Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
I woke up this morning in London to a gentle rain, and was reminded of a comment by Mark Twain. When Twain was living in the UK, a couple of his friends from the US were out to his house to tea. A week later, he writes to someone else:
“We furnished them a bright day and comfortable weather—and they used it all up, in their extravagant American way. Since then we have sat by coal fires, evenings.”
So, hoping I hadn’t used up all the good weather, in a light rain we packed and stowed and jumped on the tube to Heathrow, where we rented a car and drove west to Salisbury.
And as always, there were surprises. The first surprise was how quickly the city was replaced by lovely green countryside. And not only countryside, but farms, large farms, growing wheat from the looks of it. I’d expected miles and miles of suburbs, but that didn’t happen at all.
(Click to enlarge) The second surprise was that the rain went away, and although the day was cloudy, it was lovely.
The very best part of the day, however, was being taken on a tour of both Stonehenge and Avebury by Tim Daw. It was great to finally meet Tim. Back in 2007, a couple of years before I started writing for WUWT, Tim was gracious enough to post an article of mine about the Central England Temperature (CET) record. At present, that blog is inactive, but he is still running his family farm … and in addition, he also works at Stonehenge, and is an amateur archaeologist himself. So there could not have been a better guide.
So we all jumped into Tim’s car and he drove us from Salisbury to Stonehenge. I knew nothing about Stonehenge … and as it turns out … nobody does. Oh, that’s not quite accurate, we know that they made urns with collars around them, and that they built long barrows for their dead, not round barrows. We know that the blue stones came from Wales, and that the sarsen stones came from about twenty miles north of Stonehenge. We know that in the Middle Ages people thought Merlin built Stonehenge.
Other than that, however, I fear we know very little more than the people from the Middle Ages about who built Stonehenge, or why. But despite that lack of knowledge, or perhaps in part because of that, the place has an awesome and remote majesty that captures nearly everyone’s imagination. Here’s what it looked like today when we were there:
From there, we went to Avebury, which I’m told is another “henge”. My obviously over-valued estimate of my own knowledge of the oddities of the English language has taken a thrashing on this trip. I’ve found out a few things about British place names I never knew. One was that a “minster”, as in “Westminster”, means a big church. Next, a “stoke”, as in Greystoke, is a stockade. I found out that a “staple” or “stable” in a place-name means a market, and that “Bury”, as in Salisbury where I am now, means a fortified town. I learned that “sarsen” is a corruption of “Saracen”. My new bible on these matters is here.
I also now know that a “henge” is a circular earthen wall with a ditch inside it.
Now, all over the planet people dig circular earthen walls with ditches. Why? Well, for defense, of course. It’s a great plan. The attackers are all down in the ditch, and you stand up on top and shoot at them with whatever armament you might have. So, what’s wrong with this picture?
Well … the henges on Salisbury plain all have the ditches on the inside, not the outside. They would be totally useless for defense. So the obvious question arises … why were they built?
Bad news in that regard. Nobody knows. After asking Tim question after question about any and all aspects of the builders’ lives, I decided I could just record him saying “Sadly, no one knows”, and dispense with him altogether—I could just ask the question, and then play the recording. Not that he is ignorant on these matters, quite the contrary. It’s just that regarding why the henges were built … no one knows. Regarding the beliefs or origins of those who built them … no one knows. How did they move the stones? See the previous answer …
So with my ignorance doubly confirmed, and then reconfirmed, we left Stonehenge, and Tim took us onwards to Avebury. This is another famous nearby henge. It is much larger, encircling the entire village of Avebury. And the henge is much bigger as well, perhaps a thousand feet (300m) across, with a much higher wall and a much deeper ditch.
Again, like Stonehenge, Avebury is imbued with a sense of profound mystery—what is the purpose of the wall and the ditch? But this time the mystery is bizarrely juxtaposed with everyday life:
After we walked all the way around the circular earthen mound and came back down to the inside of the henge, the only thing I noticed was the sense of privacy, enclosure, and comfort that the surrounding earthen wall provided. Was that why they built the hedges? Mentally, I press the button on the tape recorder and hear Tim’s voice saying “No one knows …”.
From there, it was a lovely afternoon drive back to Salisbury. The clouds had built up. There were a few thunderstorms in the distance, and beneath a couple of them was “virga”, falling rain that evaporates before hitting the ground. The earth’s climate control system was back in operation, keeping the English countryside from overheating.
Back in Salisbury, we thanked Tim for his kindness. He was the very best of guides, knowledgeable and patient with rank novices like myself … a point of view for me to ponder on, indeed.
Then we walked into Salisbury town to see the Cathedral … and I’m here to tell you that it’s not any ordinary pile of stones. I’ve seem piles of stones in the form of cathedrals before … but this is a double-dyed, no holds barred cathedral.
