the Warp now, t’be sure, t’be sure…….
😉
RACookPE1978 says:
September 14, 2013 at 11:18 am
Thanks, RA. The claim is from the memorial itself. It said that the two cannons were verified, by means of their numbers and characteristics, as being used in the battle. See here for another photo, the quote is from the memorial.
The company is now known as “Carron Phoenix”, the Waterloo claim is reported here.
w.
I, too, visited the Falkirk Wheel, about 5 years ago. My daughter and I also walked along the Antoinine Wall, which is nearby. I recommend it for anyone who visits Scotland. Falkirk is a stop on the Edinburgh to Glasgow rail line, and there is a bus that runs from near the rail station to the wheel.
So David Cameron’s Big Society impressed you?
Or perhaps the long tradition of public service that is deeply ingrained in British society impressed you. The Scottish Church predates the current Government (or the Tory party for that matter) and I doubt David Cameron has much influence on their provision of care for the destitute.
But I am surprised at the implication that such a tradition is not prevalent in the USA, as well. We hear that US churches run food-banks for the poor just like UK churches. We hear that the very successful in the US give their wealth to great, speculative endeavours for the benefit of others (like curing malaria, for instance) just as we Brits have the Wellcome Trust.
No young, fit Brit who takes up jogging lasts too many months before being asked to do a sponsored run for some good cause. You Americans have marathons; it must be the same.
Surely, many things are done well by the charities in the USA?
make sure you visit the Forth Bridge – awesome
can’t find it now and don’t have time to search but I thought I had read this somehow used the flow of water to help power the system.
am I remembering wrong?
How about the lift-locks in Peterboro Ontario? More Scottish engineering.
Aw shucks, Willis, you are embawwassing me …… .
Seriously, though, it was a delight to entertain you and your ladies, the evening flew by as the coversation ranged widely, and so far as I recall neither global warming nor climate change were mentioned at any time!
And thanks for the STC plug.
M Courtney,
Seagull Trust Cruises predates Mr. Cameron’s Big Society by several decades.
oldseadog… of course it does. I didn’t really doubt it.
I only used the Kirk as the example because it was the more extreme case (and there were already Star Trek references in this post).
For a treat of energy efficient engineering, if you are able to visit North Devon be sure to ride on the water powered cliff railway between Lynton & Lynmouth.
http://www.cliffrailwaylynton.co.uk/
The points that protrude on the “leading” side of the wheel would help avoid a tidal wave when it enters the water.
Be careful, now, with the weather. The St. Leger has been run this afternoon, and, as the folk of Doncaster will tell you, the last horse always brings winter on its tail.
M Courtney says:
September 14, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Um … er … sorry, but I haven’t a clue what that means.
Again, say what? I was indeed impressed by the tradition of public service, and I obviously know who Cameron is … but I haven’t a clue what you are on about. It sounds like you have some political axe to grind, and I haven’t any idea what that might be.
You are correct that many things are indeed done well by the charities in the US, and I mean no disrespect for them at all. And certainly, some of the rich give of their time and money for good causes.
However, many things that are done in Britain by charities, for example the Lifeboat Association, and the folks that take care of the London Tower, are done by the Government in the US. Nor is there any provision like the “Gift Act For Charities” in the US tax law. So while there are obvious similarities, there are also obvious differences.
Regards,
w.
Ian Wilson says:
September 14, 2013 at 12:49 pm
I did visit it and you are entirely correct.
w.
jaymam says:
September 14, 2013 at 2:18 pm
This is not a Disney ride, the sucker moves about a foot per second or so when entering the water … almost boring, if it weren’t so awesome.
w.