NASA says Arctic sea ice 'Unlikely To Break Records' in 2013

A video animation follows. Note also that Dr. Walt Meier is now with NASA Goddard, after leaving NSIDC at the end of July. This is his first report from NASA. – Anthony

Arctic Sea Ice Update: Unlikely To Break Records, But Continuing Downward Trend

The melting of sea ice in the Arctic is well on its way toward its annual “minimum,” that time when the floating ice cap covers less of the Arctic Ocean than at any other period during the year. While the ice will continue to shrink until around mid-September, it is unlikely that this year’s summer low will break a new record. Still, this year’s melt rates are in line with the sustained decline of the Arctic ice cover observed by NASA and other satellites over the last several decades.

“Even if this year ends up being the sixth- or seventh-lowest extent, what matters is that the 10 lowest extents recorded have happened during the last 10 years,” said Walt Meier, a glaciologist with NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. “The long-term trend is strongly downward.” 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiSuUe8dhZ0

The icy cover of the Arctic Ocean was measured at 2.25 million square miles (5.83 million square kilometers) on Aug. 21. For comparison, the smallest Arctic sea ice extent on record for this date, recorded in 2012, was 1.67 million square miles (4.34 million square kilometers), and the largest recorded for this date was in 1996, when ice covered 3.16 millions square miles (8.2 million square kilometers) of the Arctic Ocean.

Watching the summertime dynamics of the Arctic ice cap has gained considerable attention in recent years as the size of the minimum extent has been diminishing – rapidly. On Sept.16, 2012, Arctic sea ice reached its smallest extent ever recorded by satellites at 1.32 million square miles (3.41 million square kilometers). That is about half the size of the average extent from 1979 to 2010.

Sea ice extent is a measurement of the area of the Arctic Ocean where ice covers at least 15 percent of the ocean surface. For additional information about the evolution of the sea ice cover, scientists also study the sea ice “area,” which discards regions of open water among ice floes and only takes into account the parts of the Arctic Ocean completely covered by ice. On Aug. 21, 2013, the Arctic sea ice area was 1.98 million square miles (5.12 million square kilometers).

This year’s melting season included a fast retreat of the sea ice during the first half of July. But low atmospheric pressures and clouds over the central Arctic kept temperatures up north cooler than average, slowing down the plunge.

With about three weeks of melting left, the summer minimum in 2013 is unlikely to be a record low, said Joey Comiso, senior scientist at Goddard and coordinating lead author of the Cryosphere Observations chapter of the upcoming report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

“But average temperatures in the Arctic fluctuate from one week to another, and the occurrence of a powerful storm in August, as happened in 2012, could cause the current rate of decline to change significantly,” Comiso said.

This year, the Arctic has witnessed a few summer storms, but none of them as intense as the cyclone that took place in August 2012.

“Last year’s storm went across an area of open water and mixed the smaller pieces of ice with the relatively warm water, so it melted very rapidly,” Meier said. “This year, the storms hit in an area of more consolidated ice. The storms this year were more typical summer storms; last year’s was the unusual one.”

The Arctic sea ice cap has significantly thinned over the past decade and is now very vulnerable to melt, Comiso said. The multiyear ice cover, consisting of thicker sea ice that has survived at least two summers, has declined at an even faster rate than younger, thinner ice.

Meier said that a thinner, seasonal ice cover might behave more erratically in the summer than multiyear ice.

“First-year ice has a thickness that is borderline: It can melt or not depending on how warm the summer temperatures are, the prevailing winds, etcetera,” Meier said. “This year’s conditions weren’t super-favorable for losing ice throughout spring and summer; last year they were. Whereas with multiyear ice, it takes unusual warm conditions to melt it, which is what we’ve seen in the most recent years.”

On the opposite side of the planet, Antarctic sea ice, which is in the midst of its yearly growing cycle, is heading toward the largest extent on record, having reached 7.45 million square miles (19.3 million square kilometers) on Aug. 21. In 2012, the extent of Antarctic sea ice for the same date was 7.08 million square miles (18.33 million square kilometers). The phenomenon, which appears counter-intuitive but reflects the differences in environment and climate between the Arctic and Antarctica, is currently the subject of many research studies. Still, the rate at which the Arctic is losing sea ice surpasses the speed at which Antarctic sea ice is expanding.