We didn’t have much time to go in, it was late and just before closing, but it was open. The Salisbury Cathedral was built in the 13th century, and has been used continuously ever since. One of the four copies of the Magna Carta is kept there, but because of the late hour we didn’t see it. However, a service was going on, and the girl’s choir was singing when we entered the Cathedral. It was the perfect accompaniment to the structure, lovely voices echoing around the massive vaulted interior:
Even in the Cathedral, however, my karma seems to be following me, no surprise there. In this case, I seem to have English clocks on the agenda. Here’s the clock from the Cathedral:
And a closeup of the gear train:
So what’s unique about this clock? Well, other than the bizarre nature of the gears, there’s nothing unique … other than the fact that it’s rumored to be the world’s oldest working clock, and it’s been running since 1386. It’s so old it never had hands to tell the time, just a bell that it rang when it was time for prayers. How curious, that the desire of humans to pray on a regular basis should set in train the long chain of clockish events that end up with John Harrison’s chronometer …
Anyhow, that’s all the news that’s fit to print from Salisbury. Tomorrow, we’re off to Bath. My thanks to all of the folks who have provided commentary, suggestions, and most importantly, offers of assistance. They are much appreciated even though they are not individually acknowledged. And my particular thanks to Tim for a most enjoyable and educational afternoon.
Regards to all,
w.
PS—On the way back from Avebury, Tim stopped in the village next to his to show us a version of the British Library that he was involved in setting up. It looks like this:
It’s a “Take One, Leave One” library, and despite plenty of nay-sayers, it has worked well both there and in Tim’s village. It seems that when Post and Telecom were taking out the phone booths, they offered to sell them to the villages for one pound. So in his village, Tim and some others said sure, we’ll take it, it’ll make a great library.
But of course, this being the UK, nothing goes so simply. The day before they were to take possession of it, some drunken yobbo hit the phone booth with his car and knocked it at an angle. Didn’t damage it much, just bent it over some.
“That’s no problem”, sez Tim and his mates, “we’ll take it anyhow.”
“Oh, no, no,”, say the P&T folks, “can’t do that. It’s all super-dangerous now, someone might get hurt, we can’t sell it to you”.
So Tim and the villagers say, “So what if it’s dangerous? I mean, we’ll just put a chain ’round it and tip it back to vertical.”
“Ooooh, you can’t do that!”, sez the P&T, “It’s not your property, it belongs to the UK Government”.
Hard to fault that logic …
So then the P&T sent out a big truck and a big crane, along with one man to work on the job, two men to direct him, three men to lean on shovels and explain things to the villagers, and an Obersturmbannführer to run the whole show. They stood the phone booth back up at great government expense, and said “OK, now it’s not a dangerous phone booth any more, so we can turn it over to you”. So Tim and the folks thanked them, and put in the books.
And to complete the story … the P&T never did come around to collect their pound. Government work at its finest, find someone doing something imaginative and useful, and get in their way. What strange animals we are indeed …









jeremyp99 says:
September 7, 2013 at 9:29 am
With all due respect to you local folks, that sounded like an urban legend to me … here’s what the usual font of misinformation has to say on the matter (emphasis mine):
w.
I am thoroughly enjoying your travelogue, Willis! Such fun for those of us stuck at home Thanks for posting.
Willis – you absolutely must get to watch a cricked match while you are in England.
All the best.
I mean cricket, of course.
Willis,
You may wish to consult the works of M. Flanders and D. Swann, particularly the monologue entitled ‘Built-Up Area’. It also appears that Mr Daw received a visit by ‘The Men from the Ministry’.
Enjoy the rest of your trip.
Best be quick if you want to watch a game of cricket, the season is nearly over.
In Ireland too a city is a city if it has a cathedral, not because it is a large spraling metropolis.
Armagh is in reality, a large county town but because it has a cathedral, it is referred to as a city.
It has two in fact.
The oldest is built on the site of a church founded by St Patrick on land at the top of Market street, donated by the local pagan king in the fifth century
Here- http://www.bing.com/maps/?where1=Windmill%20Hill,%20Armagh,%20BT60%204BR,GB&FORM=MMREDR#Y3A9NTQuNDE4MDU2fi02LjQ0NDQ0NCZsdmw9NiZzdHk9ciZlbz0wJnE9V2luZG1pbGwlMjUyMEhpbGwlMjUyQyUyNTIwQXJtYWdoJTI1MkMlMjUyMEJUNjAlMjUyMDRCUiUyNTJDR0I=
[Not valid for a US maps settings. Mod]
RACookPE1978 says:
September 7, 2013 at 8:04 am
___________________________
Wow. Just, Wow.
richardscourtney says:
September 7, 2013 at 1:05 am
. I know Richard, maybe I shouldn’t have suggested it – I was just trying to inject something ‘quite different’ in WIllis’ travels . . . maybe trying to be too ‘silly’ . . . figured he would probably look it up first, and may not go . . .
It was ‘surprising’ to me – the first time I in England, my colleagues I was traveling with ( . .all guys . .) took 3 of us who hadn’t been there before to see it – so I was just recalling my own experience, and in fun wanted to ‘share’ it with Willis . . .
Cheers !
Delighted you’re delighted!
If you go in another cathedral, don’t miss the ROOF TOUR. The tour at Salisbury is breathtaking – not so much for the views as for witnessing the construction. Stonehenge may be a marvel (though some rate Newgrange, Meath, Ireland more highly) but so is the medieval wood and stone working in the cathedrals.
