Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
I woke up this morning in London to a gentle rain, and was reminded of a comment by Mark Twain. When Twain was living in the UK, a couple of his friends from the US were out to his house to tea. A week later, he writes to someone else:
“We furnished them a bright day and comfortable weather—and they used it all up, in their extravagant American way. Since then we have sat by coal fires, evenings.”
So, hoping I hadn’t used up all the good weather, in a light rain we packed and stowed and jumped on the tube to Heathrow, where we rented a car and drove west to Salisbury.
And as always, there were surprises. The first surprise was how quickly the city was replaced by lovely green countryside. And not only countryside, but farms, large farms, growing wheat from the looks of it. I’d expected miles and miles of suburbs, but that didn’t happen at all.
(Click to enlarge) The second surprise was that the rain went away, and although the day was cloudy, it was lovely.
The very best part of the day, however, was being taken on a tour of both Stonehenge and Avebury by Tim Daw. It was great to finally meet Tim. Back in 2007, a couple of years before I started writing for WUWT, Tim was gracious enough to post an article of mine about the Central England Temperature (CET) record. At present, that blog is inactive, but he is still running his family farm … and in addition, he also works at Stonehenge, and is an amateur archaeologist himself. So there could not have been a better guide.
So we all jumped into Tim’s car and he drove us from Salisbury to Stonehenge. I knew nothing about Stonehenge … and as it turns out … nobody does. Oh, that’s not quite accurate, we know that they made urns with collars around them, and that they built long barrows for their dead, not round barrows. We know that the blue stones came from Wales, and that the sarsen stones came from about twenty miles north of Stonehenge. We know that in the Middle Ages people thought Merlin built Stonehenge.
Other than that, however, I fear we know very little more than the people from the Middle Ages about who built Stonehenge, or why. But despite that lack of knowledge, or perhaps in part because of that, the place has an awesome and remote majesty that captures nearly everyone’s imagination. Here’s what it looked like today when we were there:
From there, we went to Avebury, which I’m told is another “henge”. My obviously over-valued estimate of my own knowledge of the oddities of the English language has taken a thrashing on this trip. I’ve found out a few things about British place names I never knew. One was that a “minster”, as in “Westminster”, means a big church. Next, a “stoke”, as in Greystoke, is a stockade. I found out that a “staple” or “stable” in a place-name means a market, and that “Bury”, as in Salisbury where I am now, means a fortified town. I learned that “sarsen” is a corruption of “Saracen”. My new bible on these matters is here.
I also now know that a “henge” is a circular earthen wall with a ditch inside it.
Now, all over the planet people dig circular earthen walls with ditches. Why? Well, for defense, of course. It’s a great plan. The attackers are all down in the ditch, and you stand up on top and shoot at them with whatever armament you might have. So, what’s wrong with this picture?
Well … the henges on Salisbury plain all have the ditches on the inside, not the outside. They would be totally useless for defense. So the obvious question arises … why were they built?
Bad news in that regard. Nobody knows. After asking Tim question after question about any and all aspects of the builders’ lives, I decided I could just record him saying “Sadly, no one knows”, and dispense with him altogether—I could just ask the question, and then play the recording. Not that he is ignorant on these matters, quite the contrary. It’s just that regarding why the henges were built … no one knows. Regarding the beliefs or origins of those who built them … no one knows. How did they move the stones? See the previous answer …
So with my ignorance doubly confirmed, and then reconfirmed, we left Stonehenge, and Tim took us onwards to Avebury. This is another famous nearby henge. It is much larger, encircling the entire village of Avebury. And the henge is much bigger as well, perhaps a thousand feet (300m) across, with a much higher wall and a much deeper ditch.
Again, like Stonehenge, Avebury is imbued with a sense of profound mystery—what is the purpose of the wall and the ditch? But this time the mystery is bizarrely juxtaposed with everyday life:
After we walked all the way around the circular earthen mound and came back down to the inside of the henge, the only thing I noticed was the sense of privacy, enclosure, and comfort that the surrounding earthen wall provided. Was that why they built the hedges? Mentally, I press the button on the tape recorder and hear Tim’s voice saying “No one knows …”.