The sea ice minimum extent analysis produced at Goddard – one of many satellite-based scientific analyses of sea ice cover – is compiled from passive microwave data from NASA’s Nimbus-7 satellite, which operated from late October 1978 to August 1987, and the U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Meteorological Satellite Program, which has been used to extend the Nimbus 7 sea ice record onwards from August 1987. The record, which began in November 1978, shows an overall downward trend of 14.1 percent per decade in the size of the minimum summer extent, a decline that accelerated after 2007.

Related Link

› Arctic sea ice multimedia resources from NASA Goddard’s Scientific Visualization Studio

Maria-José Viñas

NASA’s Earth Science News Team

Source: http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/arctic-sea-ice-update-unlikely-to-break-records-but-continuing-downward-trend/

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans."
0 0 votes
Article Rating
112 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RACookPE1978
Editor
August 24, 2013 12:49 pm

Phil. says:
August 24, 2013 at 12:27 pm

It is perfectly legitimate to say that the trend WAS strongly downward. But is is just plain wrong to say that the trend IS strongly downward.
The trend is about -10% / decade, this year will still be below the trend line so the trend will be more downward than it was last year.

Phil: Those dramatic and “percent changes” are both “perfectly correct”. And “dead wrong” – actually not even meaningless, because they do have tremendous propagandist value! – but they are meaningless.
Even a 50% loss of Arctic sea from today’s minimum values – a very realistic loss of 1,000,000 sq km’s of Arctic sea ice in mid-September from last year’s record low point – does NOT heat the planet. So, what do you fear? Why does the CAGW community “advertise” and publicize and “promote” Arctic sea ice loss? Yes, Arctic sea ice may continue to decline. So what? What difference does it make if it declines from 85 north to 83 north? From 86 north to 85 north latitude? What happens in October if we lose 1,000,000 sq km’s in August or July? Well, in October, it freezes again. just like 2001, 2002, 2003, 2007, 2012 …..
Why does Arctic sea ice decline matter?
Because you need it. You deperately need it. it is the ONLY thing left in the CAGW wallet. You need it for your continued funding, your “propaganda” (er, “education” and your demands on the world’s energy. Without Arctic sea ice loss, you have nothing to live for emotionally and politically. Fear is your only weapon as you take money and opportunity from the world.
On the other hand, where “real science” (real sea ice extent increase!) does not serve your propaganda needs, you trivialize it and falsely give it “throw away” values such as 1% per year.
But that Antarctic sea ice increase of an actual 1,000,000/19,500,000 – more than 5% higher than normal – IS occurring at latitudes where the sea ice WILL reflect energy. Why are you trivializing it?

RACookPE1978
Editor
August 24, 2013 1:02 pm

goldminor says:
August 24, 2013 at 12:35 pm

Turns out the “edge” – the point where the average sea ice is reflecting sunlight if more is added in any month, is between 70-69-68 degrees latitude at Antarctic sea ice minimum. And THAT minimum IS expanding, so these “increases in the minimum” ARE reflecting significant solar energy at solar elevation angles that ARE significant.
——————————————————————–
Would this be the ‘missing heat’ that Trenberth and others are not seeing?

I am running those numbers of the probable change in reflected energy from – say 1998-2000-2002 time-frames to today’s time. What the total extra energy losses are when you add all of the effects up (from both the loss of sea ice at the north pole at high latitudes, and the gain at south pole at lower latitudes) I am getting closer to figuring out.
More to your point: How much “missing heat” is he “missing” and in what units is he missing that heat? Watts/sq meter? degrees?
What I still need are: The day-to-day “weather (average temperature over the year, average temperature range each day-of-the-year) at the edges of the Antarctic sea ice, the average wind speeds and vapor pressures above the edge of the Antarctic sea ice over the year, and a more accurate term for the energy lost – real world – by increased evaporation of exposed ocean waters.
Reflected energy calculations are easy. Those are done. But the sensible heat losses, long wave radiant heat losses, and latent heat losses:
What exactly IS the real “sky temperature” when there are clouds above the Antarctic?
What is the “sky temperature” for long wave radiation on a clear night in the Arctic?
What is the change in daily high-to-low temperatures in the Arctic at 80 north, at 85 north, and does that high-to-low temperature range change over the year? Does it change by latitude? Can a hourly temperature profile for say Thule Greenland at 79 north be projected north out on the Arctic sea ice at 85 north? Can Barrett or Point Barrow temperature profiles and cloud measurement percentiles be projected out across the Arctic sea ice, or are they worthless guesses?