I liked your glossary of place names. We in England tend to know of Norse or Anglo-Saxon names but it’s the Celtic ones that have stuck that I find amazing. So, the River Avon ;is simply the RIver River from the Celtic Avon=River. You’ll find the names of many of the features of our landscape have survived wave after wave of ancient and modern immigration with their Celtic names unchanged all the while.
Thanks for the post.
Des res: http://www.stonehenge.tv/
Theo Goodwin says: September 7, 2013 at 8:00 am
Please specify your criteria for what counts as a broch. What I have emphasized is the double-wall construction and the egg shell shape of both walls.
___________________________
A broch is a massive circular construction (ie: a great deal of effort to make) whose function is very difficult explain – other than it being a temple or perhaps a tomb.
They say brochs are defensive. But some are much too small, some are filled with rock, most have no lookout windows, and many are stuck in places that are not defensive. In addition, there is often no possibility of getting your livestock inside (your wealth), while the doors are often located several meters up. They are often built too close together too. Do you really think that Sardinia was so lawless, that it needed 7,000 ‘castles’? Were the remote Shetlands and Orkneys so lawless they need so many ‘castles’? Or did they need this number of churches (temples) ?
They also say that brochs are habitations. But they are windowless caves, and some are infilled with rock. Would you live in a Scottish broch? Could a single family build such a construction? No, they way beyond the wealth of a single family. No, these are community projects. But what would the community really need – ah yes, a church. What was always the biggest construction in any Medieval town or village? Ah, yes, the church.
And the reason for the flat stones in Scottish brochs, is that western UK is blessed with a great deal of shale and slate – rocks that naturally fissure into flat stones. There is not that option in the Mediterranean, you have to carve the limestone yourself.
So the best explanation is that all of these round towers are temples/tombs (big ones are temples, small ones a tombs). And the reason for the double-walled construction of the Scottish temples, is because the weather there is so awful. The first instance of double-brick construction, just like modern houses in the wild and windy UK.
Here is another broch for you, this time from the 1st century in Syria. It is, of course, not defensive nor is it habitable – it is a tomb (because it is small, it is a tomb, not a temple).
http://oi42.tinypic.com/5noklt.jpg
And here is the more recent manifestation of the brooch – the Irish and Scottish round-tower. There are hundreds of these all across this region.
http://s0.thejournal.ie/media/2013/06/timahoe-round-tower-1-332×500.jpg
Note again the door half way up, which is what we see on many brochs and round towers all over the Med – exactly the same design. These were always associated with monasteries, but they were not bell towers, as many have no windows at the top. So what are they? In reality, they are a continuation of the Egyptian veneration of the obelisk – a phallic symbol.
We had a great archaeology TV series in the UK called Time Team. It ran for about 20 years and sadly ended last year. One episode reported on a six year excavation around the whole Stonehenge site for miles around. This is the blurb from the Channel 4 TV web site:
Stonehenge is the nation’s most famous monument. For centuries, its age and purpose have been subject to speculation, excavation and fantasy. But over the last six years, a huge new team of archaeologists have been digging not just the monument but the entire prehistoric landscape that focuses on Stonehenge, to reveal the truth about this near-mythical place and crack its secrets.
Time Team’s cameras have been with the dig through those six summers. During their excavations the team discovered the biggest Neolithic settlement in Northern Europe, which suggests they have found the place where the people who built Stonehenge were based. But the digs also reveal that Stonehenge was just part of a vast ritualistic landscape where ancient peoples celebrated life and death in great man-made structures.
The archaeologists believe that the landscape was turned into a huge and complex special ceremonial route for the remains of the departed as they pass into the afterworld. But these theories are only proved in their last summer of digging in 2008, as the team start to dig in the stone circle itself. The results surpass their wildest dreams and this pivotal excavation finally enables the team to reveal not only when Stonehenge was built and how it was built but, perhaps most importantly, why it was built.
I saw the program and it was pretty convincing. The thing that stood out for me was that the stones represent the ancestors. It is rather like a tribal meeting with all the elders gathered in a circle. Apparently there is evidence of huge gatherings, ritual and feasting in the area. It was clearly a place of great importance. What is more they have found evidence of burials under the stones – which helps confirm their thoughts. Many Time Team programs are still available to stream over the internet. If I can find a link I will post it here.
Not the original programme but in the same vein:
http://www.channel4.com/programmes/secrets-of-the-stonehenge-skeletons/4od#3504203
Re the cathedral/city confusion – it’s not exactly an urban myth, it’s a change of tradition. From the sixteenth to the twentieth century, it was the case that the two were correlated. These days, that correlation no longer applies, but it has passed many by that – after four hundred years – things have changed.
“In the twentieth century, it was explicitly recognised that the status of city in England and Wales would no longer be bound to the presence of a cathedral, and grants made since have been awarded to communities on a variety of criteria, including population size.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_status_in_the_United_Kingdom
Shows how long our tribal memories are 😉
eco-geek;
Your orthography is often puzzling and bizarre! The word “Forrest” is a name. A bunch of trees is a “forest”. Not interchangeable.