From there, it was a lovely afternoon drive back to Salisbury. The clouds had built up. There were a few thunderstorms in the distance, and beneath a couple of them was “virga”, falling rain that evaporates before hitting the ground. The earth’s climate control system was back in operation, keeping the English countryside from overheating.
Back in Salisbury, we thanked Tim for his kindness. He was the very best of guides, knowledgeable and patient with rank novices like myself … a point of view for me to ponder on, indeed.
Then we walked into Salisbury town to see the Cathedral … and I’m here to tell you that it’s not any ordinary pile of stones. I’ve seem piles of stones in the form of cathedrals before … but this is a double-dyed, no holds barred cathedral.
We didn’t have much time to go in, it was late and just before closing, but it was open. The Salisbury Cathedral was built in the 13th century, and has been used continuously ever since. One of the four copies of the Magna Carta is kept there, but because of the late hour we didn’t see it. However, a service was going on, and the girl’s choir was singing when we entered the Cathedral. It was the perfect accompaniment to the structure, lovely voices echoing around the massive vaulted interior:
Even in the Cathedral, however, my karma seems to be following me, no surprise there. In this case, I seem to have English clocks on the agenda. Here’s the clock from the Cathedral:
And a closeup of the gear train:
So what’s unique about this clock? Well, other than the bizarre nature of the gears, there’s nothing unique … other than the fact that it’s rumored to be the world’s oldest working clock, and it’s been running since 1386. It’s so old it never had hands to tell the time, just a bell that it rang when it was time for prayers. How curious, that the desire of humans to pray on a regular basis should set in train the long chain of clockish events that end up with John Harrison’s chronometer …
Anyhow, that’s all the news that’s fit to print from Salisbury. Tomorrow, we’re off to Bath. My thanks to all of the folks who have provided commentary, suggestions, and most importantly, offers of assistance. They are much appreciated even though they are not individually acknowledged. And my particular thanks to Tim for a most enjoyable and educational afternoon.
Regards to all,
w.
PS—On the way back from Avebury, Tim stopped in the village next to his to show us a version of the British Library that he was involved in setting up. It looks like this:
It’s a “Take One, Leave One” library, and despite plenty of nay-sayers, it has worked well both there and in Tim’s village. It seems that when Post and Telecom were taking out the phone booths, they offered to sell them to the villages for one pound. So in his village, Tim and some others said sure, we’ll take it, it’ll make a great library.
But of course, this being the UK, nothing goes so simply. The day before they were to take possession of it, some drunken yobbo hit the phone booth with his car and knocked it at an angle. Didn’t damage it much, just bent it over some.
“That’s no problem”, sez Tim and his mates, “we’ll take it anyhow.”
“Oh, no, no,”, say the P&T folks, “can’t do that. It’s all super-dangerous now, someone might get hurt, we can’t sell it to you”.
So Tim and the villagers say, “So what if it’s dangerous? I mean, we’ll just put a chain ’round it and tip it back to vertical.”
“Ooooh, you can’t do that!”, sez the P&T, “It’s not your property, it belongs to the UK Government”.
Hard to fault that logic …
So then the P&T sent out a big truck and a big crane, along with one man to work on the job, two men to direct him, three men to lean on shovels and explain things to the villagers, and an Obersturmbannführer to run the whole show. They stood the phone booth back up at great government expense, and said “OK, now it’s not a dangerous phone booth any more, so we can turn it over to you”. So Tim and the folks thanked them, and put in the books.
And to complete the story … the P&T never did come around to collect their pound. Government work at its finest, find someone doing something imaginative and useful, and get in their way. What strange animals we are indeed …
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.









When we started farming we where stuck on that land and no longer could just follow the climate and food.
But farming gives you a surplus trade and eventually people living on that surplus and trade, politicians and religion etc.
Stonehenge simply means that they had good life’s and a surplus to build these political and religious monuments?
Willis, you are traveling around my most favourite part of the world. There is so much to see and do. There’s plenty of geology too if you take time to visit Wookey Hole and Cheddar Gorge.