@njsnowfan
August 25, 2013 2:34 am

Look at the puzzle pieces, In 2007 the Russians put the largest Ice Breaker in the world to work crushing the Ice in the Arctic. 2007 ring a bell???
Look at it’s tracks in the last year or so, If only I could show all the palaces this ice destroying ship has traveled.
https://twitter.com/NJSnowFan/status/371560701774823424/photo/1
Video link
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=RUSSIAN+NUCLEAR+POWERED+ICE+BREAKER+SHIP+50+LET+&oq=RUSSIAN+NUCLEAR+POWERED+ICE+BREAKER+SHIP+50+LET+&gs_l=youtube.3…44432.44432.0.45505.1.1.0.0.0.0.55.55.1.1.0…0.0…1ac..11.youtube.wdMXrF7gwPo
Year built
http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/shipdetails.aspx?mmsi=273316240

wayne Job
August 25, 2013 3:17 am

It would save a gazzillion gallons of bunker oil if the arctic stayed ice free all year, what is the problem?

Bruce Cobb
August 25, 2013 8:56 am

“The long-term trend is strongly downward.”
Yes, unfortunately it is, by which I mean the quality and integrity of climate science with folks like Meier at the helm.
“what matters is that the 10 lowest extents recorded have happened during the last 10 years,”
It matters only to Alarmists and pseudoscientists, so he is merely being a mouthpiece for them. He is a failed scientist.

August 25, 2013 1:15 pm

Bruce Cobb says:
August 25, 2013 at 8:56 am
“The long-term trend is strongly downward.”
——————————————————-
Meier should be paying more attention to the observable data. Too many models spoils the ice melt. The sst is dropping steadily all around the Arctic.
———————
goldminor says:
August 23, 2013 at 1:33 pm
The wind map shows the flow as WSW, so that is pushing the ice pack towards the Canada/Alaska coast. There is also a storm currently that is sitting to the west of the boats and is moving into the the region that need to traverse. The ARCo ice speed and drift has also changed swiftly over the last 4 days to an unfavorable southwest flow. This threatens to cut off their western exit.
——————
Two hours after I said this someone named Uwe contacted the boats with similar info. In the 48 hours since my first comment, sea ice has pushed south and a bit east and is now definitely threatening to close the western entrance/exit of the NWP. There is also increasing cold and snow falling around Bellot Strait, where the coast guard cutter had punched a hole for the 3 or 4 ships that waited. Now they might be on the wrong side of the Bellot Strait. Where the narrow southern passage of the NWP had shown a sea temp of 8C for 2/3rds of that long stretch, it now shows sea temps of about 1C. That is the change from the 21st till today.

Pamela Gray
August 26, 2013 11:57 am

The cake is done, out of the oven, and cooling. It’s just a matter of time before we put the frosting on the cake. I love weather pattern variation. It’s a bitch but she’s my bitch.

Steven Hill from Ky (the welfare state)
August 26, 2013 3:34 pm

Drought expected on Florida coastline, Arctic melting has stopped for 2013. As Mr. Bill would say “Oh Nooooooooo” The sea levels are so low that beaches are closing all over the planet. Captain to Scotty, “we need more CO2”. “I’m giving her all’s she got Captain.”

James at 48
August 27, 2013 8:54 am

We are getting darned close to the minimum. There are already areas where there is growth and thickening. This will counteract and soon overtake the area where loss processes dominate. As soon as the areas of thick ice in the East and West basins meet up (which they soon will) that’s all she wrote.

August 28, 2013 11:24 am

goldminor says:
August 25, 2013 at 1:15 pm
goldminor says:
August 23, 2013 at 1:33 pm
———————————–
Sometimes, when I first look at something that is new to me, my mind will quickly pick out key aspects of the inner dynamics of the system that I am observing. Once that happens, then I am able to make some valid observations regarding the observed system. The Northwest Passage adventurers have now been boxed in the south passage with the western and eastern exits now firmly closed…http://northwestpassage2013.blogspot.ca/
The Canadian ice breaker that punched the hole through the sea ice at Bellot Strait, thus allowing the sailboats egress, might not have done them much of a favor. The blocking ice is rated at 5/10 with 7/10 ice pushing behind the 5.10. That is moderately heavy ice. All of the Arctic cold and current ice pack has been centered in this region for the entire summer. Now with an overall cooling in the Arctic, the cold mass has expanded it,s boundaries quickly.

1 3 4 5