I am an archaeologist, or was once upon a time. Your friend Tim is correct. There are lots of theories but the truth is that we just don’t know and, unless someone invents a time machine, we never really will know for sure. That what makes it so exciting.
Enjoy your trip.
Willis, now you have seen a cathedral have a look at a really old parish church, Deerhurst between Gloucester and Tewkesbury if you are in that area. The original parts of this church were built in about 700 AD. Twice as old as Salisbury
BoyfromTottenham says:
September 6, 2013 at 8:44 pm
Thanks, Boy, you have a lovely birthplace.
Overall, the role of electricity in shaping the climate is very poorly understood. The most obvious effects are up in the thunderstorms, but as you point out, that is unlikely to be the only effects. I push the button on my tape recorder … “Sadly, no one knows”.
w.
M Courtney says:
September 6, 2013 at 11:42 pm
Personally, I think henges are agricultural.
Not only can they be used in the winter for sheltering livestock form the wind (and so fertilising the soil inside) but in the summer they catch the rain in the ditch…. good for crops.
=============================================================
I live a few miles away from Stonehenge; nearer to Avebury and Silbury Hill. Popular rumour is that Stonehenge used to be a pub. One night a fight broke out and wrecked the place.
Anyway, Willis, I’m glad you enjoyed your day out in Wiltshire (and took my advice to avoid Swindon). You can now tell people you’ve been in the county of the Moonrakers.
What are they?
Legend has it that Wiltshire was on a major smuggling route from the coast to the centre of the country. The contraband was regularly stored in village ponds en route. One clear, bright, moonlit night, when some villagers were fishing out some of the illicit goods using their farming implements, the Excisemen, suspecting dodgy behaviour, jumped out on them and demanded to know what was going on. The locals, being canny souls and noticing the moon’s reflection on the pond, said “We’m raking the moon out of the water”.
The Excisemen, convinced that the locals were, in the best tradition of the countryside, a collection of village idiots, laughed and moved on and proceeded to spread the story of the ‘ignorant’ Wiltshire folk. Many people have, over the years, sought to prove that it was their village which featured in this story; there is no proof for any of them, although Devizes (no longer a village nowadays, but with a large pond by the side of the A361) is a slightly more convincing candidate than many.
As a native of Salisbury I must admit it’s a beautiful place to live. I’m glad you enjoyed your visit.
Martin C:
At September 6, 2013 at 9:10 pm you suggest that Willis may like to see the upstanding giant cut through the grass into the chalk at Cerne Abbas.
The ladies in his party may be shocked or amused. Willis knows his ladies, but Americans tend to be very prudish.
Anyway, here is a picture and info. about the giant
http://www.stonepages.com/england/cerneabbas.html
Richard
“Overall, the role of electricity in shaping the climate is very poorly understood. The most obvious effects are up in the thunderstorms, but as you point out, that is unlikely to be the only effects. I push the button on my tape recorder … “Sadly, no one knows”.”
The thunderstorms are important to charge the upper atmosphere and that is very important for life on Earth?
“Thunderstorms also help keep the Earth in electrical balance. The Earth’s surface and the atmosphere conduct electricity easily – the Earth is charged negatively and the atmosphere, positively. There is always a steady current of electrons flowing upwards from the entire surface of the earth. Thunderstorms help transfer the negative charges back to earth (lightning is generally negatively charged). Without thunderstorms and lightning, the earth-atmosphere electrical balance would disappear in five minutes! We aren’t really sure what would happen if this balance wasn’t maintained. But thunderstorms are not the only way the atmosphere conducts electricity – the solar wind and ionospheric wind play a role too.”
And http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_electricity
The British telephone box was designed by Giles Gilbert Scott, architect who designed several major British landmarks of the early 20th century, including Liverpool Anglican Cathedral, Battersea Power Station and Bankside Power Station (later the Tate Modern).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giles_Gilbert_Scott
Hi Willis – pedantry alert.
A Minster is not merely a big church. It is one of the names for a church which was originally part of a monastic foundation. An Abbey has a similar origin.
A Minster may be a cathedral, or not. Wimborne has a Minster which is not a cathedral. York has a Minster which is also a cathedral. Salisbury has a Cathedral ever since the Normans moved the city down the hill from (the henge) at Old Sarum.
If you visit Cambridge on your travels, be sure to take in the wonderful cathedral at Ely. The lantern is a miracle of Middle Ages engineering.
Finally, Westminster Abbey is not a cathedral. It isn’t even part of the ordinary hierarchy of Church of England establishments. It is a Royal Peculiar.
Enjoy our confusing little island.
Willis,
I used to know a couple of archaeologists who tipped me off about the phrase “ritual purposes”. If you hear it in the context “this building/field/clay pot/collection of tools was used for ritual purposes” it means the archaeologists haven’t got a clue.
Great article, btw.
Doug UK @ur momisugly September 6, 2013 at 11:33 pm
Thanks Doug, That is one for the text books!
Barnes Wallis Earthquake bomb crater
Doug UK : Ditto! Almost the same postcode – Amazing how close we are, I have dogs too, walk in New Forest. My office is in Salisbury, walk dogs on river overlooking water meadows to Salisbury Cathedral.
Willis: glad you stayed in Salisbury, got to see the cathedral and Avebury. Sounds like you may have got closer to stonehenge than usual visitors do and had a great guide.
Silbury Hill would have been worthwhile, as would Maiden Castle by Dorchester, but Bath is great too and you cannot do everything.
What I tell visitors about our weather is, “if you don’t like the weather, come back in five minutes”
Stonehenge was a factory where they made malt vinegar. It’s still made today…
%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.thegrocer.co.uk%252Fcompanies%252Fsuppliers%252Fsarsons-buyer-mizkan-offloads-vinegar-plant-to-keep-oft-sweet%252F232898.article%3B420%3B311
If you’re in the Bristol area, it’s worth seeing the Clifton suspension bridge, built across the Avon gorge. It was quite a feat of engineering when it was built 150 years ago.
Another notable suspension bridge in the area is the one spanning the Severn. It can be seen on the top right-hand corner of Bob Dylan’s “No direction home” album cover – the dock he’s standing on is the one for the ferry, now long-defunct, which was the only way across the river before the bridge was built. The latter bridge is a five-minute drive from where I live.
dbstealey says: September 6, 2013 at 10:01 pm
ralfellis,
Thanks for that interesting info. Reading it at first I thought, “Those aren’t forts!”
I agree with your analysis that they were temples.
____________________________
Yes, they were not forts. The illustration at the site in Ireland has this huge ring, with three thatched mud huts in the middle. Yeah, like one family could afford to build this huge great thing. The other give-away, is that the doorway is too small to get a cow through – and there ain’t much point building a protective coral for your house and family, if you cannot protect your wealth (livestock).
And yet that is what mainstream archaeology thinks! Mad.
So what were these great so-called ‘forts’?
The answer is that the inside of the Irish brochs have a series of terraces accessed by steps, about 50cm wide. In other words, the enclosure was an amphitheater that could hold perhaps 1,000 people. But that rather changes the history of Ireland, somewhat. Out goes the image of a fearful family in a huge fortress, and in comes the image of a massive theatre, for the open entertainment of an entire town.
And what were they looking at? Well, it was not a play, as such, because the center of the amphitheater contained a smaller round-tower or broch. So that was the focus of attention. And it you look at the Minoan equivalents of these towers, all of these brochs contained a sacred tree – a sceach.
Take a look at the Minos Ring from Crete – circa 3,500 years old. You will see it has an image of two round-towers containing sacred trees attended by goddesses, picking the sacred fruits – i.e.: Eve picking the fruit in Genesis 3:3:
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5307/5859940195_140344d4a7.jpg
These are very ancient traditions, that were widespread across Egypt and the eastern Med, before they spread to the west.
.
u.k.(us) says: September 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
RACookPE1978 says: September 6, 2013 at 9:59 pm
Well, obviously. Ya gotta dig the ditch to make the wall. 8<)
==================
I think you just nailed it.
The walls have been eroded over the years.
===================================
Yeah, but if you look at a castle, the wall is on the inside of the moat, not the outside, and for a good reason.
Avebury was not a fortress, just as Stonehenge was not a fortress – they were both temples. (They are quite close to each other in Wiltshire.) Which just goes to show how powerful the Stone Age priesthood were. This was an organisation that could command huge workforces and plan vast temples, which were built way back in the Stone Age before civilisation had really begun.
And their god was stellar, as you might imagine – the veneration of the cosmos and the workings of that cosmos (i.e.: tracking the Sun, Moon and stars). That might give you a clue.
.
Here is a typical Irish amphitheater (I think it is Cahergall).
http://www.viajesfotos.com/albums/IrlandKerry2006/CahergallStoneFort/CahergallStoneFort%20%2802%29.jpg
Note the steps up to each terrace. There is actually a symmetric set of steps to the one you can see, forming a V shape of steps. The terraces are exactly 50 cm wide (one royal cubit), and are perfectly suited to sitting on. Although modern health and safety would have a fit about the precipitous design of the amphitheater.
Note that the center of the amphitheater does not have some mud huts, it contains a smaller broch or round-tower. Another thing you cannot see from a picture, is the protective nature of the amphitheater – protection from the elements, that is. Outside, it can be blowing a gale and drizzling, but inside it is wonderfully calm and dry with fantastic acoustics.
I recon you could get 1,500 people in this amphitheater, so it must have been quite a spectacle at night, lit by flaming brands, as the priesthood enacted their rituals.
.
On the subject of Avebury- in the mid 70s I remember watching a seriously gripping and spaced out children’s TV series called Children of the Stones. Twas filmed in and around Avebury.
One of the many psychedelic and mystical sci/fi shows that were on British TV at the time.
Still creeps me out, watched it on you tube a while back.
Our towns and cities are largely prevented from straggling out into endless patchy suburbs by regulation. An old and largely valid form of environmentalism that is still of benefit. The Britsh care about their environment. How it looks and feels. You can’t just build what and where you want. We have stringent planning regulations. If you live in a listed building you cannot just change it as you please but must maintain it pretty much as it was when you took possesion.
This expression of environmentalism is now culturally deep rooted and makes life living on a crowded island more asthetically pleasing. There are lots of examples:
The publically owned Forestry Commision used to be responsible for much of Brtitains forrest plantations. It planted large monotonous blocks of monoculture and aimed to maximise profit with no thought for the sightliness or any amenity value these plantations might have.
They were not popular. Protests were held, barbed wire was cut down, plantations were invaded by people who wanted to explore the woods and forrests that they in part owned. The police were called and people got arrested. The politicians got involved. They could see the validity of the protesters arguments as did elements within the Forrestry Commision. Low key legislation was passed. The Forrestry Commission inspected its own naval and the culture changed.
A forrestry worker in the UK doesn’t just plant trees and cut down tress anymore. He is part of a new culture in which the amenity value of forrestry and its appearance is as important as the price of timber. Much of the forrests have been opened up to the public. Monoculture has given way to diversity with deciduous hardwood having been introduced to break up the monotonous appearance of softwood plantations. Forrests are also seen as being important habitats for wildlife which are protected. Today in most areas in England plantations are painted on computer screens in electrons to see how they will apear from all angles before virtual is turned into real. The cutting of timber is arranged around appearance, access and wildlife habitat. Forrestry has become artistry.
British Waterways which maintained all of Britains canals and much of its navigable rivers was letting the canals fall into disrepair. They were not needed anymore as canal transport of goods was all but obsolete in the Fifties and Sixites. In effect they were managing the canals destruction. But then some enthusiasts who liked the ammenity value fo canals took issue. They started to repair and maintain sections of canal themselves at their expense. British Waterways didn’t like this too much and eventually were themselves forced back into doing the jobs they were actually paid to do. Britains canals have gone from strength to strength and now support more narrow boats than they did during their operational peak during the industrial revolution. Most boats are leisure boats these days. It is a great way to see the countryside. And many people retire to a life on the water with no local taxes.
Steam trains came to the end on the line during the 1960s but again enthustiast groups took over old unused lines and began to operate their own steam train passanger services. There are now hundreds and perhaps a thousand or two steam locomtives rescued from scrap yards finding a new lease of life on Britains private railways. From time to time even the big railways companies run mainline steam services for enthusiasts and at least one new steam locomotive has been built as part of our cultural obsession with keeping the best of the past alive.
Our collective sense of what is important dominates the slow evolution of culture in this country. Our towns cities and countryside are planned and painted on a cultural landscape of the mind.
I once met a Japanese tourist walking around Buttermere in the Lake District on a warm summers day. He realised what was going on and was in awe. The Japanese sculpture trees we sculpture our countryside. Rarely do we walk in nature but in the designs of our collective imaginations.
Stonehenge is a good illustration of why a warm climate is better than a cold climate.
Stonehenge was build somewhere around 3000BC to 2000BC. The date is not accurately known and, of course, it is a monument that evolved. There is a ditch surrounding it that may have been dug as early as ~3100BC. The older stones (the blue stones) may have been erected as early as 3000BC but radio carbon dating of the holes in which they were placed suggests that it was more like 2400 to 2200BC. Anyway lets say stonehenge was erected around 2500BC.
Now at the same time (ie, circa 2500BC) the Egyptians were building the Great Pyramid at Giza and wonderful temples.
Why is that? The simple answer is warmth. Egypt was a warm country where people did not have to struggle most of the day simply to survive. They did not have to shelter in caves and sit around fires for most of the day merely to survive and protect themselves from the elements as did stoneage man in England. The warm benevolent climate enabled them to farm as build up plentiful [stores] of food and not needing to spend all day just surviving they were able to free themselves and better educate themselves and hone skills which were passed down the generations.
When one looks at the history of civilization, the history of the spread of the iron and bronze age, it will be seen that warm climates are more advanced than cold climates. Warm climates acquire technology/technical advances at an earlier date than cold climates. And the reason for that is simple, namely that the climate in most parts of the globe is not condusive for man, and man needs to adapt either himself or his environment merely to survive. However, less adaption is required in warm climates and more in cold climates. Food is more bountiful in warm climates than in cold climates. In warm climates man is relieved of the shackle of survival and being free of this has time on his hand to advance.
The same of course applies to life in general. Bio-diversity is at its greatest in warm and wet environments (eg., tropical rain forests) and at its least in cold arid climates (eg., Antarctica and Arctic regions).
If the world were to warm by several degrees it would be good for both man and other living organisms. The only down side to a warmer globe is possible sea level rise in that this would be inconvenient given that man has build many of the most important cities [near] the ocean and at relatively low [elevation]. However, sea level rise would be gradual happening over centuries and most buildings 9especially modern ones) are not built like the Great Pyramid to survive, and most modern buildings won’t be around in 100 years, let alone say 300 years. If there is sea level rise, the city will simply adapt to the changing shore line. No big problem.
It is a fundamental failing of climate science to postulate that a warmer globe of 3 or 4 or even 5 degrees would be a bad thing. To the contrary, it would be benefiicial for man and for other life on Earth.
Further to my post above, in the penultimarte paragraph the second sentence should read
“The only down side to a warmer globe is possible sea level rise in that this would be inconvenient given that man has build many of the most important cities near the ocean and at relatively low altitude above sea level”
We have not yet built cities in the ocean!
There are a few other minor typos but I am sure that even with these, the meaning/comment is clear.
Britain also takes on what it see as good ideas from other cultures. Take for example the evolution of Anglo-Indian cuisine which I understand now has a following in the United States.
One cultural form we adopted during the 1930s was the Outdoors Movement. This was a direct import from Nazi Gernmany and really was a good idea. Going out into the coutryside and walking for pleasure, camping, cycling etc. Not quite on the military lines of the Third Reich’s mass excercises but much less formal in the main With time the outdoors movement evolved into the environmental movement and then into the Green movement by which time it had far exceeded its usefulness.
The point is of course that the Green political movements of today can trace their roots back to the early heady days of Nazi Germany and the Third Reich. They are of the same stock and the same intent.